Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

202 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Sonoma x
Judge: Pardo, Oscar x
2024.01.10 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 837
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...r for the motion by Defendants for summary judgment or in the alternative adjudication pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 437(c) as to the Complaint. Evidentiary and Procedural Issues A. Procedural History The Court notes that Defendants have already filed a motion for summary judgment or adjudication in this case on July 20, 2019 (hereinafter "MSJ-I"). The Court issued a ruling on MSJ-I on October 24, 2019, granting the motion as to all ...
2023.12.13 Motion to Compel Further Answers 709
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.13
Excerpt: ...ional interference with economic relations; 8) intentional infliction of emotional distress; 9) declaratory relief; 10) quiet title; and 11) injunctive relief. This matter is on calendar for Plaintiffs' motion to compel further answers to requests for production of documents ("RPODs") against Flint under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. Governing Law A. Inspection Requests and Producing Documents Regarding the RPODs, a demand for produ...
2023.12.13 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 823
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.13
Excerpt: ... and stay proceedings is CONTINUED to December 15, 2023, at 11:00 am in Dept. 19 for an evidentiary hearing regarding the execution of the disputed arbitration agreement. The Basis for the Motion Defendant moves to compel arbitration based on an arbitration agreement allegedly electronically signed by Plaintiff on October 6, 2020. See Declaration of Renae Souza, Exhibit D (the "Arbitration Agreement"). Plaintiff opposes the motion, alleging in he...
2023.12.13 Motion for Summary Judgment 065
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.13
Excerpt: ... 1-50 alleging causes of achon for: 1) Motor Vehicle Negligence; and 2) General Negligence. This matter is on calendar for the motion by Defendants for summary judgment pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 437c. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Burdens on Summary Judgment A. Generally Summary judgment "shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any ma...
2023.12.13 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award 017
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.13
Excerpt: ...oner is awarded $7,691.50 for bringing this matterfrom arbitration to Judgment. 1. Plaintiff is Entitled to Attorneys' Fees. The Court notes that Petitioner has provided no authorities in their memorandum making clear to the Court on what basis the Court may award them post-petition fees. The Court presumes, given that this arises out of an arbitration petition, which itself depends on the underlying contract signed by the parties, that Petitoner...
2023.12.06 Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum, Compel Further Responses 500
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.06
Excerpt: ...nt"). This matter is on calendar for Plaintiff's four motions: (1) moton to quash subpoena duces tecum, (2) motion compelling further responses to form interrogatories ("Fls"), general, from Defendants under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") SS 2030.300, and (3) moton compelling further responses to form interrogatories, employment ("EROGs") set one and (4) motion compelling further responses to form interrogatories, EROGS, set two, from Defendants...
2023.12.06 Motion to Compel Arbitration 273
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.06
Excerpt: ... Proc. ("CCP") S 1280 et seq. (the "CAA"). The Motion is GRANTED. The Basis for the Motion Plaintiff offered construction services to Defendants Gaebler and Steinberg under a construction contract. See FAC, Exhibit A (the "Contract"). The Contract contains an arbitration provision covering "any claim arising out of or relating to this contract". See Contract, pg. 9. The Contract was signed by all parties. Governing Law A party seeking to compel a...
2023.11.29 Motion to Set Aside Default 721
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ...th argue extensively about the applicability of the discretionary undertaking provision in CCP S 917.9. Both parties largely cite cases which predate the 1958 amendment that created the current version of 917.9, and associated statutes. The concern raised is that the interlocutory judgment compels the sale of the property, and therefore is an order under CCP S 917.4, under which no stay is issued unless the Court sets an undertaking. No party rai...
2023.11.29 Motion to Compel Answers 535
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ...oduction of documents ("RPODs") from Defendant under CCP SS 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall serve verified responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notce of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $50 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notce of entry of the order on this Motion. Governing Law A judgment creditor generally has the same rights to propound discove...
2023.11.29 Motion to Compel Answers 069
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ...rom Defendant under CCP SS 708.030 & 2031.3(1). The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall serve verified code-compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Moton. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Governing Law A judgment creditor generally has the same rights to propound discovery to the judgme...
2023.11.29 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 955
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ... Air Commercial Real Estate Association Standard Industrial/commercial Single-Tenant Lease agreement (the "Lease"). This matter is on calendar for the motion by Schaefer and Scoble ("Amending Parties") pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 473 for leave to amend the Cross-complaint ("SCC"). The motion is opposed by Pearson and PPI ("Opposing Parties"). The Motion is DENIED. Facts and Procedure The original complaint in this action was filed ...
2023.11.15 Motion for Preliminary Approval of PAGA Action Settlement 787
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...Motion is provisionally GRANTED. The Complaint The Complaint alleges that Defendants failed to comply with designated California Labor Cade ("LC") provisions during the course of his employment with Defendants, and alleges on information and belief that these defective policies were also in place for other employees. The Complaint contains a single cause of achon under PAGA for civil #naltes resulting from the following labor law violations: i) m...
