Excerpt: ...he common areas. A ccording to the allegations of the verified complaint, Plaintiffs are the record owners and residents of the condominium unit located at 175 W. Saint James St., Unit 105, San Jose, California (“Property”). (Complaint, ¶ 1.) The Property is part of a common interest development (“CID”) managed by the Association in accordance with its Governing Documents. (Complaint, ¶¶ 2 -3.) Defendant Christopher Gunnucio is the Pr...

Excerpt: ...s entered into a written lease agreement for a commercial space located in Angeles City, Philippines and owned by Defendant (“Property”). (Complaint ¶ 1) Both parties are residents in the State of California and the lease agreement was signed in California. The lea se agreement contains a choice -of -law provision stating “[t]his agreement is to be governed under the laws located in the State or Country where the premises is located.” (C...

Excerpt: ...'s activiti es relative to particular property. In this lawsuit, Plaintiff seeks a declaration that he is entitled to these distributions and preliminary relief preventing transfer of the property. Plaintiff recorded a lis pendens on the property, which defendant seek s to have expunged. The parties hotly dispute virtually every aspect of Plaintiff's allegations, including how Plaintiff came to be involved in the project, whether Plaintiff is eve...

Excerpt: ...fs do not di spute that they signed the transfer agreement knowing what the agreement was for or that the transfer agreement incorporates all the terms and conditions of the customer agreement. Nor do Plaintiffs dispute that the customer agreement they assumed includes this arbitration clause: Most customer concerns can be resolved quickly and amicably by calling Our customer service department at (877) 404 -4129. If Our customer service departme...

Excerpt: ...legations of the 5AC, Wilson was employed by SoundHound from November 29, 2011, to August 30, 2019. (5AC, ¶ 19.) SoundHound is a digital voice application company that enables humans to speak naturally to their smartphones and other devices. (5AC, ¶ 19.) Wilson was initially h ired as a Principal Engineer and later he was promoted to Architect. (5AC, ¶ 20.) He created a significant amount of SoundHound's intellectual property, and he was an i...

Excerpt: ... County since 2008. (FAC, ¶ 20.) In May 2018, Plaintiff transitioned to the Sheriff's office as a Management Analyst, on December 17, 2018, she was promoted to Senior Management Analyst, and on January 28, 2019, she was promoted to Program Manager II. (FAC, ¶ 21 -22. ) Sheriff Laurie Smith was one of Plaintiff's supervisors. (FAC, ¶ 13.) In January 2020, the District Attorney investigated misconduct in the Sheriff's Department, which included ...

Excerpt: ...a fraudulent sc heme to retire senior water rights vis- à-vis duplicitous water claims….for the construction and massive expansion of a luxurious private urban development” in Salt Lake City, Utah. (Complaint ¶ 2.) On September 26, 2014, Plaintiff filed suit under the Fed eral Claims Act in the Federal Court for the District of Utah relating to a public drinking water system in Salt Lake County operated by the Emigration Canyon Improvement...

Excerpt: ...nts LLC (collectively, the “Gong Defendants”) in “multiple protracted complex litigations” involving residential property located at 2276 Bentley Ridge Drive in San Jose (the “Property”).1 (Complaint, ¶¶ 1, 9.) In 2015, Jason Pacheco and Shanna Pacheco (collectively, the “Pachecos”) sued the Gong Defendants over a dispute regarding the Property. (Complaint, ¶ 12 -14.) David Hamerslough represented the Pachecos in the underlying...

Excerpt: ...e Fenton”). Pursuant t o California Rule of Court 3.1308, the Court issues its tentative ruling. I. Background This is an action for fraudulent conveyance. According to the allegations, on November 25, 2014, Martin and Hoge Fenton entered into an agreement in which Hoge Fento n agreed to represent Martin in an underlying action, which was a real property dispute between Martin's father and Mark and Paul Watts related to property located at 3156...

Excerpt: ...actions whe re there is a common question of law or fact pending in the same court. CCP §1048(a). In considering a motion for consolidation, the court should consider the timeliness of the motion, the complexity of the case, and prejudice. See State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1956) 47 C.2d 428, 430- 432. Jane Doe's motion is timely and the two actions concern the same property and involve overlapping parties. However, LHP 2019 wi...

