Excerpt: ...ase agreement with CFEP (“Agreeme nt,”) and Edward Fields, a managing member of Westfield (“Fields” or “Defendant,”) executed a written Guaranty of Lease (the “Guaranty”) (Complaint, ¶¶ 11 -13.) As part of Plaintiff's acquisition, CFEP assigned its “rights, title, and interest,” in both the Agreement and Guaranty, to Plaintiff. (Complaint, ¶ 14.) After Plaintiff became the landlord of the Subject Building, Westfield and F...

Excerpt: ...FAC, ¶ 10.) Thirthala and Garlapati are the owners of the Property. (FAC, ¶ 6.) Mr. Medina is over the age of 80. (Id. at ¶ 11.) On April 8, 2022, Mr. Medina received notice from the senior regional manager of BAP, which stated that the owners of the building intended to relocate to the area an d move into Plaintiffs' unit. (FAC, ¶ 12.) The Property owners, and manager, had knowledge that the owners would not actually move into Plaintiffs' un...

Excerpt: ...nc. filed an action to have a co nservator appointed over Lorraine. (See FAC, ¶ 11.) Plaintiff retained defendant Howard G. Frank dba The Law Office of Howard G. Frank (“Defendant”) to represent her as a beneficiary of the Korpontinos 1988 Revocable Trust Agreement (“Trust”) and the subtrusts —the Lorraine A. Korpontinos Survivor's Trust (“Survivor's Trust”), the Lorraine A. Korpontinos Marital Trust (“Marital Trust”), and th...

Excerpt: ... statutory fee -shifting provision do es not indicate any restrictions on how the fee award is to be calculated, it is presumed that the Legislature intended courts to use the prevailing lodestar adjustment method. Pasternack v. McCullough, 65 Cal. App. 5th 1050, 1055 (2021). The method begins with calculation of the lodestar, i.e. the number of hours reasonably expended multiplied by the reasonable hourly rate. Id. The lodestar figure may then ...

Excerpt: ...9, he entered into a warra nty contract with Defendant and purchased a defective 2019 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (“Subject Vehicle”) that was manufactured by Defendant. (Complaint, ¶¶ 12, 14, 28 - 30.) In connection with this purchase, Plaintiff received an express written warranty prov iding that Defendants would repair the Vehicle in the event it developed a defect during the warranty period. (Id., ¶¶ 14, 16, 18 -19; Ex. 1.) Plaintiff als...

Excerpt: ...t, ¶¶ 17-18, exh. A.) Paragraph 10 of the agreement states: 10. Arbitration. Any controversy or claim (except those regarding Inventions, Proprietary Information or intellectual property) arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered...

Excerpt: ...mon areas on the subdi vision map of Tract No. 10108, file no. 21798266 in San Jose (“Project”). (See TAC, ¶¶ 2, 14.) However, as a result of Defendant's omissions and actions, there were numerous latent defects at the Project, including: missing head flashings at windows and doors, improperly installed stucco and stucco accessories, improperly installed self- adhered membrane and building paper, improperly installed lath, improperly inst...

Excerpt: ... attached to Dec. of Fineman. Defendant is correct that Plaintiff was not a party to the contract, and therefore lacks standing to bring suit. California law provides that “[e]very action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest[.]” Code Civ. Proc. § 36 7. A real party in interest is generally defined as “the person possessing the right sued upon by reason of the substantive law.” Redevelopment Agency of San Diego v....

Excerpt: ... agent to serve. Plai ntiff has been unable to serve EMC. Defendant is a citizen of Canada and was a board director and significant shareholder of EMC. After another investigation, Plaintiff found a residential address for Defendant. In October 2023, Plaintiff engaged a Canadi an process server to conduct personal service on Defendant, but this was unsuccessful. In November or December 2023, Plaintiff retained a new process server who was able t...

Excerpt: ... now seek an o rder compelling GM to produce documents relating to (1) the SUBJECT Vehicle (RFP Nos. 1, 2, 3, 9, 14); (2) communications between Plaintiff and Defendant or those associated with Defendant (RFP Nos. 15 and 16); (3) documents relating to the call center, lo yalty program, after warrant assistance program, or technical hotline (RFP Nos. 31 -33); and (4) documents evidencing complaints made by California owners of the same make, model...

Excerpt: ...t, but from the breach of the separate Noncompetition and Nonsolicitation Agreement (“Noncompetition Agreement”) between the parties. Plaintiff argues that because the Noncompetition Agreement does not contain an arbitration clause, it cannot be compelled to arbitration. Defendant responds that the Employment Agreement and Noncompetition Agreement should be read as one, citing both Civ. Code § 1642 and Fillpoint, LLC v. Maas (2012) 208 Cal.A...

