Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

200 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Sonoma x
Judge: Pardo, Oscar x
2024.04.24 Petition to Compel Arbitration 690
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...ar for the petition by Uber to compel arbitration pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) § 1281.2. Uber's petition to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is GRAN TED . I. Fact s and Proce dure Plaintiff allegedly was injured through the negligence of Individual Defendant, and that he was acting as the agent of Uber, on October 25, 2021. On December 16, 2021, Uber updated its terms of service. See Declaration of Chenshan Yu in Support, ...
2024.04.24 Motion for Leave to File Complaint-in-Intervention 512
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...intervention (the “M o t io n ”). Th e M o t io n is GRAN TED . I. Governing Law Labor Code Division 4, governing “Workers' Compensation and Insurance,” Part 1, Chapter 5, “Subrogation of Employer,” governs the subrogation and intervention rights of employees, employers, and employers' insured on claims involving payment of workers' co mpensation or other similar benefits. Lab. Code section 3 8 5 2 g ive s e m p lo ye e s a n d e m p ...
2024.04.24 OSC Re Preliminary Injunction 822
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...ndar for Plaintiff's Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction arising out of a Temporary Restraining Order request filed on April 8, 2024. The motion is continued to May 15, 2024. I. Underlying facts Plaintiff filed the application for Temporary Restraining Order and request to set the Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction on April 8, 2024. The Court's orde r grant ing t he Te mporary Re straining Orde r and se tt ing of t he Pre l...
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Answers 462
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ...nts under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708 .030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRAN TED . Defendants shall serve verified code- compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of ent...
2024.04.24 Motion to Compel Answers 942
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.24
Excerpt: ... t e r r o g a t o r ie s (“SIs ”) a g a in s t Defendants under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRAN TED . D e f e n d a n t s s h a ll serve verified code-compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $...
2024.04.17 Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay 780
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...necessary precautions to prevent her from falling, as a result of which she fell and suffered injuries. Plaintiff's complaint, filed on November 29, 2023, alleges causes of action for (1) negligence and (2) violations of the Elder and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act (Welf & Instit. Code §15600 et. seq.) Plaintiff, a 93-year elder who was a resident at Defendants' Muirwoods Memory Care assisted -living facility in Santa Rosa, California (the...
2024.04.17 Motion for Leave to Amend FAC 679
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: .... (“CCP”) § 473 for leave to amend the FAC. The motion is DENIED. I. Legal Standards The California Code of Civil Procedure provides that a court “may in the furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper” allow a party to amend any pleading to correct a mistake. CCP § 473(a)(1). Likewise, the court may “in its discretion, after notice to the adverse party, allow, upon any terms as may be just, an amendment to any pleading ...
2024.04.17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 161
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...nting judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the Complaint fails to state sufficient facts to constitute causes of action in this matter. The motion is DENIED. I. Governing Law A. Judgment on the Pleadings A motion for judgment on the pleadings may only be made on the grounds specified in the statute. CCP section 438(c)(1). If the moving party is a defendant, the motion may be made on the grounds that the complaint does not state facts suff...
2024.04.17 Motion for Certification of Class and Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, for Attorney Fees 587
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...ll as the motion for attorney's fees and class representative enhancements. The Court issued a tentative ruling on the motion on April 4, 2024, and ordered the parties to appear for oral argument the next day. At the hearing, the Court allowed arguments by Plaintiff's counsel which focused on the Court's modification to the attorn ey's fees allocation in the settlement. Plaintiff argued the original attorney's fee request was justified but re...
2024.04.10 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 326
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...� 4 1 8 .1 0 (a)(1 ) o n t he gro und s t hat t he Co urt lacked personal jurisdiction over Defendant because the summons and complaint we re ne ve r prope rly se rve d . I . Governing La w The Co de o f Civil Pro ce d ure st at e s t hat “[a] de fe ndant , o n o r b e fo re t he last day o f his o r he r t ime t o p le ad o r wit hin any furt he r t ime t hat t he co urt may fo r go o d cause allo w , may se rve and file a no t ice o f mo t io...
2024.04.10 Motion to Compel Deposition, Responses, for Monetary Sanctions 719
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...��), special interrogatories (“SIs”), and requests for produc tion of documents (“RPODs”), and for monetary sanctions. Th e M o t io n is GRAN TED . I. Relevant Law A. Motions to Compel Responses Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is “as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits” and “[i]f an interrogatory cannot be answere...
2024.04.10 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 578
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ....50(c) provides: “The court, after notice to the adverse party, shall grant, upon such terms as may be just to the parties, leave to amend the pleading, or t o file the cross -complaint, to assert such cause if the party who failed to plead the caus e acted in good faith. This subdivision shall be liberally construed to avoid forfe it ure of cause s of act ion.” If t he propose d cross -c o m p la in t is p e r m is s iv e , leave of court ma...
2024.04.05 Demurrer 916
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...s sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The Demurrer is SUSTAIN ED w it h leave to amend. I. Legal Standards A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. CCP § 430.30(a). In the event a demurrer is sustained, leave to amend should be granted where the complaint's defect can be cured by amendment. Th e Swahn Group, I...
