Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2505 Results

Location: San Mateo x
2023.06.14 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 740
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Weiner, Marie S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.14
Excerpt: ...hin two years of the sale of the all the subject properties and the time when profits were required to be divided. To the extent that the first parcel was sold more than four years prior to the filing of this lawsuit, it is unclear whether any distribution of profits was triggered, as the Consulting Agreement sets forth a "waterfall" of payments to be made before any profit distribution, and the Court was not provided with sufficient evidence and...
2023.06.13 Motion to Dismiss or Terminate Lawsuit 366
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.13
Excerpt: ...der both Buchalter and Jaffer to pay me my share of the said properties as set out in the Operating Agreements." Deft.'s MPA, at p. 5. Defendant's motion, however, is both substantively and procedurally defective. The moton is procedurally defective because it fails to comply with the California Rules of Court relating to the formatting and content of the motion. First, Defendant's moton is single-spaced, in violation of Rule 2.108. Second, Defen...
2023.06.13 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 391
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.13
Excerpt: ...-complaint, which applies to the First Amended Verified Cross-complaint pursuant to stipulation of the parties, is DENIED. Cross-Defendant's Objections to Evidence are OVERRULED. Cross-Defendant's Evidentiary Objections Cross-Defendant's objections to exhibits submitted by Cross-complainant are substantially premised on the litigation privilege, Cal. Civ. Code, S 47, subd. (b). This privilege "applies to any communication (1) made in judicial or ...
2023.06.13 Motion for Summary Judgment 582
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.13
Excerpt: ...2021). The Court GRANTS Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice of Defendant's Exh. A (Complaint), but not for the truth of its contents (Cal. Evid. Code, S 452, subd. (d)(l)); and Exh. C (Judgment). The Court GRANTS Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice of the existence of Exh. B (De Melo Declaration), but DENIES Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice of the contents of Exh. B, with the exception of paragraphs 1-2 thereof, on the ground that ...
2023.06.13 Demurrer to FAC 506
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.13
Excerpt: ...USTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as to the first, second, and seventh causes of action; and OVERRULED as to the third and sixth causes of action for the reasons set forth below. Plaintiffs Kamipeli Finau and Ateliana Finau shall file a second amended complaint no later than ten (10) days after written notice of this order. Defendants New Rez, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED as to the existence of the do...
2023.06.13 Demurrer 444
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.13
Excerpt: ...ot plead facts establishing that C&W and/or Pope were negligent or breached any fiduciary duty owed to Plaintiff Cheese Bear, LLC ("Cheese Bear") or April Lee, DDS, MS, Inc. ("Lee," and collectively, Plaintiffs). Plaintiffs' lengthy Complaint includes numerous allegations of concealment and/or misrepresentation by the sellers of the property (that is, the Vorsatz Defendants), but it alleges almost no facts pertaining to these demurring Defendants...
2023.06.12 Motion for Trial Preference 147
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.06.12
Excerpt: ...cer. (Complaint at 42; Javer Dec. at '1 4.) In Defendants' conditional non- opposition to Plaintiffs' motion, Defendants do not dispute that Plaintiffs are entitled to a trial preference pursuant to Code Civ. Proc. S 36(a). Accordingly, the Court finds that, pursuant to CCP S 36(a), Plaintiff has demonstrated a substantial interest in this action and that her health is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing her interest in the...
2023.06.12 Motion for Mandatory Dismissal, to Quash 808
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.06.12
Excerpt: ... filed on December 20, 2018. A First Amended Complaint was filed on August 17, 2020. Defendant was substituted as Doe Defendant no. 1, and was served with the summons and complaint on September 14, 2022. (Mitrione Decl. 1-2.) A "summons and complaint shall be served upon a defendant within three years after the achon is commenced against the defendant." (Code of Civ. Proc. ("C.C.P.") S 583.210(a).) An action is "commenced" at the time the complai...
