Excerpt: ...aintiff timely filed its opposition without objecting to this deficiency. The Court deems this deficiency waived. Defendants' request for judicial notice is DENIED. (Evid. Code, SS 452, 453.) The proffered documents are not relevant to the Court's determination of this motion. (People v. Rowland (1992) 4 Cal.4th 238, 268, fn. 6; see Malek Media Group LLC v. AXQG Corp. (2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 817, 825.) Defendants' motion for summary judgment or, in...

Excerpt: ...he Court finds that defendants were the prevailing party on the second and third causes of action [for fraud and negligent misrepresentation, respectively), only, within plaintiff West Sacramento Hospitality, LLC's complaint. (Civil Code, S 1717, subd. RJN, Exhibits A, B; Folsom Decl., Exhibit D, '1 24.) However, defendants fail show that their 75%-25% apportionment within the billing records [for work performed to defend against plaintiff's comp...

Excerpt: ...of action for products liability - design defect — is SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. (Code Civ. Proc., S 430.10, subd. (d); Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 952, 967.) The Court finds that plaintiffs have failed to allege the requisite elements of this claim; thus, the FACfails to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against Braun for products liability — design defect. (Code Civ. Proc., S 430.10, subd. (d)...

Excerpt: ... "a trial court has broad discretion to accept or reject late-filed papers."]; Code Civ. Proc., S 437c, subd. (b)(2).) Plaintiff Julie Su, State Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations, State of California's request for judicial notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, SS 452, 453.) Defendants' objections to plaintiffs request for judicial notice are OVERRULED. (See Evid. Code, SS 1200, 702, 800, 140...

Excerpt: ...rt case number 34-2020- • on July 14, 2020, in case No. CV-2020-948, Nazia and Malik filed a complaint for financial elder abuse, civil suit for fraud, and forgery against defendants Shazia, Mohsan, Sadia Naseem ("Sadia"), and Ahsan (collectively "defendants"). This complaint was also filed on behalf of Zafar Iqbal. • On January 8, 2021, the Sacramento Superior Court transferred the 00280149 case to this Court. Upon receipt, this Court labele...

Excerpt: ... broad discretion to accept or reject late-filed papers."]; Code Civ. Proc., S 437c, subd. (b)(2).) Plaintiff Julie Su, State Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations, State of California's request for judicial notice is GRANTED. (Evid. Code, SS 452, 453.) Defendants' objections to plaintiff's request for judicial notice are OVERRULED. Defendants' objections to evidence in support of oppositi...

Excerpt: ...judgment. (See Hopkins & Carley v. Gens (2011) 200 Cal.App.4th 1401, 1410; Armando Ortega decl., '1 2; Priscilla Ortega decl., '1 2; Payravi decl., pp. 1-2, Exhibits 1-3.) Second, based on the evidence before the Court, the default and default judgment were taken against defendants as the result of their mistake and excusable neglect. (Barat v. Baratti (1952) 109 Cal.App.2d 917, 921; Code Civ. Proc., S 473, subd. (b); see also Lasalle v. Vogel (2...

Excerpt: ...ents attached thereto. (Evid. Code, SS 452, 453.) Defendant's request for judicial notice file with defendant's reply is DENIED. (Evid. Code, SS 452, 453.) New arguments may not be raised for the first time in a reply brief. (High Sierra Rural Alliance v. County of Plumas (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 102, 112 fn. 2.) The rule is that points raised in the reply brief for the first time will not be considered, unless good reason is shown for failure to pr...

Excerpt: ...quests for production of documents, set one, is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., SS 2030.290, 2031.300, 2033.280.) "A separate statement is not required...[w]hen no response has been provided to the request for discovery..." (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1345(b).) But, here, plaintiff did provide responses to the discovery and therefore, defendant must file a moton to compel further discovery with a separate statement. (See cal. Rules of court, rule 3.13...

Excerpt: ....4th 415, 422.) Defendant Covenant Care Courtyard's motion to strike is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., SS 435- 437.) Standing requirements will vary from statute to statute based upon the intent of the Legislature and the purpose for which the particular statute was enacted. (Blumhorst v. Jewish Family Services of Los Angeles (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 993, 1000.) We turn to section 1430, subdivision (b). (Nevarrez v. San Marino Skilled Nursing & Wellness...

Excerpt: ...sonable attorney's fees. Except as otherwise expressly provided by statute, a prevailing party is entitled as a matter of right to recover costs in any action or proceeding. (Code Civ. Proc„ S 1032, (b).) The statute defines "prevailing party" as including "a defendant in whose favor a dismissal is entered...." (Code Civ. Proc., S 1032, subd. (a)(4).) Hotel Winters is a preva-ling party as a defendant in whose favor a dismissal was entered. The...

Excerpt: ...1161(2) which states that a tenant is guilty of unlawful detainer if they fail to pay their rent and then subsequently fail to comply with a three-day to pay rent or quit order. Plaintiff has stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc., S 430.10, subd. (e).) Those facts include: 1. Plaintiff is a limited liability company which owns the real property located within the above-described judicial district and commonly k...

Excerpt: ...from defendant after unsuccessful attempts to repair plaintiffs' vehicle, and defendant declined to do so. (Code Civ. Proc, S 338; Britton v. Girardi (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 721, 734; Compl., 23.) The Court further finds that plaintiffs have stated facts sufficient to consttute a cause of action for fraudulent inducement concealment. (See Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc. (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 1356, 1382 — 13...

