Excerpt: ... second cause of action without leave to amend. The motion to strike is denied. Defendants are ordered to answer within ten (10) days of today's date. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1...

Excerpt: ...ranted as to Request Nos. 9 and 37-40, and denied as to the remaining Requests. The motion is granted as to Form Interrogatory 17.1. Monetary sanctions are denied. A party may move for an order compelling further response to a request for admission or request for production of documents if the demanding party deems that responses are incomplete, evasive, or contain meritless objections. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2031.310, subd. (a); 2033.290, subd. ...

Excerpt: ...s fourth and seventh causes of action. The demurrer is sustained with ten (10) day leave to amend. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled ...

Excerpt: ...motion to strike the whole or any part of a pleading. (Code Civ. Proc., § 435, subd. (b).) The motion may seek to strike any “irrelevant, false or improper matter inserted in any pleading” or any part of the pleading “not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 436.) Irrelevant allegations include allegations that are not essential to the statement of a claim...

Excerpt: ... will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) “The rules by which the suff...

Excerpt: ...and after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading, including adding or striking out the name of any party, or correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1).) California courts are required to permit liberal amendment of pleadings in the interest of justice between the parties to an action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd...

Excerpt: ... to BO Lenders United, LLC, the demurrer is overruled as to the first, third, and fourth causes of action, and sustained as to the second, fifth, sixth, and seventh causes of action. The demurrer is sustained as to all causes of action against Andy Zhong and Leo Zhou. The motion to strike is granted. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly plead...

Excerpt: ...osts unless they are authorized by statute or agreement.” (People ex rel. Dept. of Corporations v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc. (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 424, 429.) In a lemon law action, costs, and expenses, including attorney fees, may be recovered by a prevailing buyer under the Song-Beverly Act. (See Civ. Code, §§ 1790, et seq.) Civ. Code § 1794, subd. (d) provides, If the buyer prevails in an action under this section, the buyer shall ...

Excerpt: ... evidentiary support for a pleading or claim and if not to enable an order of summary dismissal without the need for trial. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843 (Atlantic Richfield).) Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c, subdivision (c) “requires the trial judge to grant summary judgment if all the evidence submitted, and ‘all inferences reasonably deducible from the evidence' and uncontradicted by other inferences o...

Excerpt: ...oot. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens...

Excerpt: ...bdivision (b): “the court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be...

Excerpt: ...) and ordered dismissal for Ygrene. Plaintiff's SAC asserted causes of action against Ygrene for Violation of CLRA (Civ. Code § 1770); Violation of UCL (Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200); Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Recission; and Unjust Enrichment. Plaintiff's claims arose primarily out of allegations that Ygrene's representative made misrepresentations to Plaintiff regarding a Clean Energy Program (CEP) loan program administer...

Excerpt: ... (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.010.) A properly served deposition notice is effective to require a party or party-affiliated deponent to attend and to testify, as well as to produce documents for inspection and copying. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.280, subd. (a).) “If, after service of a deposition notice, a party to the action . . . or employee of a party . . . , without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for exa...

Excerpt: ...ses of action, and overruled as to the sixth cause of action. Defendant is ordered to answer within ten (10) days of today's date. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d ...

Excerpt: ...he existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party thereto refuses to arbitrate such controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, unless it determines that: (a) The right to compel arbitration has been waived by the petitioner; or (b) Grounds exist for the revocation of the agreement.” (Code C...

Excerpt: ...ng the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Co...

Excerpt: ...n timely motion, the court must order a transfer of venue “when the court designated in the complaint is not the proper court.” (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 396b, 397(a).) A motion to transfer venue on grounds the designated court is not proper must be filed and served before or at the time of filing an answer, demurer, or motion to strike. (Code Civ. Proc., § 396b.) “Venue is determined based on the complaint on file at the time the motion to c...

Excerpt: ...t to restrictions, by taking the oral deposition of any person, including any party to the action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.010.) A properly served deposition notice is effective to require a party or party-affiliated deponent to attend and to testify, as well as to produce documents for inspection and copying. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.280, subd. (a).) The motion to compel deposition “shall set forth specific facts showing good cause justifyi...

Excerpt: ...t will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) “The rules by which the suf...

