Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

5842 Results

Location: Santa Clara x
2024.04.23 Motion to Quash Subpoena, to Compel Compliance with Subpoena 400
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...), alleging first cause of action f or negligence-unprofessional inadequate security, second cause of action for commercial premises liability and third cause of action for failure to warn of dangerous condition on business premises. According to the allegations of the FAC, on or about May 5 , 2018, security personnel of Restaurant witnessed attacks unfolding inside Restaurant's premises involving Decedent and an alleged assailant. Security pers...
2024.04.23 Motion to Amend 412
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Monahan, William
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...' claims against th em on the grounds that Cross-Complainants were truly ignorant of the fictitiously named cross -defendants' identities when the CrossComplaint was filed on July 10, 2020, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure(“CCP”) sections 473(a), 474 and 576 and California Rules of Court (CRC) Rule 3.1324 is GRANTED. CrossComplainants are granted 15 days leave to file their proposed First Amended Cross -Complaint. The court may, in the ...
2024.04.23 Motion for Vexatious Litigant Determination, to Require Security to be Furnished 545
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...rez (“Ramirez”) i s his landlord and that defendant Ramirez (and/or agents, employees, co - conspirators) committed trespass on plaintiff Martin's apartment. Plaintiff Martin's original complaint further alleged that defendant Emalee Ousley (“Ousley”) and defendant Ramirez (an d /o r agents, employees, co -conspirators) committed an assault and battery. Plaintiff Martin's original complaint also names as defendants the City of Sacramento ...
2024.04.23 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, to Strike Doe Amendment 410
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ... complaint does not identify any “Doe” defendants in paragraph 1, where all defendants are supposed to be identified. In paragraph 6, however, Sun has checked the box stating that Doe defendants “1 -5” were the “agents or employees of other named defendants.” The co mplaint does not allege compliance with any claim presentation requirement, as none of the boxes in paragraph 9 of the form are checked. In paragraph 10, where causes of ...
2024.04.23 Motion for Attorney Fees 973
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...each defendant), third c ause of action for breach of contract, fourth cause of action for breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing and fifth cause of action for specific performance. On June 23, 2023, Plaintiff's motions for summary judgment on the complaint and cross co mplaint were granted, and on November 7, 2023, judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff. On January 8, 2024, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for attorney's fees...
2024.04.23 Demurrer to TAC 545
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...ff Martin's apartment. Plaintiff Martin's original complaint further alleged that defendant Emalee Ousley (“Ousley”) and defendant Ramirez (and/or agents, employees, co -conspirators) committed an assault and battery. Plaintiff Martin's original complaint also names as defendants the City of Sacramento (“Sacramento”), City of West Sacramento (“West Sacramento”), and Google LLC (“Google”). Without much in the way of facts, plaintif...
2024.04.23 Demurrer to FACC 871
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ...er things, Stensrud made a significant capital contribution and loan to Plaintiff in exchange for 80% ownership of the company. (Complaint, ¶3.) Plaintiff corporation later prepared a written “Action by Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors of Level 5 Security, Inc.,” to formally document actions taken at the May 15, 2022 organizational meeting. (Complaint, ¶7.) The Unanimous Written Consent adopted new bylaws, documented a $...
2024.04.23 Motion to Dismiss Action on Grounds of Forum Non Conveniens 300
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Monahan, William
Hearing Date: 2024.04.23
Excerpt: ... in a forum outside this state, the court shall stay or dismiss the action in whole or in part on any conditions that may be just. (CCP § 410.30, subd. (a) (Deering, Lexis Advance through the 2024 Regular Session Ch 1).) “Forum non conveniens is an equitable doctrine invoking the discretionary power of a court to decline to exercise the jurisdiction it has over a transitory cause of action when it believes that the action may be more appropria...
2024.04.18 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 848