2023.11.15 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 506
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...on. PROCEDURAL HISTORY This achon arises from a property ownership dispute. Clark alleges that she lived with her sister, Seiffert, at 208 Indian Creek Drive, Santa Rosa, California 95409 (the "Property") for a period of roughly nine years, during which time Clark has recently discovered that Seiffert allegedly stole substantial sums of money from Clark while caring for her. (Motion for Leave Memorandum of Points and Authorities ["Motion MPA"I, 2...
2023.11.15 Motion to Strike 623
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...Proc. ("CCP") S 435. The motion is DENIED. Legal Standards A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains "irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s]" or is "not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." CCP S 435(b). However, "falsity," must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. See CCP S 437. "Where a written instrumen...
2023.11.15 Motion to Enter Judgment for Full Settlement Amount 678
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...udgment in the amount of $48,013.78. The motion is DENIED. CCP S 664.6(a) provides: "If parties to #nding litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce th...
2023.11.15 Motion to Strike Request for General Damages 679
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...iv. Proc. ("CCP") S 435. The motion is DENIED. Legal Standards A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains "irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s]" or is "not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." CCP S 436(b). However, "falsity," must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. See CCP S 437. A moton to strike is a...
2023.11.08 Motions to Compel Answers 491
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.08
Excerpt: ...and to deem requests for admissions ("RFAs") admitted under CCP S 2033.280. Defendant has filed a declaration of non-oppositon to all motions. The unopposed Motons to compel are GRANTED. The parties are ORDERED TO APPEAR on the issue of time for compliance. Plaintiff's motion to deem admissions admitted is also APPEARANCES REQUIRED. Defendant shall pay $560 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this ...
2023.11.08 Motion for Conditional Certification of Class and Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 587
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.08
Excerpt: ... GRANTED. The Complaint The presently 0#rative First Amended Complaint ("Complaint") alleges that Defendants failed to comply with California Labor Code ("LC") provisions during the course of his employment with Defendants, and alleges on information and that these policies were also enforced on other employees. The Complaint contains causes of achon for: (i) failure to pay minimum wages; (ii) failure to pay overtime wages; (iii) failure to provi...
2023.11.08 Demurrer 984
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.08
Excerpt: ...ward as a class, defined as: "All parents, family members, guardians or students in the United States who paid tuition to Defendant Sonoma Academy during the year(s) to 2020 for students who graduated before July 2020." SAC 115. This matter is on calendar for Defendant's demurrer to all causes of action within the Complaint pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of acton. D...
2023.11.01 Motion to Compel Subsequent Deposition 837
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.01
Excerpt: ...) S 2025.610 to compel subsequent deposition. The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Goveming Law Natural persons, including parties to the action, may not be deposed more than once without a court order based on a show-ng of cause. CCP S 2025.610(a), (b); see Fairmont Ins. Co. v. Sup.Ct. (Stende") 22 cal.4th 245, 254. A witness, including a witness specified in subdivision (b) of Section 1987, is not obliged to attend as a witness bef...
2023.11.01 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 322
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.01
Excerpt: ...arising initially out alleged violations of the Court's orders in another case, SCV-265225. This matter is on calendar for demurrers to all causes of action within the SAC by TRVFD, the County and Thompson pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, that there is another action proceeding between the same parties, and for misjoinder of parties. The Demurrer is SUSTAIN...
2023.10.25 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 078
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.25
Excerpt: ...ions to Strike A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains "irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s]" or is "not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." CCP S 435(b). However, "falsity," must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. See CCP S 437. A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims fo...
2023.10.25 Motion for Leave to Set Aside Default, Judgment 834
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.25
Excerpt: ...tant complaint against Defendant on May 8, 2023. Moving Defendant was personally served on May 25, 2023. Plaintiff requested entry of default on August 30, 2023, which was granted against Defendant. Defendant filed the instant motion to set aside the default on September 19, 2023. Plaintiff has filed no opposition to the motion. Governing Law "The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a ...
2023.10.25 Demurrer 199
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.25
Excerpt: ...osa, California, with causes of action for: 1) wrongful foreclosure; 2) cancellation of instrument; 3) quiet title; 4) violation of Civ. Code S 2924f; 5) violation of Civ. Code S 2923.5; and 6) violation of Business and Professions Code S 17200 et. seq. This matter is on calendar for PLM's demurrer to all causes of acton within the Complaint pursuant to CCP S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plainti...
2023.10.18 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 944
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.18
Excerpt: ...oth Fire and Hunsaker. Evidentiary and Procedural Issues A. Citations The Court previously raised the issue that Plaintiff c:ited Bagdadi v. Go Daddy Software, Inc. (2CM) 154 Cal.App.4th 1176 and Anderson v. Continental Insurance, Co. (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1659, in the motions. When the Court sought to get clarification as to these decisions, and whether they somehow countermand the decisions in R & B Auto Center, Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc. (2W6)...

202 Results

Per page

Pages