Excerpt: ...(“San Jose City”) (collectiv e l y, “City Defendants,”), and the County of Santa Clara (“Santa Clara County”) (collectively, “Defendants.”) Plaintiffs Valdez and Garrett were employed by Kiewit6 Infrastructure West Corporation (“Kiewit Corporation”) as Journeyman Pipe Fitters, working a t San Jose-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility (“Wastewater Facility.”) (FAC, ¶ 19.) The Wastewater Facility is jointly owned and op...

Excerpt: ...mplaint (“FAC”), ¶ 4.) Loren z is the Chief Executive Officer of County Hospital/SCVMC. (Id. at ¶¶ 2, 3(a).) During Plaintiff's employment, he observed County Hospital's failure to maintain a sanitary environment and improper handling of materials, including surgical instruments. (FA C, ¶ 11.) On and after September 2022, Plaintiff informed several people that certain instruments were incorrectly sterilized and had been incorrectly steril...

Excerpt: ...2. (See complaint, ¶ 7.) Construction of the project was to be substantially completed by July 7, 2022. (See complaint, ¶ 8.) Plaintiffs contend that Premiere improperly over -excavated and demolished the base rock of an approved location of a 10,000 -gallon water tank with its foundation without notifying Plaintiffs, and the project ultimately was severely delayed and incomplete. (See complaint, ¶ 9.) Premiere stopped work and left the projec...

Excerpt: ...merger of Plaintiff with Tal amantez' Castling Kids Chess, and then the hiring of Talamantez as Plaintiff's Director of Enrichment. (See TAC, ¶¶ 28, 3738.) On May 14, 2018, Talamantez executed a nondisclosure agreement with Plaintiff, in which he agreed not to disclose Plaintiff's c onfidential information or solicit its customers and to return all property in his possession at the time of termination with Plaintiff. (See TAC, ¶ 49, exh. D.) ...

Excerpt: ...mstances, a defend ant must bring a motion to vacate and set aside default within six months of the date the default was entered. Code of Civil Proc. § 473(b) provides, in pertinent part, that: (b) The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her l egal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect....

Excerpt: ...ant is served by e mail and the Plaintiff asserts that Defendant has agreed to such service. The proof of service form specifically required Plaintiff to provide the authorizing code section for its method of service and unsurprisingly, Plaintiff offered none. Moreover, the Court Clerk indicated that service was not proper when it rejected the request for entry of default on March 2, 2022, noting that service was not proper. Plaintiff claims it ...

Excerpt: ...nts.”) I. Background A. Fac tual On July 14, 2021, Plaintiff was lawfully driving his car eastbound on El Camino Real in Mountain View, California (“Subject Location”) when Defendant Ossie B. Holt (“Holt” or “Defendant”), while operating a vehicle, caused an automobile collision. (F AC, ¶¶ 10, 15.) Prior to the collision, Defendant Holt, while driving at high speed behind Plaintiff, failed to stop and “violently” rear -ended P...

Excerpt: ...intiff now seeks an order compelling GM to produce responses to Requests for Production Nos. 8, 16 -19, 21 -22, 27, 34, 37, 40- 43, and 56. These requests seek (i) all documents relating to GM's internal analysis, investigations, communications, reports and design -related documents of the alleged “BATTERY DEFECT” in both the Subject Vehicle and other customers' vehicles (Request Nos. 16- 17, 19, 21 -22, and 40- 43); (ii) all documents relati...

Excerpt: .... Plaintiff now seeks an order compelling GM to produce documents relating to (1) the subject Vehicle (RFP Nos. 1, 2, 3, 7); (2) internal Knowledge and investigation Discovery (RFP Nos. 17, 22- 24, 35- 40); (3) documents concerning summaries and memos regarding transmission defects (RFP Nos. 41 -43, 47, 49, 50); (4) documents concerning buyback policies and procedures (RFP Nos. 55. 56. 65); (5) Communications with Governmental Agencies (and suppl...

Excerpt: ...n, ¶ BC -1, exh. A.) Baro n did not pay amounts owed pursuant to the contract and Plaintiff thus suffered contractual damages and additionally seeks interest. (See FAC, first cause of action, ¶¶ BC -2 -BC -5, second cause of action, ¶¶ CC -1 -CC -3, third cause of action, ¶¶ BC -1 -BC -5, fourth cause of action, ¶¶ CC -1 -CC -4.) On December 5, 2022, Plaintiff filed the FAC against Defendant, asserting causes of action for: 1) Breach o...