2024.04.05 Motion for Certification of Class and Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, for Attorney Fees 587
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...�E+>GXji N--b + JÄf] S' + NSÄéMj f x JäT JäT S' J NJii lßÄXMiA ä Aixrwotj ß ß JÄäz f ä f XP6äT ß J zXiäTöGöTJä JzX* N•eiTÄz JÄf] Jii%txr GZJBfgä Oi IlJi±Oi 2JMi SgTXJäT#SiÄXi JäT , iqZGiAäi SGTXY*' Jfgäi JigSäT j' gß iXöJäTäXf éX*TiPtäTä fä *CéJCß TSiÄz JäT JÄf] A NJii Nf'Nfqä JäT XNJÄi 13MXMixr TJä Jzx CS Jä A XSJä &XÉJiJfgä TAB JO äNGiJi0&i Jäj a A cze xnÅäXi JäT Jö 7' JÄf]j J' TArV...
2024.04.05 Motion to Compel Further Production of Docs, for Sanctions 739
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...ake the deposition of an entity by examining an officer or agent designated by the entity to testify on its behalf. In such a case, the notice of deposition must “describe with reasonable particularity the matters on which e xa m in a t io n is r e q u e sted” and the entity must “designate and produce at the deposition those of its officers, directors, managing agents, employees, or agents who are most qualified to testify on its behalf as...
2024.04.05 Motion to Compel Responses 225
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...ode of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRAN TED . Defendants shall serve verified code -c o m p lia n t responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of ...
2024.04.05 Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens 703
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.04.05
Excerpt: ...f action for alleged violations of the Song -Be ve rly Consume r Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et se q. (the “Act”). This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants' motion on the basis of forum non conveniens. The motion is G RAN TED . I. Governing Authorities A. Forum Non -Conveniens Eve n if a court has subje ct matt e r and pe rsonal jurisdict ion, it may st ay or dismiss an action on the grounds that the court is an inconvenient forum...
2024.03.27 Motion to Dismiss on Grounds of Forum Non Conveniens 638
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...A”) and violations of the Song -Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et seq. (the “Act”). This matter is on cale ndar for Defendants' motion on the basis of forum non conveniens. The motion is DENIED. I. Go ve r n in g Au t h o r it ie s A. Forum Non -Conveniens Eve n if a court has subje ct matt e r and pe rsonal jurisdict ion, it may st ay or dismiss an action on the grounds that the court is an inconvenient forum. CCP § 418....
2024.03.27 Motion to Compel Further Responses 479
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.27
Excerpt: ...�SIs”) and requests for admission (“RFAs”) pursuant to CCP §2033.290(d) (relating to requests for admission) and CCP § 2030.300(d) (relating to interrogatories) and for monetary sanctions. The motion is GRANTED. I. Legal Authority Regarding the FIs and SIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is “as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits” and...
2024.03.13 Motion to Compel Answers to Post-Judgment Discovery 226
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...pecial interrogatories (“SIs”) against Defendants under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) §§ 708.020 & 2030.290, and to compel production of documents (“RPODs”) from Defendants under CCP §§ 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed M o t io n is GRAN TED . Defendants shall serve verified code -compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions ...
2024.03.13 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 245
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...Once an order regarding discovery has been made, it is irrelevant on future hearings enforcing the order whether that order was erroneous, as the appropriate relief would be to appeal the erroneous order, not to ignore the e ffort s t o e nforce it . In re Ma rria ge of Nikla s (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 28, 35- 36. A. Sa n c t io n s CCP § 2030.300(d), §2031.310(h); §2033.280(c) provides monetary sanction “shall” be imposed against the party l...
2024.03.13 Motion for Protective Order 648
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...t cont ains cause s of action for: 1) bre ach of e xpre ss warranty under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et seq. (the “Ac t ”) (a g a in s t M a n u f a c t u r e r ); 2 ) breach of implied warranty under the Act (against Manufacturer); and 3) Negligent Repair (against Dealer). This matter is on calendar for the motion by Manufacturer for a protective order under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) 2031.060. I. Governi...
2024.03.13 Demurrer 357
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.13
Excerpt: ...0(f) for uncertainty and pursuant to CCP § 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a caus e of action. The Demurrer is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. I. Legal Standards A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. CCP § 430.30(a). In the event a demurrer is sustained, leave to amend should be grante...
2024.03.06 Motion to Strike, Demurrer 320
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...ainst Plaintiff, Todd M. Roloff (“Roloff”), Scott A. Norgren (“Norgren”), and Suretec Insurance Company (“Suretec”, tog e t h e r w it h P la in t if f , Ro lo f f , a n d N o r g r e n , “Vanquish”). This matter is on calendar for Vanquish's motion to strike punitive damages and their demurrer to the second cause of action for fraud within the Cross -Co m p la in t pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) §§ 430.10(e) for f...
2024.03.06 Motion to Require Security be Furnished as Vexatious Litigant 627
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.03.06
Excerpt: ...f e n d a n t s ”) and Does 1 -100. This matter is on calendar for the motion by Ledwith, Ishmael, Ch ild , SRAS, a n d SSM C (“ Moving Defendants”) to require Plaintiff to furnish security as a vexatious litigant under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) § 391.1. The m o t io n is GRAN TED in p a r t . I. Underlying Procedural Facts On June 17, 2021, Plaintiff filed the original complaint in this action, along with a Request to File New L...