Excerpt: ...choscopy. (SA C ¶ 2.) While Dr. Nathan was under anesthesia, the anesthesiologist left him for crucial minutes, during which time the internist made a mistake, and Dr. Nathan suffered a stroke. (SAC ¶ 22.) Failing to detect the stroke, Stanford staff wrongly concluded t hat Dr. Nathan had suffered a heart attack and did not conduct a physical or neurological examination until 48 hours after the procedure. Dr. Nathan was released on March 16, 20...

Excerpt: ... and Housing Act (“FEHA”). (FAC, ¶ 9.) Plaintiff worked for the County's Probation Department at James Ranch. (FAC, ¶ 10.) In March 2020, he requested accommodations to work from home or to be transferred to a position that would allow him to work from home as an accommodation for his disability and being in the high -risk category for COVID -19. (FAC, ¶ 12.) Plaintiff alleges Defendants initially offered to compensate him with paid admini...

Excerpt: ...rtment between A ugust 25, 1997, and July 7, 2015. (Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Adjudication (“SSUMF”), ¶1.) She was promoted to senior accountant on June 30, 2014, and remained in that position until her retirement. (Id., ¶2.) As both an accountant and senior accountant, Defendant's responsibilities included maintaining Cupertino's general ledger accounts and performing bank ...

Excerpt: ..., previ ously doing business as Lifestyle Hospitality Inc., provides case goods, seating, millwork, various types of furniture and related items and services to the hospitality industry. (Complaint, ¶¶2, 3, and 11.) Defendant ECD -Great Street DE, LLC dba theWit Ch icago (“Defendant”) has a principal place of business at 250 Parkway Drive, Suite 120, in Lincolnshire, Illinois. (Complaint, ¶4.) Defendant owns and/or operates one or more hot...

Excerpt: ...�PCM”) is a busines s entity operating in Ocean Shores in the state of Washington. (Complaint, ¶3.) Defendants Fred Smith, John Gaston, David Eagen, Diane Dobson, and Michelle Womack are individuals residing in Ocean Shores, Washington, and together they form PCM's board of directors.1 (Complaint, ¶¶4 -8, 14.) Plaintiff Herman is a financial consultant, and plaintiff Cole is in the business of hotel management. (Complaint, ¶¶12 -13.) On 1...

Excerpt: ...information techn ology services company headquartered in San Jose. (FAC, ¶ 10.) Plaintiff Jai Kumar was hired in November 2013 and held various positions in the company over the following six years until he was terminated in December 2019. (FAC, ¶¶ 10, 11.) Plaintiff alleges Jade Global wrongfully demanded that he not discuss concerns about his compensation with other employees on the grounds that doing so would be in violation of company pol...

Excerpt: ...i nt In the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”), plaintiff Chicago Title Company (“CTC”) alleges on or about 27 July 2019, defendant 28th St Villa Apts, LLC (“Buyer”) and defendant Green Villa Apartments, LP (“Seller”) entered into an agreement for the sale of real property located at 1319 Tripp Avenue in San Jose (“Property”) from Seller to Buyer. (FAC, ¶¶9 – 10.) Between July 2019 and November 2019, plaintiff CTC ...

Excerpt: ...t issues its tentative ruling. I. Background This is an action for quiet title. Plaintiffs own real property at 1711 B Marshall Ct in Los Altos (the “Property”). (Complaint, ¶ 4.) Plaintiffs allege the basis of their title is fraudulent transfer of Severino Estillore's interest in the Property circa 1998. (Ibid.) Plaintiff seeks to quiet title to the Property against all adverse claims. Plaintiffs initiated this action to quiet title on Octo...

Excerpt: ...ls) he noted ther e was road work marked by orange cone on the shoulder of the road and noticed a steel plate across the outbound lanes. On the ride back, Plaintiff was traveling 25 mph when he got to the condition and saw that the steel plate across the inbound lanes did n ot fully cover the trench and left two shallow cutouts on either side of the asphalt. (Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (“...

Excerpt: ...d and unfair busi ness practices. According to the TACC, crossdefendant Jalal Shreim (“Jalal”) was the sole shareholder, president, and CEO of Friendly Wholesalers of California (“FWC”), formerly a successful rug business in San Jose.1 (TACC, ¶¶ 2, 4.) Crossdefendant Moh amad Shreim (“Mohamad), is Jalal's son and he was the sole proprietor of SeeMoCars, a used car dealership. (TACC, ¶ 3.) SeeMoCars was evicted from its location and M...