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...ecompensated heart failure. (Ibid.) Based on Decedent's medical history, Good Samaritan knew or should have known that Decedent was at high risk of developing pressure sores. (SAC, ¶ 15.) Decedent presented with wounds in her right and left legs. (Ibid.) Pressure sore protocol sho uld have been instituted and followed at Good Samaritan. (Id. at ¶ 16.) Decedent suffered the development and/or worsening of pressure sores while at Good Samaritan. ...
2024.04.18 Demurrer to FAC 141
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ... Company (“LBMC”), borrow ing $125,000. (FAC, ¶9.) Plaintiffs executed a promissory note (“Note”) secured by a deed of trust (“DO”) against the Subject Property, Plaintiffs' primary residence. (FAC, ¶¶10 – 11.) The Note and DOT incorrectly identified the parcel number for the Subje ct Property as 599-44 -020. (FAC, ¶¶12 – 13.) LBMC subsequently assigned the [DOT] to Mortgage Electronic Registration Services (“MERS”) on o...
2024.04.18 Demurrer to SAC 608
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...y are in the legal cu stody of defendant County. (Id.) Defendant County was responsible for the care and safety of children within Santa Clara County. (Id.) Defendant County provided child welfare, child protective, and childcare services to foster children in Santa Clara Count y, including plaintiff Michael Holys (“Holys”). (SAC, ¶9.) At all relevant times, plaintiff Holys was in foster care under the custody, care, and control of defendant...
2024.04.18 Demurrer to SAC 694
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Adams, Charles F
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...that she and simila rly-situated dancers were employed by Defendants AJ's LLC and its owner, Paul Gill, from approximately May 1, 2013, until April 22, 2017, but were misclassified as independent contractors. AJ's Restaurant & Bar (“AJ's”) was a fictitious name for a sole pro prietorship owned by Andrea Russo until he passed away in May 2021. The restaurant closed in 2020 during the Covid pandemic and never reopened, as admitted by Plaintif...
2024.04.18 Demurrer, Motion for Sanctions 984
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Monahan, William
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...rty located at 1343 San Juan Avenue in San Jose, California (“Property”) upon the death of his mother, Maria Castaneda (“Castaneda”). (Complaint at BC -4.) Upon Salvador's death or sale of the Property, Plaintiff was to be provided with her share a s issue of Castaneda.1 (Ibid.) On November 26, 2022, Salvador died and Plaintiff discovered that he transferred the Property into his trust to be given to Defendant, his wife, upon his death. (...
2024.04.18 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 229
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rosen, Amber
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ... attached to Dec. of Fineman. Defendant is correct that Plaintiff was not a party to the contract, and therefore lacks standing to bring suit. California law provides that “[e]very action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest[.]” Code Civ. Proc. § 36 7. A real party in interest is generally defined as “the person possessing the right sued upon by reason of the substantive law.” Redevelopment Agency of San Diego v....
2024.04.18 Motion to Compel Further Responses to Inspection Demands, for Monetary Sanctions, Relief from Waiver 309
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rosen, Amber
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...mon areas on the subdi vision map of Tract No. 10108, file no. 21798266 in San Jose (“Project”). (See TAC, ¶¶ 2, 14.) However, as a result of Defendant's omissions and actions, there were numerous latent defects at the Project, including: missing head flashings at windows and doors, improperly installed stucco and stucco accessories, improperly installed self- adhered membrane and building paper, improperly installed lath, improperly inst...
2024.04.18 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement 335
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Adams, Charles F
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...is Plaintiff s' motion for final approval of settlement, which is unopposed. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs began employment with Defendant in September 2019 and ended their employment in April 2022. (First Amended Class Act ion Complaint (“FAC”), ¶ 3.) Both Plaintiffs were employed by Defendant as hourly, non- exempt employees. (Ibid.) According to Plaintiffs, they were sometimes required to work ...
2024.04.18 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement, for Attorney Fees 580
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Adams, Charles F
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...y associated premiums, and failed to provide code- complaint wage statements, among other Labor Code violations. Now before the Court are Plaintiffs' motion for final approval of a settlement and motion for attorneys' fees, costs and enhancement awards, which are unopp osed. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motions. I. BACKGROUND On January 24, 2022, Ms. Martinez and Ms. Orellano filed a PAGA Complaint against Defendant in this Court in...
