Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

253 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Alameda x
Judge: Smith, Winifred x
2021.10.08 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 214
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.10.08
Excerpt: ...any supplemental filings at least 5 court days before the hearing. LWDA/PAGA RELEASE The settlement agreement states that the participating class members are releasing "all Released PAGA Claims." (Agt, I.1.) The parties might want to amend the agreement in this regard. The named plaintiff acts as agent or proxy of the LWDA under the PAGA and can release the claims of the LWDA. The named plaintiff does not represent the "aggrieved employees" in th...
2021.10.08 Demurrer 880
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.10.08
Excerpt: ... is for ages 2-3. It is sold with a plastic dropper. The label states that it is 160 mg of acetaminophen per 5 ml. The "Children's Pain Relief" states it is for ages 2-11. It is sold with a plastic cup. The label states that it is 160 mg of acetaminophen per 5 ml. The 1AC asserts that by using different names that defendants mislead consumers into thinking that the "Infants' Pain Relief" has a different formulation than the "Children's Pain Relie...
2021.10.08 Demurrer 802
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.10.08
Excerpt: ... paid sick leave based on the employee's "regular rate of pay" as the base hourly wages. Plaintiffs assert that Kaiser should have calculated the employee's "regular rate of pay" as including base hourly wages plus shift differentials, assignment based differentials, longevity differentials, and other non-discretionary wages. (Cpt para 21, 22.) The complaint asserts (1) a UCL unlawful claim borrowing from Labor Code 246; (2) a Labor Code 218, 204...
2021.09.22 Motion to Seal 702
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.09.22
Excerpt: ...99) 20 Cal. 4th 1178, 1216-1217; In re Marriage of Nicholas (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 1566, 1575-1575.) In reviewing a motion to seal, the court starts with the "strong presumption ... in favor of public access to court records in ordinary civil trials." (In re Marriage of Nicholas, 186 Cal.App.4th at 1575.) The party seeking to seal a document in a Court file must overcome that "strong presumption" by presenting declarations that contain fact suffi...
2021.09.17 Motion to Decertify Class 702
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.09.17
Excerpt: ...s on behalf of Midland. Defendant BLG filed a certificate of dissolution on 2/2/15. (Order of 7/27/18.) The claims against BLG have settled. The Complaint contains causes of action for (1) Rosenthal Act Claim (specifically alleged violations of Civil Code ["CC"] section 1788.17) and (2) Unfair Competition Law (violations of Business and Professions Code sections 17200, et seq. ["UCL"]). The complaint seeks, damages, restitution, and injunctive re...
2021.09.17 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 702
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.09.17
Excerpt: ...s. (Order of 10/6/19.) The case preliminarily settled for monetary relief of a total of approximately $700,000. The settlement agreement states there will be attorneys' fees and cost of up to $210,000 (30%) and a service award of $10,000 for each class representative. The case preliminarily settled for non-monetary relief of agreement to cooperate in the discovery for the claims against Midland. The proposed class notice form and procedure are ad...
2021.09.10 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 368
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.09.10
Excerpt: ...31/19, plaintiff stopped working at Marshalls. (Cpt para 11.) At that time, plaintiff had no authority to represent the LWDA. Emergency Rule 9 tolled the statute of limitations from 4/6/20 through 10/1/20. During this time period, plaintiff had no authority to represent the LWDA. On 11/4/20, plaintiff provided a PAGA notice to the LWDA and to Defendants. The LWDA presumably failed to respond. Therefore, on or about 1/9/21 plaintiff had authority ...
2021.08.20 Motion for Protective Order 082
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.08.20
Excerpt: ...on and discipline. ... Limiting disclosure of third party complaints, investigations, and discipline to the persons who consent to the disclosure and production of their complaints also addresses the burden issue. The results of the opt-in waiver for complaints of race harassment will define the files to be reviewed, which then limits the burden on Tesla of locating the relevant files." On 4/9/21, the court granted in part Tesla's motion to not c...
2021.08.20 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 239
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.08.20
Excerpt: ...,000. The settlement agreement states there will be attorneys' fees and cost of up to $500,000 (33%), costs of up to $30,000, a service award of $10.000 for the class representative, and settlement administration costs of up to $15,000. After these expenses, the class would get $945,000. The average payout per class member would be approximately $785.00. The proposed class notice form and procedure are adequate. The proposed class is appropriate ...
2021.08.20 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 250
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.08.20
Excerpt: ...st of up to $566,666 (33%), costs of up to $30,000, a service award of $10.000 for the class representative, a PAGA payment of $150,000 (net of $112,500), and settlement administration costs of up to $21,000. After these expenses, the class would get approximately $960,000. The average payout per class member would be approximately $365.00. The proposed class notice form and procedure are adequate. The proposed class is appropriate for class cert...
