Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2486 Results

Location: San Mateo x
2024.01.09 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 499
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.01.09
Excerpt: ...ntral Courthouse, Department G, 800 North Humboldt St., San Mateo, CA 94401. (See Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1110 [the Notice "must specify" the location of the hearing].) Since defendant is in pro per, plaintiffs are to contact defendant by 4:00 p.m. on January 8, 2024 to provide him with the proper location for the hearing. Zoom appearances are allowed. The court also notes that plaintiff's motion does not comply with the requirements of Calif...
2024.01.09 Demurrer to FAC 439
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.01.09
Excerpt: ...een the parties. (Code of Civ. Proc., S 452; Saxer v. Philip Morris Inc. (1975) 54 Cal.App.3d 7, 18.) The demurrer admits the truth of all material facts properly pleaded (i.e., all ultimate facts alleged, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or aw). (Aubry v. Tri-City Hosp. Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 952, 966-967.) The court grants defendant's request for judicial notice. ((Lockhartv. MVM, Inc. (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1452, 1460 [ju...
2024.01.08 Motion to Compel Further Responses, for Sanctions 314
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.01.08
Excerpt: ...TIMOTHY ALEXANDER TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendant Timothy Alexander ("Defendant") to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set 1, Special Interrogatories, Set 1 and Request for Production, Set 1, from Plaintiff Ole Ventures Inc. ("OVI") and Request for Sanctions is ruled on as follows: (1) The Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories and Special Interrogatories is DENIED as untimely. A motion to compel furt...
2024.01.08 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action 834
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.01.08
Excerpt: ...g a "Shareholder Agreement" ("Agreement") entered into on April 1, 2016 by Plaintiff Ester Uziel ("Plaintiff") and her son, Defendant David uziel ("Defendant"). The Agreement, attached as Exhibit A to both Plaintiff's initial verified Complaint and her unverified First Amended Complaint ("FAC") contains an arbitration provision at paragraph 9.1, which reads: "If a dispute arises out of or relates to this Agreement or its breach, the parties agree...
2024.01.08 Motion to Compel Arbitration 087
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.01.08
Excerpt: ...on submitted in support of Defendants' Reply is OVERRULED. Existence of Agreement to Arbitrate On petition of a party to an arbitration agreement alleging the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party to the agreement refuses to arbitrate that controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, u...
2024.01.08 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 173
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2024.01.08
Excerpt: ...laint is SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part. Defendants Matte Sun Group, LLC's and Evan Haskell's Request for Judicial Notice is DENIED as irrelevant. (AL Holding Co. v. O'Brien & Hicks, Inc. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 1310, 1313 fn. 2 ["a court must decline to take judicial notice of material that is not relevant"].) As a preliminary matter, Plaintiff TGA F299 Franklin LLC's opposition was not timely filed or served. (See Code of Civ. Proc„ S ...
2024.01.05 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 653
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.01.05
Excerpt: ...Annuity Association of America (2020) 53 Cal.App.5th 71, 80—81.) Plaintiff Satish Sandadi's Request for Judicial Notice is DENIED as irrelevant. (AL Holding Company v. O'Brien & Hicks, Inc. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 1310, 1313 fn. 2 ["a court must decline to take judicial notice of material that is not relevant" l.) Defendant's Objections to Evidence are SUSTAINED as to the six declarations submitted by Plaintiff in support of his opposition — ex...
2024.01.05 Demurrer to TAC 140
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.01.05
Excerpt: ...psed registration. SMCSO's Demurrer is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as to the First and Second causes of achon and the remaining causes of action against the SMCSO are STRICKEN for the reasons below. A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, raising issues of law but not fact regarding the form or content of the opposing party's pleading. (Donabedian v. Mercury Insurance Company (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) Because a demur...
