Excerpt: ...) 231 Cal.App.3d 232, 238. ) The complaint must be "liberally construed, with a view to substantial justice between the parties." (Code Civ. Proc. § 452.) The court gives the complaint a reasonable interpretation, and treats the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded. (Aubry v. Tri-City Hosp. Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966-67; Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) The court may consider all material facts pleaded in the...

Excerpt: ... cleared. Mr. Beltran, offered to have Santiago Hernandez assist with trimming trees because had experience trimming trees and tools, and Mr. Tuomey agreed. (AR:0131-0132.) On May 21, 2016, Santiago Hernandez was seriously injured while working to remove the trees. (Administrative Record Pages ("AR"): 118:7-119:14; 131:21-132:4.) Mr. Hernandez was not licensed by the California Contractors State Licensing Board as a tree trimmer and Mr. Tuomey wa...

Excerpt: ... Plaintiff-in- Intervention Chubb filed a notice of lien related to is worker's compensation policy for amounts paid related to the same accident. On March 17, 2020, Defendants settled their claims with Plaintiff Hammond, which included a negligence cause of action. Defendants now demurrer to the First Amended Complaint-in-Invention on the grounds that since the negligence cause of action has been dismissed from the Complaint-in-Intervention, tha...

Excerpt: ...HOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Petitioner challenges the City of Oakland's issuance of Certificates of Compliance for Alameda County Assessor Parcel Nos. 019-0102-004-00, 024-0697-007-15, 025- 0701-011-00 and 025-0707-014-02 ("Subject Parcels"). The Certificates were issued during the time that the parcels were the property of the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Estate. Petitioner alleges in the petition that he is a resident of the County of Alameda and "was also a...

Excerpt: ... defendants' moving papers are true and correct copies of the documents executed between the parties. The court therefore grants judicial notice of the documents and considers the merits of arguments presented. The operative First Amended Complaint filed in the present case asserts five causes of action: 1) Declaratory Relief- Shareholders Agreement; 2) Breach of Contract- Employment Agreement; 3) Breach of Contract- legal Fees Obligation for Mar...

Excerpt: ... to Plaintiff. (Declaration of Peter Rehon at ¶ 6, Exhibit 1.) Defendant was to provide further verified responses no later than November 10, 2020. The court also previously granted Plaintiff's request for issue, evidentiary and monetary sanctions on March 3, 2021 and awarded monetary sanctions in the amount of $13,372.50 and to pay $1,500 in sanctions to the court. (Declaration of Peter Rehon at ¶¶ 3-17.) Plaintiff represents that no such res...

Excerpt: ...HOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Petitioner challenges the City of Oakland's issuance of Certificates of Compliance for Alameda County Assessor Parcel Nos. 019-0102-004-00, 024-0697-007-15, 025- 0701-011-00 and 025-0707-014-02 ("Subject Parcels"). The Certificates were issued during the time that the parcels were the property of the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Estate. Petitioner alleges in the petition that he is a resident of the County of Alameda and "was also a...

Excerpt: .... RG19041496. The Court finds that the cases are properly coordinated and consolidated. The cases are not complex; they both involve the same automobile accident and do not fall into any of the categories for complex litigation as defined by C.R.C., Rule 3.400. The cases involve a common question of fact as to how damages should be allocated to the respective defendants and there is a significant risk of conflicting rulings. Further, factors of c...

Excerpt: ...mmit Surgery Center, Pontine Inc,, ProMed Spine, Kaiser Hospital of Union City, Kaiser Radiology-Union City, Kaiser Central Support Services, Requests Nos. 1-7 are limited to any conditions related to the neck, back, shoulders, headaches/migraines, emotional distress, anxiety and/or physical fatigue from September 26, 2013 to the present. The court further ORDERS that the deposition subpoena for production directed to Custodian of Records for Gei...

Excerpt: ...nvestigation. A three-person faculty subcommittee of the UC Berkeley Privilege and Tenure Committee) ("PTC") conducted a three-day hearing, the committee recommended that Plaintiff should be suspended without pay for one year, a letter of censure, and sensitivity training. UC Berkeley Chancellor Christ on 8/13/18 determined that the recommendation was not appropriate and imposed a three-year suspension without pay. Plaintiff resigned effective 7/...

Excerpt: ...f Contract, is OVERRULED as to Saybrook, and SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND for failure to state a cause to defendant TCS. As discussed in the three earlier demurrers to the Complaint and First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff's First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract alleges breach of his written Faculty Appointment Contract, which had a one-year term that expired on May 31, 2019. Employment under the Contract was at will. Language in para. 5...

Excerpt: ...murrer to the eighth cause of action. LEGAL STANDARD A general demurrer tests the sufficiency of the complaint, i.e., whether it states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action upon which relief may be based. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e); Aragon-Haas v. Family Security Ins. Services, Inc. (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 232, 238. ) The complaint must be "liberally construed, with a view to substantial justice between the parties." (Code C...