2021.08.13 Demurrer 686
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.08.13
Excerpt: ...eeks to abate both cases under CCP 430.10(c) on the ground that there is another cause of action pending between the same parties on the same cause of action. NATURE OF CLAIMS UNDER PAGA The LWDA is the real party in interest in both the Archuletta case and the Aguilar case. Plaintiffs who assert claims under PAGA are asserting claims on behalf of the State of California's Labor Workforce Development Agency. "An employee plaintiff suing ... under...
2021.08.13 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement, for Dismissal of Class Claims 126
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.08.13
Excerpt: ...r the [PAGA] does so as the proxy or agent of the state's labor law enforcement agencies." (Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348, 381.) (See also ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court of San Diego County (2019) 2019 WL 4309684 at *4; Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc. (2016) 5 Cal.App.5th 665, 671.) A person asserting a claim on behalf of the LWDA under PAGA must obtain court approval for any settlement. Labor Code 2699(l)(2) states...
2021.08.13 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 378
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.08.13
Excerpt: ...ake any supplemental filings at least 5 court days before the hearing. LWDA/PAGA RELEASE The settlement agreement does not expressly release the claims of the LWDA that were asserted in the case. The briefing suggests that the parties intend to release the claims of the LWDA for penalties. The parties might want to amend the agreement in this regard. The settlement agreement states that the "released claims" includes a release of claims for penal...
2021.08.13 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 874
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.08.13
Excerpt: ...st of up to $612,000 (35%), costs of up to $30,000, a service award of $7,500 for each of the three class representatives, a net PAGA payment of $18,750, and settlement administration costs of up to $17,000. After these expenses of approximately $699,250, the class would get $1.050,750. The average payout per class member would be $1,263. The proposed class notice form and procedure are adequate. The proposed class is appropriate for class certif...
2021.08.13 Motion to Compel Arbitration 698
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.08.13
Excerpt: ...8. On 7/8/21. the United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted defendant's motion to compel arbitration. (Slade v. Empire Today, LLC (S.D. Cal., 2021) 2021 WL 2864813.) On 11/20/20, Plaintiff filed this putative class action against Defendant alleging violations of the disclosure provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act related to background checks in connection with employment. Defendant removed that case to th...
2021.07.09 Motion to Compel Arbitration 508
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.07.09
Excerpt: .... "The general rule of motion practice ... is that new evidence is not permitted with reply papers. (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537-1538.) "A trial court has discretion to consider new evidence in reply papers supporting a summary judgment motion as long as the opposing party has notice and an opportunity to respond. ... Evidence which is used to fill gaps in the original evidence created by the opposition is particularly appro...
2021.07.09 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 772
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.07.09
Excerpt: ...el for Plaintiff has provided a declaration in support of the motion that provides the information required by CCP 382.4 regarding the absence or presence of a relationship between counsel and the residual beneficiary. Counsel for Plaintiff had a prior employment relationship with Centro de la Raza and currently has a co- counsel relationship with Centro de la Raza. The payment of residual funds to Centro de la Raza creates an appearance of impro...
2021.07.09 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 330
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.07.09
Excerpt: ...nt administration costs of up to $15,000, and a net PAGA payment of $37,500. After these expenses of approximately $435,833, the class would get $564,167. The average payout per class member would be $1,007. The proposed class notice form and procedure are adequate. The proposed class is appropriate for class certification. The motion makes an adequate analysis as required by Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116. The scop...
2021.07.09 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 870
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.07.09
Excerpt: ...nsel must file the required declaration." Counsel must file a declaration with the required information or direct the court to a previously filed declaration with the required information. Assuming that counsel provides the CCP 382.4 information, then the order would be: The motion of plaintiffs for final approval of class action settlement is GRANTED. The motion of plaintiffs for approval of fees and costs and award is GRANTED. APPROVAL OF THE S...
2021.07.09 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 646
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.07.09
Excerpt: ...costs of up to $25,000, a service award of $5,000 for the class representative, a net PAGA payment of $18,750, and settlement administration costs of up to $6,000. After these expenses of approximately $154,750, the class would get $145,250. The average payout per class members would be $410. The proposed class notice form and procedure are adequate. There were no opt outs and no objections. (Kruckenberg Supp Dec.) The proposed class is appropria...
