Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

125 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: San Francisco x
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 240)) AND term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND term_taxonomy_id = 388)) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 25
Array
(
)
2024.04.25 Motion to Compel Production of Docs, Further Responses 487
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.25
Excerpt: ...uments And Further Responses To Sca'S 1st Sets Of Discovery Requests. (PART ONE OF THREE) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the mot...
2024.04.25 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 642
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.25
Excerpt: ...endant 1625 Leavenworth Street Llc To Plaintiffs Special Interrogatories Set One And Request For Monetary San ctions Against Defendant 1625 Leavenworth Street Llc And Its Attorney. (PART ONE OF THREE) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigne d to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked...
2024.04.25 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 188
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.25
Excerpt: ...orm Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests For Production Of Documents, Compliance With Requests For Production Of Documents And For Monetary Sanctions. (PART ONE OF TWO) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to he ar this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipula...
2024.04.25 Motion to Compel Compliance, for Monetary Sanctions 935
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.25
Excerpt: ...2,000 Monetary Sanction. (PAR T ONE OF TWO) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed...
2024.04.25 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 832
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.25
Excerpt: ...ements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by teleph...
2024.04.16 Motion for Trial Preference, to Extend Discovery Cutoff 148
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16
Excerpt: ...off Plaintiff's Motion for Order Granting Preference in Setting Case for Trial, and Extending Discovery Cutoff is GRANTED under C.C.P. section 36(a). No opposition filed. 1. The trial date is August 5, 2024 at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last da y pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is August 13, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing summar...
2024.04.09 Motion for Trail Setting Preference, Extending Discovery Cutoff 192
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09
Excerpt: ...ly co nditional non-opposition filed. 1. The trial date is July 29, 2024 at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is August 6, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Lo cal Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing summary judgment/adjudication motions is July 23, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to t...
2024.04.02 Motion for Preferential Setting 164
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ....m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is July 30, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rul e 20. 2. The last day for hearing summary judgment/adjudication motions is July 16, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to the relevant provisions of the C.C.P., unless the parties stipulate otherwise. b. Befo...
2024.04.02 Motion for Preferential Setting 128
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02
Excerpt: ...t to C.C.P. section 36(f) is July 30, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing sum mary judgment/adjudication motions is July 16, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to the relevant provisions of the C.C.P., unless the parties stipulate otherwise. b. Before a party files and serves a summary jud...
2024.03.26 Motion for Preference in Trial Setting, Extending Discovery Cutoff 180
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ... filed. 1. The trial date is July 15, 2024 at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is July 23, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing summary judgment/adjudication motions is July 9, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to the relevant provisions of the C.C...
2024.03.26 Motion for Preference in Trial Setting 164
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26
Excerpt: ... of the recipients served but rather refers the Court to "SEE TRANSACTION RECEIPT ON FILE & SERVEXPRESS WEBSITE." Even if a proper POS was on file, the motion would be denied on the merits . Plaintiff failed to provide clear and convincing medical documentation demonstrating that Plaintiff suffers from an illness or condition raising substantial medical doubt of survival beyond six months. (C.C.P. Section 36(d).) Counsel refers to the De...
2024.03.19 Motion for Trial Preference 173
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.19
Excerpt: ...at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is July 16, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local R ules, and Local Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing summary judgment/adjudication motions is July 2, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to the relevant provisions of the C.C.P., unless the parties stipulate otherwise...
2024.02.27 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 075
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.02.27
Excerpt: ...th respect to Defendant's motion for summary judgment, Defendant relies on the three deposition transcripts (enclosed as Exhibits B, C, and D to the Hoover Declaration) to show there are no triable issues of material fact reg arding the asbestos contents of its Dex -O -Tex product line. The Court sustains Plaintiffs' objections to the exhibits as hearsay. As such, Defendant presents no evidence on this matter. Defendant fails to meet its ...
2024.02.21 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 136
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.02.21
