Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

5970 Results

Location: Santa Clara x
2021.07.20 Motions to Compel Responses, for RFAs to be Admitted, for Monetary Sanctions 579
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Manoukian, Socrates P
Hearing Date: 2021.07.20
Excerpt: ... North First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 19 July 2021. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. ‐‐‐oooOooo‐‐‐ Orders on Motions of Plaintiff to: 1. Compel Century Park to Provide Responses to Form Interrogatories and for Sanctions; 2. Compel Century Park to Provide Responses to Speci...
2021.07.20 Motion to Compel Arbitration, Stay Action 659
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2021.07.20
Excerpt: ...serts that plaintiff's original complaint named only Kennedy as defendant, and that Kennedy's earlier motion to compel arbitration and stay of action was denied by this court on procedural grounds. Plaintiff then filed a first amended complaint naming National as a new defendant. While National asserts that it is a completely separate and distinct entity from Kennedy, the FAC alleges National is liable to plaintiff on an agency and/or joint emplo...
2021.07.20 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 899
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Kirwan, Peter H
Hearing Date: 2021.07.20
Excerpt: ...use. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of the work of these two defendants asbestos was disturbed and released into the residence. Defendant MG Remediation, Inc. was then hired to perform asbestos remediation. Plaintiff's original complaint was filed on January 7, 2019. The operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) was filed on September 3, 2020. The FAC states four causes of action1 for: (1) Breach of Contract (against all three contractor ...
2021.07.20 Demurrer 836
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rudy, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2021.07.20
Excerpt: ... in San Jose in 2000 as a seventh grader. (SAC, ¶¶ 12‐13.) Due to behavioral issues caused by hyperactivity, Plaintiff was placed in a separate classroom from his peers with several other boys under the care, control and supervision of defendant Roland Saher (“Saher”). (Id., ¶¶ 14‐16.) Saher was allegedly not sufficiently credentialed, trained and vetted for such an assignment. (Id.) Plaintiff and his classmates were physically isolat...
2021.07.20 Demurrer 689
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rudy, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2021.07.20
Excerpt: ... Complaint, in May 2016, the United States Department of the Navy (the “Navy”) issued a funding solicitation through the Small Business Innovation Research5 (“SBIR”) for an “Integrated Hybrid Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) System” for the V‐22 Osprey, a military aircraft. (Complaint, ¶ 16.) The objective of the foregoing systems was to utilize certain sensors and actuators to detect and track damages to structures. (Id., ¶ 17....
2021.07.20 Demurrer 616
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Kirwan, Peter H
Hearing Date: 2021.07.20
Excerpt: ... Background This is an action for wrongful death and dangerous condition of public property. According to the allegations of the complaint, two‐year‐old Alexavier Gonzalez Padilla (“Decedent”) was struck and killed by a motor vehicle at the intersection of Banff Street and Danube Way in San Jose, California. (Complaint, ¶ 22.) Decedent's minor siblings— Aileen, Amelia, Bryan, Desiree, and Izaiah—witnessed the accident and, consequent...
2021.07.20 Demurrer 512
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Kirwan, Peter H
Hearing Date: 2021.07.20
Excerpt: ...propria persona, he is entitled to the same, but no greater, consideration than other litigants and attorneys. Further, the in propria persona litigant is held to the same restrictive rules of procedure as an attorney.” (Burnete v. La Casa Dana Apartments (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 1262, 1267, internal citations omitted.) “A doctrine generally requiring or permitting exceptional treatment of parties who represent themselves would lead to a quagmi...
2021.07.20 Demurrer 332
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Manoukian, Socrates P
Hearing Date: 2021.07.20
Excerpt: .... The court may adopt, modify or reject the tentative ruling after considering the parties' oral arguments. The tentative ruling will have no legal effect unless adopted by the court. No notice of intent to appear is required. If you wish to submit on the tentative decision, you may send a telefax to Judge Borrell's secretary, Isabel Alarcon, at 805‐477‐5894, stating that you submit on the tentative. A copy of the telefax must be sent to all ...
2021.07.20 Demurrer 271
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rudy, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2021.07.20
