Search

Array
(
)

2831 Results

Location: San Francisco x

Array
(
)

SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 240))) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 50

Array
(
)

2024.04.26 Motion to Compel Further Responses 270
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.26

Excerpt: ...Bar who meets all the require ments set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge....

2024.04.26 Motion for Protective Order, for Sanctions 647
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.26

Excerpt: ...assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all partie s to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed via fax or consent to sign given b...

2024.04.26 Motion for General Protective Order 525
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.26

Excerpt: ...temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by telephone, the stipulation may be signed vi a fax ...

2024.04.25 Motion to Compel Production of Docs, Further Responses 487
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.25

Excerpt: ...uments And Further Responses To Sca'S 1st Sets Of Discovery Requests. (PART ONE OF THREE) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the mot...

2024.04.25 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 642
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.25

Excerpt: ...endant 1625 Leavenworth Street Llc To Plaintiffs Special Interrogatories Set One And Request For Monetary San ctions Against Defendant 1625 Leavenworth Street Llc And Its Attorney. (PART ONE OF THREE) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigne d to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked...

2024.04.25 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 188
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.25

Excerpt: ...orm Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests For Production Of Documents, Compliance With Requests For Production Of Documents And For Monetary Sanctions. (PART ONE OF TWO) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to he ar this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipula...

2024.04.25 Motion to Compel Compliance, for Monetary Sanctions 935
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.25

Excerpt: ...2,000 Monetary Sanction. (PAR T ONE OF TWO) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed...

2024.04.25 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 832
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.25

Excerpt: ...ements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a party appears by teleph...

2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Subsequent Deposition, for Sanctions 305
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24

Excerpt: ...onald, a me mber of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that th e motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the ...

2024.04.23 Motion for Relief from Waiver of Objections 863
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23

Excerpt: ...iforn ia State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be hear d by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superi...

2024.04.19 Demurrer 087
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.19

Excerpt: ...us and violent people," where Embattle provided security. (Id. at 5:24.) A male patron "twice attempted to steal Gomez' phone from her purse" and "pushed both Gomez and Co ntreras." (Id. 4:18 -22.) Later, outside the club, the male patron again pushed plaintiffs, then "pulled out a gun and shot Contreras multiple times." (Id. at 5:8 -9.) Embattle's security guards "were inadequately trained to intervene in ...

2024.04.17 Petition for Relief from Provisions of Government Code 480
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17

Excerpt: ... Government Code section 945.4" is denied as moot. (Petition, 1:23 -24.) Section 945.4 provides that a government claim must be ﬁled to perfect a subsequent court action for damages. Government Code section 946.6 al lows the court to relieve the plaintiff from the failure to ﬁle a proper claim. These provisions are inapposite because the record shows that plaintiff (through prior counsel Bora Song) in fact ﬁled a claim on April 27, 2023...

2024.04.16 Motion to Compel Responses 242
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16

Excerpt: ...ntative ru ling part 1 of 2) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion wil l be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Ju...

2024.04.16 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 120
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16

Excerpt: ...r who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If...

2024.04.16 Motion to Compel Further Responses 720
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16

Excerpt: ...State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court J...

2024.04.16 Motion for Trial Preference, to Extend Discovery Cutoff 148
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16

Excerpt: ...off Plaintiff's Motion for Order Granting Preference in Setting Case for Trial, and Extending Discovery Cutoff is GRANTED under C.C.P. section 36(a). No opposition ﬁled. 1. The trial date is August 5, 2024 at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last da y pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is August 13, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing summar...

2024.04.16 Demurrer 338
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16

Excerpt: ...4; next to a picture of two thick pats of butter. The package's "nutrition facts" list "shortening butter blend" as the second of 11 crust ingredients. In fact, the FAC alleges, the crust's butter content is negligible. Thus, the FAC pleads violations of California's unfair competition (UCL) and false advertising (FAL) laws and the state's consumer legal remedies act (CLRA), as well as fraud and unjust enrichment. ...