Excerpt: ...ng as follows. I. Backgro und This is action arises out of alleged sexual abuse suffered by Plaintiff when she was a student at St. Aloysius. (TAC, ¶ 28.) In 1997, when Plaintiff was four years old, she participated in school related and after -school activities at St. Aloysius. (TAC, ¶¶ 30.) Father Benedict Van Der Putten (“Van Der Putten”) was a priest at St. Aloysius and he sexually abused and assaulted Plaintiff multiple times from 199...

Excerpt: ...er, or managing agent of Sierra. Paragraph 6 of Plaintiff's Sierra employment agreement, which he does not dispute he signed at the time he was employed, is titled “Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate Claims” and states in the only boxed text in the agreement: “This disp ute resolution agreement is a contract and covers important issues related to ES's [employee's] rights. It is ES's sole responsibility to read it and understand it. ES is free to...

Excerpt: ...�Property). Steleco LLC and Kipling Post LP were the owners (collectively, the “Owners”) of the Property and KOA was the project architect. (SACC, ¶¶ 8 -9.) The Owners filed a cross -complaint against DPR for breach of written contract, which alleges various construction deficie ncies and damages for breach of contract. (SACC, ¶ 12.) Plaintiff Pacific States Environmental Contractors, Inc. (“Pacific States”) initiated this action a...

Excerpt: ...ssues its tentativ e ruling. I. Background This action arises from the tragic death of Mr. Henry Gonzales. On May 26, 2021, a mass shooting occurred at a SCVTA's railyard in San Jose. Mr. Henry Gonzales (Decedent) was employed by SCVTA and present on the day of the shooting . Mr. Gonzales witnessed the murder of his co -workers, and/or saw his co -workers within minutes after they were murdered, causing him to suffer severe emotional and psycholo...

Excerpt: ...operty at 374 Surber Dr. in San Jose (the “Property”). (Complaint, ¶ 7.) Defendant Rochelle Deleersnyder is real estate salesperson working with NRT West, Inc. dba Coldwell Banker (collectively “Coldwell”) and defendant Nakul Kapoor is a real estate salesperson worki ng with Intero Real Estate Services, Inc. (collectively “Intero”). (Complaint, ¶¶ 2, 3.) Coldwell and Intero were the designated listing agents for the Property on beh...

Excerpt: ...d she was owed, and Ward later entered a settlement with Cytobank. Cytobank filed an action for interpleader, deposited the amount of lien Costanzo obtained against Ward's recovery, and named Ward, the Constanzo Law Firm, and the McClure Law Firm as defendants. W ard initiated a fee arbitration, and the arbitrators found Costanzo was not entitled to fees. Ward had already paid the arbitration fee, and the arbitrators ordered that Ward be respons...

Excerpt: ...rtyards”). Plaintiff is an owner within the Courtyards. All owners within the Courtyards are members of Eagle Ridge Owners Association (“Association”) and subject to the Eagle Ridge Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (“CC&Rs”). The Courtyards are also subject to the Declaration of Annexation and Supplemental Restrictions for The Community of Eagle Ridge (“Supplement”). The Supplement mandates that the Association ...

Excerpt: ... and Pla intiffs surrendering the vehicle. The parties could not agree on an amount of reasonable fees and costs, thus this motion followed. II. Legal Standard An attorneys' fee award to the prevailing party is mandatory under the Song -Beverly act: “If the buye r prevails in an action under this section, the buyer shall be allowed the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of costs and expenses, including ...

Excerpt: ...iff entered a n investment advisory agreement with Clarity Wealth Advisors, LLC (“Clarity”) through its agent and owner Mr. Dalal. (FAC ¶ 20.) Pursuant to the agreement, Clarity agreed to provide investment advice to Plaintiff. (FAC ¶¶ 21 -22.) At all times relevant, Def endant Dalal was also a member of Casa Blanca Investments, LLC (“Casa Blanca”) and its agent. (FAC ¶ 41.) In October 2018, Mr. Dalal advised Plaintiff to invest in Ca...

Excerpt: .... Plaintiff Eftychios Theodorakis alleges that he was employed by Defendant Dfinity as a software engineer in August 2018. (Complaint, ¶11.) Dfinity is a wholly owned subsidiary of Dfinity Stiftung, a not -for - profit foundation with its principal place of business in Zurich, Switzerland (“Dfinity Foundation”). (Complaint, ¶¶2, 3, 11.) Dfinity is a decentralized network design whose tokens are a form of digital currently similar to ...