2024.04.18 Motion to Compel Further Responses 053
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Adams, Charles F
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...below, Plaintiff' s motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND According to the allegations of the operative Complaint (“Complaint”), Ms. Velasco was employed by Bright Matters, which provides cleaning and janitorial services throughout the state of California, as a janitor from appr oximately September 2021 until her termination in January 2022. Ms. Velasco alleges that she and other aggrieved employees were willfully misclassified as independent con...
2024.04.18 Motion to Compel Further Responses, to Compel Compliance 668
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...ENIED IN PART. Fi rst, Steinberg Hart seeks further responses to Requests for Production Nos. 24, 25, and 26 from its second set of document requests, under section 2031.310. Z&L's responses consisted solely of objections, without any statement of compliance. But Z&L argu es in its opposition that these requests are duplicative of Requests for Production Nos. 4, 5, and 6, which were presumably contained in Steinberg Hart's first set of document ...
2024.04.18 Motion to Consolidate 623
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Monahan, William
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...n Hsu and Chin- Wei Hsu in Case No. 23CV427626 filed a similar notice in their case referencing this Case No. 22CV407623, the same day. In both notices, the second box in Section 1(h) is checked indicating that each case “arise from the same or substantially identical transact ions, incidents, or events requiring determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact.” The plaintiffs in both actions are represented by ...
2024.04.18 Motion to Stay 721
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Chung, Frederick S
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...024. The primary ba sis for the District's demurrer was the claim that Assembly Bill 218 (“AB 218”), which amended the limitations period for bringing a childhood sexual assault claim under Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1, was unconstitutional under Article XVI, § 6 of the California Constitution, also known as the “Gift Clause.” The court ultimately rejected this claim and overruled the demurrer. (See January 23, 2024 Order.)3 Two...
2024.04.18 Motion to Stay Civil Action 499
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.18
Excerpt: ...ion Chicago Title Insurance Company and cross -complainant Roya Javid (R Javid”) each filed joinder in Javid's opposition (collectively “Objectors”). On March 29, 2024, defendant and cross complainant Orange Coast Title Company of Northern California (“Orange Coast”) and defendant, cross - defendant and cross -complainant Susan Trujillo (Trujillo) filed response to Tashjian's motion to stay in support of stay. Evidentiary objections O...
2024.04.17 Motion to Compel Deposition, for Summary Judgment, to Seal 472
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Zayner, Theodore C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...n September 29, 2021, Pl aintiff designs, manufactures, and sells electric cars, electric vehicle powertrain components, as well as scalable energy generation and storage products. (FAC, ¶ 36.) Plaintiff sells successful electric vehicles and is poised to enter the pickup truck market, with over 500,000 reservations for its highly anticipated Cybertruck. (Ibid.) Defendants Rivian Automotive, Inc. and Rivian Automotive, LLC (collectively, “Rivi...
2024.04.17 Motion for Attorney Fees, for Summary Adjudication, to Seal 027
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Zayner, Theodore C
Hearing Date: 2024.04.17
Excerpt: ...) Arvind Srin ivasan v. ZL Technologies, Inc., et al. (Case No. 20CV373027); (3) Arvind Srinivasan v. ZL Technologies, Inc. (Case No. 20CV373149); (4) ZL Technologies, Inc., et al. v. Arvind Srinivasan (Case No. 21CV378097); (5) Arvind Srinivasan v. ZL Technologies, Inc . (Case No. 21CV382329). and As is relevant here, ZL Technologies, Inc., et al. v. Arvind Srinivasan (Case No. 21CV378097) (“Defamation Case”) is a defamation action filed by...
2024.04.16 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 435
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Pennypacker, Evette D
Hearing Date: 2024.04.16
Excerpt: ...a fraudulent sc heme to retire senior water rights vis- à-vis duplicitous water claims….for the construction and massive expansion of a luxurious private urban development” in Salt Lake City, Utah. (Complaint ¶ 2.) On September 26, 2014, Plaintiff filed suit under the Fed eral Claims Act in the Federal Court for the District of Utah relating to a public drinking water system in Salt Lake County operated by the Emigration Canyon Improvement...

5842 Results

Per page

Pages