2024.02.28 Motion to Compel Further Production 648
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...ess warranty under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et seq. (the “Act”) (against Manufacturer); 2) breach of implied warranty under the Act (against Manufacturer); and 3) Negligent Repair(against Dealer). This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiffs to compel further production directed at the document requests set forth in Plaintiffs' first demand for inspection served to Manufacturer (the “RPODs”). Th...
2024.02.28 Motion to Enter Judgment 969
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...ment in the case in the amount of $10,471.00, as Defendant has defaulted on the agreement. There is no opposition t o the motion. The Motion is GRAN TED . CCP § 6 6 4 .6 (a ) p r o v id e s : “If p a r t ie s t o p e n d in g lit ig a t io n s t ip u la t e , in a w r it in g signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judg...
2024.02.28 Motion to Consolidate 940
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.28
Excerpt: ...o lid a t e t h is c a s e w it h Scot t sda le insura nce Compa ny v. Nort h Ba y Pressure Wa shing, Inc. , SCV-273302, also pending in Department 19 (the “Associated Action”) pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) §1048, for all purposes. The M o t io n is GRAN TED . The Associated Action is filed by plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company (“Consolidation Plaintiff”) against Defendant. Thereafter, in the Associated Action, ST Hosp...
2024.02.23 Special Motion to Strike, Demurrer 155
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.23
Excerpt: ...ny (“Amerihome”), BW Re a l Es t a t e (“BW ”), W e s t e r n Allia n c e Bank (“Western”, together with Amerihome and BW, “Additional Cross-Defendants”) and Roes 1 -10. Thereafter, Plaintiff dismissed the FAC. There are two matters on calendar covered in this ruling. First, is Plaintiff's special motion to strike (“Anti -SLAPP motion”) brought pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) § 425.16 to strike the First, Second,...
2024.02.16 Motion to Allow Discovery of Psychiatric Records 838
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ... Evide nt iary and Proce dural Issue s The Court notes that Defendant's reply is over length, presenting 12 pages of substantive argument, where the page limit for replies is 10 pages. Cal. Rule of Court Rule 3.1113(d). The Court, on its own motion, strikes pages 12 -1 3 fo r f a ilin g t o c o m p ly w it h the Rules of Court. II. Procedural Hist ory Plaintiff brought this action against Defendant on or about August 5, 2020, alleging she suffere...
2024.02.16 Demurrers, Motion to Strike 060
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.16
Excerpt: ...nd Does 1 -50 arising out of alleged misconduct in representing Plaintiffs in a real estate transaction (the “Complaint”). The Complaint contains causes of action for: 1) breach of contract; 2) negligence; 3) negligent misrepresentation; 4) fraud; 5) failure to disclose; 6) violations of Business and Professions Code § 17200 (“UCL Claim”); 7) rescission; and 8) b r e a c h o f f id u c ia r y d u t y . This matter is on calendar for Buye...
2024.02.07 Motion to Designate Matter as Complex 299
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ... Inc. (“Eno”) (all together “Defendants”), as well as Does 1- 40, arising out of alleged breach of contract and construction defects. Cross- complaints from Wahidi, Eno, and SR Iron have each followed. This matter is on calendar for a motion by the Plaintiff to designate the matter complex under Cal. Rule of Court (“CRC”) Rule 3.400. The Court has also continued the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) from February 1, 2024, to the ...
2024.02.07 Motion to Designate Case as Complex 287
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...ht surety companies and insurers, relating to breach of contract, construction defects, and negligence (the “DXC”). The Hollys have thereafter filed a cross-complaint for indemnity and breach of contract against the ten subcontractors named in the DXC, along with eleven more subcontractors not named therein (the “HXC”). This matter is on calendar for the motion by the Hollys to designate the case complex under Cal. Rules of Court (“CRC�...
2024.02.07 Motion to Compel Further Production 509
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...arranty Act, Civ. Code § 1790 et seq. (the “Act”); 2) breach of implied warranty under the Act; and 3) violation of §1793.2 under the Act. This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiffs to compel further production directed at the document requests set forth in Plaintiffs' first demand for inspection (the “RPODs”). The Motion is GRANTED. I. Governing Law Regarding RPODs, a party to whom a document demand is directed must respon...
2024.02.07 Motion for Terminating Sanctions and Monetary Sanctions 245
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.02.07
Excerpt: ...regarding discovery has been made, it is irrelevant on future hearings enforcing the order whether that order was erroneous, as the appropriate relief would be to appeal the erroneous order, not to ignore the efforts to enforce it. In re Marriage of Niklas (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 28, 35-36. CCP § 2025.450(g)(1) provides that a monetary sanction “shall” be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel deposition unless the court finds “...
2024.01.31 Demurrers, Motion to Strike 322
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ... TRVFD, “Defendants”), arising initially out alleged violations of the Court's orders in another case, SCV- 266225. This matter is on calendar for demurrers to all causes of action within the SAC by TRVFD, the County and Thompson pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. (“CCP”) § 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, that there is another action proceeding between the same parties, and for misjoinder of...
