Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2584 Results

Location: Sonoma x
2023.08.02 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMK 849
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...breach of express warranty through failure to repair timely under the Act (Civ. Code S 1793.2(b); 3) breach of implied warranty under the Act. This matter is on calendar for the motion to compel deposition of person most knowledgeable, and production of documents thereon under Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP") 2025.450. The unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendants are ordered to produce their person(s) most knowledgeable as to the subject matters in...
2023.08.02 Motion for Summary Judgment 503
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...nd slipped and fell due to water on the floor. Defendant's employees or agents responded, told Plaintiff to stay put, and called 911. Plaintiff alleges he incurred wage loss, hospital and medical expenses, general damage, and loss of earning capacity as a result of the fall. In their motion, Defendant states that Plaintiff was supplied as a room attendant by the staffing agency; Porter Pros, to work at the Fairmont. Defendant argues that the Fair...
2023.08.02 Motion for Summary Judgment 449
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...ierrez ("Gutierrez"), (all together, "Cross-Defendants"), Ashley Eib ("Eib"), Marie Young ("Young", dismissed), Margherita Gudenzi ("Gudenzi", dismissed), Michael Sean McGuire ("McGuire", now dismissed), and Does 1-50 alleging fifteen causes of action. This matter is on calendar for the moton by the Cross-Defendants for summary judgment or in the alternative adjudication pursuant to Cal. Code Civ. Proc. ("CCP") S 437(c). The Motion is GRANTED in ...
2023.08.02 Motion for Summary Adjudication 018
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...s failed to pay as agreed. It also contends that Defendants knowingly made false promises or representations in order to induce it to enter into the Agreement and provide the services even though they never had any intention of paying Plaintiff. Defendants, plus the alleged wife of Steve, Mary Bates ("Marv") (collectively, "Cross Complainants"), filed a cross-complaint against Plaintiff as well as Plaintiff's alleged principal, Michael Stutes ("S...
2023.08.02 Motion for Reconsideration 797
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...motion was entered on April 18, 2022. Defendants Rachel Averbuck ("Averbuck") and Jennifer Jill Hale ("Hale") on February 24, 2022, filed a motion to compel Plaintiff to attend an independent medical examination ("IME"). Defendant Jenna Lynn Riley ("Riley") joined in the motion. Plaintiff, now self represented, on May 13, 2022, filed a "Request for Case to be Put on Hold While Seeking New attorney," in which she informed the court that she was se...
2023.08.02 Motion for Leave to File FAC 605
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...sts of two assessor's parcels, one without street frontage (the "Rear Parcel") and one along West Spain Street (the "Front Parcel"), and the Mattson Property borders real property at 10 West Spain Street, Sonoma, which belongs to Defendant State of California (the "State"). Plaintiff alleges that the Property at issue is a "sliverof land" running the entire property boundary between the Front Parcel and the State Property, about 157 feet long and...
2023.08.02 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 688
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...ed Agreement") between Plaintiff Uponor, Inc. and Defendants Frederick and Linda Hecht to resolve certain claims in an underlying action. In the underlying action, Defendants brought claims against Plaintiff, a general contractor, and a plumbing subcontractor for property damage allegedly caused by Plaintiff's improperly manufactured tubing, which was subsequently improperly installed by the subcontractor. Defendants asserted various causes of ac...
2023.08.02 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 522
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...of entry of this order within 5 days of entry of this order. CRC 3.1320(g). Facts and History Plaintiffs Mark Stokes ("Stokes"), Larissa May Torkelson Smith ("Torkelson"), and John Fradelizio ("Fradelizio") (collectively, Stokes, Torkelson, and Fradelizio are the "Individual Plaintiffs"), and their current employer, Plaintiff ABD Insurance and Financial Services, Inc. ("ABD"), seek declaratory relief regarding their ability to compete with Defend...