2023.06.12 Motion for Change of Venue 084
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.06.12
Excerpt: ...est for Judicial Notice is GRANTED pursuant to Cal. Evidence Code secton 452(d). In an action is for injury to person or personal property or for death from wrongful act or negligence, the superior court in either the county where the injury occurs or the injury causing death occurs or the county where the defendants, or some of them reside at the commencement of the action, is a proper court for the trial of the action. Cal. Code of Civil Proced...
2023.06.12 Demurrer 484
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.06.12
Excerpt: ... three payment options in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 1161(2). The Court agrees with Defendant. Pursuant to CCP S 1161(2), a three-day notice must provide the following information relating to how payment may be made: (1) "the amount that is due, the name, telephone number, and address of the person to whom the rent payment shall be made, and, if payment may be made personally, the usual days and hours that person will be avai...
2023.06.12 Demurrer 323
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.06.12
Excerpt: ... does not state that non-renewal of lease will render termination of the tenancy. The notice should have given the opportunity to cure. This did not happen because the notce was to quit without the opportunity to perform." The argument lacks merit. The Notce expressly states that rent was not paid by February 1, 2023, and it sets forth explicit instructions on how and where to pay the delinquent rent. The Notice is sufficient. Defendant's argumen...
2023.06.09 Motion for In Camera Review, to Compel Personnel Records, to Seal Affidavit of Counsel 066
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.06.09
Excerpt: ...chester's Personnel Records is GRANTED IN PART for the reasons set forth below. San Mateo Police Department shall produce the documents in Noah Winchester's personnel records as identified below for in camera review in Department 21 on a date to be set on June 9th. Plaintiffs are ordered to produce the information in the possession of their counsel derived from Noah Winchester's personnel records for in camera review in Department 21 on a date to...
2023.06.09 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint 630
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.06.09
Excerpt: ...nd 576. The Court, in its discreŸon, has proceeded to the merits of the MoŸon despite the moving parŸes' iniŸal failure to comply with Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324(a) and (b). The Zakaria Decl. in support of the Reply provides the required informaŸon. Bank of America (“BOA”) argues that because it is not being added as a Doe Defendant, the relaŸon back doctrine does not operate to circumvent the statutes of limitaŸons that a...
2023.06.09 Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims 192
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.06.09
Excerpt: ...in of Bell's/Galisha's Cross-claims as Moot," filed 2-27-23, are DENIED. DFS' Requests for Judicial Notice, filed 2-27-23, are GRANTED. Evid. Code Sect. 452(d). Background. In these consolidated cases (19ClV07192 and 19ClV0794), plaintiff/Cross-Defendant DFS has sued two former employees, Roxanne Bell and Diosdado Galisha, for trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract. DFS' breach of contract claims against both Bell and Galisha allege...
2023.06.08 Demurrer to FACC 377
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.06.08
Excerpt: ...). Cross-complainant's Request for Judicial Notice is DENIED. To the extent Cross-complainant seeks to rely on the substance of the Contractors State License Board License Exam Study Guide, the material constitutes hearsay for which no exception has been identified. The document is not relevant to the proceeding without relying on its contents. Cross-Defendant's objections to this request are therefore sustained. Cross-complainant has a C-23 Orna...
2023.06.08 Application for Writ of Attachment 788
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.06.08
Excerpt: ... probable validity of the claim, (3) the attachment is not sought for any purpose other than to secure recovery on the claim, and (4) the amount to be secured is greater than zero. CCP S 484.090. Except as otherwise provided by statute, a claim is one upon which an attachment may be issued: (1) in an achon on a claim or claims for money, (2) based upon a contract, express or implied, and (3) where the total amount of the claim or claims is a fixe...
2023.06.06 OSC Re Preliminary Injunction 287
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.06
Excerpt: ...Anthony J. Martinez ("Mr. Martinez") is to bring a copy of all Operating Agreements to the hearing. 2. Who are the "current lien holders" to whom Mr. Martinez stated in his May 17, 2023 email to Plaintiff's counsel that he would deed cwer the property? See Domingue Decl., Exh. B. 3. What are the terms of any loans from the lien holders or the basis of any liens? 4. What is the current valuation of the property, and what is the current amount owed...
