Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

1670 Results

Location: San Bernardino x
2023.12.05 Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default, Judgment, Renewed Judgment, Writ of Execution
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2023.12.05
Excerpt: ...tion(s): Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default, Default Judgment, Renewed Judgment, Writ of Executon and other orders Movant(s): Defendant Ha Tien Thi Ha aka Ha Tien Thi (erroneously sued and served as Tien T. Ha aka Tien H. Ha aka Ha Tien Ha aka Tina Ha aka Ha Tien Ha, et al. Respondent(s): Plaintiff Unifund CCR Partners, a New York Partnership Discussion - Here, Defendant seeks to set aside the judgment on the ground that it is void because she ...
2023.12.05 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 898
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Keh, Winston 33
Hearing Date: 2023.12.05
Excerpt: ...Staff of San Antonio Regional Hospital. A first amended complaint ("FAC") was filed on July 7, 2023 asserting the following causes of acton for: (1) violation of Business & Professions Code, 517200, et seq.; (2) retaliation in violation of Health & Safety Code, 51287.5; and (3) intentional interference with Prospective Economic Advantage. On August 25, 2023, Defendants San Antonio Regional Hospital and Medical Staff of San Antonio Regional Hospit...
2023.12.05 Demurrer
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2023.12.05
Excerpt: ...eet and confer requirement applies to amended pleadings Page | 6 as well as originals. (Code Civ. Proc., S 430.41, subd. (a).) The meet and confer shall occur at least five days before the date the responsive pleading is due. (Code Civ. Proc., S 430.41, subd. If there is no resolution, the demurring party shall submit a declaration with h-s/her demurrer stating either (a) the means in which the parties met and conferred and that no resolution was...
2023.12.05 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 001
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.05
Excerpt: ...ating to (1) meal periods; (2) rest breaks; (3) overtime wages; (4) wage timeliness; (5) final pay; (6) maintenance of required records; (7) accurate wage statements; (8) unfair competition; as well as (9) civil penalties pursuant to PAGA. Per the terms of the currently proposed settlement, Plaintiff would represent a class of non-exempt workers in Defendant's California operations from August 27, 2026, to July 25, 2023. (Settlement, 992 ["Class"...
2023.12.04 Motion for Leave to File FAC 451
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.04
Excerpt: ...time wages; (2) minimum wages; (3) meal periods; (4) rest breaks; (5) waiting time; (6) wage statements; (7) wage timeliness; (8) reimbursements; as well as (9) violation of the unfair competition law. In essence, Plaintiff alleges that he was employed by Defendants from October of 2013 through approximately December 2020. He seeks to represent all current and former non-exempt California employees who worked for Defendants during the statutory p...
2023.12.04 Demurrer, Motion to Strike FAC
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2023.12.04
Excerpt: ...lege that CDA has a possessory right to the property itself; thus, the cause of action does not state sufficient facts to support nor does COA have standing to bring a trespass cause of action. Additionally, GS8 also specially demurs that the trespass cause of action is uncertain because the FAC fails to allege who owns or possesses the property. In response, Plaintiff argues that it has adequately alleged that it owned the pipeline and the groun...
2023.12.01 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2023.12.01
Excerpt: ... or in the alternative, summary adjudication pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (f) in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff's SAC and the following causes of action contained in Plaintiff's SAC: (1) First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract; and, Page | 10 (2) Second Cause of Action for Conversion. Analysis: Plaintiffs First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract: Plaintiff's First Cause of Action is for Breach ...
2023.12.01 Motion for Protective Order
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ochoa, Gilbert G S24
Hearing Date: 2023.12.01
Excerpt: ...ch 27, 2023, Faerber served his Designation of Expert Witnesses listing Richard Lewis Ruffalo, M.D. (Ruffalo), an anesthesiologist and pharmacologist, along with Kevin P. Becker, M.D., another anesthesiologist, both of whom are to testify concerning causation and damages according to the sworn declaration of defense counsel. (Scott Decl„ 96; Exh. 1.) Scott further declares one of the arguments proffered in support of Faerber's motion for summar...
2023.12.01 Motion for Preferential Trial 949
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Raphael, Tony R17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.01
