Excerpt: ... in the subpoena are grossly overbroad and far more injurious to Plaintiff's privacy interest than any possible probative value Defendant would obtain from it. Plaintiff contends the subpoena only serves the purpose of harassing Plaintiff and invading her privacy. Plaintiff also contends the information sought can be obtained by other means less intrusive. Plaintiff also contends the information sought is irrelevant. As discussed below, the Court...

Excerpt: ... pleading, or any part thereof, including single words or phrases. Stearns Ranchos v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway (1981) 19 Cal.App.3d 24. It is proper for the Court to strike any irrelevant, false or improper matter. CCP S 436(a). The Court can also strike any part of a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with California law. CCP S 436(b). The proper procedure for testing the adequacy of punitive damages is a motion to strik...

Excerpt: ...n showing good faith efforts to meet and confer prior to filing the motion. CCP SS and 2031.310(b). The moton was supported by a declaration which provides the 4 alleged good faith meet and confer efforts. Defendant vehemently disputes that Plaintiff met and conferred in good faith. A review of the evidence provided by both parties shows that substantial meet and confer efforts did take place but that ultimately they were unsuccessful. It appears...

Excerpt: ...rance of justice and on any terms as may be proper, after notice to the adverse party. The Court's discretion in this regard will usually be exercised liberally to permit amendment. Nestle v. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal. 3d 920, 939. Leave to amend should be liberally granted so long as there is no statute of limitations issue or prejudice to the opposing party. Harris v. City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal.4th 203, 240. Here, neither party has addr...

Excerpt: ...motion. CRC 3.1345. This did not occur. Without service on Ms. Whipple, the Court is without jurisdiction to enter the order. Since Ms. 5 Whipple is a former employee of Defendant, the Court cannot compel it to produce her for deposition. The motion is DENIED. A proposed order was with the Court which will be modified to conform to the Court's final ruling. Tentative Ruling on Motion to Compel Deposition of Defendant Shlomo Rechnitz: Plaintiffs m...

Excerpt: ...(f). 3 Merits of Motion: A party may object to the complaint by filing a demurrer. CCP S 430.10. A general demurrer should be sustained if the complaint fails to "state facts sufficient to constitute a valid cause of action." CCP S 430.10(e). A demurrer can also be brought on the grounds that the pleading is "uncertain." CCP S 430.10(f). A complaint, or causes of action therein, are subject to demurrer for uncertainty if it is so uncertain that a...

Excerpt: ...ime, no response to the OSC has been filed, however, Plaintiff has sent several letters to the Court. Although the 2 correspondence was not in an appropriate format for filing, and some appeared to be ex parte communications, as Plaintiff is the only party to have made an appearance in this case, in the interest of justice, the Court chose to consider the correspondence. The Court starts this analysis with the principle of providing in propria pe...

Excerpt: ... CCP S 564.5 prov-des the Court with authority, upon motion, to enter judgment pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement entered into in writing, or orally before the Court. If requested by the parties, the Court also retains jurisdiction cwer the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement. ld. In this action, the parties entered into a Conditional Stipulated Settlement. Defendant executed the...

Excerpt: ...ature and was not filed by fax. The Court further notes that an Opposition to this matter was due to be filed no later than March 7, 2023. Filing on March 13, 2023 would have been untimely. The Court has the discretion to not consider late filed papers. CRC 3.1300(d); Rancho Mirage Country Club Homeowners Assn. v. Haselbaker (2016) 2 Cal. App. 5th 252. However, due to the attempt to file an Opposition, the Court will entertain an oral opposition ...

Excerpt: ... compelling further responses if: 1) the response to a request for production is incomplete; 2) a representation of inability to comply is inadequate, incomplete, or evasive; or 3) an objection to the request is without merit or too general. CCP S 2031.310(a). A motion to compel further responses for production must show "good cause" for the request. CCP S 2031.310(b)(1). "Good cause" can be established by showing the request was made in good fai...

Excerpt: ...Superior Court, naming Shasta County, Shasta County Sheriff's Department, and Doesl- 25 as Defendants. The matter arises out of an incident in April of 2019, wherein Plaintiff and her husband were arrested and placed into custody at the Shasta County Jail for an alleged verbal dispute. Plaintiff alleges she was subjected to excessive force when a deputy shoved her into a concrete wall, threw her on the ground, and got on top of her. (Complaint p....

Excerpt: ...rce the terms of the settlement agreement, if continued jurisdiction is agreed to by the parties. The agreement of the parties alone is insufficient; a request must be made to the Court. See Mesa RHF Partners, LP. v. City of Los Angeles (2019) 33 Cal. App.5th 913, 918. If the case is voluntarily dismissed without the request, the Court does not retain jurisdiction under CCP S 664.6. ld. Here, no such request was made to this Court and the achon w...

Excerpt: ...rther responses if the responses are evasive/incomplete. CCP § 2030.300(a)(1). Plaintiff moves for a further response to Special Interrogatory No. 14. That interrogatory sought the names and addresses of Defendant's employees. Defendant's response was that the information would be provided in a separate document. Despite this response, no separate document was ever provided. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that Defendant's response to Sp...

