Excerpt: ... a response to this information without an affirmative "opt in" from its current and former employees. ANI argues that the Belaire-West process of providing employees the opportunity to "opt out" of having their information provided is no longer acceptable following the California Consumer Privacy Act ("CCPA") and California Privacy Rights Act ("CPRA"). The CCPA became effective January 1, 2020 (Stats. 2018, ch.55, § 3 [amending Civ. Code § 179...

Excerpt: ...pay for the cost of preparing the record on appeal. (Govt Code 6103.) On 3/26/21, Plaintiff Muchnick then elected to use an appendix under CRC 8.124. PROCEDURE This motion concerns the interpretation and application of Rules of Court that relate to the record on appeal. CRC 8.124(a)(1) states that the superior court is to resolve disputes about the use of an appendix. APPLICATION OF GOVT CODE 6103 The Regents is a public entity, so the Govt Code ...

Excerpt: ...long as the amendment is "in the furtherance of justice, and upon such terms as may be proper." (Code of Civil Procedure ["CCP"] § 576; see also CCP § 473(a)(1) [allowing amendments to pleadings after notice to adverse party].) This Court should be "liberal in allowing the amendment of pleadings at any stage of the proceedings where the amendment does not cause prejudice to the rights of other parties." (McGuan v. Endovascular Technologies, Inc...

Excerpt: ... for cannabis use and fails to inform the customers that they will be exposed to smoke as a reasonably foreseeable use of the product. (H&S 25249.6.) The 1AC filed 1/20/21 is the operative complaint. The 1AC asserts that defendant distributes its products in Alameda County. (1AC, para 8, 11.) The order of 3/4/21 denied Defendant's previously filed a motion to change venue. The citations to paragraphs in the 1AC in the prior order demonstrate that...

Excerpt: ...required the county board of supervisors to "consult[] with the local pediatric hospital" regarding expenditures. Children's Hospital demurred to that Complaint, and the Court sustained the demurrer without leave to amend on March 30, 2021 and ordered Children's Hospital dismissed as a party to this action. Children's Hospital filed a summary memorandum of costs on April 6, 2021, claiming $513.76 in filing and motion fees. Plaintiffs now move to ...

Excerpt: ... dispute." (Miller v. Fortune Commercial Corporation (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 214, 220, citing Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal. 4th 826, 843.) Summary judgment is proper only when "there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." (Code of Civil Procedure ["CCP"] § 437c(c).) When a defendant moves for summary judgment, it is the defendant's burden as movant to ...

Excerpt: ...cia fell from 13 feet high and hit him. The inspection showed that it fell because it was cut 1/8-1/16 inch short and out of square Plaintiff asserts a single claim for dangerous condition of public property. (Govt Code 835.) (SSUF 1) EVIDENCE The objection of the Regents to the Declaration of Zachary Moore is DENIED. Moore is a mechanical and forensic engineer and is a qualified expert in those areas. Moore's testimony that the fascia was an uns...

Excerpt: ...itting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. [Citation.] We also consider matters which may be judicially noticed. [Citation.] Further, we give the complaint a reasonable interpretation, reading it as a whole and its parts in their context. [Citation.]" (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) "Liberality in permitting amendment is the rule, if a fair opportunity to correct any def...

Excerpt: ...mpensation Plan And Agreement and plaintiff had time to review it before deciding whether to sign it. The arbitration provision is presented in the same manner as the other provisions in the Agreement. Plaintiff initialed each page of the agreement. Plaintiff had the opportunity to "out-out" of arbitration and did not exercise that choice. The agreement is a take it or leave it agreement. This is an indication that it is procedurally unconscionab...

Excerpt: ...illips filed the motion to transfer venue to San Diego. On 10/20/20, Leslie Phillips had filed her answer to the cross-complaint. MOTION #1 - PREFERENCE The motion of Stephen E. Phillips for trial preference is GRANTED. STANDARD UNDER CCP 36(a). CCP 36(a) states: (a) A party to a civil action who is over 70 years of age may petition the court for a preference, which the court shall grant if the court makes both of the following findings: (1) The ...