Excerpt: ...9, Plaintiffs purchased real property located at 710 North Winchester Boulevard in Santa Clara (the “Property”). (TAC, ¶ 1.) Samantha Landon was the Sellers' real estate agent and Excel was the real estate broker for the Sellers. (TAC, ¶ ¶ 4, 5.) Walter E. Mc Guire Real Estate was the real estate broker. (TAC, ¶ 6.) Morgan Ann Amos Manos was Plaintiffs' real estate agent on the Property under the brokerage of McGuire. (TAC, ¶ 7.) On Apri...

Excerpt: ...ehavior by a s enior executive as required by Samsung internal policies and was promptly fired in retaliation for this protected activity. Mo filed his Complaint on December 2, 2022, asserting (1) unlawful retaliation in violation of public policy, (2) wrongful termination in violation of public policy, and (3) discrimination and harassment. Samsung filed an answer on February 6, 2023, denying all allegations and asserting in its fifteenth af...

Excerpt: ... victims and killed two others. Grace Solutions provides emergency shelter for the unhoused throughout San Jose, CA. (RSSUF Nos. 1 & 2) In 2021, Grace Solutions entered into an agreement with Defendant GRACE BAPTIST CHURCH to utilize their space for Grace Solutions' emer gency shelter for the unhoused. (RSSUF No. 3) At the time of the incident, Grace Solutions had seven employees, including Mr. Chelley, and a number of volunteers working at the p...

Excerpt: ...tion.” (See also Department of Forestry & Fire Protection v. Howell (2017) 18 Cal.App.5th 154.) There are four types of terminating sanctions: (1) striking pleadings in whole or in part; (2) staying further proceedings by a party until it obeys a discovery order; (3) dismissing the action or part of it; and (4) rendering a default judgment. (Code of Civ. Pro. §2023.030(d).) An issue sanction either orders that designated facts be taken as esta...

Excerpt: ...zemipour lied about investment opportunities, which caused Plaintiff to invest money with him that Kazemipour spent on unauthorized personal expenses and travel. (FAC, ¶ 21.) With the assistance of defendant Troy Foster, Kazemipour defrauded Plaintiff out of approxima tely $750,638. (Ibid.) On information and belief, Tirgari alleges from 2019 to 2021, Kazemipour used funds from their joint investment account for his own personal benefit and the...

Excerpt: .... App. 4th 1272, 1283 (citations omitted).) “The petitioner bears the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by a preponderance of the evidence, and a party opposing the petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any fact necessary to its defense. [Citation.] In these summary proceedings, the trial court sits as a trier of fact, weighing all the affidavits, declarations, and other documenta...

Excerpt: ...rike the TACC; (3) defenda nt Hudson Insurance Company's (“Hudson”) motion to strike the TACC; and (4) Hudson's motion for sanctions against Abdo. Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1308, the Court issues its tentative ruling. I. Background This is an action for fraud and unfa ir business practices. According to the TACC, crossdefendant Jalal Shreim (“Jalal”) was the sole shareholder, president, and CEO of Friendly Wholesalers of Cali...

Excerpt: ...urt granted both motions. Plaintiff now asks the Court to vacate its grant of summary judgment for Flowers pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) because Plaintiff mistakenly filed her opposition to both motions late because she thought both motions were s et for January 22, 2024. Plaintiff's request is denied. While Plaintiff is correct that the Court declined to exercise its discretion to consider Plaintiff's late filed opposition because...

Excerpt: ...ges “[d]eff ects and nonconformities to warranty manifested themselves within the applicable express warranty period, including but not limited to, transmission defects, infotainment defects, body defects; among other defects and non -conformities. Plaintiff filed th is action on September 7, 2023, asserting various statutory claims, fraudulent inducement, and negligent repair. Plaintiff now seeks to compel FMC to produce further documents in ...

Excerpt: ...chael Maidy's, Timothy Cox's, Martin Pichinson's motion for summary judgment, and (6) Feeva Technology Inc.'s motion for summary judgment, against Cross- Defendant, Peter Kleidman. Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1308, the Court issues its tentative ruling. I. Bac kground This is an action for breach of settlement agreement allegedly entered to resolve lawsuit CrossDefendant Kleidman filed in 2013. According to the Cross- Complaint brough...