2021.07.06 Motion to Stay Case 866
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.07.06
Excerpt: ... In this case plaintiff Center for Environmental Health assets that defendants sell products that contain acrylamide or will foreseeably contain acrylamide when used, that the acrylamide is in sufficient quantities to be hazardous to health, that the products do not have adequate warnings, and that the defendants are in violation of Proposition 65 (H&S 25249.6 et seq). In California Chamber of Commerce v. Becerra, E.D. Cal. ("CalChamber") the Cal...
2021.07.02 Motion to Dismiss Class Claims 482
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.07.02
Excerpt: ...6-1087.) Class actions cannot be dismissed without Court approval to ensure that the named plaintiff and his or her counsel have not used the threat of a class action as leverage to obtain an unreasonable settlement for the individual named plaintiff. This serves two purposes. First, this ensures that the named plaintiff and his or her counsel do not enrich themselves in violation of their fiduciary duties to the absent class members. (Pirjada v....
2021.07.02 Motion for Protective Order 600
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.07.02
Excerpt: ...5. Stated otherwise, "the fruits of pretrial discovery are, in the absence of a court order to the contrary, presumptively public." San Jose Mercury News, Inc. v. United States Dist. Court - N. Dist. (9th Cir. 1999) 187 F.3d 1096, 1103. In determining whether Defendants have demonstrated good cause, the Court considers whether the litigants and third parties have legitimate privacy interests, whether the interests are substantial, and whether tho...
2021.07.02 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 616
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.07.02
Excerpt: ...6,655 (33%), costs of up to $22,000, a service award of $10,000 for each of the three class representatives, and settlement administration costs of up to $11,200. After these expenses of approximately $182,000, the class would get $170,000. The average payout per class member would be $240.00. The proposed class notice form and procedure are adequate. The proposed class is appropriate for class certification. The motion makes an adequate analysis...
2021.06.25 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 316
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.25
Excerpt: ...der Joe's Co. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 989, 996.) Plaintiff Portobello Residential Owners Association (the HOA) interviewed CIDology about whether it could do certain work regarding construction management. CIDology represented it could do the work, but knew that it could not do the work. (1AC, paras 69, 76, 85.) On 1/16/17, the HOA and CIDology entered into a contract. (1ACt, para 18, Exh 1.) Following the work, there were water intrusion issues. (...
2021.06.25 Motion for Leave to File SAC 082
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.25
Excerpt: ...Complaint that asserted subclasses that could plausibly be certified. The order of 4/9/21 stated: "At the hearing on 4/7/21, plaintiff noted that the creation of subclasses will arguably require that there be a representative for each subclass and on that basis requested leave to add new plaintiffs to the case to act as representatives of any subclasses. The court does not in this order permit plaintiff to add new plaintiffs. Plaintiff may file a...
2021.06.25 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 580
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.25
Excerpt: ...irst, the settlement anticipates funding the settlement in two stages (para 3.04) and then making distributions to the class members in two stages. (para 3.01). The funding would be $100,000 six months after preliminary approval (estd 12/25/21) and the balance of $150,000 two months after final approval (estd 2/3/22). The court has no concerns with the two-tier funding, but is not rationally related to the two-tier distribution. Regarding the dis...
2021.06.25 Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement 126
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.25
Excerpt: ...para 44.) The parties may also address any other issues raised by this order. Plaintiffs and defendants must file any supplemental papers five court days before the continued hearing date, and send email courtesy copies to Dept 21. The court's PRE-TENTATIVE order is as follows: The Motion of Plaintiff for approval of PAGA settlement under Labor Code 2699(l)(2) is [UNDECIDED]. The Motion of Plaintiff for dismissal of class claims under CRC 3.770 i...
2021.06.23 Motion to Sever Complaint 600
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.23
Excerpt: ...ion of Jay Siegan Presents, LLC, to strike the cross-complaint (R-2261530) is DROPPED. BACKGROUND Defendants International Musicians League ("IML") and International Artists League ("IAL") are businesses the provided bands for events doing business as "Lucky Devils Band." Defendant IML and IAL advertise themselves as providing services to musicians. (2AC, para 27(a) and (b).) IML and IAL arrange events for musicians to showcase their talent. (2AC...
2021.06.23 Motion to Compel Deposition 600
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.23
Excerpt: ...on. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS The issue on this motion is whether Bergy must answer certain questions. IML asserts that some of the information sought was IML's trade secrets or confidential business information. This is not a basis for refusing to answer. The parties entered into a protective order and the protective order has an "attorneys eyes only" provision that can apply to was IML's trade secrets or confidential business information. IML assert...