Excerpt: ...allegations of the Complaint, on July 28, 20201, Plaintiff tripped and fell on broken, raised and/or uneven pavement on the sidewalk located in front of 1904 Serge Ave., San Jose, California (“Subject Premises,”) sustaining serious injuries. (Complaint, ¶¶ 9, 13 -14, 19.) Plaintiff asserts that her injuries were the result of Defendant City's acts and omissions (Complaint, ¶ 10) and cross -complainant Kindig's2 negligent failure to maintai...

Excerpt: ...e context of Pla intiff's motion for RFP set one, and that the Court (J. Manoukian) issued an order on December 19, 2023 compelling Xilinx only to turn over the identity of the employees, but not their actual text messages. As such, the Court should not now compel the turn ing over of those same text messages. In reply, Plaintiff argues that because the Court was “deeply troubled” by Defendant's argument that text messages of its employees se...

Excerpt: ...heard. [Citation.] In [determining] the county (or counties) where venue is proper, the courts generally look to the main relief sought, as determined from the complaint as it stands at the time of the motion for change of venue. [Citation.]” (K.R.L. Partnership v. Superior Cou rt (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 490, 496- 497.) “‘It is a long established rule that a motion for change of venue must satisfy two requirements: (1) It must be shown the a...

Excerpt: ...partan sought damages i n the amount of $31,945.19 plus finance charges and interest and attorney's fees of $2,058.00. (See 4AC, first cause of action, ¶¶ BC -2 -6.) Defendant Annie Kim Le, aka Annie Le, aka Annie K. Le, Anniel A. Le, aka Anh Le, aka Kim Le, aka, Kim A. Le, aka A nnie Le Anna, aka K. Le Anna, aka K. Leannie, aka K. L. Leannie dba American Gas & Oil Corporation and dba Philip, LLC (“Le”) personally guaranteed and promised ...

Excerpt: ...d SAC, Plaintiff had a duty to “competently” advise City Entities and to defend them in “numerous lawsuits” involving the City Entities' ownership of the “San Francisco 49ers football team.” (Id. at ¶ 3.) From approximately February 2017 to December 2017, Plaintiff became the “Interim City Attorney” for the Defendant, in a “part time capacity.” (Id. at ¶ 4.) From December 19, 2017, until his termination on September 2, 2021,...

Excerpt: ...egligent repai r, and fraud by concealment. Plaintiffs now seek an order compelling Ford to produce documents relating to (1) the subject Vehicle (RFP Nos. 1, 3, 12, 15); (2) internal Knowledge and investigation Discovery (RFP Nos. 17, 19, 31, 36, and 39); (3) documents concerning summaries and memos regarding transmission defects (RFP Nos. 43, 45, and 46); (4) documents concerning buyback policies and procedures (RFP Nos. 56, 57, 58, 68, 69, and...

Excerpt: ...n May 3, 2023, plaintiff s Lingsen and Hang Chun Leung (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed the FAC against defendants Welcome Market and Welcome Market's owner, Tawa Supermarket, Inc. (“Tawa”) (collectively, “Defendants”) asserting causes of action for: 1) Premises liability; 2) Negligence; and, 3) Loss of consortium. Defendants move for summary judgment, or, in the alterative, for summary adjudication of each cause of action, on the ...

Excerpt: ...d witnesses in December 2023, that revealed extensive new information concerning the management and problems at SSH necessitating the need to file an amended complaint. Because of the new information, Plaintiff now believes a claim for punitive damages is warranted. Plaintiff had initially pled punitive damages but voluntarily dismissed the claim without prejudice on April 10, 2023, approximately three months after filing the initial complaint....

Excerpt: ...the Healing Wellness Cente r, Inc. (“Center,”) a California corporation located in San Jose. (FAC, ¶¶ 1 -4, 16.) Plaintiff agreed to provide chiropractic services for the Center's “group practice.” (FAC, ¶ 17.) The Agreement provided that Plaintiff “would be responsible for his own t axes, but said nothing [about] billing using CHIANG's Tax ID number, nor was the CENTER using CHIANG's Tax ID number discussed when negotiating” the A...

Excerpt: ...(See FAC, ¶ 34.) On the date of the signing of the loan agreement, Modesto Duran was in the hospital recovering from COVID; however, Zoe Hamilton, MF's representative, pressured Marisela to forge Modesto's signatures on the loan agreement. (See FAC, ¶ 35.) Defendants forced Plaintiffs to execute a promissory note — secured by a deed of trust to the home and Plaintiffs' commercial property at 373 South Twenty -Fourth Street in San Jose (“Com...

