Excerpt: ...ore alleged tortfeasors or co-obligors was made in good faith. (CCP § 877.6(a).) The notice of motion or application for good faith determination must list each party and pleading or portion of pleading affected by the settlement and the date on which the affected pleading was filed. (CRC Rule 3.1382.) The California Supreme Court in Tech -Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward- Clyde & Assoc. (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488, established the standard for determining wheth...

Excerpt: ...tes the awa rd pursuant to a response to the petition or a petition to correct or vacate the award. (CCP § 1286; Valsan Partners Limited Partnership v. Calcor Space Facility, Inc. (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 809, 818 [no authority to alter terms of award absent petition to correct]; see Thriftimart, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 202 Cal.App.2d 421, 425 -26 [an objection to the granting of a motion to confirm an award is equivalent to a motion to vacat...

Excerpt: ...in evidence or appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” (CCP § 2017.010; see Davies v. Superior Court (1984) 36 Cal.3d 291, 301.) “For discovery purposes, information is relevant if it ‘might reasonably assist a party in evaluating the case, preparing for trial, or facilitating settlement.' [Citation] Admissibility is not the test and information, unless p rivileged, is discoverable if it might reason...

Excerpt: ...was directed obtains relief from waiver, he or she cannot raise objections to the documents demanded. There is no deadline for a motion to compel responses. Likewise, for failure to respond, the moving party need not attempt to resolve the matter outside court before filing the motion. Where the motion seeks only a response to the inspection demand, no showing of "good cause" is required. If a party to whom interrogatories are directed fa...

Excerpt: ... 484.010.) The application shall be executed under oath and must include: (1) a statement showing that the attachment is sought to secure the recovery on a claim upon which an attachment may be issued; (2) a statement of the amount to be secured by the attachment; (3) a statement that the attachment is not sought for a purpose other than the recovery on the claim upon which the attachment is based; (4) a statement that the applicant has no inform...

Excerpt: ...er: (1) strike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading; or (2) strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of California, a court rule, or an order of the court. (CCP §§ 436(a)- (b); Stafford v. Shultz (1954) 42 Cal.2d 767, 782 [“Matter in a pleading which is not essential to the claim is surplusage; probative facts are surplusage and may be stricken out or disregard...

Excerpt: ...ed if the court finds that the claimant has not established by a preponderance of the evidence the probable validity of the real property claim. (CCP § 405.32.) After a lis pendens is expunged, a party may not file another lis pendens on the property without leave of court. (CCP § 405.36.) A “real property claim” means the causes of action, if proven, would affect either: (a) title to or the right to possession of specific real property, or...

Excerpt: ...e of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. ( Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (CCP §§ 430.30, 430.70.) At the pleading stage, a plaintiff need only allege ultimate facts sufficient to apprise the defendant of the factual...

Excerpt: ... § 2025.280(a).) If, after service of a deposition notice, a party deponent fails to appear, testify, or produce documents or tangible things for inspection without having served a valid objection under CCP § 2025.410, the depos ing party may move for an order compelling attendance, testimony, and production. (CCP § 2025.450(a).) The motion must be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration, or, when a party deponent fails to attend the depo...

Excerpt: ...icial notice. ( Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (CCP §§ 430.30, 430.70.) At the pleading stage, a plaintiff need only allege ultimate facts sufficient to apprise the defendant of the factual basis for the claim against him. (...

Excerpt: ...CP §177.5.) The party seeking to impose sanctions need only show the failure to obey earlier orders. (Puritan Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 877, 884 [interpreting former statute dealing with “refusal” to comply].) Numerous cases hold that severe sanctions (i.e., terminating or evidentiary sanctions) for failure to comply with a court order are allowed only where the fail ure was willful. (See R.S. Creative, Inc. v. Creativ...

Excerpt: ...matter either is itself admissible in evidence or appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” (CCP § 2017.010; see Davies v. Superior Court (1984) 36 Cal.3d 291, 301.) A motion to compel further responses to a demand for inspection or production of documents (RPD) may be brought based on: (1) incomplete statements of compliance; (2) inadequate, evasive or incomplete claims of inability to comply; or (3) unme...

Excerpt: ...ek a court order pursuant to CCP section 1987.1 compelling the nonparty to comply with the subpoena within 60 days after completion of the deposition record. (CCP § 2025.480(b); see also UnzippedApparel, LLC v. Bader (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 123, 127.) The motion must be accompanied by a meet and confer declaration. (CCP § 2025.480(b).) There is no “good cause” requirement when seeking to compel documents from a nonparty. (CCP § 2020.410(c)....