2021.06.18 Motion to Compel Further Responses 082
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.18
Excerpt: ... budget related delays in filing, scanning, and serving its orders. The Judicial Council form interrogatories are designed for use in factually focused single plaintiff litigation. The form interrogatories re not designed for class actions or other cases where phrases like "Incident" cannot be defined with reference to a discrete time and place. Accordingly, the court considers the adequacy of the responses as they relate to plaintiff's individua...
2021.06.18 Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses 702
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.18
Excerpt: ...d v. Brachfeld case but that Midland (having asserted the privilege) could not use those documents. (Orders of 10/6/20 and 1/14/21) Plaintiff now seeks three documents; (1) the Audit report (2) the Wohlfert Depo Exh 12; and (3) the Mikhail Depo Exh 3. Plaintiff asserts that they are not privileged or protected and if so, then the privilege or protection was waived because a "significant part of the communication" was disclosed. (Evid Code 912(a)....
2021.06.18 Demurrer 848
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.18
Excerpt: ...s cases and PAGA cases. (Lacour v. Marshalls of CA, LLC (2021) 2021 WL 2211953.) Below is a summary. The court uses the Supreme Court's preferred terms of claim preclusion and issue preclusion. (DKN Holdings LLC v. Faerber (2015) 61 Cal.4th 813, 824.) "[T]he preclusive effect of a prior judgment is determined by the court in which it is asserted, not the court that rendered it." (In re Fireside Bank Cases (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 1120, 1131.) Where...
2021.06.11 Motion to Dismiss Class Claims 482
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.11
Excerpt: ...6-1087.) Class actions cannot be dismissed without Court approval to ensure that the named plaintiff and his or her counsel have not used the threat of a class action as leverage to obtain an unreasonable settlement for the individual named plaintiff. This serves two purposes. First, this ensures that the named plaintiff and his or her counsel do not enrich themselves in violation of their fiduciary duties to the absent class members. (Pirjada v....
2021.06.11 Motion to Compel Arbitration 100
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.11
Excerpt: ...hes of contract and statutory violations related to its actions as a PBM. The motion to compel arbitration presents several issues about several agreements. The court addresses them separately. DOES ARBITRATOR DECIDE ARBITRABILITY As a general principle, "the enforceability of an arbitration agreement is ordinarily to be determined by the court. The parties may agree in the arbitration provision, however, that the enforceability issue will be del...
2021.06.08 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 386
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.08
Excerpt: ...98) [Unpublished].) The COVID-19 pandemic started in March 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed and highlighted certain deficiencies in the California educational system In June 2020, the State of California enacted SB 98, which authorized distance learning and authorized $5.3 billion to assist school districts with that and other COVID related challenges. As of June 2021 (the date of the hearing), the COVID-19 pandemic is not over. As of June...
2021.06.08 Motion for Leave to Intervene 386
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.08
Excerpt: ...s attending California public schools. (Butt v. State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668 (Butt).) Compton seeks to intervene, asserting that the case involves issues that cannot be resolved without their participation and that resolving the case with their involvement would impair their interests Compton's proposed compliant in intervention includes claims that are not currently in the case MANDATORY INTERVENTION Mandatory intervention is governe...
2021.06.04 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 772
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.04
Excerpt: ...ake any supplemental filings at least 5 court days before the hearing. LWDA/PAGA RELEASE The settlement agreement does not expressly release the claims of the LWDA that were asserted in the case. The briefing suggests that the parties intend to release the claims of the LWDA for penalties. In any such release, the named plaintiff acting as agent or proxy of the LWDA releases the claims of the LWDA. The named plaintiff does not represent the "aggr...
2021.06.04 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 262
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.04
Excerpt: ...attorneys' fees of up to $172,500 (30%), costs of up to $15,000, a service award of $7,500 for the class representative, a net PAGA payment of $18,750, and settlement administration costs of up to $15,000. After these expenses, the class would get $327,000. The average payout per class members would be $3,800. The proposed class notice form and procedure are adequate. The proposed class is appropriate for class certification. The motion makes an ...
2021.06.04 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements 606
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.04
Excerpt: ...re will be attorneys' fees and cost of up to $50,000 (40%), costs of up to $TBD, a service award of $4,000 for each class representative, and settlement administration costs of up to $8,000. After these expenses of approximately $80,000, the class would get $45,000. The average payout per class members would be $1,250. The proposed class notice form and procedure are adequate. The proposed class is appropriate for class certification. The motion ...
2021.06.04 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements 405
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.04
Excerpt: ...re will be attorneys' fees and cost of up to $50,000 (40%), costs of up to $TBD, a service award of $4,000 for each class representative, and settlement administration costs of up to $8,000. After these expenses of approximately $80,000, the class would get $45,000. The average payout per class members would be $1,250. The proposed class notice form and procedure are adequate. The proposed class is appropriate for class certification. The motion ...
