Excerpt: ...' Evidentiary Objections: 1. Declaration of Racha Nour: All overruled. (Defendants' should have labeled these objections consecutively rather than by paragraph. 2. Declaration of Alan D. Wallace: All objections, except Objection #4, are overruled. The opinion as to his "general opinion that a reasonably careful real estate professionals [Sicl operating in the field in similar circumstances to Defendants here would have recommended to Plaintiff to...

Excerpt: ...its 1-3 attached to Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice filed March 9, 2023. Mohon for Reconsideration: The motion is denied. The Court loses jurisdiction to rule on a pending moton for reconsideration after entry of judgment. (APRI Ins. Co. v. Sup.Ct. (Schatteman) (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 176, 181 [immaterial that moton to reconsider filed before entry of judgment]; Branner v. Regents of Univ. of Calif. (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1043, 1048 ["A mot...

Excerpt: ... a Court Order even in the absence of an authorization from Plaintiff.12 It would appear that Plaintiff has refused to informally provide an authorization and opposed the instant motion on the grounds that the Court cannot compel her to issue a written authorization because she asserts it is an unauthorized method of discovery to require Plaintiff to produce a written authorization in response to a Request for Production of Documents. The Court w...

Excerpt: ...ies had entered into an arbitration agreement. Defendant thereafter undertook to secure a stipulation to arbitrate, did not file motions or propound discovery and filed objections to Plaintiff's discovery to preserve its right to respond if arbitration was not successful. Plaintiff does not assert any substantive unconscionability and his claims of procedural unconscionability either lack evidentiary support2 or are not supported by the case law....

Excerpt: ...Notice: The Court denies Plaintiff's request for judicial notice. Plaintiff Rutherford's requests involve irrelevant documents given the procedural posture of the case. (Hernandez v. Board of Education (2004) 126 Cal.App.4th 1161, 1168, fn. 1 [judicial notice can be denied on relevancy groundsl.) Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice: The Court denies Plaintiff's request for judicial notice. New evidence with the reply is generally improper (Ja...

Excerpt: ...ions as an individual or whether he was acting in an official capacity for ASTI. Plaintiffs allege their business relations began in 2014, but there are no allegations as to when the specific business plan was created, even though there are allegations that ASTI was registered with the Secretary of State on January 12, 2015. 2. Second Cause of Action for Negligent Misrepresentation: The demurrer is sustained, with thirty days leave to amend. As w...

Excerpt: ...ent S29. The trial attorneys shall personally appear at the TRC — no court call. The trial document exchange is June 8, 2023 (which is a non-appearance date) and the trial documents filing date is June 19, 2023, except that motons in limine shall be filed in accordance with the local rules. The parties are ordered to comply with the Court's Trial Setting Order which will be available on the Court's website in a few days. All trial documents sha...

Excerpt: ...errule 3. Objections to the Points & Authorities: 1 – 9. overrule (objections are proper only as to evidence, not argument) 4. Supplemental Declaration of Julie Weiner: 1-28. overrule Motion: A. Procedural Issue: Plaintiffs have “lodged” certain documents in support of their Opposition. If a party intends to “lodge” exhibits, he needs to cite to a statute, rule of court, or local rule that provides for the “lodging” of exhibits. (Lo...

Excerpt: ... Exhibits A-K and M-Q in their entirety. 2. Motion: A. Where the moving party in a motion for judgment on the pleadings is the defendant, the motion is limited to the grounds that the court has no jurisdiction over the subject of the cause of action alleged in the complaint or the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the defendant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subds. (c)(1)(B)(i)- (ii).) Like a demurrer, ...

Excerpt: ...ves the right to exclude any such evidence upon proper objection during the trial depending upon what occurs at trial. The denial or grant of these motions is without prejudice. Where any motion is granted, the Court orders the parties and their attorneys to advise all witnesses: 1. Not to mention, refer or attempt to convey to the jury any evidence excluded or limited; and 2. Not to make any reference to the fact that any Order was made on a mot...

Excerpt: ...laintiff's medical condition has greatly evolved since the action was filed. Defendants appear to have initially read the case as much more limited in terms of damages than it is turning out to be. Plaintiff does not demonstrate any prejudice, other than further delay. On the other hand, the case is very old and it has been nearly six years since the case was filed. Plaintiff complains that Defendants have not acted diligently in the discovery pr...

Excerpt: ... be a proper document that the Court can take judicial notice of. However, the same document is attached as an Exhibit to the Cross Complaint so it may still be properly considered. 3. The Court takes judicial notice of Exhibit J. Defendants, Cross‐Complainants' Request for Judicial Notice: 1. The Court takes judicial notice of the existence, filing and legal effect of Exhibits A through D and F but not of the truth of matters asserted in these...

Excerpt: ...rms” of the sales agreement Plaintiffs executed with Metro Nissan which contain the arbitration provision. (In re Henson (9th Cir. 2017) 869 F. 3d 1052, 1060 [“We expressly rejected Toyota's argument that the plaintiffs' claims were necessarily based on the Purchase Agreements merely because the lawsuit was predicated on the bare fact that a vehicle purchase occurred.”], citing Kramer v. Toyota Motor Corp. (9th Cir. 2013) 705 F.3d 1122, 112...

