Excerpt: ...r Respo nses to Special Interrogatories, and 3) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production. Defendant opposes the Motions. Plaintiff propounded discovery on October 2, 2023, consisting of 19 Requests for Production of Documents, 19 Special Inte rrogatories, and Form Interrogatories – General series 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 15.1. After a brief extension, Defendant timely served objections to each of the three sets of discovery on No...

Excerpt: ...olicy in fav or of enforcing arbitration agreements. 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. The FAA applies to any written arbitration agreement in a contract evidencing a transaction involving interstate commerce. AlliedBruce Terminix Companies, Inc. v. Dobson (1995) 513 U.S. 25, 277 . A party seeking to enforce an arbitration agreement has the burden of showing FAA preemption. (Woolls v. Superior Court (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 197, 211.) For example, a petitioner...

Excerpt: ...ught the lo an and deed of trust in August 2016, and currently owns the mortgage note and deed of trust. The Cadle Company services the loan for BBR Investments LLC. The Cadle Company moves for summary judgment or in the alternative summary adjudication. The motion is unopposed. Merits: The party moving for summary judgment bears the initial burden to make a prima facie showing that there are no triable issues of material fact. Aguilar v. Atlanti...

Excerpt: ...tter will be continued to permit Petitioner to address these defects. Merits: Currency that is “furnished or intended to be furnished by any person in exchange for a controlled substance” or used or intended to be used to facilitate particular provisions of the Health and Safety Code are subject to seizure and forfeiture. Health and Safety Code § 11470. The judicial and/or administrative procedure for forfeiture is laid out generally in Heal...

Excerpt: ...d Confer: CCP § 430.41 requires the demurring party to “meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer.” The Declaration of John Kenny states sufficient facts to meet this requirement. Merits: A demurrer should be sustained if the complaint fails to “...

Excerpt: ...oader (Serial No. 1FF2454DAB0240050);  Pierce PM -3348 Delimber (Serial No. 15918). Merits of Motion: CCP § 512.060 provides that in order to obtain a writ of possession plaintiff must: 1) demonstrate the probable validity of the claim, meaning that it is more probable than not that it will u ltimately obtain a judgment for possession of the personal property; and 2) satisfy the undertaking requirements of Section 515.010. Plaintiff has suffi...

Excerpt: ...ment neglig ent misrepresentation, and 5) add a cause of action for violation of Magnuson Moss Warranty Act. Defendant General Motors LLC opposes the motion. Merits: CCP § 473(a)(1) permits any pleading to be amended in furtherance of justice and on any terms as may be proper, after notice to the adverse party. The Court's discretion in this regard will usually be exercised liberally to permit amendment. Nestle v. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal. 3d 9...

Excerpt: ... access to cou rt proceedings. Dep't of Fair Emp. & Hous. v. Superior Ct. of Santa Clara Cnty. (2022) 82 Cal. App. 5th 105, 108 (“DFEH”). Because of the inherently sensitive nature of some proceedings, statutes specifically allow for keeping certain parties' identities confidential. (See, for example, Civ. Code, § 1708.85, subd. (f)(1) [plaintiff in action for nonconsensual distribution of sexually explicit materials may proceed un...

Excerpt: ...nts to pr oduce the PMQ within 15 days. The PMQ was deposed on November 29, 2023, pursuant to the parties' agreement. Plaintiff established that the PMQ testified as to categories 1 -2, and 9 -13 only. Plaintiffs thereafter moved for issue and evidence sanctions an d to compel further deposition of a PMQ on the remaining categories, which the Court granted in part on January 4, 2024 (the hearing on the motion held January 2, 2024, and the Court ...

Excerpt: ...rial or as a basis of adjudication and a presumption of openness of substantive court proceedings in ordinary cases, our Supreme Court in NBC Subsidiary (KNBC –TV), Inc. v. Superior Court (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1178, (NBC Subsidiary ) set forth the findings that both the t rial and appellate courts must expressly make to seal a record. (Id. at pp. 1200, 1208 –1209, fn. 25.) Courts must find that (1) there is an overriding interest supporting sea...

Excerpt: ...al Notice: The requests for judicial notice are unopposed. The Court grants the requests for judicial notice. Objections to Evidence: Defendant's Objections Nos. 1 -3, 6 and 7 are SUSTAINED. Defendant's Objections Nos. 4, 5 and 8 - 15 are OVERRULED. Defendant 's Objection to Mr. Obagi's 3 declaration filed in support of the reply is SUSTAINED. Entitlement to Attorney's Fees: Plaintiff's operative Second Amended Complaint alleged a single cause o...

Excerpt: ...erica (Saf eco) is Plaintiff's alleged insurer. Safeco demurs to the Second Cause of Action of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (FAC), on the grounds that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against Safeco pursuant to CCP 430.10(e). Meet and Confer: CCP § 430.41 requires the demurring party to “meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the ...

Excerpt: ...nly known a s a Pitchess motion. See Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531. Pitchess motions have been codified in Evid. Code § 1043 which requires a written motion in both civil and criminal actions. Evid. Code § 1043(a). The motion shall include: “1) identification of the proceeding in which discovery or disclosure is sought, the party seeking discovery or disclosure, the peace or custodial officer whose records are sought, the ...