Excerpt: ...Ie Civ. Prcyc., S 2030.300; see Sole Energy Co. v. Petrominerals Corp. (2W5) 128 Cal.App.4th 187, 193 [the trial court may construe a pleading labeled as one type of motion to be a different type of motion].) The Court finds that this motion was not timely filed. (Code Civ. Pru., SS 1013, subd. (a) [service is complete at the time of the but any period of notice and any right or duty to do any act or make any response within any or on a date cert...

Excerpt: ...l., 4 — 11, Exhibits A— F.) Zero Net Energy Alliance, Inc. shall prov-de a verified response to plaintiffs discovery request, without objections, by July 1, 2023. 2 of 3 Plaintiff's request for sanctons is GRANTED IN PART in the amount of $720M. (Code Civ. Proc., SS 2023.030, subd. (a), 2031.3[n, subd. (c); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1348; Pleau-Fuller Decl., '1 11.) The Court declines to award sanctions for time not yet incurred. If no hear...

Excerpt: ...Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 967; Jones v. Awad (2019) 39 Cal.App.5th 1200, 1207 [the elements of a cause of action for premises liability are the same as those for negligencel.) The Court finds that plaintiffs' complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for premises liability. (Donnell v. California Western School of Law (1988) 200 Cal.App.3d 715, 725 — 726; See Rakestraw v. California Physicians' Serv. (2000) 81 ...

Excerpt: ...round that the memorandum of costs was filed prematurely. 2 of 2 2. Regarding defendant's deposition costs, service of process, and fees for electronic filing or service, this Court DENIES the motion to tax costs. These are all allowable costs. (Code Civ. Proc., S 1033.5, (a)(3)(A), They were also incurred, reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation, and reasonable in amount. (Code Civ. Proc., S 1033.5, subd. (c).) 3. Regarding defenda...

Excerpt: ...eged facts to state this cause of action. (Davis v. (1943) 61 Cal.App.2d 788, 794; citing Burkett v. Griffith (1891) 90 Cal. 532, 541; Am. Compl„ 11 — 13, 49— 53; Exhibits. E— G.) The motion as to plaintiff's sixth cause of action for intentional interference with contractual relationship is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. (Code Civ. Proc., S 438, subd. see Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 cal.3d 311, 318.) The court finds that defendant Scott T...

Excerpt: ...or committing fraud and forgery in court waiver fee by lying under penalty or [sic.] perjury under oath in court as follows: Defendant/respondent's motion to deem plaintiffs/pebtoners to be vexatious litigants is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., S 391.) The Court finds that defendant/respondent has failed to establish the requisite elements for this Court to deem plaintiff/petitoners to be vexatious litigants. (Ibid.; Morton v. Wagner (2007) 156 cal.App...

Excerpt: ...N PART. (9 U.S.C. S 1, et seq.; Code Civ. Proc., S 1281.2.) The Court finds that plaintiff Martinez Narez's individual PAGA claims are subject to the executed arbitration agreement(s) within plaintiff's employment file. (Stenson Decl., '1 8, Exhibits 1 — 6; Op., p. 2, II. 3—4.) However, the Court finds that the California Supreme Court, in the case of Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (Case No. S274671), is presently reviewing the issue of wh...

Excerpt: ... have established that there are a triable issues of material fact as to duty, breach of duty and causation. (Civ. Code, S 1714; Ladd v. County of San Mateo (1996) 12 Cal.4th 913, 917; T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals corp. (2017) 4 cal.5th 145, 163; Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 cal.4th 296, 315; Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery co. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 764, 771 ["in the absence of a statutory provision establishing an exception to the general rule of Civil Co...

Excerpt: ...is Court exercises its discretion to allow the costs of travel to the hearing on December 15, 2022. (Code Civ. Proc., S 1033.5, subd. (c)(4).) A prevailing party is entitled "as a matter of right" to recover costs in any acton or proceeding unless a statute expressly provides otherwise. (Segal v. ASICS America Corp. (2022) 12 Cal.5th 651, 658, quotation marks in original; Code Civ. Proc., S 1032, subd. (b).) Section 1033.5 sets forth the types of...

Excerpt: ...App.4th 742, 749, citing McAllister v. County of Monterey (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 253, 280.) The Court rules upon defendant Larry French's demurrer to [and motion to strike] plaintiff's complaint as follows: Defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's complaint based upon the statute of limitations set forth in Code of Civil Procedure section 366.2(a) and lack of standing as a result thereof is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., S 430.10, subd. The Court finds tha...

Excerpt: ...on Inc. dba KDC Construction and defendant McCandless & Associates Inc. have each filed a joinder in defendants Valley Star Partners, LLC, Mitch Engstrom, and Mark Engstrom's motion to require vexatious litigant plaintiff to furnish security. Plaintiff Howard Herships acknowledges in his opposition that Cirks and McCandless have joined in the moton. (See plaintiff's opposition, p. 2.) Plaintiff does not dispute that Cirks and McCandless can join ...

Excerpt: ...nfer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer." l.) Respondent's demurrer to the second, sixth and seventh causes of action on the ground that Randall Wilson is an indispensable party is OVERRULED. (Code Civ. Proc., SS 389, 430.10, subd. (d).) The Court finds that while petitioner Bradford G. Crandall. Sr.'s petition does contain allegations that Mr. Wilson may be a joint tortfeasor, respondent has failed to...