2023.08.02 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMK 005
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.08.02
Excerpt: ...ce of Deposition of Defendant GM's PMK and requests for production of documents with the deposition to take place on January 17, 2023. (Sogoyan decl., 914, Exhibit 3.) On January 10, 2023, GM provided its response. (ld., 915.) The response consisted of general introductory objections as well as objections to each category of matters for examination. (ld., Exhibit 3.) In response to some examination requests, GM stated that without waiving its obj...
2023.07.26 Motion for Leave to File SAC 905
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...n behalf of DFLP. In brief, Plaintiff complains that Defendant Lynn Duggan ("Lynn"), general partner of DFLP, breached obligations to DFLP under a loan which DFLP made to Lynn ("the GP Loan"), improperly halted distributions to the other partners, and impermissibly entered into an agreement to sell a general partner interest. The action has seen significant litigation since it was filed, including a motion by DFLP, joined by Lynn and the other pa...
2023.07.26 Demurrer 693
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...were ultimately found to owe substantial unpaid taxes and penalties. Plaintiffs allege that they are winemakers operating a business as DNA Vineyards (the "Business"), they hired Defendant, a certified public accountant ("CPA"), to provide the services and prepare and file their tax returns starting with their 2014 return, Defendant initially prepared an amendment to their 2013 return before preparing and filing their returns for the 2014 through...
2023.07.26 Motion for Attorney Fees 778
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...acated because the parties reached a settlement which awarded Plaintiff attorneys' fees and costs, but left the matter to further stipulation or order of the Court. This matter is on calendar for Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to the parties' settlement agreement and Cal. Civ. code S 1794. The Motion is GRANTED, in the amount of $81,328.58. The Basis for Fees Cal. Civ. Code S1794(d) provides: "Ifthe buyer prevails in an...
2023.07.26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 115
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...at she has one or more valid defenses to Plaintiff's causes of action, the motion will be granted, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff's unopposed request for judicial notice is GRANTED. The legal effect of the court's order deeming matters admitted is judicially noticed. A plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the pleadings if "the complaint states facts sufficient to consttute a cause or causes of action against the defendant and the answer does n...
2023.07.26 Motion for Leave to File SAC 254
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ..., according to the explanation in the motion, Plaintiffs have removed any claim for, or reference to, punitive damages. Plaintiffs attach a copy of the proposed SAC. There is no opposition. Service Plaintiffs filed proof of service for this motion showing only electronic service on an attorney, Caitlyn M. Harris ("Harris") but Defendant has not appeared in this action in any way and Harris is not her attorney of record. Service is therefore defec...
2023.07.26 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 969
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...ed to as NEWREZ which holds a lien on the Property, and directing that the Property be sold. Defendant Eugene and Victoria Williams ("Williams") (collectively, "Cross-complainants"), filed a cross-complaint against Plaintiff, complaining that they all purchased the Property together by agreement, with each one holding a 1/3 interest with a share of the loan liability, Eugene is Plaintiff's father, and Williams is Plaintiff's sister. They allege t...
2023.07.26 Motion for Sanctions 688
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...he presently operative cross-complaint (the "Cross- Complaint") against defendants William B. Kelly ("William") as trustee of the Thomas P. Kelly, Jr. 1999 Dated May 8, 1999 (the "Trust"), and John A. Kelly ("John", together with William, "Cross-Defendants") arising out of Cross-Defendant's alleged mishandling in managing the affairs of the Trust. This matter is on calendar for Thomas's motion for sanctions against John's counsel, Mark Clausen ("...
2023.07.26 Motion for Summary Judgment 755
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...principal amount lent plus applicable interest and finance charges for charges he made to the credit card for goods, services, or cash advances. (ld. at "14-5.) Adams' current balance on the credit card is $13,373.78, for which no payments have been made since November 29, 2022, but regarding which there have been no payment disputes claimed. (ld. at 5-13.) We Is Fargo brought this action against Adams alleging causes of achon for: (1) breach of ...
