Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2842 Results

Location: San Francisco x
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 240))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 275,25
Array
(
)
2023.08.02 Demurrer 810
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...1) provides that if, as here, "a trust is created by more than one settlor, each settlor may revoke the trust as to the portion of the trust contributed by that settlor." (ld.; see also Estate of Powell (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1434, 1440 [1994 legislative amendment to Probate Code 15401 "reversed prior judicial decisions holding that a trust could not be revoked by less than all joint settlors"].) Plaintiff adequately pleads she revoked the portion...
2023.08.01 Motion to Transfer 652
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.01
Excerpt: ...tiffs' mistaken belief that two defendants then resided here. In fact, the two defendants' December 2022 interrogatory responses show they had moved to Texas in January 2022, before "the commencement of the action." (Bains Dec. Ex. D 3:36-4:7, Ex. E 3:25-4:5; CCP 395(a).) Thus, ours is nota "proper court for the trial of the action." (ld.; see also CCP 397.) Plaintiffs apparently concede the relevant facts, but argue that movants "waived their ri...
2023.08.01 Motion to Compel Arbitration 973
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.01
Excerpt: ...on Of Plaintiff Mark Shukens Claims, And (2) Stay The Proceedings. Defendants' (PAC-12 ENTERPRISES, LLC, PAC-12 NETWORK, LLC, PAC-12 CONFERENCE) motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff Shuken's claims and stay this action is granted. Shuken entered into a broad arbitration agreement with defendant Pac-12 Enterprises. (Lockett Decl., Ex. 1, sec. 14.) The FAA applies to Shuken's agreement based on the express terms of the agreement and because th...
2023.08.01 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 815
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.08.01
Excerpt: ...1:19-22) is supported by no authority. In any event, fraud by movants is also specified using their names. (ld. at 7:18-8:6, 9:15-10:2.) Second, movants argue that their alleged fraudulent statements regarded future events. But the complaint alleges false statements by movants in the context of the sales transactions themselves. (ld. at 17:18-8:2.) Even if all the false statements were made earlier, the complaint pleads they were already "false w...
2023.07.31 Motion to Compel Production of Docs and Deposition 549
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.31
Excerpt: ...udge, has been assigned to hear this moŸon. Prior to the hearing all parŸes to the moŸon will be asked to sign a sŸpulaŸon agreeing that the moŸon may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parŸes to the moŸon sign the sŸpulaŸon, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the moŸon with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the sŸpulaŸon may be signed via fax...
2023.07.28 Motion to Quash Service of Summons or Stay or Dismiss 728
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.28
Excerpt: ...before the court on April 28, 2023 and it was denied. See April 28, 2023 Order. She now seeks to have the motion reheard and so improperly brings a motion for reconsideration. Under CCP 1008, a motion for reconsideration must be made within 10 days after service upon the party of written notice of entry of the order and be based upon new or different facts, circumstances, or law. Here, Ms. Tang filed the current moton on June 9, 2023, which far e...
2023.07.28 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 543
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.28
Excerpt: ...ended Complaint The motion is moot as to the bank because it already obtained a dismissal with prejudice on May 31, 2023. The court vacates plaintiffs voluntary dismissal without prejudice that she filed on May 8, 2023, and grants the individual defendants' moton for summary judgment. The court dismisses the individual defendants with prejudice. The court vacates plaintiffs voluntary dismissal without prejudice that she filed on May 8, 2023, and ...
2023.07.28 Demurrer 781
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.28
Excerpt: ...rrer depends on re-casting the SAC as one for libel with a one year statute of limitations. E.g„ Motion at 3:18 ff. This is futile. The claim is, as stated, for interference with contract. The parties agree the statute of limitations for that claim is two years. The demurrer seems to make the alternative argument that even if there is a two year limitations period, that too was patently transgressed based on the supposed accrual of the claim as...
2023.07.27 Motion to Terminate Sanctions or to Compel Deposition 129
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.27
Excerpt: ... as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via...
2023.07.27 Motion for Terminating, Issue, Evidentiary, and Monetary Sanctions, or for Contempt 742
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.27
Excerpt: ...he California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Su...
2023.07.26 Motion to Amend SAC 651
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ... County Of San Francisco Plaintiffs motion "to amend second amended complaint against Comcast to join new party defendant City and County of San Francisco" is denied. Pro per plaintiff has been adjudged a vexatious litigant subject to a CCP 391.7 prefiling order that bars him from "filing any new litigation' without "first obtaining leave of the presiding judge." (ld.) "Litigation" broadly includes a "civil action or proceeding" against what plai...
2023.07.26 Motion for Relief from Unaffordable Arbitration Fees and Costs 808
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...is another attempt by plaintiff to avoid the arbitration he contractually agreed to - an arbitration this court ordered 11 months ago. Plaintiff is a sophisticated businessperson who declares he has "spent more than $800,000 of my own money" on a marijuana dispensary. (Valdez Dec. 2:20-22.) Plaintiff claims he is "currently receiving public assistance," but proffers no documentary evidence of that. (ld. at 2:16-17.) Likewise, plaintiff reports he...
2023.07.24 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 569
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.24
Excerpt: ... without prejudice. Scott & Warner Builders, Inc. was general contractor on a home reconstructon project that had a flooding event. There were "several subcontractors," including Deehan and Ideal Restoration, Inc. (Pham Dec. 2:5-7.) SWB's insurer apparently paid the homeowner some unstated amount of money and seeks $280,301 from some unstated set of the several subcontractors for unstated liabilities. Deehan seeks to settle for $35,000; Ideal opp...