Excerpt: ...ant 3") (hereinafter, collectively "Defendants.") Plaintiff alleges five causes of actions: 1) negligence; 2) negligent hiring; 3) intentional infliction of emotional distress; 4) battery; and 5) violation of Ralph Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code S 51.7. On August 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint alleging the same causes of action.l No trial date has been set in this case. On June 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed this motion for prefe...
2023.11.30 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 257
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Lee, Corey G S37
Hearing Date: 2023.11.30
Excerpt: ...laration of his mechanical engineering expert, Mark Burns. C&L filed separate objections to the declarations with its reply. Objection to the Khorshidi declaration is overruled. Objections 1-3 to the Burns declaration is overruled, but objections 4-7 are sustained based on lack of foundation. Defendant C&L's MSJ Defendant C&L moves for summary judgment on the grounds that: (1) it does not own, lease, occupy, or control the property on which Plain...
2023.11.30 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 600
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Lee, Corey G S37
Hearing Date: 2023.11.30
Excerpt: ...fic Collision Report, and Offcer Amanda Beeman's deposition testimony. Extrinsic evidence, however, is not properly considered at the pleading stage. The extrinsic evidence here is also presented for the purpose of attacking the pleadings themselves and unrelated to whether Plaintiff was insufficiently diligent in pursuing this motion. Such evidence is more properly presented on summary judgment or at trial. The Court therefore sustains Plaintiff...
2023.11.30 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 990
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2023.11.30
Excerpt: ... it assumed the contract/agreement at issue. (Compl. at "1 7 & 21.) Around October 14, 2015, Mayra Diaz (Diaz), a representative and agent of Suncrest, made an unsolicited visit to Plaintiff's residence, located at 7958 North Maple Ave., Fontana, CA 92336, and she presented the option to purchase/install roof-mounted solar panel systems on his home. (ld. at 15-17.) The conversaton between Diaz and Plaintiff was in Spanish, which is Plaintiff's na...
2023.11.30 Motion to Compel Deposition 704
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Lee, Corey G S37
Hearing Date: 2023.11.30
Excerpt: ...m ("Lim") and Heidi Kupferman ("Kupferman"). Defendants oppose and Plaintiffs reply. The two motions are nearly identical and are each supported by the declaration of Plaintiff's attorney Scott K. Johnson ("Johnson"). Johnson declares Plaintiffs issued notices of depsiton on April 19, 2023, for depositions on May 23 and 24, 2023, respectively. (Johnson Decl. re: Lim, '15, Exh. 8; Johnson Decl. re: Kupferman, 95.) Defendants subsequently objected ...
2023.11.29 Motion to Compel Further Responses 057
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Lee, Corey G S37
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ..."). On July 28, 2023, she e-served her responses with the verification dated July 31, 2023. (Ma Decl. at 95, Exhs. E-F.) Finding the objections/responses to (i) Form Interrogatories #1.1, 2.1-2.7, 2.11, & 12.1, (ii) Special Interrogatories #1-2, 5-10, 13-16, & 18-23, and (iii) RFPs #1-8 deficient, Plaintiff Lightking moves to compel further responses. Defendant Zhou opposes in part. Plaintiff Lightking replies. After the motions were filed, Defen...
2023.11.29 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 189
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ...Leisure Manor (esa Braswell Leisure Manor) ["Braswell"l. The Complaint pleads 3 causes of action: (1) elder abuse/neglect (wrongful death & survival) by all, (2) wrongful death by Plaintiffs Johnson, Andrew, Joseph, and Sorrell, and (3) negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) by Plaintiff Johnson. Defendant Braswell answered. The Complaint alleges that Ysidra Duarte ("Decedent") began living at Braswell's assisted living facility on Jun...
2023.11.28 Motion to Compel Arbitration 247
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...e with Defendant BMW. Plaintiff alleges that defects and nonconformities manifested within the warranty period, including those relating to the vehicle's electrical, transmission, and breaks. She further alleges that, despite a reasonable number of attempts, the Defendant was unable to fix the vehicle. Further that the manufacturer failed to replace or make restitution, as required by the Song-Beverly Act (Act). On August 26, 2022, Plaintiff file...
2023.11.28 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 975