Excerpt: ...rtainty that a judgment over $35,000 cannot be obtained. (CCP §§ 396, 403.040(a).) A motion for reclassification shall be granted where the case is improperly classified and the moving party shows good cause for not seeking reclassification earlier. (CCP § 403.040(b).) Mindful of this potential deprivation of damages that reclassification entails, courts have imposed a high standard on a trial court's determination that a matter does not m...

Excerpt: ...r: (1) strike out any irrelevant, false, or improper matter inserted in any pleading; or (2) strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of California, a court rule, or an order of the court. (CCP §§ 436(a)- (b); Stafford v. Shultz (1954) 42 Cal.2d 767, 782 [“Matter in a pleading which is not essential to the claim is surplusage; probative facts are surplusage and may be stricken out or disregarde...

Excerpt: ...auses of action alleged” or (2) the complaint or cross -complaint “does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against that defendant.” (CCP § 438(c).) A motion for judgment on the pleadings has the same function as a general demurrer but is made after the time for demurrer has expired. Except as provided by statute, the rules governing demurrers apply. ( Cloud v. Northrop Grumman Corp. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 995, 999.) ...

Excerpt: ...ce of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. ( Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (CCP §§ 430.30, 430.70.) At the pleading stage, a plaintiff need only allege ultimate facts sufficient to apprise the defendant of the factua...

Excerpt: ... an evasive response to a discovery request; disobeying a court order to provide discovery; and making or opposing, unsuccessfully, a motion to compel without substantial justification. (Id.) Possible sanctions include a monetary sanction ordering that one engaging in the misuse of the discovery process, or any attorney advising that conduct, or both pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by anyone as a result of tha...

Excerpt: ...dmissible in evidence or appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” (CCP § 2017.010; see Davies v. Superior Court (1984) 36 Cal.3d 291, 301.) “For discovery purposes, information is relevant if it ‘might reasonably assist a party in evaluating the case, preparing for trial, or facilitating settlement.' [Citation] Admissibility is not the test and information, unless privileged, is discoverable if it mig...

Excerpt: ...73(a)(1), 576.) Motions for leave to amend the pleadings are directed to the sound discretion of the court. “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading . . ..” (CCP § 473(a)(1); see CCP § 576.) Policy f avors liberally granting leave to amend so that all disputed matters between the parties may be resolved. (See Howard v. County of San Diego (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 1422, 1...

Excerpt: ...nt. (CCP §§ 473(a)(1), 576.) Motions for leave to amend the pleadings are directed to the sound discretion of the court. “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading . . ..” (CCP § 473(a)(1); see CCP § 576.) Policy f avors liberally granting leave to amend so that all disputed matters between the parties may be resolved. (See Howard v. County of San Diego (2010) 184 Cal....

Excerpt: ... 657, a motion for new trial may be granted if there is any: [¶] 1. Irregularity in the proceedings of the court, jury, or adverse party, or any order of the court or abuse of discretion by which either party was prevented from having a fair trial. [¶] 2. Misconduct of the jury; and whenever any one or more of the j urors have been induced to assent to any general or special verdict, or to a finding on any question submitted to them by the cour...

Excerpt: ...n the face of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. ( Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (CCP §§ 430.30, 430.70.) At the pleading stage, a plaintiff need only allege ultimate facts sufficient to apprise the defendant of th...

Excerpt: ...roper service of process. ( Ruttenberg v. Ruttenberg (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 801, 808.) “When a motion to quash is properly brought, the burden of proof is placed upon the plaintiff to establish the facts of jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence.” ( Aquila, Inc. v. Sup. Ct. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 556, 568.) The plaintiff has “the burden of proving the facts that did give the court jurisdiction, that is the facts requisite to an effe...

Excerpt: ...ay impose a monetary sanction . . ..” (CCP §§ 2030.290(c), 2030.300(e), 2031.300(c), 2031.320(c).) Misuse of the discovery process, which includes disobeying a court order to provide discovery, is conduct subject to sancti ons. (CCP § 2023.010(g).) Possible sanctions are: (a) [A] monetary sanction ordering that one engaging in the misuse of the discovery process, or any attorney advising that conduct, or both pay the reasonable expenses, inc...

Excerpt: ...judgment creditor must show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that: “(1) the parties to be added as judgment debtors had control of the underlying litigation and were virtually represented in that proceeding; (2) there is such a unity of interest and ownership that the separate personalities of the entity and the owners no longer exist; and (3) an inequitable result will follow if the acts are treated as those of the entity alone.” (Relent...