2024.01.24 Motion to Compel Further Responses 776
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...ar for the moton by Corporate Defendant seeking to compel further responses to requests for production of documents set one ("RPODs"), Nos. 4, 24, 27, 36, 48, and 58, and request for sanctions in the amount of $5,510.00, from Plaintiff under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. Governing Law Regarding the RPODs, a demand for production may request access to "documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored info...
2024.01.24 Motion to Strike Particular Claims 027
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...ez, "Defendants"), and Does 1-100. The Complaint alleges a variety of causes of action derived from work contracted to be performed by Defendants. Grape Land has filed a cross- complaint alleging further contract actions ("Cross-complaint"). This matter is on calendar for Plaintiffs' motion to strike particular claims from the Cross-complaint, or in the alternative, to require a bill of particulars under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP"), S 454. Pl...
2024.01.24 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 331
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...his matter is on calendar for Defendant's motion to strike pun-tive damages. The motion to strike is DENIED. Governing Law A. Motion to Strike Punitive Damages A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains "irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s]" or is "not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." CCP S 435(b). However, "falsity," must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading its...
2024.01.24 Motions to Compel Answers 767
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...tions to compel answers to special interrogatories ("Sl") against Defendant under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2030.300, and to compel compliance with Plaintiff's request for production of documents ("RPOD") under CCP S 2031.310. The motions are GRANTED. Governing Law A. Special interrogatories A party may propound up to 35 special interrogatories to another party. (CCP S 2030.030(a).) If the party propounds more than 35, it must attach to e...
2024.01.24 OSC Re Contempt 714
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.24
Excerpt: ...a (the "Property"). Defendant has filed the instant motion for issuance of an order to show cause ("OSC") re: contempt against the receiver, Mark Adams ("Receiver"). The motion is DENIED. Judicial Notice As a preliminary matter, the Court takes permissive judicial notice of the docket within this case, including the orders therein, and the filings of the Receiver in this case. Judicial notice of official acts and court records is statutorily appr...
2024.01.19 OSC Re Contempt 714
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...t has filed the instant motion for issuance of an order to show cause ("OSC") re: contempt against the receiver, Mark Adams ("Receiver"). The motion is DENIED. Judicial Notice As a preliminary matter, the Court takes permissive judicial notice of the docket within this case, including the orders therein, and the filings of the Receiver in this case. Judicial notice of official acts and court records is statutorily appropriate. See Cal. Evid. Code...
2024.01.19 OSC Re Contempt 470
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...mplaint, Plaintiff alleges that 275 and Walden are the lessors of the Property. 275 and Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement on February 8, 2020. Plaintiff filed the Complaint based on Defendants' alleged violations of the lease agreement, particularly as it pertained to issues of the parking lot and other common areas on the Property. Plaintiff thereafter moved the Court for a preliminary injunction, which was heard on July 26, 2023. The Cou...
2024.01.19 Motion to Compel Further Responses 065
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...cuments ("RPODs"), Set One, Nos. 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 18, 20, 22, 32, 34, 36, and 39, against Defendant under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. The motion is GRANTED. Governing Law Regarding the RPODs, a demand for production may request access to "documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control" of another party. A party to whom a document demand is...
2024.01.19 Motion to Compel Arbitration 759
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.19
Excerpt: ...or Code violations, and civil penalties thereon(the "Complaint"). This matter is on calendar for the petition (styled as a "motion") by the Defendant to compel arbitration pursuant to Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 USC SS 1-15. Defendant's petition to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is DENIED. Facts and Procedure This matter arises out of an employment relationship between the parties. Defendant avers that Plaintiff, as part of his on...
2024.01.10 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 314
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...cedure ("CCP") S 418.10(a)(1) on the grounds that the Court lacked personal jurisdiction over Laird because the summons and complaint were never properly served. Governing Law The Code of Civil Procedure states that "[a] defendant, on or before the last day of his or her time to plead or within any further time that the court may for good cause allow, may serve and file a notice of motion [tlo quash service of summons on the ground of lack of jur...
2024.01.10 Motion to Enter Judgment 384
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...ount. The motion is DENIED. CCP S 664.6(a) provides: "If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance...
2024.01.10 Motion to Compel Answers 366
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...d to compel production of documents ("RPODs") from Defendants under CCP SS 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall serve verified code-compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Governing Law A judgment creditor generally has the...
2024.01.10 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 837
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...r for the motion by Defendants for summary judgment or in the alternative adjudication pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 437(c) as to the Complaint. Evidentiary and Procedural Issues A. Procedural History The Court notes that Defendants have already filed a motion for summary judgment or adjudication in this case on July 20, 2019 (hereinafter "MSJ-I"). The Court issued a ruling on MSJ-I on October 24, 2019, granting the motion as to all ...
2023.12.13 Motion for Summary Judgment 065
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.13
Excerpt: ... 1-50 alleging causes of achon for: 1) Motor Vehicle Negligence; and 2) General Negligence. This matter is on calendar for the motion by Defendants for summary judgment pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 437c. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Burdens on Summary Judgment A. Generally Summary judgment "shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any ma...