Excerpt: .... Motion: The motion is denied. Moving party has failed to demonstrate the existence of an arbitration agreement between Plaintiffs and Defendant. Preliminarily, the language of the arbitration provision plainly does not give Defendant the right to compel arbitration as a third‐party beneficiary or otherwise. Rather, the language refers to types of disputes between Plaintiff and the Dealership which may be arbitrated by Plaintiff or the Dealers...

Excerpt: ... (5) United Site Services, Inc. and Sanctions (continued from 11/09/ and 11/15/22) Tentative Ruling: The motions are granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's Evidentiary Objections: The objections are overruled. Like motions to strike at trial, evidentiary objections must be specific and particularized. It is not the Court's burden to guess which portions of the proffered evidence are subject to the objection; the burden is on the objectin...

Excerpt: ...ond by one of the following: (1) an agreement to comply; (2) a representation of inability to comply; or (3) a legitimate objection to all or part of the demand. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.210, subd. (a).) A representation of a party's inability to comply must state: (1) that a diligent search and reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to locate the item demanded; and (2) the reason the party is unable to comply: e.g., the document: never e...

Excerpt: ...ntiff's ‘claim' for unjust enrichment as a claim for relief. See, e.g., Ghirardo v. Antonioli, 14 Cal.4th 39, 50 (1996) (recognizing that a plaintiff may advance a stand‐alone claim for unjust enrichment, particularly where he or she seeks restitution and other remedies are inadequate). These courts focus on whether the facts demonstrate a defendant's unjust receipt of some benefit. Other courts cast unjust enrichment as an effect: it is simp...

Excerpt: ...is a cause of action. A district court has succinctly summarized the conflict as follows: Some courts have read a plaintiff's ‘claim' for unjust enrichment as a claim for relief. See, e.g., Ghirardo v. Antonioli, 14 Cal.4th 39, 50 (1996) (recognizing that a plaintiff may advance a stand‐alone claim for unjust enrichment, particularly where he or she seeks restitution and other remedies are inadequate). These courts focus on whether the facts ...

Excerpt: ...tion is denied. Certification is not appropriate because (a) Plaintiffs fail to present any facts or evidence that Zhigang, Guduan, Haixia, Zhao, and Liu can be shown to have personally engaged in any of the alleged wage‐and‐ hour violations; (b) Plaintiffs fail to establish the proposed class suffered similar wage‐andhour violations, i.e., typicality2 is lacking; (c) Plaintiffs fail to establish that proving their wage‐and‐hour claims ...

Excerpt: ...pose or address this issue in their opposition and the Court determines that the Order sustaining the demurrer for failure of the facts alleged is considered a judgment on the merits. (See Kanarek v. Bugliosi (1980) 108 Cal.App.3d 327, 333‐334. Furthermore, "the same facts are pleaded in the second action [citation], [and] …, the new complaint contains the same defects as the former." (Id at 334.) 2. Eighth Cause of Action for Wrongful Forecl...

Excerpt: ...excuses further performance by the innocent party.” (De Burgh v. DeBurgh (1952) 39 Cal.2d 858, 863.) However, “[a] contract is totally breached and an anticipatory repudiation occurs when the promisor without justification and before he has committed a breach, makes a positive statement to the promisee indicating that he will not or cannot substantially perform his contractual duties.” (Gold Mining & Water Co. v. Swinerton (1943) 23 Cal.2d ...

Excerpt: ...een corrected. Plaintiffs' allegations appear largely, if not entirely, identical to those previously pleaded in their First Amended Complaint (FAC). For the same reason they failed before, they still fail. Plaintiffs have not alleged facts to support a misrepresentation cause of action against Defendants. 2 Most of Plaintiffs' allegations involve suggestions of fraud, rather than factual allegations of fraud, against Defendants. For example, in ...

Excerpt: ...e judicial notice of two published California appellate opinions. Because the opinions are authority, not evidence, judicial notice is unnecessary. Demurrer: The demurrer is sustained, without leave to amend. The action is barred by the statute of limitations. The general limitation period for an action against a notary in his official capacity is three years. If the action is based on notarial malfeasance, as is the case here, the action must be...

Excerpt: ... Court to consolidate the UD action or stay enforcement of a judgment from another court that is on appeal. While technically, for purposes of consolidation, the other action still is pending (Code Civ. Proc., § 1049), what exactly the Court would be consolidating is unclear. Motion to Stay Unlawful Detainer Judgment: The motion is denied, without prejudice. Generally the UD judgment is binding upon this Court unless the judgment is properly ove...

Excerpt: ...f of service of the motion on file. But ultimately Respondent waived the lack of service by filing a substantive opposition. Arambula v. Union Carbide Corp. (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 333, 342‐43; Carlton v. Quint (2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 690, 697 [“It is well settled that the appearance of a party at the hearing of a motion and his or her opposition to the motion on its merits is a waiver of any defects or irregularities in the notice of motion.”...