2023.07.20 Motion to Strike Cross Complaint 885
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.20
Excerpt: .... First, the court decides whether the defendant has made a threshold showing that the challenged cause of action is one arising from protected activity If the court finds that such a showing has been made, it must then determine whether the plaintiff has demonstrated a probability of prevailing on the claim." (Navellier v. Sletten (2002) 29 Cal.4th 82, 88.) Silverman's protected activities were filing and pursuing a lawsuit against Fayad. That t...
2023.07.20 Motion to Quash Service of Summons or Stay or Dismiss 389
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.20
Excerpt: ...rts to have served Borenstein via a front desk guard at a San Francisco apartment building. However, Borenstein declares under #nalty of perjury that he does not live or work in the apartment, did not authorize anyone there to accept service and for "the past five years, and currently, I live outside the United States in Israel." Plaintiffs points - much of them hearsay of which judicial notice cannot be taken - are unavailing. It is true, as pla...
2023.07.20 Motion for Amendment of Judgment 806
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.20
Excerpt: ..., well before moving to compel arbitraŸon against respondents in 2021. (See, e.g., Fayad Dec. 3:24-4:4, Ex. A.) Yet he has not sought to include Silverman in the arbitraŸon proceedings unŸl now. Further, everyone agrees peŸŸoner had the burden to prove that Silverman is liable under a conjuncŸve three-part test. (Relentless Air Racing, LLC v. Airborne Turbine Ltd. Partnership (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 811, 815-16; Memo. 4:20-26; Opp. 3:1...
2023.07.18 Motion to Compel Further Production of Docs, for Monetary Sanctions 301
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.18
Excerpt: ...eming, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the moton will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same a...
2023.07.18 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses 267
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.18
Excerpt: ...OMPEL DISCO RESPONSE TO DEFT GENENTECH, INC.(TENTATIVE RULING PURPOSES ONLY PART 2 OF 2) Plaintiffs' discovery requests and this motion were misguided and ineffective as a procedural matter but were nevertheless intended to effectuate the purposes of discovery. Accordingly, sanctions for alleged abuse of the discovery process would be unjust under the circumstances and are denied. For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties ar...
2023.07.18 Motion to Augment Expert Disclosure or Supplement Expert Disclosure 250
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.18
Excerpt: ...he California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Su...
2023.07.13 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 683
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.13
Excerpt: ...ocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract." (AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 563 U.S. 333, 336; 9 U.S.C. sec. 2.) Plaintiff Honorio Altun entered into a sales contract with a dealership. (Compl. 8.) The manufacturer of the car, Nissan, is not a party to this sales contract. Nissan seeks to compel arbitration against Altun through equitable estoppel. Under equitable estop...
2023.07.13 Motion for Issue Sanctions and Monetary Sanctions 624
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.13
Excerpt: ...ry Sanctions In An Amount Not Less Than 6785 (Motions). (part 1 of 2) plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants' motion sanctions is denied. plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants bring their moton pursuant to CCP 128.7(b)(2) - (3), on the grounds that Defendants/cross-complainants' MSA lacks legal support, because (1) their entire argument that a breach of fiduciary duty has been established is premised on the fiction that the overruling of a demurrer is a ruling on the...
2023.07.12 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 467
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.12
Excerpt: ...rgues for stay of the arbitration so the court acton can be tried first. That would be contrary to strong public policies favoring arbitration. (See, e.g., AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 563 U.S. 333; Lewis v. Fletcher Jones Motor Cars, Inc. (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 436.) To the extent California law were to apply here at all, CCP 1281.2 applies only when "a party to the agreement refuses to arbitrate." Such is not so here. Moreover, CCP 12...
2023.07.11 Motion to Compel Further Responses 209
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.11
Excerpt: ...gs:Matter on the Discovery calendar for Tuesday, July 11, 2023, Line 3, (to be heard at 1:30 p.m. by Judge Pro Tem Scott Borrowman) 2 - PLAINTIFFS PEBBLEBROOK HOTEL, LP, PEBBLEBROOK HOTEL TRUST, SERENITY NOW, LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LET IT FLHO, LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, GEARY DARLING, LP. A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, SF TREAT, LP, A DELWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORI...
2023.07.06 Motion to Require Undertaking, for Leave to File SACC 694
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.06
Excerpt: ...Undertaking. WSJ, LLC 's motion to require out-of-state plaintiff to file a CCP 1030 bond is denied. "To obtain an order requiring such bond, defendant must show a 'reasonable possibility' that it will prevail at trial, and a detailed estimate of the costs it is likely to incur." (Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civ. Proc. Before Trial, 11:280.2.) At minimum, WSJ fails to show the latter; the Fisher declaration is insufficient. For the 9:30 a....
2023.07.03 Motion for Summary Adjudication 624
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2023.07.03
Excerpt: ...ment for a negligent breach of fiduciary duty is met, there are no triable issues of material fact and defendants have no defenses. (Not., 10-17.) Cross-Defendants negotiated a settlement agreement for cross-complainants which included "crucial" terms that an independent board would be implemented and or the matter would proceed to trial. (MPA, 2:28, 3:1-2.) The language of the settlement agreement reads as follows: "The parties agree to explore ...

2842 Results

Per page

Pages