2023.12.13 Motion to Compel Further Answers 709
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.13
Excerpt: ...ional interference with economic relations; 8) intentional infliction of emotional distress; 9) declaratory relief; 10) quiet title; and 11) injunctive relief. This matter is on calendar for Plaintiffs' motion to compel further answers to requests for production of documents ("RPODs") against Flint under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. Governing Law A. Inspection Requests and Producing Documents Regarding the RPODs, a demand for produ...
2023.12.13 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 823
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.13
Excerpt: ... and stay proceedings is CONTINUED to December 15, 2023, at 11:00 am in Dept. 19 for an evidentiary hearing regarding the execution of the disputed arbitration agreement. The Basis for the Motion Defendant moves to compel arbitration based on an arbitration agreement allegedly electronically signed by Plaintiff on October 6, 2020. See Declaration of Renae Souza, Exhibit D (the "Arbitration Agreement"). Plaintiff opposes the motion, alleging in he...
2023.12.13 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award 017
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.13
Excerpt: ...oner is awarded $7,691.50 for bringing this matterfrom arbitration to Judgment. 1. Plaintiff is Entitled to Attorneys' Fees. The Court notes that Petitioner has provided no authorities in their memorandum making clear to the Court on what basis the Court may award them post-petition fees. The Court presumes, given that this arises out of an arbitration petition, which itself depends on the underlying contract signed by the parties, that Petitoner...
2023.12.06 Motion to Compel Arbitration 273
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.06
Excerpt: ... Proc. ("CCP") S 1280 et seq. (the "CAA"). The Motion is GRANTED. The Basis for the Motion Plaintiff offered construction services to Defendants Gaebler and Steinberg under a construction contract. See FAC, Exhibit A (the "Contract"). The Contract contains an arbitration provision covering "any claim arising out of or relating to this contract". See Contract, pg. 9. The Contract was signed by all parties. Governing Law A party seeking to compel a...
2023.12.06 Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum, Compel Further Responses 500
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.12.06
Excerpt: ...nt"). This matter is on calendar for Plaintiff's four motions: (1) moton to quash subpoena duces tecum, (2) motion compelling further responses to form interrogatories ("Fls"), general, from Defendants under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") SS 2030.300, and (3) moton compelling further responses to form interrogatories, employment ("EROGs") set one and (4) motion compelling further responses to form interrogatories, EROGS, set two, from Defendants...
2023.11.29 Motion to Set Aside Default 721
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ...th argue extensively about the applicability of the discretionary undertaking provision in CCP S 917.9. Both parties largely cite cases which predate the 1958 amendment that created the current version of 917.9, and associated statutes. The concern raised is that the interlocutory judgment compels the sale of the property, and therefore is an order under CCP S 917.4, under which no stay is issued unless the Court sets an undertaking. No party rai...
2023.11.29 Motion to Compel Answers 535
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ...oduction of documents ("RPODs") from Defendant under CCP SS 708.030 & 2031.300. The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall serve verified responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notce of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $50 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notce of entry of the order on this Motion. Governing Law A judgment creditor generally has the same rights to propound discove...
2023.11.29 Motion to Compel Answers 069
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ...rom Defendant under CCP SS 708.030 & 2031.3(1). The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendants shall serve verified code-compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Moton. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Governing Law A judgment creditor generally has the same rights to propound discovery to the judgme...
2023.11.29 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 955
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.29
Excerpt: ... Air Commercial Real Estate Association Standard Industrial/commercial Single-Tenant Lease agreement (the "Lease"). This matter is on calendar for the motion by Schaefer and Scoble ("Amending Parties") pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 473 for leave to amend the Cross-complaint ("SCC"). The motion is opposed by Pearson and PPI ("Opposing Parties"). The Motion is DENIED. Facts and Procedure The original complaint in this action was filed ...
2023.11.15 Motion for Preliminary Approval of PAGA Action Settlement 787
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...Motion is provisionally GRANTED. The Complaint The Complaint alleges that Defendants failed to comply with designated California Labor Cade ("LC") provisions during the course of his employment with Defendants, and alleges on information and belief that these defective policies were also in place for other employees. The Complaint contains a single cause of achon under PAGA for civil #naltes resulting from the following labor law violations: i) m...
2023.11.15 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 506
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...on. PROCEDURAL HISTORY This achon arises from a property ownership dispute. Clark alleges that she lived with her sister, Seiffert, at 208 Indian Creek Drive, Santa Rosa, California 95409 (the "Property") for a period of roughly nine years, during which time Clark has recently discovered that Seiffert allegedly stole substantial sums of money from Clark while caring for her. (Motion for Leave Memorandum of Points and Authorities ["Motion MPA"I, 2...
2023.11.15 Motion to Enter Judgment for Full Settlement Amount 678
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...udgment in the amount of $48,013.78. The motion is DENIED. CCP S 664.6(a) provides: "If parties to #nding litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce th...
2023.11.15 Motion to Strike 623
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...Proc. ("CCP") S 435. The motion is DENIED. Legal Standards A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains "irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s]" or is "not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." CCP S 435(b). However, "falsity," must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. See CCP S 437. "Where a written instrumen...