2023.07.26 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens, for Attorney Fees 155
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...ction 22 is sustained to the degree it represents Defendants' belief of Plaintiff's position. The balance are OVERRULED. Governing Law A lis pendens notice is an instrument recorded against real property that gives notice of a pending lawsuit affecting title to the property. It clouds title and prevents the transfer of the property until the litigation is resolved. Malcom v. Sup.Ct. (Green) (1981) 29 Cal.3d 518, 523. It is a remedy which must be ...
2023.07.26 Motion to Transfer Case to Appropriate Court 892
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...ecklessly caused an automobile accident on State Route 29 in Napa, California, near Imola Avenue which resulted in Decedent's death. He adds that Jevarian was intoxicated or under the influence of alcohol at the time, having consumed alcohol before the accident despite knowing that she would be driving. He complains also that the accident resulted wholly or partly from a dangerous condition in the signage and configuration of that intersection an...
2023.07.26 Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandamus 653
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Honigsberg, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2023.07.26
Excerpt: ...which job she became a member of the California Public Employees' Retrement System ("CalPERS"). (Petition, Exhibit A, pg. 2, 1.) At the time, Decedent's registered domestic partner was a real party in interest, Donna Starr ("Starr"). (ld. at Exhibit A, pg. 2, '1 2.) Decedent listed Starr as a beneficiary when she retired in 2015 and started receiving a monthly retirement benefit of $4,884.63. (ibid.) Decedent separated from Starr in 2017 and marr...
2023.07.19 Motions to Compel Deposition, for Sanctions 882
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Broderick, Patrick M
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ... for their depositions, which shall take place in the next 60 days. Sanctions are granted in the total amount of 95M) On April 18, 2023, Plaintiff served notices to take the depositions of Defendants Jamie and Sami Halteh on May 23, 2023. (Kayne decl., 94.) On May 1, 2023, attorney Christopher Daley of the firm Phillips Spallas & Angstadt LLP, counsel for Jamie Halteh and Sami Halteh, confirmed in a telephone call with Plaintiff's counsel's colle...
2023.07.19 Motion to Reclassify Case to Limited Civil Jurisdiction 876
Location: Sonoma
Judge: DeMeo, Bradford
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...nlimited to limited jurisdiction, on motion by a defendant filed by the time that defendant must file its initial responsive pleading. C.C.P. 5403.040(b) permits later-filed motions to reclassify, but only if "The moving party shows good cause for not seeking reclassification sooner". Page 2 of 2 WALMART's motion made no showing of gtnd cause for the six to seven month delay in filing here. Even if WALMART's motion had been timely filed and timel...
2023.07.19 Motion to Enter Judgment for Full Settlement Amount 384
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...he motion is DENIED without prejudice. CCP S 664.6(a) provides: "If parties to #nding litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally before the court, for settlement of the case, or part thereof, the court, upon motion, may enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement. If requested by the parties, the court may retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until #...
2023.07.19 Motion to Disburse Monies from Surplus Funds on Deposition 055
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...ter the judgment was entered in 2016 per her interest in the property. The Petition is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part without prejudice. Relevant Law Under CC section 2924j(a), absent an interpleader action, within 30 days of execution of a trustee's deed resulting from a sale with proceeds remaining after payment of the creditor, etc., the trustee must send notice to all persons with recorded interests in the property. Subdivision (b) requi...
2023.07.19 Motion to Declare Vexatious Litigant 714
Location: Sonoma
Judge: Pardo, Oscar
Hearing Date: 2023.07.19
Excerpt: ...ant motion to declare Defendant a vexatious litigant under Cal. Code of Civil Procedure ("CCP"), S 391. The moton is GRANTED. Governing Law The vexatious litigant statutes were created to curb misuse of the court system by those acting in pro per who repeatedly relitigate the same issues. Hupp v. Solera Oak Valley Greens Ass'n. (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 1300, 1311. "These persistent and obsessive litigants' abuse of the legal system 'not only wastes ...

2584 Results

Per page

Pages