2023.06.06 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens 582
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.06
Excerpt: ...tiff and Cross-defendant Puja Gupta ("Gupta") no later than thirty (30) days after service of written notce of this order. De Martini's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED as to exhibits A—I as to the existence of the documents as court records but not as to "the truth of matters stated therein." Herrera v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1366, 1375. As a preliminary matter, the Notice of Motion lists the incorrect ad...
2023.06.06 Motion to Compel Further Responses 401
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.06
Excerpt: ...tions, filed April 6, 2023, is CONTINUED-IN-PART (to July 18, 2023), and DENIED-IN-PART. A. Non-compliant briefs 80th parties' Memoranda of Points and Authorities exceed the 15-page limit. Cal. R. Ct., Rule 3.1113(d). See Plaintiff's April 6, 2023 Memorandum (23 pages) and FCA US, LLC's May 10, 2023 Opposition brief (18 pages). Plaintiffs' non-compliant Memorandum is accompanied by a 100+ page Separate Statement, and a 485-page supporting declara...
2023.06.06 Motion for Terminating Sanctions, for Monetary Sanctions 071
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.06
Excerpt: ...DERS evidence sanctions and monetary sanctions, as set forth below. A. Terminating Sanctions Plaintiff failed to respond to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and a request for production of documents. Following an informal discovery conference, the Court ordered Plaintiff to respond to all three sets of discovery. Plaintiff eventually provided responses to the form and special interrogatories, but not the document requests. The Court...
2023.06.06 Demurrer 675
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.06.06
Excerpt: ...indicating that Geico committed acts that "were the legal (proximate) cause of injuries and damages to plaintiff." Complaint, 'l MV-I. The Court agrees. Because there are no facts to indicate that Plaintiff's injuries were caused by Geico, Plaintiff cannot state a cause of achon for negligence against Geico resulting from the alleged motor vehicle accident. Geico further asserts that a direct action against an insurer is not allowable until after...
2023.06.05 Demurrer to FAC 462
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.06.05
Excerpt: ...hnson and Rose Johnson shall file a second amended complaint no later than ten (10) days after service of written notice of this order. Defendants Compass California II, Inc. ("Compass") and Joe Velasco demur to the tenth cause of action for fraudulent concealment set forth in Plaintiffs Dennis Johnson's and Rose Johnson's First Amended Complaint (the "FAC")— pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision on the grounds that it...
2023.06.05 Demurrer 677
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.06.05
Excerpt: ...or "Creditor's Claim Deemed Rejected." (SAC 33-43.) The SAC states that Plaintiff previously filed a creditor's claim in the related pending probate action, Estate of Omid Tabatabai, San Mateo Superior Court Case No. 22PRO[n832 ("probate action"). (SAC '134.) The SAC alleges that Defendants failed to take action on the creditor's claim, and therefore Plaintiff exercises its option to deem the creditor's claim as rejected. (SAC 38-42.) Since a cre...
2023.06.05 Application for Writ of Possession 573
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.06.05
Excerpt: ...urchased the vehicle. Richards's purchase was financed, creating a lien immediately upon the sale. Defendants towed the vehicle pursuant to Vehicle Code section 22651, resulting in an immediate lien "for caring for and keeping the vehicle safe." (Veh. Code S 22851, subd. (a)(l).) Plaintiff's lien is superior to Defendants' lien, having been created and having attached first. The owner of a vehicle towed pursuant to Section 22651 has a right to re...
2023.06.02 Demurrer 015
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.06.02
Excerpt: ...nce's Shellfish Company, Inc. shall file its answer to the Complaint no later than ten (10) days after service of written notice of entry of this order. Defendant Vince's Shellfish Company, Inc. ("VS Co.") demurs to Plaintiffs Anna Marie Loftus', Rosanna Wieland's, and Jeanette Mary Wild's (hereafter collectively "Plaintiffs") Complaint—pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 430.10, subdivision (e)—on the grounds that it fails to allege...