Excerpt: ...ble in evidence or appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” (CCP § 2017.010; see Davies v. Superior Court (1984) 36 Cal.3d 291, 301.) “For discovery purposes, information is relevant if it ‘might reasonably assist a party in evaluating the case, preparing for trial, or facilitating settlement.' [Citation] Admissibility is not the test and information, unless privileged, is discoverable if it might rea...

Excerpt: ...¿(CCP § 1021.) The prevailing party on a contract, which specifically provides for attorney fees and costs incurred to enforce the agreement, is entitled to reasonable attorney fees in addition to other costs.¿(Civ. Code § 1717(a); CCP §§ 1032, 1033.5(a)(10)(A).)¿The court, upon notice and motion by a party, shall determine the prevailing party and shall fix, as an element of the costs of suit, the reasonable attorney fees.¿(Civ. Code § ...

Excerpt: ...arty on a contract, which specifically provides for attorney fees and costs incurred to enforce the agreement, is entitled to reasonable attorney fees in addition to other costs.¿(Civ. Code § 1717(a); CCP §§ 1032, 1033.5(a)(10)(A).)¿The court, upon notice and motion by a party, shall determine the prevailing party and shall fix, as an element of the costs of suit, the reasonable attorney fees.¿(Civ. Code § 1717(a), (b).)¿Any notice of mot...

Excerpt: ...of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. ( Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (CCP §§ 430.30, 430.70.) At the pleading stage, a plaintiff need only allege ultimate facts sufficient to apprise the defendant of the factual b...

Excerpt: ...), “A party seeking a continuance of the date set for trial, whether contested or uncontested or stipulated to by the parties, must make the request for a continuance by a noticed motion or an ex part e application under the rules in chapter 4 of this division, with supporting declarations. The party must make the motion or application as soon as reasonably practical once the necessity for the continuance is discovered. ” Under CRC Rule 3.133...

Excerpt: ... this sancti on, the court may impose a monetary sanction . . . . ” (CCP §§ 2030.290(c), 2030.300(e), 2031.300(c), 2031.320(c).) Misuse of the discovery process, which includes disobeying a court order to provide discovery, is conduct subject to sanctions. (CCP § 2023.010(g).) Possible sanction s are : (a) [A] monetary sanctio n ordering that one engaging in the misuse of the discovery process, or any attorney advising that conduct, or both ...

Excerpt: ...t: “(1) The party has subsequently served a response that is in substantial compliance with Sections 2030.210, 2030.220, and 2030.230. (2) The party's failure to serve a timely response was the result of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.” Under Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) §2033.280(c), “The court shall make this order, unless it finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has served, before the h...

Excerpt: ...ies.¿(CCP § 1021.) The prevailing party on a contract, which specifically provides for attorney fees and costs incurred to enforce the agreement, is entitled to reasonable attorney fees in addition to other costs.¿(Civ. Code § 1717(a); CCP §§ 1032, 1033.5(a)(10)(A).)¿The court, upon notice and motion by a party, shall determine the prevailing party and shall fix, as an element of the costs of suit, the reasonable attorney fees.¿(Civ. Code...

Excerpt: ... agreement is governed by the California Arbitration Act (“CAA”) or the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), courts resolve doubts about an arbitration agreement's scope in favor of arbitration. (Moncharsh, supra, 3 Cal.4th at 9; Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West Assocs. (9th Cir. 2009) 553 F.3d 1277, 1284; see also Engalla v. Permanente Med. Grp., Inc. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 951, 971 -972 [“California law incorporates many of the basic policy ob...

Excerpt: ...s with a mechanism to cut through the parties' pleadings in order to determine whether, despite their allegations, trial is in fact necessary to resolve their dispute.” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co . (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.) “A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party co...

Excerpt: ...576.) Motions for leave to amend the pleadings are directed to the sound discretion of the court. “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading . . ..” (CCP § 473(a)(1); see CCP § 576.) Policy f avors liberally granting leave to amend so that all disputed matters between the parties may be resolved. (See Howard v. County of San Diego (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 1422, 1428.) Abse...

Excerpt: ...ust be apparent on the face of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. ( Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (CCP §§ 430.30, 430.70.) At the pleading stage, a plaintiff need only allege ultimate facts sufficient to apprise th...