2021.06.04 Motion to Strike 138
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.04
Excerpt: ...ack to 7/5/19. The LWDA's claims for penalties against Lucid extend back to 8/31/19. FACTS On 9/26/19, plaintiff started employment. (1AC, para 6.) On 10/28/20, Plaintiff stopped employment. (1AC, para 6.) On 12/22/20, Plaintiff sent a PAGA letter to the LWDA regarding defendant Atieva. On 12/30/20, plaintiff filed this case against defendant Atieva. On 1/22/21, Plaintiff sent a PAGA letter to the LWDA regarding defendant Lucid. On 2/24/21, plain...
2021.06.02 Motion for Approval of Settlement 932
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.02
Excerpt: ...The motion of Plaintiff Center for Environmental Health for approval of settlement with General Mills, Inc, in Center for Environmental Health v. Barrell O' Fun Snack Foods, RG17-881932, regarding Animal Cookies is DENIED. STANDARD "[T]he court must determine the proposed settlement is just. ... [A] trial court should not approve an agreement contrary to law or to public policy. ... the court cannot surrender its duty to see that the judgment to ...
2021.06.02 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 275
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.06.02
Excerpt: ...olated a variety of Labor Code provisions. The demurer and motion to strike concern legal issues regarding whether claims exist as a matter of law rather than challenges ot the adequacy of the factual allegations. DEMURRER The Demurrer of Golden Gate Bell to 7th cause of action in the First Amended Complaint filed 2/4/21 is SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The 7th cause of action alleges failure to pay timely wages as required under Labor Code 204....
2021.05.28 Motion for Approval of Settlement 180
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.05.28
Excerpt: ...The motion of Plaintiff Center for Environmental Health for approval of settlement with General Mills, Inc, in Center for Environmental Health v. Barrell O' Fun Snack Foods, RG17-881932, regarding Animal Cookies is DENIED. STANDARD "[T]he court must determine the proposed settlement is just. ... [A] trial court should not approve an agreement contrary to law or to public policy. ... the court cannot surrender its duty to see that the judgment to ...
2021.05.28 Demurrer 275
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.05.28
Excerpt: ...olated a variety of Labor Code provisions. The demurer and motion to strike concern legal issues regarding whether claims exist as a matter of law rather than challenges ot the adequacy of the factual allegations. DEMURRER The Demurrer of Golden Gate Bell to 7th cause of action in the First Amended Complaint filed 2/4/21 is SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The 7th cause of action alleges failure to pay timely wages as required under Labor Code 204....
2021.05.25 Motion to Enforce Settlement 373
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.05.25
Excerpt: ...n a workday. Second, that AMC would continue to define work periods based on the start and stop times of the time worked. This affects the entitlement to and calculation of Labor Code 226.7 payments for missed meal periods and rest breaks because they are based when breaks are provided during a work period. Plaintiff brings this motion to address the apparent inconsistency of calculating time for one purpose based on a midnight to midnight workda...
2021.05.25 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 554
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.05.25
Excerpt: ...16,666.67 (33 1/3%), costs of up to $15,000, a service award of $5,000 for each class representative, and settlement administration costs of up to $7,500, and a net PAGA payment of 1,250. After these expenses of approximately $145,400, the class would get $204,600. The average payout per class members would be $2,045. The proposed class notice form and procedure are adequate. There were no opt outs and no objections. The proposed class is appropr...
2021.05.21 Motion to Sever for Trial 524
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.05.21
Excerpt: ...claims against Anheuser-Busch and that the claims should be severed for discovery and trial. This motion is a merits motion presented as a procedural motion. The merits issue is whether the claims against Horizon Beverage are distinct from the claims against Anheuser-Busch. If Defendant Horizon Beverage Company asserts that it was not the employer of plaintiff after 11/1/15, then it can file a motion for summary adjudication of the claims against...
2021.05.18 Motion to Compel Further Responses 600
Location: Alameda
Judge: Smith, Winifred
Hearing Date: 2021.05.18
Excerpt: ... talent. (2AC, para 27(d).) Clients can request specific musicians. (2AC, para 27(n).) When IML or IAL has a client it then invites musicians, who can sign up for the event and play at the event. (2AC, para 27(g).) The musician is paid a share of the proceeds of the performance. (2AC, para 27(g).) The client pays IML or IAL, and IML or IAL then pays the musicians. (2AC, para 27(j).) IML and IAL issue Form 1099s to musicians and do not issue W-2s....

253 Results

Per page

Pages