Excerpt: ...ss certification hearing for 01/10/2019. The time between filing and the reservation was 3 years and 10 days. What is the effect of the time gap, if any, on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss? 2. The Motion for Class Certification was heard on 09/13/2019 and the class was certified on 09/27/2019. Between Plaintiff obtaining its reservation on 02/15/2018 and the order certifying the class - a period of approximately 1 year and 7 months - the parties en...

Excerpt: ... which may be judicially noticed. [Citation.] Further, we give the complaint a reasonable interpretation, reading it as a whole and its parts in their context. [Citation.]" (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) "Liberality in permitting amendment is the rule, if a fair opportunity to correct any defect has not been given." (Angie M. v. Superior Court (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 1217, 1227.) For the Court to grant leave to amend after sustaining ...

Excerpt: ...easanton. (Cpt 7) Plaintiff sat on a bench and the bench collapsed. (Cpt 8) Plaintiff sustained serious injuries. (Cpt 8) Taylor Boynton was the sales manager for the area where incident occurred. (Cpt 5) Plaintiff alleges causes of action for (1) negligence, (2) premises liability, and (3) products liability. ORDER Negligence. OVERRULED. Plaintiff adequately alleges that Taylor Boynton, as sales manager for the area where incident occurred, had ...

Excerpt: ...y service. CCP 203(a) now excludes from jury service 11 categories of persons. At issue in this case is CCP 203(a)(11), which states: "(a) All persons are eligible and qualified to be prospective trial jurors, except the following: ... (11) Persons who are currently required to register as a sex offender pursuant to Section 290 of the Penal Code based on a felony conviction." Plaintiff asserts a single cause of action asserting that the legislati...

Excerpt: ...nce of any trust. (Yu Dec, para 13) In 1993 it is unclear whether Mother lived in Alameda County (Lian Dec., para 2) or in China (Yu Dec., para 9-10.) In 2007, something happened. Daughter Lian asserts that in 2007 Second Daughter Leshing and Leshing's daughter Tao Yu persuaded Mother to transfer responsibility for the trust to Yu. If so, then the trust was presumably still for the benefit of Daughter Lian. Yu assets that in 2007 Mother sold the ...

Excerpt: ...to pay for the dental practice. Richard Evangelista filed a cross complaint alleging that Stephen Phillips breached the contract and that Leslie Phillips misappropriated trade secrets. Leslie Phillips filed a cross-complaint against Richard Evangelista arising from her employment with him from 2017-1919. On 3/22/21, Evangelista served a subpoena on Verizon Wireless seeking all of Leslie Phillips's telephone records for the time period 12/1/18 - 6...

Excerpt: ...tion procedures is to allow this Court to "cut through the parties' pleadings in order to determine whether, despite their allegations, trial is in fact necessary to resolve their dispute." (Miller v. Fortune Commercial Corporation (2017) 15 Cal.App.5th 214, 220, citing Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal. 4th 826, 843.) Summary judgment is proper only when "there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party i...

Excerpt: ..., contractor NorCal Builders, and subcontractor Lutz Construction Services. Under the agreement, (1) there was a mutual release between H&H and NorCal, (2) Lutz released claims against H&H, (3) NorCal was to pay Lutz $30,000 in installments, and (4) if NorCal defaulted, then Lutz could seek judgment against NorCal. The 1AC alleges that Defendants Accredited Surety is NorCal's construction bond surety for that Guardian, is Accredited's claims agen...

Excerpt: ...ff Karen Permillion started employment with Alameda Health System. In March / Apr. 2017, plaintiff transitions to role in "EBEW" team. The job description requires a medical billing and coding certification, but Plaintiff is told that the requirement was not necessary. In Nov. 2017, plaintiff files for FMLA leave; takes 12 weeks protected leave. When she returns, she has doctor's orders to take intermittent leave. In April 2018, Plaintiff's manag...

Excerpt: ...s as "naturally occurring." The Court will not approve a settlement that allows such deductions unless the moving party shows, with evidence, that each allowance is based on accurate measurements of amounts of lead unavoidably found in low-lead sources of that ingredient. The supporting papers also provide no evidence from which the Court can determine the scale of unwarned exposures, such as the number of servings sold within California over a r...

