Excerpt: ...ribed notice conditions. (Kwok v. Bergren (1982) 130 Cal.App.3d 596, 600.) Where forfeiture of the tenant's lease for non‐ payment of rent is one of the objectives of the action, the exact amount of rent claimed to be due must be stated in the notice to pay rent or quit. (Baugh v. Consumers Associates, Limited (1966) 241 Cal.App.2d 672, 674.) Where notice is insufficient, a complaint fails to state a cause of action. (See Baugh v. Consumers Ass...

Excerpt: ...interrogatories].) The Court finds that defendant has established a reasonable, good faith attempt to resolve informally this discovery dispute. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2031.310, subd. (b)(2); 2016.040; Ichinaga decl., ¶¶ 18‐20. Exs. 5, 6, 8, 9.) The Court finds defendant's motion to compel further responses is timely. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (c); Ichinaga decl., ¶18.) 2 of 3 Defendant's motion to compel further response to reque...

Excerpt: ...as these documents are irrelevant to the Court's determination of the instant motion. (People v. Rowland (1992) 4 Cal.4th 238, 268, fn. 6.) The Court construes Bridge Partners' motion to sever complaint‐in‐intervention as a motion to bifurcate and GRANTS said motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1048, subd. (b); see Morehart v. County of Santa Barbara (1994) 7 Cal.4th 725, 738, fn. 3 [“Code of Civil Procedure section 1048 no longer authorizes sever...

Excerpt: ... include: filing, motion and jury fees (§ 1033.5, subd. (a)(1)) and service of process by a public officer, registered process server, or other means (§ 1033.5, subd. (a)(4)). If service is by a registered process server, the recoverable cost is the amount actually incurred in effecting service…unless those charges are successfully challenged by a party to the action. (§ 1033.5, subd. (a)(4)(B).) An award of costs shall be subject to the fol...

Excerpt: ...isclosure of information which is not relevant to the subject matter of the action and will not lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (Coy v. Superior Court (1962) 58 Cal.2d 210, 220; Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Superior Court for Los Angles Co. (1968) 263 Cal.App.2d 12, 19 [if interrogatories are so framed as to require the disclosure of relevant as well as irrelevant matter, the trial court in the exercise of its discretion ma...

Excerpt: ...il Procedure section 1008 is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1008, subd. (a).) The Court finds that plaintiff has failed to provide any “new or different facts, circumstances, or law” upon which relief can be granted. (Ibid.; See In re Marriage of Herr (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1463, 1468 [facts of which a party seeking reconsideration was aware of at the time of the original ruling are 2 of 2 not “new or different facts,” as would support a tr...

Excerpt: ...to the hearing, with an additional 2 court days required for electronic service].) The Court also finds that plaintiff has failed to show “a reasonable and good faith attempt at an informal resolution” of the discovery dispute prior to filing the instant motion. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2016.040, 2030.300, subd. (b)(1); Townsend v. Superior Court (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1431, 1438; Clement v. Allegre (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1294; Obregon v. ...

Excerpt: ...pp.3d 596, 600.) Courts have held that because of insufficient notice served upon a tenant, an unlawful detainer complaint failed to state a cause of action. (Baugh v. Consumers Associates, Limited (1966) 241 Cal.App.2d 672, 675 [the defect was failure to state amount of rent owed].) Plaintiff sets forth that defendant Mohammad Iqbal filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy on April 8, 2021, effectuating an automatic stay against existing creditors. (Plain...

Excerpt: ...tained within the City's response to plaintiff's separate statement of undisputed material facts in opposition to the motion for summary judgment because “[a]ll written objections to evidence must be served and filed separately from the other papers…in opposition to the motion.” (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(b); Hodjat v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1, 7 – 8.) The Court declines to rule on the Ci...

Excerpt: ...production has met his burden of showing good cause simply by a fact‐specific showing of relevance. (Kirkland v. Superior Court (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 92, 98.) Once good cause is shown, the burden shifts to the responding party to justify his objection. (Ibid.) Defendant in this case seeks three months of communications directly relevant to plaintiff's attempts to seek and obtain employment before his suspension, plaintiff's intent to resign his...

Excerpt: ...transactions or occurrences as the cause[s] of action which the plaintiff alleges in his complaint.” (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 426.10, subd. (c), 428.10, subd. (b); Heshejin v. Rostami (2020) 54 Cal.App.5th 984, 993‐994; Young decl., ¶ 1, Exhibit A.) However, El Macero has not shown that its causes of action against plaintiff were “in existence at the time of service of the answer.” (Heshejin, supra, 54 Cal.App.5th at p. 993; see also Crock...

Excerpt: ...gency as such is a statement of ultimate fact.” (Skopp v. Weaver (1976) 16 Cal.3d 432, 439.) Consequently further allegations explaining how this fact of agency originated become unnecessary. (Id.) Plaintiffs have set forth allegations of agency that are sufficient to withstand demurrer. (See complaint, ¶¶ 14, 17, 21, 22.) However, respondeat superior is a theory of vicarious liability, not an independent cause of action. (See Hilts v. Solano...