2023.06.02 Demurrer to FAC 140
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.06.02
Excerpt: ...e of Action, titled unlawful Eviction, is based on Plaintiff's car being towed, which Plaintiff alleges constituted placing Plaintiff in a "state created danger" under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constituton. (42 U.S.C. S 1983.) The First Cause of Action fails to state a legally cognizable claim for two reasons: 1. A local government entity, such as Defendant County Sheriff's Office, "may not be sued under Se...
2023.06.02 Motion to Determine Good Faith Settlement 073
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.06.02
Excerpt: ...Nicole Santacroce reached a settlement agreement with the moving defendants following negotiations with arbitrator and mediator David Hamerslough wherein Defendants are to pay Plaintiffs in exchange for a dismissal with prejudice as to Lurline Assets Group, LLC and Oscar Lito Jaojoco and a release of all claims, including a waiver of Civil Code Secton 1542, with each party agreeing to pay its own attorneys' fees and costs. A determination that th...
2023.06.01 Motion to Compel Arbitration and for Stay Pending Arbitration 446
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.06.01
Excerpt: ...controversy, the Court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists, unless it determines that: (a) The right to compel arbitration has been waved by the petitioner; or (b) Grounds exist for the revocation of the agreement; or (c) A party to the arbitration agreement is also a party to a pending court action or special proceeding with a third party, ...
2023.06.01 Motion to Approve and Ratify Payment of Costs, Fees, and Expenses 531
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.06.01
Excerpt: ...t 2022 through November 2022 relating to the Conservation of [Respondent) California Insurance Company (CIC) (Motion) came for hearing before this Court on June 1, 2023, at 2:00 p.m. All parties appeared through their counsel. Having considered all papers filed regarding the Mohon, oral arguments of the parties, any testimony and evidence presented at the hearing, and all other pleadings and papers on file herein, the Court GRANTS the Motion. DIS...
2023.06.01 Motion for Summary Judgment 789
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.06.01
Excerpt: ...mmary Adjudication is DENIED as to Plaintiff's remaining claims for the reasons set forth below. Statute of Limitations —Relation Back Doctrine Defendant contends, first, that Plaintiff's causes of action are time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. Defendant cites Scherer v. Mark (1976) 64 Cal. App 3d 834, 842 for the rule that "Where no effort has been made to allege a cause of action against a fictitiously named Doe defendant, ...
2023.06.01 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 624
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.06.01
Excerpt: ...s rule. The economic loss rule provides that a plaintiff may not recover purely economic damages for tort claims. See Jimenez v. Superior Court, (2002) 29 Cal.4th 473. The component exception to the economic loss rule states that the rule "does not necessarily bar recovery in tort for damage that a defective product (e.g., a window) causes to other portions of a larger product (e.g., a house) into which the former has been incorporated." ld. at 4...
2023.06.01 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 548
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.06.01
Excerpt: ... is GRANTED in its entirety. (Evid. Code Sect. 452). As to documents filed in court, the Court takes judicial notce of their contents and filing dates, but does not take judicial notice of the truth of statements or allegations in the documents. Page limits. The City's Memorandum of Points & Authorities exceeds the CRC-imposed page limit. Counsel for the City will be expected to comply with all page limits going forward. In its discretion, the Co...
2023.06.01 Demurrer 459
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.06.01
Excerpt: ... days after service of written notice of this order. Silvia Revolorio, Elmer Lopez, and Cristofer Lopez (hereafter collectively "Defendants") demur to the Complaint, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (e), contending that the notice to pay rent or quit served to Defendants (the "Notice") was required to indicate that payment of the overdue rent could be made by mail rather than simply by personal delivery. (See Apr. 1...
2023.05.31 Motion for Reconsideration 950
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Weiner, Marie S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.31
Excerpt: ...andatory dismissal statute Secton 583.310. Code of Civil Procedure Section 583.310 mandates that a civil action be dismissed for failure to prosecute if the case does not start trial within five years of filing: "An action shall be brought to trial within five years after the action is commenced against the defendant." This civil action was dismissed for failure to bring the matter to trial within five years. For the sake of argument, even there ...