Excerpt: ...earn v. Trader Joe's Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 989, 996.) The court GRANTS the requests of Wells Fargo for judicial notice of the federal court order of 6/19/19 (RJN , Exh 5), the bankruptcy court order of (RJN Exh 29), and the 7/10/18 dismissal of the bankruptcy case (RJN Exh 31.) The other RJNs are not relevant to this order. Defendant Smith isthe former owner of record of a single-family residence (the "Property"). Defendant Robinson was marri...

Excerpt: ...judgment. On 7/18/16 the court granted summary judgment against Edward Plummer (Grandfather). Edward Plummer did appeal this Court's judgment, and the court of Appeal reversed. On 8/21/20, defendant Kaiser filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings asserting that under CCP 377.60 the Grandfather did not have standing to sue for wrongful death. On 9/22/20, the court granted that motion as to Grandfather stating: "Plaintiff concedes that he does ...

Excerpt: ..., Plaintiff noticed leaks and mold in his unit. (1AC, para 18.) In the spring of 2019, plaintiff noticed bed bugs in his unit and self-treated the unit for beg bugs. (1AC, para 20, 21.) The treatment was unsuccessful. (1AC, para 21.) In March 2019, Plaintiff reported bed bug and mold issues to Defendants. (1AC, para 22.) Defendants took no action. (1AC, para 23.) On 5/14/19, Plaintiff filed a housing inspection request with the City. (1AC, para 2...

Excerpt: ...dgment or adjudication on each of its causes of action. Defendants oppose. For the reasons discussed below, the City's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. LEGAL STANDARDS The purpose of summary judgment procedures is to allow this Court to "cut through the parties' pleadings in order to determine whether, despite their allegations, trial is in fact necessary to resolve their dispute." (Miller v. Fortune Commercial Corporation (2017) 15 Cal.App...

Excerpt: ...aint. On 2/25/21, plaintiff filed an application to amend the complaint and attached a third amended complaint. The court denied this application. The court addresses the issues to the extent it can in the absence of the relevant complaint. Several of the issues can be decided as a matter of agreement or as a matter of law. The complaint that is not in the court record appears allege claims for (1) sexual assault/battery and for intentional infli...

Excerpt: ...000 to Kho. (OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho (2010) 8 Cal.5th 111, 119-120.) On 9/15/15, OTO filed an appeal from the Labor Commissioner's order, decision, and award ("ODA") dated 8/25/15. Following various appellate proceedings, on 8/29/19, the California Supreme Court in the Arbitration Case found the superior court had set vacated the ODA in error and remanded the case back to the trial court. (OTO, L.L.C. v. Kho (2010) 8 Cal.5th 111, 138-141.) On 1/25/21,...

Excerpt: ... necessarily incurred by the defendant." (Nelson v. Anderson (1999) 72 Cal. App. 4th 111, 131.) The party filing a motion to tax has the burden of showing that an item is not properly chargeable or is unreasonable. The Court's first determination is whether the statute expressly allows the particular cost item. The Court's second determination is whether the amount of the cost is unnecessary or unreasonable. In resolving the second issue, the obj...

Excerpt: ...llectively "Defendants") provided business insurance to Plaintiff during the period from 1998-2012. On 8/9/12, Plaintiff filed this case. Plaintiff seeks to recover policy benefits for lawsuits and claims against it arising from alleged defects in Plaintiff's plumbing components involving nine different lawsuits or projects. Plaintiff claims that Defendant renewed Plaintiff's policy in 2009/2010 even though it did not have enough money to pay cla...

Excerpt: ...ght to cancel the three Deeds of Trust from the three loans. This case is pending. In Orange Coast Title Company of Southern v. Does, RG19014321, the escrow company alleges that unidentified persons represented themselves to be Bui and Nguyen and fraudulently obtained loans. This case is pending. In this case, Evergreen v Real Advantage, RG20069506, Evergreen alleges that RATIC breached the title insurance agreement by not proving a defense in Bu...

Excerpt: ...llectively "Defendants") provided business insurance to Plaintiff during the period from 1998-2012. On 8/9/12, Plaintiff filed this case. Plaintiff seeks to recover policy benefits for lawsuits and claims against it arising from alleged defects in Plaintiff's plumbing components involving nine different lawsuits or projects. Plaintiff claims that Defendant renewed Plaintiff's policy in 2009/2010 even though it did not have enough money to pay cla...