Excerpt: ...edent”) were previously joint tenants as common‐law husband and wife of real property located at 444 Bella Corte in Mountain View (the “Property”) by way of grant deed dated November 22, 2004. (FAC, ¶ 19, Exhibit A.) Decedent was hospitalized with terminal cancer from December 6, 2018 until his death on January 6, 2019. (Id., ¶ 18.) Plaintiff was by Decedent's side nearly every day during that time. (Id., ¶ 20.) On December 29, 2018, P...
2021.07.20 Motion to Vacate Default, Judgment 210
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Manoukian, Socrates P
Hearing Date: 2021.07.20
Excerpt: ... Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 19 July 2021. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. ‐‐‐oooOooo‐‐‐ Order On Motion of Defendant to Vacate Default/Default Judgment. I. Statement of Facts. This complaint was filed on 5 July 2016. 3 the complaint alleges a cause of action for breach of contract. On ...
2021.07.15 Demurrer 985
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rudy, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2021.07.15
Excerpt: ... the Complaint, Plaintiff's mother, Maria Ramirez (“Maria”), was an employee of IDT at a Salinas, California semiconductor facility when she conceived and gave birth to her him. (Complaint, ¶ 6.) During the course of her pregnancy, IDT utilized teratogenic, genotoxic, developmentally toxic, developmentally neurotoxic and reproductively toxic chemicals in the assembly and manufacture of products at its Salinas facility, and such toxicants can...
2021.07.15 Demurrer 017
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Kirwan, Peter H
Hearing Date: 2021.07.15
Excerpt: ..., provided accounting services to Plaintiff, Craig Urban, and UPI. (Id. at ¶¶ 2‐3, 6, 9, 14, & 19.) In 1999, UPI established a Money Purchase Pension Plan (“Plan 1”) and a Profit Sharing Plan (“Plan 2”). (Complaint, ¶ 10.) Plaintiff made contributions and payments to Plan 1 and Plan 2. (Id. at ¶ 12.) In addition, UPI was required to make annual contributions to Plan 1 for Plaintiff. (Id. at ¶ 11.) Plaintiff did not receive his full...
2021.07.15 Demurrer 355
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Kulkarni, Sunil R.
Hearing Date: 2021.07.15
Excerpt: ... Family Holding ApS (JPTB)—seek damages and other relief. Before the Court is a demurrer by individual cross‐ defendants Kathy Pesic and Iliya Pesic (the Pesics) to all of the clams asserted against them in the Amended Cross‐Complaint (FAXC). (Code Civ. Proc., 430.10, subd. (e).) As discussed below, the Court SUSTAINS the Pesics' demurrer with leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND Silvaco commenced this action by filing a complaint for declaratory ...
2021.07.15 Demurrer 554
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rudy, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2021.07.15
Excerpt: ...vely, “Cross‐Complainants”). I. Background A. Factual 1. Complaint This is an action for breach of contract. According to the allegations of the complaint (“Complaint”), PAPO is the owner of CTC, a real estate development project located in Palo Alto which includes the premises located at 2108 El Camino Real, Palo Alto (the “Property”). On November 20, 2013, CTC, as landlord, and J&A Family Markets, Inc. (“J&A”), as tenant, ente...
2021.07.15 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 666
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Manoukian, Socrates P
Hearing Date: 2021.07.15
Excerpt: ...osing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 7 July 2021. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. ‐‐‐oooOooo‐‐‐ Order ON Motion for Summary Judgment, OR in the Alternative Summary Adjudication I. Statement of Facts. Plaintiff James Rhys Kantor (“Kantor”) began work as an employee of defendants Vernon Kirk (“Kirk”) and San...
2021.07.15 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 806
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2021.07.15
Excerpt: ...ssment in connection with arranging a loan. (See 4AC, ¶ 17.) Summers is a real estate person who does business as or under the supervision of defendant John Trowbridge (“Trowbridge”) through the fictitiously named Capital Funding. (See 4AC, ¶ 7.) Kenoyer introduced himself as a licensed home loan mortgage broker with CHL. (Id.) Plaintiffs told Summers and Kenoyer that they wanted a loan to remodel their family home, and Kenoyer represented ...
2021.07.15 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement, for Attorney Fees 271
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Kulkarni, Sunil R.
Hearing Date: 2021.07.15
