Excerpt: ...ded that Why Systems would provi de equipment and services to Emodo at a monthly rate of $271,068 and with a 5% charge for late payments and award of attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the collection of amounts due. (Compl., ¶ 6, subds. (a) -(c).) Defendant breached the August Lease by failing to make the payments due and owing of at least $5,028,492, excluding interest and fees. (Compl., ¶ 8.) On July 31, 2023, Plaintiff filed its Co...

Excerpt: ...s father and his mother Adrienne, as joint tenants, gifted property located at 2960 Sierra Road in San Jose (the “Property”) to Tyler and his wife, Leticia Kawamoto. (SAC, ¶ 10.) On April 30, 2007, Tyler and Leticia paid Tyler's parents $350,438.87 for the Property, and they continued to make mortgage payments of $1,500 per month. (SAC, ¶¶ 11 -12.) On June 6, 2008, Tyler's father passed away. (SAC, ¶ 13.) On November 12, 2008, Adrienne tr...

Excerpt: ...ussed below, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND A. Related Case In August 2017, another Samaritan employee, Jennifer Richert, filed a similar action related to her wage statements, Richert v. Samaritan, LLC (Super. Ct. Santa Clara County, No. 17CV314186) (Richert) . Ms. Richert is represented by the same counsel who represent Plaintiffs here. She alleges that, during pay periods when she received overtime wages, her wage statements failed to i...

Excerpt: ... again st Emil Eshagh and The Perfect Finish Inc. (“Perfect Finish”) in the amount of $50,733.28, for breach of contract, fraud, and other causes of action. Emil Eshagh was/is involved in the operation of The Perfect Finish. (Complaint, ¶ 11.) Plaintiffs had contracted Perfect Finish to design, build, and install kitchen and bathroom cabinets. (Complaint, ¶ 9.) On May 1, 2023, during a debtor's exam, Mr. Eshagh claimed (1) Earthlime Inc. wa...

Excerpt: ...party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 14 February 2024. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. --- oooOooo--- Order On Defenda n t 's Demurrer To Plaintiff's Complaint. I. Statement of Facts. Plaintiff Ampere Computing LLC (“Ampere”) is a semiconductor manufacturer founded in 2017. (Plaintiff Ampere's complaint in case n...

Excerpt: ...V395005) after Respondents successfully quashed a petition to correct the arbitration award, this court (Judge Kirwan) awarded $461,250.00 out of the $745,696.49 requested. In the second motion, filed in a related case (No. 22CV399395) after Respondents (who were petitioners in that case) prevailed on a petition to confirm the arbitration award, this court (the undersigned) awarded $361,923.55 out of the $810,545.35 requested in this case. The ...

Excerpt: ...nt, ¶ 1.) Dr. Asllani is a Kosovo resident, doctor, and human rights activist, who has documented human rights violations in the Western Balkans for the past 30 years. (Complaint, ¶ 3.) Plaintiffs allege Google discriminated against the Albanian language by excl uding it on Google platforms and failing to support it on Google Ads and Google Adsense. (Complaint, ¶¶ 9 -12.) In 2014, the Director of Google Adriatic visited the Republic of Kosovo...

Excerpt: ... & Nguyen Thi Ngoc Quy Insuran ce Trust. The original and still -operative complaint, filed on October 20, 2020, states three causes of action: (1) Fraudulent Transfer re: “Granite Bay Property,” in violation of Civil Code (“Civ. Code”) section 3439.04(a), part of the Uniform Voidable Transfer Act (“UVTA”) (Civ. Code, §§ 3439 et seq.); (2) Fraudulent Transfer re: “$1.9 Millon Granite Bay Loan,” in violation of Civ. Code section...

Excerpt: ...First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 14 February 2024. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. --- oooOooo --- Orders on: (1) Motion Of Defendants/ Cross -Complainants For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication, On Cross -Complaint; (2) Motion Of Defendants For Summary Judgm...

Excerpt: ... on March 31, 2019, he entered into a warranty contract with Defendant and purchased a defective 2019 GMC Sierra 1500 (“Subject Vehicle”) that was manufactured and warranted by Defendant. (Complaint, ¶¶ 16 -18, 29, 31.) In connection with this purchase, Plaintiff received an express wri tten warranty providing that Defendants would repair the Vehicle in the event it developed a defect during the warranty period. Plaintiff also received an i...

Excerpt: ...on Agreement,” the cour t agrees with Plaintiff and grants his motion. The court denies defendants' motion. The parties settled their litigation shortly before trial, as memorialized in a one - page settlement agreement dated February 28, 2019. The parties noted in the agreement that they “anticipate a more formal settlement agreement being drafted and executed but it is their intent that this document, [sic] signed by them be a binding legal...

Excerpt: ...nt inc reased the interest rate from 1% to 5%, they declined to move forward with the loan, and the loan was never funded. Defendant claims the loan agreement was made between Plaintiff Van Tu's brother and Defendant in 2015. In the course of researching a pos sible refinance of the property, Plaintiffs discovered the short form deed for $200,000 was filed against their property and filed this lawsuit to quiet title. On August 13, 2021, Plaint...