Excerpt: ...ling party on a contract, which specifically provides for attorney fees and costs incurred to enforce the agreement, is entitled to reasonable attorney fees in addition to other costs.¿(Civ. Code § 1717(a); CCP §§ 1032, 1033.5(a)(10)(A).)¿The court, upon notice and motion by a party, shall determine the prevailing party and shall fix, as an element of the costs of suit, the reasonable attorney fees.¿(Civ. Code § 1717(a), (b).)¿Any notice ...

Excerpt: ...st be apparent on the face of the pleading or via proper judicial notice. (Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. Therefore, it lies only where the defects appear on the face of the pleading or are judicially noticed. (CCP §§ 430.30, 430.70.) At the pleading stage, a plaintiff need only allege ultimate facts sufficient to apprise the ...

Excerpt: ...proper service of process. (Ruttenberg v. Ruttenberg (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 801, 808.) “When a motion to quash is properly brought, the burden of proof is placed upon the plaintiff to establish the facts of jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence.” (Aquila, Inc. v. Sup. Ct. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 556, 568.) The plaintiff has “the burden of proving the facts that did give the court jurisdiction, that is the facts requisite to an effec...

Excerpt: ...gh the parties' pleadings in order to determine whether, despite their allegations, trial is in fact necessary to resolve their dispute.” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.) “A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party contends that the cause of action has ...

Excerpt: ...tion Against Public Policy; (2) Wrongful Termination in Violation of Implied Employment Agreement; (3) Racial and Color Discrimination; (4) Disability Discrimination; (5) Workplace Harassment; (6) Retaliation for Engaging in Protected Activity; (7) Failure to Provide Workplace Environment Free from Harassment Discrimination and/or Retaliation; (8) Denial of Reasonable Accommodation; and (9) Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Relat...

Excerpt: ...hat Defendants failed to respond and remediate his complaints of other residents smoking tobacco, marijuana and crack cocaine. Plaintiff alleges the noxious fumes penetrated and permeated his unit, exposing him to carcinogenic and nuisance chemicals in the air. Plaintiff alleges Defendants ultimately moved him to a new unit in response to his complaints. Plaintiff alleges that even in the new unit he was still exposed to second-hand smoke. Plaint...

Excerpt: ... Farrell, alleging that she was a squatter. Defendant Darshad died while the UD actions were pending. Plaintiff Farrell ultimately obtained a favorable judgment in the UD actions. Plaintiff also alleges that Defendant Darshad assaulted and battered her during her tenancy, made derogatory and threatening statements to her and forced her to wear hijabs. Plaintiff alleges Darshad also locked her out of the leased property multiple times. On February...

Excerpt: ...nder on a loan secured by the property, sought to sell the property at a non-judicial foreclosure sale. Plaintiff Sunrise Projects, LLC (“Sunrise”) and Cross-Complainant Alvin Cox (“Cox”) each claim to be the highest bidder for the property under the provisions of a recently enacted statutory scheme which changes the procedures for certain non-judicial foreclosure sales as codified by the Legislature at Civil Code § 2924m. The property a...

Excerpt: ...l-monitoring device read all of his thoughts and memories. (Second Amended Complaint “SAC” ¶ 63.) On December 27, 2022, BDO sent Plaintiff a detailed letter setting forth the grounds for a demurrer to his initial complaint. (Declaration of Melvin B. Wu (“Wu Decl.”) at ¶ 2.) Plaintiff responded to BDO's letter on December 30, 2022, and agreed to file an amended complaint. (Id. at ¶ 3.) On January 12, 2023, Plaintiff filed the First Amen...

Excerpt: ...herwise provided by statute or by rule of court adopted pursuant to statute, the policy favoring the right of parties to make stipulations in their own interests and the policy favoring trial or other disposition of an action on the merits are generally to be preferred over the policy that requires dismissal for failure to proceed with reasonable diligence in the prosecution of an action in construing the provisions of this chapter.” CCP sectio...

Excerpt: ...ts with a mechanism to cut through the parties' pleadings in order to determine whether, despite their allegations, trial is in fact necessary to resolve their dispute.” (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 843.) “A party may move for summary adjudication as to one or more causes of action within an action, one or more affirmative defenses, one or more claims for damages, or one or more issues of duty, if the party conten...

Excerpt: ...nction . . ..” (CCP §§ 2030.290(c), 2030.300(e), 2031.300(c), 2031.320(c).) Misuse of the discovery process, which includes disobeying a court order to provide discovery, is conduct subject to sanctions. (CCP § 2023.010(g).) Possible sanctions are: (a) [A] monetary sanction ordering that one engaging in the misuse of the discovery process, or any attorney advising that conduct, or both pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, ...