2023.11.15 Motion to Strike Request for General Damages 679
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...iv. Proc. ("CCP") S 435. The motion is DENIED. Legal Standards A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains "irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s]" or is "not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." CCP S 436(b). However, "falsity," must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. See CCP S 437. A moton to strike is a...
2023.11.08 Motion for Conditional Certification of Class and Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 587
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.08
Excerpt: ... GRANTED. The Complaint The presently 0#rative First Amended Complaint ("Complaint") alleges that Defendants failed to comply with California Labor Code ("LC") provisions during the course of his employment with Defendants, and alleges on information and that these policies were also enforced on other employees. The Complaint contains causes of achon for: (i) failure to pay minimum wages; (ii) failure to pay overtime wages; (iii) failure to provi...
2023.11.08 Demurrer 984
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.08
Excerpt: ...ward as a class, defined as: "All parents, family members, guardians or students in the United States who paid tuition to Defendant Sonoma Academy during the year(s) to 2020 for students who graduated before July 2020." SAC 115. This matter is on calendar for Defendant's demurrer to all causes of action within the Complaint pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of acton. D...
2023.11.08 Motions to Compel Answers 491
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.08
Excerpt: ...and to deem requests for admissions ("RFAs") admitted under CCP S 2033.280. Defendant has filed a declaration of non-oppositon to all motions. The unopposed Motons to compel are GRANTED. The parties are ORDERED TO APPEAR on the issue of time for compliance. Plaintiff's motion to deem admissions admitted is also APPEARANCES REQUIRED. Defendant shall pay $560 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this ...
2023.11.01 Motion to Compel Subsequent Deposition 837
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.01
Excerpt: ...) S 2025.610 to compel subsequent deposition. The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Goveming Law Natural persons, including parties to the action, may not be deposed more than once without a court order based on a show-ng of cause. CCP S 2025.610(a), (b); see Fairmont Ins. Co. v. Sup.Ct. (Stende") 22 cal.4th 245, 254. A witness, including a witness specified in subdivision (b) of Section 1987, is not obliged to attend as a witness bef...
2023.11.01 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 322
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.11.01
Excerpt: ...arising initially out alleged violations of the Court's orders in another case, SCV-265225. This matter is on calendar for demurrers to all causes of action within the SAC by TRVFD, the County and Thompson pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, that there is another action proceeding between the same parties, and for misjoinder of parties. The Demurrer is SUSTAIN...
2023.10.25 Motion to Strike Punitive Damages 078
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.25
Excerpt: ...ions to Strike A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains "irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s]" or is "not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court." CCP S 435(b). However, "falsity," must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. See CCP S 437. A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims fo...
2023.10.25 Motion for Leave to Set Aside Default, Judgment 834
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.25
Excerpt: ...tant complaint against Defendant on May 8, 2023. Moving Defendant was personally served on May 25, 2023. Plaintiff requested entry of default on August 30, 2023, which was granted against Defendant. Defendant filed the instant motion to set aside the default on September 19, 2023. Plaintiff has filed no opposition to the motion. Governing Law "The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a ...
2023.10.25 Demurrer 199
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.25
Excerpt: ...osa, California, with causes of action for: 1) wrongful foreclosure; 2) cancellation of instrument; 3) quiet title; 4) violation of Civ. Code S 2924f; 5) violation of Civ. Code S 2923.5; and 6) violation of Business and Professions Code S 17200 et. seq. This matter is on calendar for PLM's demurrer to all causes of acton within the Complaint pursuant to CCP S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plainti...
2023.10.18 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 944
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.18
Excerpt: ...oth Fire and Hunsaker. Evidentiary and Procedural Issues A. Citations The Court previously raised the issue that Plaintiff c:ited Bagdadi v. Go Daddy Software, Inc. (2CM) 154 Cal.App.4th 1176 and Anderson v. Continental Insurance, Co. (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1659, in the motions. When the Court sought to get clarification as to these decisions, and whether they somehow countermand the decisions in R & B Auto Center, Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc. (2W6)...
2023.10.11 Demurrer 241
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.11
Excerpt: ..., which are part of the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act ("CMIA"). This matter is on calendar for Defendants' demurrer to all causes of acton within the Complaint pursuant to CCP S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to consttute a cause of action. The Demurrer is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. Legal Standards A. Demurrers Generally A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading unde...
2023.10.04 Motion for Leave to Set Aside Dismissal 266
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.04
Excerpt: ...ow Cause re Dismissal for lack of prosecution on December 15, 2022. The OSC hearing was set for February 16, 2023. Plaintiff nor their counsel appeared at the February 16, 2023 hearing. The case was dismissed as a result of Plaintiff's non-appearance. This motion was filed August 7, 2023. The parties signed a stipulation settling the matter in October of 2022. Governing Law "The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or ...
2023.10.04 Demurrer 767
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.04
Excerpt: ...ory fraud (the "FAC"). This matter is on calendar for Defendant's demurrer to the seventh cause of action within the FAC pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of achon and CCP S 430.10(f) for uncertainty. Defendant's demurrer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is OVERRULED. Governing Law A. Standard on Demurrer A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appe...