Excerpt: ...federal court on behalf of a putative class of employees of defendant. In a class action, the plaintiff seeks to recover wages and money due to the members of the class. Defendant seeks to stay the LWDA's case pending resolution of the class action. COURT'S INHERENT AUTHORITY TO STAY The Court may stay a case in its entirety in the interest of justice. (C.C.P. 187; Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison (1998) 18 Cal.4th 739, 7...

Excerpt: ...ntiff Zermemo filed this case in state court as proxy or agent of the LWDA under PAGA. In a PAGA case, the plaintiff can recover penalties on behalf of the LWDA. In a PAGA case the LWDA cannot recover wages. (ZB, NA v. Superior Court (2019) 8 Cal.5th 175.) Defendant seeks to stay the LWDA's case pending arbitration of plaintiff's individual claims. STAY UNDER CCP 1281.4 CCP 1281.4 states: "If a court of competent jurisdiction, whether in this Sta...

Excerpt: ... called the Rotunda Building, across the plaza from Oakland City Hall. In particular, the FAC's eighth and ninth causes of action seek a judicial declaration (8) that Rotunda Partners is obligated to make a "Contingent Payment" under Section 5(b) of the promissory note only on the first "bona fide sale" transaction and (9) that, assuming that is so, the "Contingent Payment" obligation provides no minimum dollar amount on the triggering transactio...

Excerpt: ...for the dental practice. Richard Evangelista filed a cross complaint alleging that Stephen Phillips breached the contract and that Leslie Phillips misappropriated trade secrets. Leslie Phillips filed a cross-complaint against Richard Evangelista arising from her employment with him from 2017-1919. REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION The Motion to compel Evangelista to provide further responses to RFAs 1-7 and 9- 11 is DENIED. The RFAs sought admissions contra...

Excerpt: ...aleed now demur to those cross-complaints. Because the cross-complaints and demurrers in these actions are nearly identical, the Court addresses them both at once. LEGAL STANDARDS The standard for construing a complaint on demurrer is long-settled: "We treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. [Citation.] We also consider matters which may be judicially noti...

Excerpt: ...aleed now demur to those cross-complaints. Because the cross-complaints and demurrers in these actions are nearly identical, the Court addresses them both at once. LEGAL STANDARDS The standard for construing a complaint on demurrer is long-settled: "We treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. [Citation.] We also consider matters which may be judicially noti...

Excerpt: ...907104. Plaintiff must file a consolidated Second Amended Complaint on or before 4/16/21. BACKGROUND The court assumes "the truth of the properly pleaded factual allegations, facts that reasonably can be inferred from those expressly pleaded and matters of which judicial notice has been taken." (Redfearn v. Trader Joe's Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 989, 996.) The court GRANT's Red Bull's and the Individuals' requests for judicial notice of Court fil...

Excerpt: ...rt will drop the motion when it comes on calendar on 3/19/21. If counsel do not submit a stipulation on scheduling the expert depositions that takes this motion off calendar, then the court's tentative decision will remain as follows: TENTATIVE DECISION FOR 3/19/21 Plaintiff alleges exposure to various paints, cleaners, and other products, that the products contained benzene, and that the benzene caused hm to develop Acute Myeloid Leukemia ("AML"...

Excerpt: ...s agreed to IMEs by Dr Strassberg and Dr. Berg. Dr Strassberg was to be a several hour-long interview and a physical examination related to neurological issues. Dr. Berg was to be a written test. Plaintiff travelled from Los Angeles to the Bay Area. On 7/22/20 there were disputes over the length of the Dr Strassberg IME and whether plaintiff could have a nurse present for the physical exam portion of the IME. The IME was not completed. On 7/23/20...

Excerpt: ...Complaint filed 12/7/18 asserts four causes of action: (1) breach of contract; (2) violation of Civil Code § 2924c; (3) violation of Civil Code § 2924.17; and (4) B&P 17200. On summary judgment the court's review of the evidence is similar to an accounting of monies due and monies paid. Where there are factual disputes, the court construes the evidence in favor of plaintiff FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION - BREACH OF CONTRACT The motion of Ocwen for summ...