2024.01.05 Demurrer 630
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2024.01.05
Excerpt: ...ons, LLC ("Cross-complainants"), is OVERRULED. Cross Complainants did not file an opposition to this Demurrer, but filed a Notice of Filing of Second Amended Cross-complaint on December 21, 2023 and an Objection to Amiseq's Reply on December 28, 2023. Despite its label, the Objection is essentially an unauthorized surreply filed without leave of court as it responds to the arguments raised by Amiseq's Reply. The Court therefore has discretion to ...
2024.01.04 OSC Re Contempt 691
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.01.04
Excerpt: ... Background. On March 6, 2023, the Court issued a Civil Harassment Restraining Order, prohibiting/enjoining Amber Baptiste from repeating 18 statements/allegations about Goguen that Baptiste had previously made in various social media postings. (3-6-23 Restraining Order.) Thereafter, Baptiste continued sending email communications repeating these prohibited statements/allegaäons, and thus, which violated the Restraining Order. On May 18, 2023, a...
2024.01.04 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 185
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2024.01.04
Excerpt: ...inaton in January 2023. Defendant seeks to compel arbitration on the ground that Plaintiff's Employment Agreement with Defendant, which Plaintiff signed, contains a binding agreement to arbitrate all claims alleged in Plaintiff's Complaint. CCP S 1281.2 requires the Court to order contractual arbitration "[Oln petition of a party to an arbitration agreement alleging the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party ...
2024.01.03 Demurrer to SAC 913
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2024.01.03
Excerpt: ...v. Proc., S 430.10, subd. (e).) A. Background This case arises from a series of disputes between plaintiff Tadayoshi Hirata and individual defendant William Watt ("Watt"), who is alleged to be an officer and manager at defendant AVM. AVM filed a demurrer to plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), which the Court sustained with leave to amend. (September 13, 2023 Minute Order.) As did the FAC, the SAC again asserts four causes of action again...
2024.01.03 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award, Attorney Fees 099
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2024.01.03
Excerpt: ...from Ruling on Defendant's Petition This action was stayed when the Court granted defendant's motion to compel arbitration. (See Order, Aug. 7, 2023.) Once arbitration is ordered and the action stayed, the Court retains "merely vestigial jurisdiction over matters submitted to arbitration." Those matters include confirming, correcting, or vacating an arbitration award. (Titan/value Equites Grp., Inc. v. Superior Ct. (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 482, 487;...
2024.01.02 Motion to Tax Costs 522
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.01.02
Excerpt: .... IF THE COURT DOES NOT RECEIVE NOTICE THAT THE TENTATIVE IS CONTESTED, THEN THE TENTATIVE WILL BE ADOPTED AT THE JANUARY 9, 2024 HEARING. The Motion of plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants Thomas Robert Brouchoud and Lynda Elaine Flores Brouchoud, Trustees of the Thomas Robert Brouchoud and Lynda Elaine Flores Brouchoud Trust Dated August 27, 2004 ("Plaintiffs") to Tax the Costs Memorandum by Defendants/crosscomplainants Aldo L. Milani, Paul M. Hunter, L...
2024.01.02 Motion to Compel Compliance 212
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2024.01.02
Excerpt: ... TENTATIVE WILL BE ADOPTED AT THE JANUARY 9, 2024 HEARING. The instant action turns on Plaintiff's allegations surrounding a motor vehicle crash and the resultant injuries Plaintiff suffered. Defendant now moves to compel responses to the thirteen requests for production that make up Defendant's Request for Production of Books, Documents, and Other Things, Set Two. (Ex. A to Notice of Motion Compelling Compliance under Code of Civil Procedure sec...
2023.12.29 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement 015
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.29
Excerpt: ... papers, with the determinative fact for the Court being that the Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release (Fairbrother Decl„ Exh. D) was never signed by Plaintiffs or their counsel. Nevertheless, Defendant now seeks to enforce that Agreement. Whether the Notice of Settlement (Fairbrother Decl., Exh. C) was filed inadvertently is irrelevant. Plaintiffs argue that the settlement agreement cannot be enforced pursuant to CCP 5664.6 because it...