Excerpt: ...kground This is an action for negligence, negligent hiring, training, retention, and supervision arising from a vehicle collision which took place in March 2020. Plaintiff Tillie Eze was a passenger when the driver who picked her up via the Uber application allegedly fell asleep at the wheel, failed to stop, and rear-ended the vehicle in front of the driver's vehicle. Plaintiff filed her Complaint against Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC., an...

Excerpt: ...g, supervision, and retention, and negligent infliction of emotional distress arising from a trip and fall incident which took place in August 2020. Plaintiff Alma Rosa Sanchez-Arroyo filed her Complaint against Smart One Investments, LLC and Superior Plus Real Estate Group on March 10, 2021. Defendants filed their motion for summary judgment on July 26, 2022. Summary Moving Arguments Defendants move for summary judgment or, in the alternative, s...

Excerpt: ...ghway Patrol (“CHP”) on February 9, 2022. The accident involved Plaintiff's Insured and co-Plaintiff, Christopher Acosta. This case was consolidated with 22STCV17377 on August 22, 2022. Defendant CHP filed its demurrer on July 11, 2022. Summary Moving Arguments CHP demurs to Acosta's complaint on the grounds that there can be no common law negligence liability against CHP because it is a public entity. Additionally, CHP argues that the Compla...

Excerpt: ...ant if the court makes both of the following findings: (1) The party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole. (2) The health of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party's interest in the litigation. (Code Civ. Proc. § 36, subd. (a).) Plaintiff is 94 years old and suffers from dementia, chronic kidney disease, osteoporosis, reflux disease, and anxiety disorder. (Verdugo Decl. ¶ 2, Ex. 1.) Plai...

Excerpt: ...to any pleading, including adding or striking out the name of any party, or correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1).) California courts are required to permit liberal amendment of pleadings in the interest of justice between the parties to an action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a); Dieckmann v. Superior Court (1985) 175 Cal.App.3d 345, 352.) “Public policy dicta...

Excerpt: ...n and denied as to the seventh cause of action. A motion for judgment on the pleadings may be made after the time to demur has expired and an answer has been filed. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (f).) A motion by a defendant may be made on the grounds that the complaint or cross-complaint “does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (c)(B)(ii).) A motion for judgme...

Excerpt: ...action, Plaintiff asserts one cause of action against Defendant for Breach of Express Warranty under the Song-Beverly Act. (Comp. ¶ 16.) Plaintiff propounded the Special Interrogatories (Set One) on Defendant on November 4, 2021. (Norder Decl. ¶ 4, Ex. 1.) Defendant served responses on December 7, 2021, with verifications served on January 27, 2022. (Norder Decl. ¶ 5, Ex. 2.) Plaintiff now seeks to compel Defendant's further responses to Speci...

Excerpt: ...stained as to the third, fourth, seventh and ninth causes of action. The demurrer is overruled as to the first, second, fifth, sixth, and eighth causes of action. The motion to strike is granted in part and denied in part. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1...

Excerpt: ...ow a determination as to whether an opposing party can show evidentiary support for a pleading or claim and if not to enable an order of summary dismissal without the need for trial. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843 (Atlantic Richfield).) Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c, subdivision (c) “requires the trial judge to grant summary judgment if all the evidence submitted, and ‘all inferences reasonably deducible ...

Excerpt: ...he legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court ...

Excerpt: ...dants are ordered to produce responsive documents, without objection, within ten (10) days of today's date. A party may move for an order compelling further response to a request for production of documents if the demanding party deems that responses are incomplete, evasive, or contain meritless objections. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (a).) A motion to compel further responses to an inspection demand “shall set forth specific facts sho...

Excerpt: ...eat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, cor conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) “The rules by which the sufficiency...

Excerpt: ...nt against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) ...

Excerpt: ... Inc. (Plaintiff). The demurrer is sustained without leave to amend. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only f...

Excerpt: ... and Marcos Figueroa ("Marcos") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") against Defendants AT&T Corporation ("AT&T"); AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings Inc. ("AT&T Mobility"); All Access Equipment Rentals, Inc. ("All Access"); RBR Properties, Inc. ("RBR"); Vinculums Services, LLC ("Vinculums"); New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC ("Cingular"); JLG Industries, Inc ("JLG"); Joel Lupercio ("Lupercio"); Jorge Ceja ("Ceja"); Roberto Guerrero ("Guerrero") (col...

Excerpt: ...er as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) “The rules by which the sufficiency of a complaint...

Excerpt: ...rt will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) “The rules by which the su...