2024.04.15 Motion to Quash Service of Summons or Stay or Dismiss 643
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.15

Excerpt: ...sdiction. (Edmunds v. Superior Court (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 221, 228.) To establish speciﬁc jurisdiction, "[t]he plaintiff 's claims� 'must arise out of or relate to the defendant's contacts' with the forum." Ford Motor Co. v. Mont. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 592 U.S. 351, 359 (2021). In addition, a manufacturer can be haled into court where it makes efforts to serve the California mar ket and the sale is not an isola...

2024.04.12 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 243
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.12

Excerpt: ... For Monetary Sanction s(tentative ruling part 1 of 2) Pro Tem Judge James Fleming, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties t o the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearin...

2024.04.12 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication, to Seal Confidential Docs 102
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.12

Excerpt: ...e ruling has been emailed to the parties.) Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied. The court rules as follows on defendants' alternative motion for summary adjudication: The motion is denied as to cause of action one for race discrimination in violation of FEHA. The motion for summary adjudication as to the second cause of action for retaliation is denied. The motion for summary adjudication as to the third cause of action for ...

2024.04.10 Motion to Strike 129
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10

Excerpt: ...2:3 -14; TACC 19:19- 22, 21:9.) First, defendant "cannot recover restitution on behalf of others" under his unfair competition law (UCL) claim because this case is not a class actio n. (Not. 2:9-12; Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1756, AFL -CIO v. Sup. Ct. (2009) 46 Cal.4th 993, 1005 ["all unfair competition law actions seeking relief on behalf of others �must be brought as class actions"].) Second, "attorney's fees ar...

2024.04.10 Demurrer 768
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10

Excerpt: ...n Code of Civil Procedure 340.6 to argue that the malpractice case is time -barred, because the complaint was ﬁled on December 4, 2023 - purportedly more than a year after plaintiffs "suffered the injuries alleged" and "the end of" the "attorney -client relationship." (Memo. 2:3 -6.) This court assumes for argument's sake that alleged injuries were suffered before December 4, 2022. But CCP 340.6 provides that the lim...

2024.04.09 Motion for Trail Setting Preference, Extending Discovery Cutoff 192
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.09

Excerpt: ...ly co nditional non-opposition ﬁled. 1. The trial date is July 29, 2024 at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is August 6, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Lo cal Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing summary judgment/adjudication motions is July 23, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to t...

2024.04.08 Motion for Reconsideration, to Strike 568
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.08

Excerpt: ...MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF BRYAN L. MALONE; EXHIBITS (ADDED FOR POSTING OF TENTATIVE RULING) (Part two of tw o) For the 9:00 a.m. Discovery calendar, all attorneys and parties are required to appear remotely. Hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. To appear at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services, " navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and...

2024.04.08 Motion to Compel Arbitration 082
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.08

Excerpt: ...re inconsistent with the right to arbitrate; (2) whether "the litigation machinery has been substantially invoked" and the parties "were well into preparation of a lawsuit" before the party notiﬁed the opposing party of an intent to arbitrate; (3) whether a party either requested arbitration enforcement close to the trial date or delayed for a long period before seeking a stay; (4) whether a defendant seeking arbitration ﬁled ...

2024.04.08 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award 411
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.08

Excerpt: ...ary to effectuate the arbitrator's choice of remedy. Yer ABC, LLC, the alleged assignee of defendants, argues that the court should deny this motion because it is liquidating defendants' assets and conﬁrmation of the arbitrator's security award would conﬂict with governmental restrictions. Yer ABC, LLC's only proof of these restrictions is a naked declaration from one of its members. (Yorkison Decl.) There is nothing from the ...

2024.04.05 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena for Production of Business Records 843
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05

Excerpt: ...CS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND FRANCIS LEE'S MOTION TO QUASH THE DEPO SUBPOENA FOR PRODUCTION OF BUSINESS RECORDS - 260 MICHELE COURT PARTNERS LP. (ADDED FOR POSTING OF TE NTATIvE RULING) (Part two of two) Second, Defendants argue that the subpoena will "inevitably result in a violation of Defendants' and third- party ﬁnancial information, tax documents, and conﬁdential personnel records as well," but do not provide how...