Excerpt: ...ts initial burden of showing Plaintiffs do not possess, and cannot reasonably obtain, needed evidence of asbestos exposure and causation. (See Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 855.) Defendant enclosed excerpts of Volume 5 of the Deposition of Plaintiff Joseph Fare, taken on November 27, 2023, in its moving evidence. (See Hollingsworth Decl. at 2:16 -17 [par. 6].) Defendant also enclosed Plaintiffs' Answers to Standard Int...
2024.02.15 Motion for Summary Judgment 136
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.02.15
Excerpt: ...ded evidence of asbestos exposure and causation. (Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 855.) 1. With respect to Plaintiffs' special discov ery responses as factually devoid, Defendant meets its initial burden. a. The Court did not consider the following responses from Plaintiffs to Defendant's separate statement of undisputed material facts ("UMFs"). (i) Plaintiffs' response to UMF No. 3 (dis puting the charac...
2024.01.18 Motion for Trial Preference 109
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.01.18
Excerpt: ...y Defendant Golden Gate Drywall and Defendant Westburne Supply, Inc. Joinder to Golden Gate Drywall's opposition filed by Frederick Meiswinkel, Inc. Reply filed by Plaintiff. 1. The trial date is May 6, 2024 at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is May 17, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rule 20 except as noted below. 2. The last day for ...
2024.01.18 Motion for Summary Judgment 997
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.01.18
Excerpt: ...efendant's separate statement. The following fail to unequivocally state whether Defendant's stated material facts are disputed or not: Nos. 5; 7; 8; 10; 11; 14; and 16. (Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.1350, subd. (f)(2).) The following fail to unequivocally state whether Defendant's stated material facts are disputed or not and, if disputed, fail to cite to evidence supporting that position: Nos. 16 through 24. (Ibid.) The following confound the natu...
2023.12.28 Motion for Summary Judgment 100
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.12.28
Excerpt: ...idence of asbestos exposure and causation. (Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 855.) Plaintiffs identified the deposition transcript of Decedent Arthur Hawkins, Jr., taken in In re Petition of Candy Knight, Sacramento Superior Court Case No. 34-2018-00230424, as a defendant-specific document in this wrongful death case. (Ohlsen Dec„ Ex. C [Plaintiffs' Amended Response to Defendant's Special Interrogatories, Set One] at 10:17-1...
2023.12.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 017
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.12.14
Excerpt: ...n is procedurally defective. Defendant fails to sustain its initial burden of showing Plaintiffs do not possess and cannot reasonably obtain needed evidence of asbestos exposure and causation. (Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. 25 Cal.4th 826, 855.) Melvin Rodrick stated that he "installed asbestos-containing GARLXK gaskets and worked with asbestos-cement pipe, plumber's putty, gaskets, and other asbestos-containing materials that were supplied by CA...
2023.12.07 Motion for Terminating and Monetary Sanctions 742
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.12.07
Excerpt: ...r of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority a...
2023.12.07 Motion for Summary Judgment 967
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.12.07
Excerpt: ...ain needed evidence of causation for the following reasons. (Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 825, 855.) First, Defendant does not show Decedent's deposition testimony is inadmissible in this case. (See Aguilar, supra, 25 Cal.4th at p. 851 [discussing role of trial burden of proof on summary judgment); Berroteran v. Super. Ct. (2022) 12 Cal.5th 867, 895 [discussing trial burden of proof regarding admissibility of deposition testimo...
2023.10.10 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 988
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.10.10
Excerpt: ...or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication is DENIED. Defendant fails to sustain its initial burden of showing its moving evidence conclusively negates the essential element of causation in the survival and wrongful death causes of action. (Brantley v. Pisaro (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 1591, 1598; Aguilar v. Atl. Richfield Co. (2W1) 25 Cal.4th 826, 855.) With regard to asbestos as the cause of death, Defendant's moving evidence ordinarily would be s...
2023.10.06 Motion for Summary Judgment 986
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.10.06
Excerpt: ...tion. Plaintiffs' objection to Paragraph 8 of the Haran Declaration on lack of foundation/personal knowledge and hearsay grounds is OVERRULED. The Court considered Exhibits A through B of the Rose Declaration. Defendant's objections to Exhibit A on prejudice, lack of foundation, and improper lay opinion grounds and to Exhibit B on prejudice, lack of foundation, improper lay opinion, and improper expert designation grounds are OVERRULED. Defendant...
2023.09.07 Motion for Summary Judgment 069
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.09.07
Excerpt: ...notice of Exhibit 1 (Plaintiff's Complaint) in the Weglarz Declaration. The Court considered Exhibit 2 (Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant's Special Interrogatories, Set One), Exhibit 3 (Plaintiff's Responses to Standard Asbestos Case Interrogatories), Exhibit 4 (Plaintiff's Deposition, June 7, 2023), Exhibit 5 (Plaintiff's Deposition, Aug. 30, 2017, Taken in Case No. CGC-15-276397), and Exhibit 6 (Plaintiff's Deposition, Nov. 7, 1996, Taken in C...
2023.08.31 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 978
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2023.08.31
Excerpt: ...r Declaration. The Court sustains Plaintiffs' objections to Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Htnver Declaration on hearsay grounds. As such, the Court did not consider Undisputed Material Facts Nos. 6 and 7 in Defendant's Separate Statement of undisputed Material Facts, which rely on Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Hoover Declaration as evidentiary support. Defendant fails to sustain its initial burden of showing that Plaintiff does not possess, and cannot re...

125 Results

Per page

Pages