Excerpt: ...e potential liability for the claims alleged. Additionally, the court is concerned about the low settlement amount given the large number of aggrieved employees, 5,592, which would result in very small amounts that would ultimately be distributed to the individual aggrieved employees. The court is not convinced that the settlement is "fair, adequate and reasonable." (See, e.g., Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc. (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 224, 244-45.) P...

Excerpt: ...ated in prior meet and confers that Plaintiff will not oppose the motion to strike. Therefore, the court GRANTS the motion to strike and STRIKES the Second (erroneously labeled "Third") Cause of Action, in the First Amended Complaint, in its entirety, Pages 4:13-5:17 as to Defendant Kritika Sehgal. PUNITIVE DAMAGES Plaintiff seeks to strike the third cause of action for Punitive Damages, as well as the prayer for "Punitive Damages/Exemplary Damag...

Excerpt: ...the order or decision is not supported by the findings, or the findings are not supported by the evidence." (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.) The court's review is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the factual findings. "Substantial evidence" is relevant evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. ... Such evidence must be reasonable, credible, and of solid value." (California Youth A...

Excerpt: ...e court finds that although Plaintiff sought an IDC first in December 21, 2021, due to limited scheduling for informal discovery conferences, the IDC was not able to be scheduled until April 9, 2021 and during that time, the time period to file was tolled since Plaintiff was unable to obtain a reservation number to file the motion until after the IDC occurred. The court therefore considers the motion on its merits. Plaintiffs' request to compel f...

Excerpt: ...r summary judgment must show either that one or more elements of plaintiff's cause of action cannot be established or that there is a complete defense to that cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (p)(2).) Once defendant makes this showing, the burden shifts to plaintiff to show the existence of a triable issue of fact regarding the cause of action or defense. (Id.) "There is a triable issue of material fact if, and only if, the eviden...

Excerpt: ...t there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (c).) A defendant moving for summary judgment must show either that one or more elements of plaintiff's cause of action cannot be established or that there is a complete defense to that cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437c, subd. (p)(2).) Once defendant makes this showing, the burden shif...

Excerpt: ...the motion and has indicated in prior meet and confers that Plaintiff will not oppose the motion to strike. Therefore, the court GRANTS the motion to strike and STRIKES the Second (erroneously labeled "Third") Cause of Action, in the First Amended Complaint, in its entirety, Pages 4:13-5:17. PUNITIVE DAMAGES Plaintiff seeks to strike the third cause of action for Punitive Damages, as well as the prayer for "Punitive Damages/Exemplary Damages." In...

Excerpt: ...id up front and approximately 21,000,000 to potentially be paid in April 2021, if the Rhodes exercised their "put payment" rights under the agreement, which would purchase Plaintiffs' remaining 25% interest in the company). As part of the sale, Rhodes negotiated and signed a Stock Purchase Agreement ("SPA"), which contained a mandatory forum selection clause requiring that all disputes be litigated in Cook County, Illinois. The language of the fo...

Excerpt: ... settlement is within the "reasonable range" of the settling defendant's proportional share of comparative liability for the plaintiff's injuries. (Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & Associates (1985) 38 Cal.3d 488, 499.) Courts consider (1) "a rough approximation of plaintiffs' total recovery and the settlor's proportionate liability"; (2) "the amount paid in settlement"; (3) "the allocation of settlement proceeds among plaintiffs"; and (4) "a ...

Excerpt: ...g competent testimony. The court will not require that the PMQ review over two thousand loan files from the trust at issue in order to be found to serve as PMQ for the topics at issue below. Request No. 2: Terms and conditions for loan modifications within the TRUST, both permanent and temporary: The request for further testimony is DENIED. Plaintiff has already obtained relevant testimony and the period between 2007 and 2012 is not at issue in t...

Excerpt: ...ns and entered default against Harish Ram, the court cannot enter judgment until the court has found that there is underlying wrongdoing has been established. (5 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (11th ed. 2017) Torts, §§151- 152, pp. 281-286; Kidron v. Movie Acquisition Corp. (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 1571, 1581; Richard B. LeVone v. Higashi [Conspiracy is not a cause of action, but a legal doctrine that imposes liability on persons who do not commit th...

Excerpt: ...as to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. only. Legal Standard for Demurrer A general demurrer tests the sufficiency of the complaint, i.e., whether it states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action upon which relief may be based. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e); Aragon-Haas v. Family Security Ins. Services, Inc. (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 232, 238. ) The complaint must be "liberally construed, with a view to substantial justice between t...

Excerpt: ... or decision is not supported by the findings, or the findings are not supported by the evidence." (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.) The court considers due process issues using the court's independent judgment. (Doe v Regents of the University of California (2016) 5 Cal.App.5th 1055, 1073; Tafti v. County of Tulare (2011) 198 Cal.app.4th 891, 896.) The Regents must follow its own procedures and those procedures must provide a level of due process ap...