Excerpt: ...ce's continued and renewed motion for attorney's fees. (Save Open Spaces Santa Monica Mountains v. Superior Court (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 235, 250 – 256 [Save Open Spaces]; Barth Decl., ¶¶ 6 – 9, Exhibits 6 – 10.) However, the Court also finds a compelling interest in petitioner's right of associational privacy, and protection of the attorney‐client and work‐product privileges. (Cal. Const., art. I, §§1 – 3; Save Open Spaces, supra,...

Excerpt: ...d. (c)(1)(A).) Plaintiff's complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and defendant Christopher A. Hubert's answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint. (Ibid.; H. Russell Taylor's Fire Prevention Service, Inc. v. Coca Cola Bottling Corp. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 711, 726‐727; CACI No. 372; Higgins v. Wortell (1861) 18 Cal. 330, 333; Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Most (1940) 39 Cal.App...

Excerpt: ...thin their separate statement of disputed material facts in opposition to Shopcore's motion for summary judgment; or, (2) defendant Jason Marsh's (“Marsh”) evidentiary objections made within his response to Shopcore's separate statement of undisputed material facts in support of motion for summary judgment because “[a]ll written objections to evidence must be served and filed separately from the other papers…in opposition to the motion.�...

Excerpt: ...rby as the evidence objected to is not germane to the disposition of the instant motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (q).) Pruco's objections to the declarations of Dr. Timothy J. Wiegand and Dr. Mario San Bartolome are OVERRULED. Pruco's motion for summary adjudication as to issues nos. 1 and 2 is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(2).) “The rule in insurance cases is that a material misrepresentation or concealment in an insura...

Excerpt: ...idge Partners”) request for judicial notice is DENIED. (Evid. Code, §§ 452, 453.) The proffered documents are irrelevant to the Court's determination of the instant motion. (People v. Rowland (1992) 4 Cal.4th 238, 268, fn. 6.) Proposed intervenors' motion for leave to intervene is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387.) For both mandatory and permissive intervention, the party seeking to intervene must make a timely application to the court. (Code...

Excerpt: ...before this Court. (See Decision After Hearing on Appeal, issued March 8, 2022.) Respondent's motion to strike appellant's memorandum of costs in its entirety is denied. Appellant concedes a clerical error in the tabulation of costs and stipulates that the correct tabulation is that service of process costs were $455.56 and the total costs claimed are thus $590.56. Thus, the Court grants respondent's request to tax the amount claimed in error: $5...

Excerpt: ...rate treatment. (Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a); Guz v. Bechtel Nat., Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 317, 354; Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604 [the sole issue raised by a general demurrer is whether the facts pleaded state a valid cause of action – not whether they are true; thus, no matter how unlikely or improbable, plaintiff's allegations must be accepted as true for the purpose of ruling on the demurrer]...

Excerpt: ... Proc., § 2025.410, subd. (c); Underwood decl., ¶¶ 21‐22, Exhibits 15‐16.) Bridge Partners' motion for protective order is GRANTED IN PART. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.420, subd. (b).) The Court finds that Bridge Partners has established good cause for a protective order, which allows parties and their counsel to appear via Zoom (or similar method). (Ibid.) However, the Court limits to the sought protective order to only non‐deponent indiv...

Excerpt: ...writing, of the intent to take defendants' defaults, including failing to provide a date by which a responsive pleading needed to be filed. (See Lasalle v. Vogel (2019) 36 Cal.App.5th 127, 135, 141 [all parties shall cooperate in bringing the action to trial or other disposition, quiet speed and unreasonable deadlines do not qualify as “cooperation” and cannot be accepted by the courts]; Barreno Decl., ¶¶ 3 – 4.) The notice of motion does...

Excerpt: ...., LLC v. Monroy (2013) 215 Cal.App 4th 972, 1004 [Heritage].) The Court may rely on its own knowledge and familiarity with the legal market in setting a reasonable hourly rate. (Id., at p. 1009; Serrano v. Priest (1977) 20 Cal.3d 25, 49.) In the Court's experience, the local rates for this type of work ranges from $350.00 to $450.00 per hour. In making its calculation, a court should also consider the experience, skill, and reputation of the att...

Excerpt: ... Code, §§ 452, 453.) The proffered documents are irrelevant to the Court's determination of the instant motion. (Rowland, supra, 4 Cal.4th at p. 268, fn. 6.) Plaintiffs' motion for summary adjudication as to the first cause of action (elder abuse) is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(1).) Plaintiffs have failed to establish that defendants took Kaneezan Iqbal's property for wrongful use, with the intent to defraud, or by undue influe...

Excerpt: ...laintiff The People of the State of California has provided competent evidence that defendant, Flowmaster, and Driven have all shared a corporate officer – Thomas W. Tomlinson. (In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I and II (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 100, 110–111 [citations omitted]; Centerpoint E. v. Superior Court (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1101, 1120 [citations omitted]; Ray v. Alad Corp. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 22, 28 – 29 [a 2 of 3 corporation acquiring ...

Excerpt: ...may move for an order compelling production and notice of that motion to compel shall be given to all parties and the deponent. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.480, subds. (a), (c), emphasis added.) A written notice and all moving papers supporting a motion to compel an answer to a deposition question or to compel production of a document or tangible thing from a 2 of 5 nonparty deponent must be personally served on the nonparty deponent unless the non...