2024.04.05 Motion to Compel Responses, Demand Inspection 647
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05

Excerpt: ...he California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a st ipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a S...

2024.04.05 Motion for Reconsideration 913
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05

Excerpt: ...dividual claim and stay the representative claim is denied. First, there is no basis for reconsideration because plaintiff does not cite "new law." Plaintiff cites the concurrence in Johnson v. Lowe's Home Centers, LL C, 93 F.4th 459 (9th Cir. Feb. 12, 2024) to argue that the court should revisit its decision to stay the representative action. The court has broad discretion to determine what constitutes "new law" for reconside...

2024.04.02 Motion for Preferential Setting 164
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02

Excerpt: ....m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is July 30, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rul e 20. 2. The last day for hearing summary judgment/adjudication motions is July 16, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to the relevant provisions of the C.C.P., unless the parties stipulate otherwise. b. Befo...

2024.04.02 Motion for Preferential Setting 128
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.04.02

Excerpt: ...t to C.C.P. section 36(f) is July 30, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing sum mary judgment/adjudication motions is July 16, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to the relevant provisions of the C.C.P., unless the parties stipulate otherwise. b. Before a party ﬁles and serves a summary jud...

2024.03.29 Motion to Compel Further Responses 656
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29

Excerpt: ... Docs Set 4 This motion is denied on procedural and substantive grounds. The ﬁrst ground for denying this motion is that it is untimely as it was ﬁled three (3) days after the date provided in the order shortening time allowing the ﬁling of t he motion on shortened notice and the motion does not comply with the order shortening time. The second ground for denying this motion is that the separate statement submitted in support of the motion ...

2024.03.29 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication, to File Under Seal 728
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.29

Excerpt: ...dgment is denied. Defendant San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency's ("SFMTA") motion for summary judgment is granted. CCSF's motion for summary adjudication on the general negligence and other ancillary negligence causes of actio n is granted. (The Court's complete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.) Friday's Law & Motion Calendar will be called out of Dept. 301. Anyone intending to appear in person ...

2024.03.27 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 793
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27

Excerpt: ...r received the summons and complaint," so the default and default judgment are void. (Memo. 2:18; Not. 1:26 -2:1.) It is undisputed that defendant lived at, and ran his d/b/a construction business out of, 1201 32nd Avenue, San Fra ncisco, so substitute service could be accomplished there. (CCP 415.20.) A registered process server declares under penalty of perjury that she tried to serve defendant at the address over the course of three days, ...

2024.03.26 Motion for Preference in Trial Setting 164
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26

Excerpt: ... of the recipients served but rather refers the Court to "SEE TRANSACTION RECEIPT ON FILE & SERVEXPRESS WEBSITE." Even if a proper POS was on ﬁle, the motion would be denied on the merits . Plaintiff failed to provide clear and convincing medical documentation demonstrating that Plaintiff suffers from an illness or condition raising substantial medical doubt of survival beyond six months. (C.C.P. Section 36(d).) Counsel refers to the De...

2024.03.26 Motion for Preference in Trial Setting, Extending Discovery Cutoff 180
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 503 Asbestos
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26

Excerpt: ... ﬁled. 1. The trial date is July 15, 2024 at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is July 23, 2024. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rule 20. 2. The last day for hearing summary judgment/adjudication motions is July 9, 2024. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to the relevant provisions of the C.C...

2024.03.26 Motion for Relief from Waiver 041
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26

Excerpt: ...LING PART 1 OF 3) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agree ing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem...

2024.03.26 Motion to Compel Deposition, for Protective Order, for Sanctions 965
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26

Excerpt: ...tive Order Re: Deposition Of Pla intiff Melanie Garcia; And Request For Sanctions (tentative ruling part 1 of 3) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all...

2024.03.26 Motion to Compel Further Responses 331
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26

Excerpt: ...eets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion m ay be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a par...