2023.10.04 Motion for Summary Adjudication 260
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.04
Excerpt: ...plitter which caused Plaintiff's injury. Defendant's undisputed Material Facts ("DUMF") '1 1. Defendant did not have any responsibility for creation of the wood splitter, or its transition into the market place. DUMF '1 3-5. Defendant borrowed the wood splitter. DUMF '12. The Burdens on Summary Judgment and Adjudication A. Generally Summary adjudication "shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any ma...
2023.10.04 Motion for New Trial 202
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.04
Excerpt: ... dismissal. The motion is DENIED. Governing Law A new trial is a re-examination of an issue of fact in the same court after a trial and decision by a jury, court, or referee." CCP S 656. However, "[tlhe right to a new trial is purely statutory, and a motion for a new trial can be granted only on one of the grounds enumerated in the statute." Fomco, Inc. u Joe Maggio, Inc. (1961) 55 cal.2d 162, 166. The verdict may be vacated and any other decisio...
2023.10.04 OSC Re Contempt, Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction 225
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.10.04
Excerpt: ...intiffs' request for an Order to Show Cause re: Contempt for violations of court orders, and for TRVFD's request to dissolve the preliminary injunction issued August 4, 2021. As to the Contempt, the matter is APPEARANCES REQUIRED. The motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction is DENIED. Underlying Facts Plaintiffs' causes of action are predicated on allegations of violations of the use Permit issued for TRVFD's property adjoining the property...
2023.09.27 Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 099
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.09.27
Excerpt: ...er with KFH and Health Plan, "Defendants"), and Does 1-50, arising out of Defendants' care of Decedent. This matter is on calendar for the petition by the Defendants to compel arbitration pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 1281.2. Defendants' petition to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is DENIED. l. Facts and Procedure The Decedent signed an "Enrollment Application" in April of 2004. See Woods Declaration in Support ("Woods Decl."...
2023.09.27 Motion for Summary Judgment 709
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.09.27
Excerpt: ...ional interference with economic relations; 8) intentional infliction of emotional distress; 9) declaratory relief; 10) quiet title; and 11) injunctive relief. This matter is on calendar for the moton by Flint for summary judgment of the SAC or in the alternative adjudication pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 437(c). Summary judgment is DENIED. Summary adjudication is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. l. Evidentiary and Pleading Issues...
2023.09.27 Motion for Leave to File Complaint 479
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.09.27
Excerpt: ...mplaint for fraud (See Declaration of Amin Kazemini ["Kazemini Decl."l, Exhibit A, the "Cross-complaint"), as during discovery Plaintiff produced two seemingly conflicting copies of the underlying lease. Moving Defendant alleges that the Plaintiff has created a fraudulent copy. Plaintiff does not attach a copy of the Lease to the Complaint. Moving Defendant argues that he should be allowed to file the cross-complaint as it is compulsory. l. Le I ...
2023.09.27 Motion for Certification of Class and Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 920
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.09.27
Excerpt: ...ees and class representative enhancements. The Motions are GRANTED. Applicable A. Fairness of Settlement Standards After preliminary approval, the Court determines whether a class action settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable in a final hearing, often referred to as a "fairness hearing." Cal. R. Ct. 3.769(g); see also Dunk v. Ford Motor Co. (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 1794, 1801. The purpose of this requirement is "the protection of those class me...
2023.09.13 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMK and Production of Docs 849
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.09.13
Excerpt: ...reach of express warranty through failure to repair timely under the Act (Civ. Code S 1793.2(b); 3) breach of implied warranty under the Act. This matter is on calendar for the motion to compel deposition of person most knowledgeable, and production of documents thereon under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") 2025.450. The Mohon is GRANTED. Defendants are ordered to produce their person(s) most knowledgeable as to the subject matters in the deposit...
2023.09.13 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 331
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.09.13
Excerpt: ...is matter is on calendar for Defendant's motion to strike punitive damages and their demurrer to the second cause of action for fraudulent inducement within the Complaint pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") SS 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and under CCP S 430.10(f) for uncertainty. As to the second cause of action, the Demurrer is OVERRULED. The motion to strike is GRANTED with leave to amen...
2023.09.13 Demurrer to FAC, Motion to Strike 318
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.09.13
Excerpt: ...ended Complaint. Plaintiff has leave to amend within 10 days of the service of the notice of entry of this order. Defendant is to serve the notice of entry of this order within 5 days of entry of this order. California Rule of court ("CRC") 3.1320(g). Facts In his First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), Plaintiff complains that, when a minor, he was confined in Los Guilicos Juvenile Hall (the "Hall"), owned and operated by Defendant. While in the care o...
2023.09.13 Demurrer 771
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.09.13
Excerpt: ... S 430.10(e) for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, that Plaintiffs have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies, and that Plaintiffs lack stand-ng to seek the relief they request. The Demurrer is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. Legal Standards A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticea...
2023.09.08 Motion for Summary, Adjudication, to Seal 944
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.09.08
Excerpt: ...both Fire and Hunsaker. The Court will CONTINUE the hearing on these two motions on summary judgment to October 18, 2023, at 3:00 pm, so that the Parties can address the substantive issues raised by the Court in this tentative ruling. This matter is also on calendar for the Fire's motion to seal portions of certain filings and exhibits made in support of Plaintiff's motion and Defendants' oppositions. The moton is GRANTED. l. Motion To Seal The R...