Excerpt: ... Commission now moves to change venue pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 394. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. The parties agree that Shasta County is an appropriate initial venue for filing. They disagree as to whether section 394, a removal statute, app lies in this case. Code of Civil Procedure section 394 provides, in pertinent part: [A]ny action or proceeding brought by a county, city and county, city, or local agency within a certain...

Excerpt: ... discovery law provides for a broad range of sanctions for conduct that amounts to abuses of the discovery process including evidentiary and issue sanctions. Cedars -Sinai Medical Center v. Superior Court (1998) 18 Cal.4th 1, 12. The spoilation of evidence can be a n abuse of discovery. Id. Spoilation of evidence is defined as “the destruction or alteration of relevant information or the failure to preserve evidence for another party's use in ...

Excerpt: ...that i t is uncertain and fails to state sufficient facts for a cause of action. Plaintiffs oppose the demurrer. Meet and Confer: CCP § 430.41 requires the demurring party to “meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer.” The Declaration of Ian Schar...

Excerpt: ... or impro per matter inserted in any pleading;” or 2) “strike out all or any part of any pleading not drawn in conformity with the laws of this state.” CCP § 436(a) & (b). A motion to strike is the proper method to challenge an improper request for punitive damage s. Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v Superior Court (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 365, 385. In order to seek punitive damages, a plaintiff must plead that the defendant was guilty of oppression...

Excerpt: ...f America (Safeco) is Plaintiff's insurer. Safeco moves for an order severing Plaintiff's claims against Safeco from Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Simao, Rayfifield, and Reservoir Lane, LLC, pursuant to CCP § 598 and § 1048(b), Evid. Code § 1155, and the Court's inherent powers. These code sections do not directly support a motion to sever related to claims at the outset of litigation. “Although judges and lawyers commonly use the ...

Excerpt: ...is uncertain and fails to state su
¯icient facts for a cause of action. Plainti
¯s oppose the demurrer. Defendant Chapman has Þled a Notice of Hearing directed to all parties and their attorneys of record, however there is no proof of service on Þle. Additionally, no Declaration has been Þled 2 regarding compliance with meet and confer requirements of CCP § 430.41. Proof of service must be Þled no later than Þve court days before the time...

Excerpt: ...vil Procedure Section 1021.5. Respondent opposes the motion. Background: On April 10, 2023, this Court issued a Ruling on Writ of Mandate ordering County to release the records sought. In that Ruling, the Court found the Petitioner was the prevailing 3 party entitled to reasonable attorneys fees and costs according to proof. On April 28, 2023, County Þled a M oti on to Vacate th e R ul i n g or i n th e A ltern ati ve fo r a N ew Tri al , a n d ...

Excerpt: ... the Decedents. Plainti
¯s have Þled competing motions to compel the inspection of the same records pursuant to CCP §§ 2017.010, 2031.010, 2031.310 and 2031.320. Both sides have requested sanctions. The crux of the present dispute is the scope of access to be provided to the Plainti
¯s. The parties appear to agree that the Decedent's medical records are discoverable and can be obtained through an inspection. Plainti
¯s request access to Def...

Excerpt: ...Knollcrest (“Ingersoll Defendants”) have Þled a separate demurrer, on the same grounds. Plainti
¯ Devinne Goodale 2 opposes the motions. Plainti
¯ presented to Defendants' oral surgery center, Riverside Oral Surgery (“Riverside”), on June 29, 2022 for a tooth extraction. Plainti
¯ alleges that she chose Riverside based upon representations on its website, speciÞcally a link to Yelp reviews of the practice, and the compassion and prof...

Excerpt: ...nter judgment pursuant to the terms of a settlement agreement entered into in writing, or orally before the Court. At a mandatory settlement conference on July 19, 2023, Plaintiffs and Defendants Dustin Mitchell and Sierra Severson (hereinafter "Defendants") entered into an oral settlement on the record before the Court. Defendants agreed to pay Plaintiffs the sum of $20,000. The parties agreed the settlement would be made pursuant to CCP S 564.4...

Excerpt: ...s of the Health and Safety Code are subject to seizure and forfeiture. Health and Safety Code S 11470. The judicial and/or administrative procedure for forfeiture is laid out generally in Health and Safety Code SS 11488.4 and 11488.5. For a judicial forfeiture the District Attorney's Office (or other agency) is required to file a Petiton for Forfeiture. Health and Safety Code S 11488.4(a). The Petition for Forfeiture must be served on the individ...

Excerpt: ...al notice. Objections to Evidence: Defendant's Objections Nos. 1-3, 6 and 7 are SUSTAINED. Defendant's Objections Nos. 4, 5 and 8- 15 are OVERRULED. Defendant's Objection to Mr. Obagi's declaration filed in support of the reply is SUSTAINED. Entitlement to Attorney's Fees: Plaintiff's operative Second Amended Complaint alleged a single cause of action under Labor Code S 1102.5 for retaliation. Plaintiff prevailed on that cause of action at trial ...