Excerpt: ...ly, “Defendants”), causing h im to sustain injuries. (See complaint, ¶ 9.) Defendants knew or should have known about the dangerous condition created by the utility cover and catch basin being used on the subject premises as a latent dangerous condition in an area open and known and foreseeably to be used by the public. (See complaint, ¶ 10.) On September 20, 2021, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants asserting causes of action f...

Excerpt: ... 2020, set forth c auses of action for: (1) Violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681b(b)(2)(A) (FCRA); and (2) Violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681d(a)(1) and 1681g(c) (FCRA). On November 18, 2020, the court issued its Order Deeming Case Complex and Staying Discovery and Responsive Pleading Deadline, which stayed all discovery in this case. On June 4, 2021, Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), which sets forth causes of action ...

Excerpt: ...023, sets forth causes of action for: (1) Failure to Pay All Minimum Wages; (2) Failure to Pay All Overtime Wages; (3) Meal Period Violations; (4) Rest Period Violations; (5) Wage Statement Violations; (6) Failure to Timely Pay Wages During Employment and Upon Terminatio n; (7) Unfair Competition; and (8) PAGA Penalties. The parties have reached a settlement. Plaintiff Anicia Cisneros (“Plaintiff”) moved for preliminary approval of the settle...

Excerpt: ...ilure to Provi de Meal Periods or Compensation in Lieu Thereof; (2) Failure to Provide Rest Periods or Compensation in Lieu Thereof; (3) Failure to Pay Minimum Wages; (4) Failure to Pay Overtime Wages; (5) Failure to Reimburse Work Related Expenses; (6) Failure to Comply with Itemized Employee Wage Statement Provisions; (7) Failure to Pay All Wages Upon Termination; (8) Unfair Business Practices; and (9) California Labor Code Private Attorneys Ge...

Excerpt: ...�Plaintiff”). Pl aintiff's original Complaint, filed on September 30, 2019, set forth the following causes of action: (1) Breach of Contract; (2) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; (3) Intentional Misrepresentation; (4) Promise Without Intent to Perform; (5) Fraudulent Omission; (6) Breach of Fiduciary Duty; (7) Quasi -Contract Based on Unjust Enrichment; (8) Violation of California Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200; (9) I...

Excerpt: ...d oral argument, the Court essentially found for Petitioners. The arbitrator's interim award states: Arbitrator awards Claimants $13,504.00 as damages for breach of the HIA, plus costs in the amount of $748.32, plus attorney's fees according to proof. Claimant shall submit to Arbitrator an itemized statement of attorney's fees incurred showing the attorney's hourly rate, the date the work was performed, the work performed, and the amount of time ...

Excerpt: ... First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 09 February 2024. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. ---oooOooo--- Order on Motion of Defendants to Quash Subpoena Issued to Bank of America, N.A. I. Statement of Facts. Plainti
¯ Þled this complaint on 22 of August 2022.4 Plainti
¯s contend that defen...

Excerpt: ...lleges Purvis breached his Þduciary duties to StormQuant when “he walked o
¯ the job with no notice or e
¯ort to protect StormQuants interests” and engaged in self-dealing to enrich himself and others, including his spouse. (Id.) StormQuant alleges Purvis “developed a scheme” to create employment agreements that would only be o
¯ered if StormQuant obtained $5 million in funding from an investor. (Complaint, ¶ 7.) StormQuant alleges ...

Excerpt: ...ly favor the enforceability of arbitration agreements and require that – where parties have agreed to arbitrate – they must do so in lieu of litigating in court. (Buckeye Cheek Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna (2006) 546 U.S. 440, 443; Moses H. Cone Mem. Hospital v. Mercury Constr. Corp. (1983) 460 U.S. 1, 24-25; Harris v. Tap Worldwide, LLC (2016) 248 Cal.App.4th 373, 380 [“California law favors enforcement of valid arbitration agreements.”]; t...

Excerpt: ...answered questions. This brief was also tardy.4 The court would like the parties to address the following questions at the hearing: 1. Plainti
¯s argue that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) does not apply in this case, because “[t]here is no indication . . . that AXIOM engaged in any interstate commerce or that the agreement is intended to encompass such activity at all.” (Opposition at pp. 3:28-4:2.) If the court ultimately agrees an...

Excerpt: ...ackground 1. Complaint According to the Complaint, the Falcocchias engaged in unpermitted work on their residential property in violation of the City's municipal code. An administrative hearing was held before the City's Appeals Hearing Board (the “Board”). The Board ordered the Falcocchias to obtain City approval, including permits and inspections, for work done on their property. The Board also assessed administrative costs and penalties, i...

Excerpt: ... did not Þle her memorandum o points and authorities until January 22, 2024, which is only 15 court days beore a February 13, 2024 hearing date. Code o Civil Procedure section 1005, subdivision (b), requires moving papers to be served at least 16 court days beore a hearing. Unsurprisingly, given the lack o notice (much less, timely notice) the court has received no response to the motion rom Nordstrom. Second, even i notice were proper, t...

Excerpt: ...5660.40 for a total of $121,272.90. Nguyen is the “prevailing defendant under CCP section 425.16(c), which mandates that “a prevailing defendant on a special motion to strike shall be entitled to recover his or her attorney's fees and costs.” (CCP § 425.16(c).) On November 8, 2023, the Court issued an order granting Nguyen's anti-SLAPP motion with respect to six of the seven counts contained in Plainti
¯'s First Amended Complaint. By this...