Excerpt: ...der”) alleges on February 10, 2022, Lender's predecessors -in -interest entered into a loan agreement (the “Loan”) for up to $3,262,500.00. (Complaint, ¶ 7.) The borrower executed a secured note (the “Note”) in which they agreed to pay the original lender the principa l amount of $3,262,500.00 plus interest, costs, and attorneys' fees. (Complaint, ¶ 8.) To secure payment under the Loan and Note, the borrower pledged to the original le...

Excerpt: ...d and wa s responsible for maintaining the roadway and contracted with Defendant MasTec North America, Inc. (“MasTec”) to dig and/or maintain trenches or tunnels for electrical components near where Plaintiff's accident occurred. (Complaint, ¶¶10 -11.) According t o Plaintiff, MasTec contracted with Smart Communications Systems, LLC (“SCS”) to assist and oversee the construction, including resurfacing the roadway at the accident locatio...

Excerpt: ... this lawsuit. Wh ile this case was pending, Mr. Wu left Bitmain and is now the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary of Non- Party Bitdeer. Bitmain has evidence from its discovery of Cryplex that Cryplex contacted Mr. Wu at Bitmain to discuss this lawsuit, including “litigation funding”, “acquisition of claims”, or “business transactions.” Bitmain seeks to obtain further discovery on these topics directly fr...

Excerpt: ...) failure to provide meal periods, (6) failure to provide rest breaks, (5) failure to pay wages due upon termination; (8) failure to issue accurate and itemized wage statements, (9) failure to indemnify, and (10) unlawful business practices in violation of California Business and Professions code § 17200. Defendant asserts this matter must be sent to arbitration and the litigation stayed because Plaintiff entered an arbitration agreement at the ...

Excerpt: ...r Velador Zuniga are mother and son. Esther Zuniga is the Trustee of the Ester V. Zuniga Revocable Living Trust Dated December 20, 2004 (“Trust”). Defendant Alesia Murrieta is the Successor Trustee under the terms of the Trust and Esther Zuniga's granddaughter. The facts are not disputed. Esther Zuniga and her ex -husband, Plaintiff's father, purchased the Property as their residence in 1972. On July 2, 2003, Plaintiff's father/Esther Zuniga'...

Excerpt: ...ve rulings below. I. Background This is a personal injury matter arising out of incidents that occurred during Plaintiff's incarceration. On August 7, 2020, a deputy twisted Plaintiff's wrist over tightened handcuffs, causing injury. (SAC, p. 40; Attachment to Co mplaint, p. 4.)2 On October 3, 2020, another deputy challenged Plaintiff because he refused orders to confront another inmate. (Ibid.) Plaintiff identifies another incident on October 2...

Excerpt: ...in user -in terface (“UI”) designs, via email to provide UI design services for his project, which would later become known as Zoom. The email designated Plaintiff as “UI consultant,” and his job was to provide his professional opinions and make recommendations for im proving the product's UI. Between October 27, 2011, and October 29, 2011, Mr. Yaun and Plaintiff exchanged emails regarding contract terms, eventually entering a Shares -for...

Excerpt: ...Lua. (Complaint, p. 4.) Lua initiated this action on December 3, 2021, asserting claims for negligence and premises liability. On October 4, 2023, Seaside filed the instant motion, which Lua opposes. II. Evidentiary Objections Lua's objections to Seaside's evide nce do not need to be ruled upon because they do not comply with Rule of Court 3.1354. Rule 3.1354 requires two documents to be submitted when evidentiary objections are made: the object...

Excerpt: ...reholder of a separate entity, Cynthi.io Inc. Google's termination letter —sent only to Mr. Willaims —accuses Plaintiff of conducting work for Cynthi.io using Google's time and resources, including his corporate laptop. Plaintiff vehemently denies very sentence o f the termination letter, referencing both his pre -hiring correspondence with other Google personnel and his cooperation during Google's investigation of this alleged conflict of i...

Excerpt: ... Way in Stanford, County of Santa Clara (“Property”.) The Property is owned by Plaintiff as part of its housing program located in a 450 -acre subdivision and used exclusively to provide subsidized housing for eligible faculty. (FAC ¶¶ 3, 8, 33.) On August 21, 2018, P laintiff entered into a ground lease agreement with the Faculty Lessee for a term of 51 years. Plaintiff reserved a significant ongoing interest in the Property and granted o...