2023.08.30 Motion to Amend Judgment 197
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.30
Excerpt: ...therance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading or proceeding by adding or striking out the name of any party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect...." CCP S 187 states in full: "When jurisdiction is, by the Constitution or this Code, or by any other statute, conferred on a Court or judicial officer, all the means necessary to carry it into effect are als...
2023.08.30 Motion for Summary Adjudication 955
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.30
Excerpt: ...itten Air Commercial Real Estate Association Standard Industrial/commercial Single-Tenant Lease agreement (the "Lease"). This matter is on calendar for the motion by the Plaintiff for summary adjudication pursuant to Cal. Cade Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 437(c). For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary adjudication as to the first cause of action is DENIED. The motion for summary adjudication as to issues 2 and 3 enumerated in the notice ...
2023.08.30 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens, for Attorney Fees 155
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.30
Excerpt: ... 10, 11, 14-20, and 23-25 are SUSTAINED. Objection 22 is sustained to the degree it represents Defendants' belief of Plaintiff's position. The balance are OVERRULED. Governing Law A lis pendens notice is an instrument recorded against real property that gives notice of a pending lawsuit affecting title to the property. "A lis pendens clouds title until the litigation is resolved or the lis pendens is expunged, and any party acquiring an interest ...
2023.08.30 Motion to Compel Compliance, for Sanctions, to Compel Further Responses 477
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.30
Excerpt: ...under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") S 2031.310. This matter is on calendar for five (5) motions by the parties, to which their dispositions are as follows: 2. 3. 4. 5. Smash's Motion to Com#l Compliance with the Court's Order, filed July 25, 2023 is DENIED. Monetary sanctions requests from both parties are DENIED. Smash's Motion for Sanctons for Failure to Comply with Discovery Orders, filed July 27, 2023 is DENIED as to issue and evidence sanc...
2023.08.30 Motion to Compel Responses 709
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.30
Excerpt: ...tion is GRANTED. Defendants shall serve verified code-compliant responses free of objections within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Defendants shall pay $60 in sanctions to Plaintiff within thirty (30) days of notice of entry of the order on this Motion. Governing Law A judgment creditor generally has the same rights to propound discovery to the judgment debtor in order to facilitate collection of the judgment. Pa...
2023.08.16 Motion to Set Aside Renewed Judgment 570
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.16
Excerpt: ...r is on calendar for Judgment Creditor's moton to set aside under CCP S 473(d) the renewed judgment entered on March 8, 2023, as Defendant was under the protection of a bankruptcy stay at the time of renewal. The court has the power to set aside any void order upon the motion of a party. CCP S 473(d). "The filing of a bankruptcy proceeding operates as a stay of 'the commencement or continuation of a judicial action or proceeding against the debto...
2023.08.16 Motion to Enter Judgment for Full Settlement Amount 128
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.16
Excerpt: ...ies to #nding litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until #rformance in full of the terms of the settlement." CCP S 654.6(b) provid...
2023.08.16 Motion to Compel Deposition 058
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.16
Excerpt: ...r is on calendar for the motion to compel deposition of the Administrator(s) of Defendant's facility where Decedent received care for the timeframe covering 09/25/20 through 05/16/21 ("Administrator's Notice"), and for the deposition of Michele Larrew ("Larrew Notice"), and production of documents thereon under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") 2025.450. The Administrator's Notice contains forty-two (42) document requests, Larrew's Notice contains ...
2023.08.16 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 372
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.16
Excerpt: ...nst all Defendants for failure to have a workers compensation policy in place. (See generally, Complaint.) The named defendants include the following: Ridgefront Properties, LLC, ("Ridgefront") which owns real property in Mendocino County, including real property located at 78500 Rd. 343, Covelo, California ("Property"), but has no employees and conducts no business other than leasing property. (UMF, 1-3.) Greenhouse Family Farms, LLC, ("Greenhou...
2023.08.09 Motion to Compel Arbitration 243
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ... he suffered during the course of that employment. This matter is on calendar for the petition (styled as a "motion") by the Medical Group to compel arbitration pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 1281.2. Providence has filed a joinder tothe petition. Defendants' petition to compel arbitration and stay proceedings is GRANTED. Facts and Procedure This matter arises out of an employment relationship between the Plaintiff and Annadel. Plainti...
2023.08.09 Motion for Stay or Dismissal 624
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...ction for alleged violations of California Labor Code S 2698. This matter is on calendar for Defendants' motion for dismissal or a stay due to the existence of a class action in federal court based on the same alleged labor code violations. The motion is DENIED. Governing Authorities Stays and Concurrent Federal Jurisdiction California courts maintain the inherent power to stay proceedings in the interests of justice and to promote judicial effic...
2023.08.09 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 849
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.09
Excerpt: ...ments violate Civil Code section 896(a) standards for water issues, including unintended passage of water beyond, around, or through designated moisture barriers at doors, windows, patio and deck doors, roofs, roofing systems, decks, decking, stucco, exterior walls, and more. The FAC adds that there are signs of water intrusion behind the building paper and the building sheathing is compromised with rot above a window. Plaintiffs named several de...

200 Results

Per page

Pages