Excerpt: ...ent pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement entered into in writing, or orally before the Court. If requested by the parties, the Court also retains jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the settlement until performance in full of the terms of the settlement. Id. In this action, the parties entered into a Conditional Stipulated Settlement. Defendant executed the agreement on August 25, 2016 while Plaintiff executed the agreement on Sep...

Excerpt: ... be sustained if the complaint fails to “state facts sufficient to constitute a valid cause of action.” CCP § 430.10(e). A demurrer can be used to challenge defects that appear on the face of the complaint or from matters that may be subject to judicial notice. Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal. 3d 311, 318. The court “treat[s] the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact...

Excerpt: ...ant first appeared on 4/15/21 (21 months ago). The interrogatories which are the subject of this motion were served on 12/2/22. The discovery cut‐off is the same day as the hearing of this motion, 1/30/23 (now extended by stipulation to 2/6/23). Despite what the Court considers extensive meet and confer efforts, responses to form interrogatories 16.3 through 16.6 remain incomplete. The Court finds the response to interrogatory 16.1 is adequate....

Excerpt: ...mplaint. Merits of Motion: Plaintiff has alleged a common count causes of action to collect on a debt. “The only essential allegations of a common count are ‘(1) the statement of indebtedness in a certain sum, (2) the consideration, i.e., goods sold, work done, etc., and (3) nonpayment.'” Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Zerin (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 445, 460. The complaint contains a statement of the indebtedness, that money was loaned, that the the...

Excerpt: ...nt request judicial notice of prior pleadings in this action and prior pleadings filed in Cossuto v. Estate of Michael Garrett et. al. (Shasta County Case No. 196776). No objections have been raised to the request. The request for judicial notice is GRANTED. Merits of Motion: A party may object to the complaint by filing a demurrer. CCP § 430.10. A demurrer lies if the court has no jurisdiction over the subject cause of action. CCP § 430.10(a)....

Excerpt: ...nadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. This relief is typically referred to as discretionary relief under Section 473(b). 3 This relief can be based on counsel's conduct but it still requires that any neglect be excusable before relief can be granted. Tackett v. City of Huntington Beach (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 60, 65. To determine whether a mistake was excusable, the court will inquire whether the same error might have been made by a reasonab...

Excerpt: ...2: OVERRULED Objection No. 3: OVERRULED Objection No. 4: OVERRULED Objection No. 5: OVERRULED Objection No. 6: OVERRULED Objection No. 7: OVERRULED Objection No. 8: OVERRULED Objection No. 9: OVERRULED Objection No. 10: OVERRULED Objection No. 11: OVERRULED Objection No. 12: OVERRULED Objection No. 13: OVERRULED Objection No. 14: OVERRULED Objection No. 15: OVERRULED Objection No. 16: OVERRULED Objection No. 17: OVERRULED Motion for Summary Judgm...

Excerpt: ...has not yet appeared, personal service is required. CCP § 512.030(b). A proof of service by mail for Defendant Dennis Conrad has been filed. Dennis Conrad has not yet appeared and therefore personal service was required. No proof of service has been filed for Defendant Jane Doe Conrad. The Court finds that neither Defendant has been properly served with the Writ. The writ is denied due to lack of proper service. Additionally, the application is ...

Excerpt: ...ntical terms. Merits of Motion: The law favors the settlement of lawsuits, particularly in complex litigation, where they save time and resources. Neary v. Regents of the University of California (1992) 3 Cal. 4th 273, 277‐281 (superseded by statute on other grounds). A trial court must approve a class 2 action settlement agreement and may do so only after determining it is fair, adequate, and reasonable. It is vested with broad discretion in m...

Excerpt: ...eadowview Drive, #500 in Redding, CA. Provision 26 of the Lease provides that in any action…the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorney fees, expert witness fees, and costs. Following a two day trial on February 23‐24, 2022, this Court ruled the lease was legally terminated, effective June 1, 2020 following proper service of a 24 month notice of termination on Defendant per the terms of the Lease. The Court further declared P...

Excerpt: ...ther the costs are appropriate. 2 The Song‐Beverly Act contains a cost‐shifting provision that specifically allows prevailing buyers to recover their costs, including attorney's fees. Civ. C. § 1794(d). The Consumers Legal Remedies Act also contains a mandatory fee provision for a prevailing plaintiff. Civ. C. § 1780(e). An attorney's fee award is limited to the amount the court determines was reasonably incurred by the buyer in commencing ...

Excerpt: ...ive demands, including unreasonable violations of the right of privacy. Id. A party may obtain discovery related to any matter, if the matter itself is admissible or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. CCP § 2017.010. However; privileged information is not discoverable. CCP § 2017.010. The subpoena challenged by this motion was issued by Plaintiffs to Defendants' insurance company CSAA. CSAA is providing a def...