2023.12.29 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 881
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.29
Excerpt: ...IED IN PART. The burden of proof is on Defendants that a cause of action cannot be established by showing the undisputed facts presented by Defendants prcwe the contrary of Plaintiffs' allegations as a matter of law. Brantley v. Pisaro (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 1591, 1597. Defendants, as moving parties, cannot "simply argue or allege that the opposing party has no evidence." Scheiding v. Dinwiddie Construction Company (1999) 69 Cal.App.4th 64, 80—8...
2023.12.29 Motion for Summary Adjudication 544
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.29
Excerpt: ...is DENIED. A cross-complainant has met his or her burden of show-ng that there is no defense to a cause of action if that party has proved each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on the cause of action. (CCP Once the cross- complainant has met that burden, the burden shifts to the cross-defendant to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. (Ibid.) Th...
2023.12.29 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 056
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.29
Excerpt: ...o constitute a cause or causes of action against the defendant and the answer does not state facts suffcient to constitute a defense to the complaint." (CCP The grounds must appear on the face of the answer or from any matter of which the Court may take judicial notice. (ld., at subd. (d).) The Court may take judicial notice of admissions or inconsistent statements that a defendant has made and that cannot be reasonably controverted and thus disr...
2023.12.28 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens 829
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.12.28
Excerpt: ...ons of the complaint determine whether a "real property claim" is involved. (Urez Corp. v. Sup.Ct. (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 1141, 1149.) A "real property claim" is any cause of action which, if meritorious, would affect title to specific real property. (Code of Civ. Proc. S 405.4.) "Real property claim" includes a marriage dissolution proceeding in which ownership of real property is at issue. (Kane v. Huntley Fin" (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 1092, 1095.)...
2023.12.28 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 806
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.12.28
Excerpt: ...20-23 Requests for Judicial Notice are GRANTED. (Evid. Code Sect. 452(d).) As to these court-filed documents, the Court takes judicial notice of their contents and filing dates, but not the truth of statements/allegatons therein. Defendants' 12-20-23 Objection to the Treasa Gavin declaration is SUSTAINED on grounds that on a motion for judgment on the pleadings, the Court may only consider the subject pleading, and matters subject to judicial not...
2023.12.28 Demurrer 801
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.12.28
Excerpt: ...t Portfolio Servicing, Inc.'s and U.S. Bank, N.A.'s Request for Judicial Notice is DENIED as irrelevant. (AL Holding Co. v. O'Brien & Hicks, Inc. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 1310, 1313 fn. 2 ["a court must decline to take judicial notice of material that is not relevant"].) Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A. (collectively, "Lenders"), the latter in its capacity as trustee for WaMu Mortgage Pass Through Certificate For WMALT...
2023.12.28 Demurrer 409
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.12.28
Excerpt: ...ormance of the agreement, declaratory relief, or, in the alternative, for resc:ission of the agreement based on mutual mistake. Defendant 930 Linden Ave LLC ("Defendant" or "Linden") now demurs to the Complaint. A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, raising issues of law but not fact regarding the form or content of the opposing party's pleading. (Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 CA4th 968, 994.) For the purposes of de...
2023.12.22 Motions for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 881
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ...chard Poletti, individually and dba Poletti Realty, and John Poletti, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as discussed herein. Issue 1: Claims by Keith Giusto against Poletti Defendants The MSA is DENIED as to Issue 1. It is undisputed that Plaintiff Keith Giusto asserts no claims against any of the Poletti Defendants. Therefore, summary adjudication cannot be granted on claims that are not alleged and there are no claims to dismiss. Issue 2: T...
2023.12.22 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 546
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ...ifications herein. Accordingly, the Court's prior tentative from December 1, 2023, is adopted and incorporated here by this reference. The parties' supplemental briefing following the hearing on December 1, 2023, has not persuaded the Court to change its prior tentative decision that relief is warranted under CCP 5473.5. Here, two years have not yet passed since the default judgment was entered. (See Mar. 30, 2023 Default Judgment.) Nor have 180 ...

2486 Results

Per page

Pages