Excerpt: ..., was “enrolled in” Defenda nt Does 1 through 6-operated religious organizations (collectively, “Doe Church Defendants”) in California. (FAC, ¶¶ 1 -2, 5, 13.) While a minor, Plaintiff attended religious services at these organizations. (Id., ¶¶ 13, 15 -16.) The FAC alleges Plaintiff wa s a minor at the time of the assault, but it neither specifies the age of Plaintiff nor date(s) of the alleged assault. (Id., ¶ 2.) Defendant Doe 7 (...

Excerpt: ...Cal.App.3d 243, 245-246. A plaintiff's choice of venue is “presumptively correct.” Id. At 247. The burden of proof is on defendant. Defendants first claim that venue must be transferred because it is not proper pursuant to CCP section 395.5. Under 395.5, a plaintiff must bri ng its case where the contract was made or performed, where the obligation or liability arose or where the breach occurred, or in the county where the principal plac...

Excerpt: ...ssed, abused and molested by McQuigg both on and off the premises of MHS. (See complaint, ¶¶ 16 -18.) In August 2023, McQuigg was arrested and charged with sexually abusing and molesting a minor student at MHS. (See complaint, ¶ 26.) On August 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants District, and McQuigg (collectively “Defendants”), asserting causes of action for: 1) Negligence, negligent supervision, negligent hiring and/...

Excerpt: ...d omissions (see c omplaint, ¶ 14) and defendant Lisa M. Flores' (“Flores”) negligent failure to maintain, inspect, repair and warn of the dangerous condition of the subject property (see complaint, ¶¶ 20 -23). On October 21, 2021, Plaintiff presented a claim for damages wit h defendant City of San Jose (“City”) in compliance with Government Code section 911.2, and, on November 10, 2021, City sent written noticed rejecting Plaintiff's ...

Excerpt: ...e allegations of the Complaint, Plaintiff Splashworks “owns” and manages Stars Therapy Services (“Stars”), an infant and toddler developmental program and service provider for children with “developmental delays.” (Complaint, ¶ 8.) Plaintiff heavily relies on its “custom” software system/platform (the “Legacy System”) to manage Stars. (Ibid.) The Legacy system, also referred to as “Splashworks 1.0,” took Plaintiff “year...

Excerpt: ...ixteen years old.” (Complaint, ¶¶ 1 -2, 8, 11 -14.) According to the allegations in the Complaint, Plaintiff, who is currently sixty -two years old, was a student at Lynbrook High School (“Lynbrook”) located in Santa Clara County. (Ibid.) The alleged sexual abuse occurred betw een 1976 and 1977. Defendant, a public entity/school district, was an employer of Doe 2, a then 40 -year -old Lynbrook science teacher who molested and sexually abu...

Excerpt: ...al negligence. The FAC al leges Officer Taktejeva engaged in police misconduct on March 19, 2021 when she displayed inaccuracies in her police report in relation to an attack by Tang Jianing (“Jianing”) on Plaintiff.1 Specifically, the FAC alleges: inaccurate reporting regarding Ji aning's account of the attack and weapon utilization; failure to communicate Plaintiff's injury to the on- call judge who issued the emergency protective order; P...

Excerpt: ...ry relief; and, 3) Fraud. On March 22, 2023, the Arzadons filed a demurrer to the complaint. Artemio passed away. On May 5, 2023, Estrella R. Floresca (“Estrella”), individually and as the successor of interest of Artemio C. Floresca, filed a first amended complaint (“FA C”) asserting identical causes of action. On June 6, 2023, the Arzadons filed an answer to the FAC. Estrella demurred to the unverified answer and on September 29, 2...

Excerpt: ...nt project in San Jose know n as “Downtown West.” (See FAC, ¶¶ 1 -2, 42 -47.) Defendant Leslie Kipp is one of several descendants of former owners of the parcels comprising the subject property and may claim to have some right, title, estate, interest, lien or cloud on title to the s ubject properties. (See FAC, ¶¶ 5 -41.) Plaintiffs collectively assert fee interest ownership of the subject properties, alleging that Civil Code section 831...