2024.03.26 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted 593
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26

Excerpt: ..., a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same au...

2024.03.26 Motion to Obtain Cellular Phone Records, to Enforce Deposition Subpoena 392
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.26

Excerpt: ...llular Phone Records From Metropcs By T -Mobile Or Alternatively, To Enforce Dep osition Subpoena (tentative ruling part 1 of 2) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro T...

2024.03.22 Request for Monetary Sanctions 932
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22

Excerpt: ... 1 of 2) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a s tipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will...

2024.03.22 Petition to Enforce Intestigative Subpoena 484
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22

Excerpt: ...tember 28, 2023, a laborer was killed in a trench collapse. The construction company does not deny that agents of the construction company, Filiberto Poblano, John D'Arcy and John W. Tobin, wer e supervising site safety, managing the work and/or present on the day of the trench collapse. Pursuant to its authority under the Government and Labor Codes, the petitioner pursues an investigation to determine whether there were any violations of law...

2024.03.22 Motion to Strike or Exclude Late Disclosed Non-Retained Expert Testimony 130
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22

Excerpt: ...te Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing th at the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Jud...

2024.03.22 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted, for Monetary Sanctions 139
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22

Excerpt: ... And To Deem Documents Genuine Under C.C.P. 2033. 280(B) And For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant Ricardo Dias Under C.C.P. 2023.030(A) And 2033.280(C) (tentative ruling part 1 of 2) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stip...

2024.03.22 Motion to Compel Responses, for Sanctions 006
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22

Excerpt: ...meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear this motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the mo tion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all parties to the motion sign the stipulation, the hearing will proceed before the Judge Pro Tem who will decide the motion with the same authority as a Superior Court Judge. If a pa...

2024.03.22 Motion for Protective Order, for Sanctions 965
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.22

Excerpt: ...ive Order Re: Deposition Of Plai ntiff Melanie Garcia; And Request For Sanctions (tentative ruling part 1 of 3) Pro Tem Judge Philip Ward, a member of the California State Bar who meets all the requirements set forth in CRC 2.812 to serve as a temporary judge, has been assigned to hear th is motion. Prior to the hearing all parties to the motion will be asked to sign a stipulation agreeing that the motion may be heard by the Pro Tem Judge. If all...

2024.03.21 Motion for Summary Judgment 858
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21

Excerpt: ...edical malpractice defendant ﬁles an expert declaration that its conduct met the standard of care, it is entitled to summary judgment unless plaintiff addu ces conﬂicting expert evidence. (Munro v. Regents of University of California (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 977, 985.) Pro per plaintiff's opposition papers are largely incomprehensible, but could be read to seek a continuance to enable her to adduce an expert de claration. (See CCP 437c(h).) ...

2024.03.21 Demurrer 513
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.21

Excerpt: ... at a vacation rental home booked through Airbnb. The 22- months'-pregnant wife slipped and fell on steep stairs in dangerous condition. Born prematurely as a result, plaintiff baby suffered l oss of all toes on her right foot and other injuries. (FAC 1:27- 2:18.) Airbnb advises its property owners to "ensure stairs are safe and have railings" and inspects for safety before listing a property on its website. (Id. at 3:10 -14.) The FAC...

2024.03.20 Motion for Attorney Fees 218
Location: San Francisco
Judge: Department 302
Hearing Date: 2024.03.20

Excerpt: ...ceivables. That contract provided for assignment to plaintiff of security interests in the receivables and had a prevailing -party attorney fee provision. (Civ. Code 1717.) In turn, Galca had an oral contract for temporary staffing services with TPI (SAC at 4:27 -5:3), generating receivables assigned to plaintiff. Galca was suspended as an LLC in 2017. (Memo. 3:24 - 4:3.) Plaintiff sued, alleging TPI did not pay receivables as required, but TPI p...

2831 Results

Per page

Pages

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...57

The Best Way toLearn About a Judgeis to Read Their Rulings!

The Best Way to
Learn About a Judgeis to Read Their Rulings!