2023.05.31 Demurrer to FAC 421
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Weiner, Marie S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.31
Excerpt: ...i and Jackie A. Fagnani, and the defendant is Teiko Inuoe Lewis dba Peninsula Cleaners. First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), 1-3. The Second Settlement Agreement is signed between Fagnani Properties LP, John Fagnani, individually and as Trustee of the John and Jackie Fagnani Family Trust dated August 2, 1999, and Jackie Fagnani, individually and as Trustee of the John and Jackie Fagnani Family Trust dated August 2, 1999, on the one hand, and Teiko In...
2023.05.30 Motion for Extension of Time 099
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.30
Excerpt: ...s of service of written notice of entry of this order. Plaintiffs shall not file any Request for Entry of Default against Bragg or Silicon Valley Real Ventures before that date. California Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054, subd. (a) provides in pertinent part that When an act to be done, as provided in this code, relates to the pleadings in the action, ... , the time allowed therefor, unless otherwise expressly provided, may be extended, upo...
2023.05.30 Motion for Attorney Fees 427
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.30
Excerpt: ... order granting Plaintiffs' Special Motion to Strike in part (the "Anti-SLAPP Motion"), pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure, secton 425.16 subd. Plaintiffs are entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with that portion of the motion that was granted. Richmond Compassionate Care Collective, Inc. v 7 Stars Holistic Found., (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 38, 45. The majority of Plaintiffs' fees were incurred in con...
2023.05.26 Demurrer to FAC 148
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.05.26
Excerpt: ... SUSTAINED-IN-PART and OVERRULED-IN-PART, as set forth below. Page limits. Going forward, the parties are advised to strictly comply with stated page limits for all briefing. The CRC-imposed page limitations exist to insure brevity; they are not an invitation for parties/their counsel to gain additional pages by transferring large swaths of text into the footnotes. Footnotes should be used sparingly. Meet and confer. The 3-22-23 meet and confer d...
2023.05.26 Demurrer to FAC 661
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.05.26
Excerpt: ...tract is OVERRULED. The Court previously overruled the Demurrer to this claim in the original Complaint. Nevertheless, ARE argues that it may bring a demurrer to this claim once again because IncellDx filed a FAC. (See Carlton v. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 1210- 1211.) While Carlton supports that ARE may bring a demurrer to this claim though, the Court is not persuaded that the breach of contract claim in the FAC necess...
2023.05.26 Motion for Terminating, Evidentiary, Issue Preclusion, and Monetary Sanctions 041
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Foiles, Robert D
Hearing Date: 2023.05.26
Excerpt: ...f Plaintiff's Complaint as a result of Plaintiffs failure to comply with the Court's November 4, 2023 Order compelling Plaintiff to serve responses to Defendant's Form Interrogatories, Set One, and Demands for Production, Set One, as well as Plaintiff's failure to submit any Case Management Statements ahead of scheduled case management conferences. Defendant's counsel states that "To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Order and...
2023.05.25 Motion to Compel Arbitration 985
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ... language of the clause must be clear and unmistakable. Second, the delegation must not be revocable under state contract defenses such as fraud, duress, or unconscionability." (Aanderud v. Superior Ct. (2017) 13 Cal. App. 5th 880, 892.) The delegaton clause at issue does not pass this test. The Arbitration Agreement delegates to the Arbitrator questions of "whether a claim or dispute must be arbitrated." (Arbitration Agreement at 1, fourth full ...
2023.05.25 Motion to Compel Arbitration 793 (2)
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ... cite Theresa D. v. MBK Senior Living LLC (2022) 73 Cal.App.5th 18 for their argument that the Residents Bill of Rights (Health & Saf. Code sect. 1569.261 et seq.) prohibits requiring a resident to sign a contract waiving jury trial rights "as part of the contract for, or as a condition of, admission" to a residential care for elderly facility. (ld. at 29.) The Arbitration Agreement in the present case is separate from the residency agreement, an...