Excerpt: ... failure to provide a termination review board hearing and denies summary adjudication as to the third cause of action. The Court grants summary adjudication in favor of Defendants as to all other breaches of contract stated under Issue One and on the second cause of action. The function of a motion for summary judgment or adjudication is to allow a determination as to whether an opposing party can show evidentiary support for a pleading or claim...

Excerpt: ...27, 37-48, 51, and 54-58. The motion is denied as to Request Nos. 31, 33-36, 50, 52, 53, and 59. A motion to compel further production must set forth specific facts showing good cause justifying the discovery sought by the inspection demand. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310(b)(1).) It is not necessary for the motion to show that the material sought will be admissible in evidence. “Good cause” may be found to justify discovery where specific ...

Excerpt: ...ing the verdict is the same as its power to grant a directed verdict. [Citation.] ‘A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict may be granted only if it appears from the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the party securing the verdict, that there is no substantial evidence in support.' [Citations.]” (Brennan v. Townsend & O'Leary Enterprises, Inc. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1336, 1345.) “The court may not weigh evidence, dra...

Excerpt: ...limited to filing fees. (Code of Civ. Proc. §1033.5, subd. (a)(1).) Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1033.5, subdivision (c)(2), allowable costs are only recoverable if they are “reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation.” Even mandatory costs, when incurred unnecessarily, are subject to section 1033, subdivision (c)(2). (Perko's Enterprises, Inc. v. RRNS Enterprises (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 238, 245.) The memorandum of cost is ...

Excerpt: ...for summary judgment or adjudication is to allow a determination as to whether an opposing party can show evidentiary support for a pleading or claim and if not to enable an order of summary dismissal without the need for trial. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843 (Atlantic Richfield).) Code of Civil Procedure Section 437c, subdivision (c) “requires the trial judge to grant summary judgment if all the evidence submitte...

Excerpt: ..., attorney fees are not recoverable as costs unless they are authorized by statute or agreement.” (People ex rel. Dept. of Corporations v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc. (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 424, 429.) The attorney bears the burden of proof as to “reasonableness” of any fee claim. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5(c)(5).) This burden requires competent evidence as to the nature and value of the services rendered. (Martino v. Denevi (1986) 182...

Excerpt: ...he whole or any part of a pleading. (Code Civ. Proc., § 435, subd. (b).) The motion may seek to strike any “irrelevant, false or improper matter inserted in any pleading” or any part of the pleading “not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 436.) Irrelevant allegations include allegations that are not essential to the statement of a claim, allegations that...

Excerpt: ...ciency of a complaint against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal....

Excerpt: ...ction). The motion is granted. Under Code Civ. Proc. § 2031.060, subd. (b), “[t]he court, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party or other person from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, or oppression, or undue burden and expense,” including “[t]hat a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not be disclosed, or be disclosed only to specified persons o...

Excerpt: ...court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) “The rules by which the...

Excerpt: .... §1033.5, subd. (a)(1).) Under Code of Civil Procedure section 1033.5, subdivision (c)(2), allowable costs are only recoverable if they are “reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation.” Even mandatory costs, when incurred unnecessarily, are subject to section 1033, subdvision (c)(2). (Perko's Enterprises, Inc. v. RRNS Enterprises (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 238, 245.) The memorandum of cost is a verified statement by the party, attorney...

Excerpt: ...nt against a demurrer, a court will treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions, or conclusions of law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318 (Blank); C & H Foods Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (1984) 163 Cal.App.3d 1055, 1062.) It is well settled that a “demurrer lies only for defects appearing on the face of the complaint[.]” (Stevens v. Superior Court (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 594, 601.) ...

Excerpt: ...ted by appropriate affidavits and after a hearing, if the court deems a hearing to be necessary, the court may at any time enter an order permitting the discovery otherwise prohibited by this subdivision if the court finds, on the basis of the supporting and opposing affidavits presented, that the plaintiff has established that there is a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294.” (Civ. Code,...

Excerpt: ...trary, capricious, or whimsical action. (Sauer v. Superior Court (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 213, 228.) “The sanctions the court may impose are such as are suitable and necessary to enable the party seeking discovery to obtain the objects of the discovery he seeks but the court may not impose sanctions which are designed not to accomplish the objects of the discovery but to impose punishment.” (Motown Record Corp. v. Superior Court (1984) 155 Cal.A...