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...ainer complaint against Defendants Grabowski, Crawford, and Graboswki Brothers Racing (G8R). Defendants CITV and DGM appeared by filing prejudgment claims of right of possession. Generally, Plaintiff alleges that the subject property is a commercial warehouse with two suites. Plaintiff has owned the subject property since Defendant Grabowski occupied shortly thereafter and Page 7 was allowed to occupy until March 2021, when he, along with Defenda...
2023.11.28 Motion for Summary Judgment 388
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...on administration services; Clark Construction Group of California (Clark) was engaged as Plaintiff's general contractor. On June 1, 2020, the County filed its complaint alleging the following four causes of action against HOK: (1) contractual indemnity; (2) declaratory relief; (3) breach of contract; and, (4) negligence. The County alleges the following: In November 2012, the County and HOK entered -nto a design contract (the Professional Servic...
2023.11.28 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 211
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...he moving party must demonstrate that "the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable." (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. united Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2W5) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, th...
2023.11.28 Application for Writ of Attachment 978
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...amended order. Case Summary This is an action relating to the breach of construction contracts. Plaintiff alleges that it entered into a Master Contractor Agreement (MCA) with Defendant, in which it would provide construction materials at various construction sites. Individual Defendant Theisen allegedly executed a personal guaranty, both individually and as trustee of a related trust. Plaintiff alleges it also executed a Master Pay App Agreement...
2023.11.27 Motion for Preferential Trial 949
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Raphael, Tony R17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.27
Excerpt: ...nor with severe cognitive disabilities (First Am. Complt. 13), alleges that while he was at school and in the care and custody of Defendants, he was abused on at least two separate occasions in 2022. (First Am. Complt. 18, 21.) Plaintiff filed his original complaint on May 23, 2023 alleging five causes of action: 1) Negligence; 2) Negligent Hiring, Supervision, and Training; 3) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; 4) Battery; and 5) Viol...
2023.11.27 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 820
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.27
Excerpt: ...final pay; (7) required maintaining of records; (8) accurate statements; (9) unfair competition law; as well as a claim for civil penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). On March 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC) to add a cause of action for violations relating to indemnification of necessary employee expenses. After commencing litigation, the parties informally exchanged policy and payroll document...
2023.11.22 Motion to Compel Further Responses 731
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.22
Excerpt: ...GRANT sanctions against Defendant in the amount of $2,5æ', payable within 30 days. Case Summary This is, in essence, a discrimination and harassment case. Plaintiffs contend that they were harassed and discriminated against during their employment as police officers at Defendant City. They allege discrimination and harassment on the basis of disability and age, as well as other protected categories. Plaintiff Vasek further contends he was denied...
2023.11.22 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 751
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.22
Excerpt: ...Y, without prejudice. Alternatively, the Court would consider a CONTINUANCE for the purpose of submission of a revised class notice. Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements in General Settlement of a class action requires court approva . (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.759.) The moving party must demonstrate that "the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable." (Kullar v. Fcm Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. un...
2023.11.22 Demurrer 923
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Driscoll, David E 22
Hearing Date: 2023.11.22
Excerpt: ...garding a 2018 Ford F-1ffJ (the Vehicle), which the Plaintiffs purchased for one hundred thousand nine hundred and thirty-nine dollars and twenty-eight cents ($100,939.28.) Plaintiffs allege the Vehicle had multiple defects and nonconformities to the warranty and Ford is unable to conform the Vehicle to the applicable express warranty. Plaintiffs further allege Raceway breached duty to Plaintiffs in failing to use ordinary care and skill by faili...

1670 Results

Per page

Pages