2023.05.25 Motion for Summary Judgment 995
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...o. (2021) 69 Cal.App.5th 243, 255.) As a preliminary matter, Defendants Horse Park at Woodside LTD ("Horse Park") and Bravo have waived the affirmative defense upon which they move for summary judgment. The defense they assert falls under the doctrines of waiver of liability and express assumption of risk. (See Coates v. Newhall Land & Farming, Inc. (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 1, 7— 8.) Neither of these theories are implicated by any of the twenty-fi...
2023.05.25 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 624
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...ority on this issue, and that the First Appellate District has recently held, in Dhital v. Nissan North America, Inc., 84 Cal.App.5th 828 (2022), that the economic loss rule does not bar fraudulent inducement claims based on concealment. Nonetheless, Defendant asserts that the Court should follow federal decisions, including Catherine Petersen v. FCA US LLC, No. CV 21-1386 OSF (EX), 2021 WL 3207960, at *5 (C.D. cal. July 8, 2021) and Tappana v. A...
2023.05.25 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 345
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...dwood City, CA, 94063, Courtroom 2B. Any party contesting this tentative ruling must also give notice to all other parties of the correct location for the hearing in case any party intends to appear in person. The Demurrer of Defendants Cenlar FSB ("Cenlar") and Citibank, N.A. ("Citibank") (collectively "Defendants") to the First Amended Complaint ("FAC") of Plaintiffs Christopher R. Dhillon and Marissa A. Dhillon ("Plaintiffs") is SUSTAINED IN P...
2023.05.25 Demurrer 353
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.05.25
Excerpt: ...fendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED pursuant to Cal. Evidence Code section 452(d). Defendants argue that the demurrer should be sustained on the ground that there is another achon pending between the same parties on the same cause of action, pursuant to Cal. Code of Civil Procedure Secton 430.10(c). In the related probate action, Case No. 23-PRO-00327, there are three causes of action for (1) Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Removal of T...
2023.05.24 Motion to Reopen Discovery 036
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Weiner, Marie S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.24
Excerpt: ...is due in November 2023, and the parties have declined to stipulate to any waiver of the five year dismissal statute. This is a motion for reconsideration in disguise. On August 17, 2022 this Court held a hearing on Plaintiff's moton to continue the trial (which was granted) and Defendants' motion to continue all pretrial dates and deadlines, to be calculated based upon the new trial date, which was denied. The Court found "No good cause for cont...
2023.05.24 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 464
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Weiner, Marie S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.24
Excerpt: ...$25,000, Plaintiff will need to formally serve the Amended Complaint on Defendant, which would re-open Defendant's default. (See 3-21-22 Order denying Plaintiff's "Application to Amend the Complaint."); see also The Rutter Group: unlawful Detainer Complaint, Cal. Prac. Guide Landlord-Tenant Ch. 8-8, Sect. 8:498 ("An amended complaint making substantive changes in effect "opens" existing defaults: All defendants, even those currently in default un...
2023.05.24 Demurrer 310
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Weiner, Marie S
Hearing Date: 2023.05.24
Excerpt: ...ional Tort and "Discriminated Against as a Member of an underrepresented Group" are attached. However, the only attachments to the Complaint are documents showing a hotel reservation, and a police report. The checked boxes and attachments are insufficient to show what causes of action are alleged so that Defendant may prepare a defense. The Demurrer to each cause of action is therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend for uncertainty pursuant to Cal...
2023.05.22 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena 913
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Swope, Raymond
Hearing Date: 2023.05.22
Excerpt: ...ment Debtor VITALY GOLOMB concedes belong to him, his wife Kateryna Mamyko-Golomb, and Golomb Solet Capital. Judgment Debtor Golomb concedes that he was CEO and "owner" of TIME TRAVELLER. If that is true, then money transfers to his wife and to Golomb Solet-i Capital raise questions about their propriety, especially since at least some of the transfers occurred after this lawsuit was filed. To determine whether the transfers were fraudulent for t...

2505 Results

Per page

Pages