Excerpt: ... Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburg, PA (collectively "Defendants") provided business insurance to Plaintiff during the period from 1998-2012. On 8/9/12, Plaintiff filed this case. Plaintiff seeks to recover policy benefits for lawsuits and claims against it arising from alleged defects in Plaintiff's plumbing components involving nine different lawsuits or projects. Plaintiff claims that Defendant renewed Plaintiff's policy in 2009/2010 even th...

Excerpt: ... date of 10/24/20. On 10/15/20, the court continued the motion for summary judgment to 11/9/20. Plaintiff had not filed an opposition. On 11/9/20, the court continued the motion for summary judgment to 3/11/21. Plaintiff had not filed an opposition. Plaintiff has still not filed any opposition. Plaintiff has not filed any papers in this case since the 8/7/19 proof of service of the complaint. Defendant has regularly filed notices demonstrating pr...

Excerpt: ...oncerns a vehicle-pedestrian accident at the corner of 40th and Opal in Oakland. (SSUF 1.) The median strip on 40th Street between Opal and Shafter has vegetation that separates the two directions of traffic on 40th Street. (SSUF 22.) The City maintains the vegetation by authorizing private persons to maintain the vegetation through the "Adopt-A -Spot" program." (PAF 1, 2.) On the date of the accident, the vegetation in the median strip was more ...

Excerpt: ... necessarily incurred by the defendant." (Nelson v. Anderson (1999) 72 Cal. App. 4th 111, 131.) The party filing a motion to tax has the burden of showing that an item is not properly chargeable or is unreasonable. The Court's first determination is whether the statute expressly allows the particular cost item. The Court's second determination is whether the amount of the cost is unnecessary or unreasonable. In resolving the second issue, the obj...

Excerpt: ...pert designation date. The parties could not reach agreement. This motion followed. CCP 2034.230 states: "A demand for an exchange of information concerning expert trial witnesses ... shall specify the date for the exchange of lists of expert trial witnesses, expert witness declarations, and any demanded production of writings. The specified date of exchange shall be 50 days before the initial trial date, or 20 days after service of the demand, w...

Excerpt: ...ther plaintiff's son would move away from California. The attorney's work as negligent and he failed to achieve the desired result. The attorney's billings were inadequate and did not conform to B&P 6148. Plaintiff asserts claims for (1) breach of written contract, (2) professional negligence; (3) breach of fiduciary duty; and (4) negligence. REQUEST FOR JUDICAL NOTICE The request of defendant for judicial notice is DENIED. When the items sought ...

Excerpt: ...right to inhabit a home in Albany. The XC also alleges that Li has failed to pay rent on time, has failed to pay rent since March 2020, and as a result is currently in arrears for approximately $21,460 in back rent. The XC asserts a right to recover that unpaid rent under a theory of breach of contract or unjust enrichment. The Landlords oppose the demurrer and motion to strike. They also object to any consideration on the grounds that both were ...

Excerpt: ...nty argues that this action should be abated in favor of its own validation action, that Plaintiffs' allegations fail to state a cause of action. Dupuis also argues that Plaintiffs' due process causes of action (the only causes of action asserted against Dupuis) fail to state a cause of action, and the County requests to join that demurrer. Plaintiffs also move to strike language from the County's demurrer. For the reasons stated below, the motio...

Excerpt: ...ed case should be abated. Validation actions under Code of Civil Procedure section 860 are proceedings against the world to adjudicate the validity of a statute when authorized by another statute. Here, the relevant statute provides that an action alleging that "a [sales] tax ordinance . . . is contested, questioned, or denied on the basis that the tax ordinance is unconstitutional or otherwise invalid and filed for the sole purpose of contesting...

Excerpt: ...aana Technologies, LLC, for $746,555.10. The court found that the stipulation of settlement did not permit entry of judgment against Yanna's CEO, Puri. On 8/12/19, Plaintiff MacFarlane filed a request for dismissal without prejudice as to Puri. The Motion of MacFarlane to amend judgment is GRANTED as to Puri. The Motion of MacFarlane to amend judgment is DENIED as to Yaana, Inc., and Yaana Solutions, LLC. (R-2224769) "The authority of a court to ...