Excerpt: ...der. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for final approval of the settlement and for approval of her attorney fees, costs, and service award. Plaintiff's motion is unopposed. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS final approval. I. LEGAL STANDARDS FOR SETTLEMENT APPROVAL A. Class Action Generally, “questions whether a [class action] settlement was fair and reasonable, whether notice to the class was adequate, whether certification of the cla...
2021.07.15 Motion for New Trial 381
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Kulkarni, Sunil R.
Hearing Date: 2021.07.15
Excerpt: ...OUND The factual and procedural background to this action is summarized in the Court's April 27th, 2021 order granting Acer's motion for summary judgment (the Order), and is not repeated here. The first page of the Order summed up the Court's reasoning in granting summary judgment: Intellisoft does not seek an injunction, but instead monetary relief. And its sole theory of monetary relief for all claims is not viable in light of the undisputed fa...
2021.07.15 Motion to Compel Source Code Repositories, for Sanctions 926
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Kulkarni, Sunil R.
Hearing Date: 2021.07.15
Excerpt: ...s's motion to compel source code repositories, which Cisco opposes. Cisco also seeks unspecified sanctions in connection with its opposition. As discussed below, the Court DENIES Leadfactors's motion and DENIES Cisco's request for sanctions. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual According to the operative Third Amended Complaint (TAC), ConnectBeam was the first integrated social software platform that combined “social bookmarking, tagging, social networking...
2021.07.15 Motion to Dismiss, Uphold Mandatory Fee Arbitration Award 503
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Rudy, Christopher
Hearing Date: 2021.07.15
Excerpt: ... of the legal services provided. The Fee Agreement, at paragraph 11 provides that: “If there are any disputes about the billing, services charged, statements, etc., Client shall promptly notify Attorney and agrees to have these matters handled by Mandatory Fee Arbitration with the county in which the matter was filed. Before any other actions are pursued by Attorney or Client, the parties agree to first mediate their differences with a Mediator...
2021.07.13 Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment 282
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Takaichi, Drew C
Hearing Date: 2021.07.13
Excerpt: ... judgment was entered on or about July 21, 2014. On July 21, 2016, defendant filed motion to vacate the judgment which was denied pursuant to order filed August 19, 2016. On March 23, 2017, defendant filed motion to vacate default and judgment, and to quash service of summons and complaint. The motion was denied pursuant to order filed August 23, 2017. In the instant motion, defendant seeks to set aside the default judgment on the grounds that th...
2021.07.13 Motion to Deem RFAs Admitted 827
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Manoukian, Socrates P
Hearing Date: 2021.07.13
Excerpt: ...San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 12 July 2021. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. ‐‐‐oooOooo‐‐‐ Order on Motion of the Irvine Company for an Order Deeming Requests for Admissions Served on Crisp Company to Be Admitted. I. Statement of Facts. The facts of this matter are well known to this C...
2021.07.13 Motion to Consolidate or Transfer 093
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Manoukian, Socrates P
Hearing Date: 2021.07.13
Excerpt: ...th First Street, San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 12 July 2021. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. ‐‐‐oooOooo‐‐‐ Order on Motion of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. to Consolidate/Transfer Pursuant to Code Of Civil Procedure, §§ 403 and 1048 and California Rules Of Court, Rule 3.500. I. ...
2021.07.13 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 574
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Manoukian, Socrates P
Hearing Date: 2021.07.13
Excerpt: ... San Jose. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 12 July 2021. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. Order on Motion of Defendants to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. I. Statement of Facts. Plaintiff filed this complaint on 25 January 2021. The complaint alleges causes of action as follows: 1. Civil Code, § 179...
2021.07.13 Motion to Compel Arbitration 217
Location: Santa Clara
Judge: Manoukian, Socrates P
Hearing Date: 2021.07.13
Excerpt: ...e. Any party opposing the tentative ruling must call Department 20 at 408.808.6856 and the opposing party no later than 4:00 PM on 12 July 2021. Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and Counsel. ‐‐‐oooOooo‐‐‐ Order on Motion of Defendants to Compel Arbitration. I. Statement of Facts. This complaint was filed on 8 January 2021. 11 The complaint alleges causes of action for trade secret misappropriation and fo...

5970 Results

Per page

Pages