Excerpt: ...their papers a nd the hearing, the court makes the following rulings: This is an action for attorney malpractice. According to the allegations of the complaint, in 2013, plaintiff Kevin Young (“Young”) began working at plaintiff ABC Wholesale, Inc. (“ABC”), a company founded by his parents. (See complaint, ¶ 8.) Young obtained legal advice regarding the business, including operations and collections, from defendants Judy ChiDee Tsai (“...

Excerpt: ...ghth Division (F ord Motor Warranty Cases (2023) 89 Cal.App.5th 1324 (Ochoa)), and one from the Seventh Division (Montemayor v. Ford Motor Co. (June 26, 2023, B320477) __ Cal.App.5th __ [2023 Cal.App.Lexis 481; 2023 WL 4181909] (Montemayor)) —both of which expressly disagre e with Felisilda. More recently, the Third Appellate District Court of Appeal in Keilar on August 16, 2023, and, the First Appellate District Court of Appeal in Yeh on Septe...

Excerpt: ...of action in the First Ame nded Complaint (“FAC”). Defendants have also filed a motion to strike certain portions of the FAC. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual According to the allegations of the FAC, Plaintiff was employed at Yeganah. (FAC, ¶¶ 20 -21.) On or about August 28, 2021, Plainti ff pointed out to Tarighat that he believed Tarighat had made a mistake with a customer's food order. (Id., ¶ 22.) Tarighat became upset and began yelling at Pl...

Excerpt: ...al According to the allegation s in the operative Complaint, Plaintiff Pereira entered into a “Listing” agreement with prospective buyers, Xiochiti Mijangos and Patel Mijangos (collectively, “Buyers,”) for the sale of real property located on 12935 Columbet Avenue, San Martin, Californi a (“Subject Property.”) Robert Ellis (“Ellis,”) a realtor at Remax Morgan Hill, was the listing agent of the Subject Property. (Complaint. p. 3.) ...

Excerpt: ... on March 31, 2019, he entered into a warranty contract with Defendant and purchased a defective 2019 GMC Sierra 1500 (“Subject Vehicle”) that was manufactured and warranted by Defendant. (Complaint, ¶¶ 16 -18, 29, 31.) In connection with this purchase, Plaintiff received an express wri tten warranty providing that Defendants would repair the Vehicle in the event it developed a defect during the warranty period. Plaintiff also received an i...

Excerpt: ...ly, “Defendants”), causing h im to sustain injuries. (See complaint, ¶ 9.) Defendants knew or should have known about the dangerous condition created by the utility cover and catch basin being used on the subject premises as a latent dangerous condition in an area open and known and foreseeably to be used by the public. (See complaint, ¶ 10.) On September 20, 2021, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants asserting causes of action f...

Excerpt: ...onal (“Colliers”), and John Machado (“Machado”)(collectively, “Cross-Defendants”). According to the allegations of the Cross-Complaint (“XC”), on May 7, 2002, Schmitt purchased a fee estate of real property located at Hillsdale Ave in San Jose (“the Property”). (XC, ¶ 1.) Alliance was hired through Colliers' agent Machado, to handle the transaction and prepare the grant deed for the Property. (Id. at ¶ 4.) Also on May 7, 200...

Excerpt: ...nd fraud by concealment. Plainti
¯ now seeks an order compelling Ford to produce documents relating to (1) the subject Vehicle (RFP Nos. 1, 3, 12, 15); (2) Internal Knowledge and Investigation Discovery (RFP Nos. 17, 19, 31, 36, and 39); (3) Summary documents and Deposition Testimony Regarding these Documents (RFP Nos. 43, 45, and 46); (4) Policies and Procedure Discovery (RFP Nos. 56, 57, 58, 68, 69, and 73); and (5) Communications with Governm...

Excerpt: ...bpoena to Mr. Abye to produce records of Bend Capital, LLC (“Bend”). Bend has two, 50% managing members: Mr. Chung and Ms. Chung. Mr. Chung asserts that Ms. Chung did not have the right to unilaterally cause Bend to engage a law Þrm without his consent. Mr. Abye has since been disqualiÞed from representing Bend but, according to Mr. Chung, he continues to withhold Bend's records related to Mr. Abye's representation and positions asserted on...

Excerpt: ...Complaint (“FAC”), ¶ 4.) On or about May 19, 2022, Plainti
¯ disclosed to Defendant that she had sleep apnea, a disabling medical condition, and required accommodations. (FAC, ¶ 5.) Instead of accommodating Plainti
¯, Defendant terminated her employment. (Id. at ¶ 6.) Plainti
¯ duly and satisfactorily performed her duties of employment and was willing and able to perform her duties if reasonable accommodations had been made. (FAC, ¶¶ ...