Excerpt: ...cted free speech under the common interest doctrine set forth in Civil Code § 47(c)(1). The County seeks to strike paragraphs 38 through 43 and 61 through 68 of Plaintiff Steven Heindel's First Amended Complaint. The alleged defamatory statements are contained in paragrap hs 38 through 40 of the First Amended Complaint, which state: 38. Several senior ranking members of the Sheriff's Office have spread rumors that Sergeant Heindel was “walked ...

Excerpt: .... (“SPS”) and U.S. Bank, N.A. (“US Bank”) (collectively, the “Lender Defendants”) regarding a mortgage loan relating to real property located in Daly City, CA. The Lender Defendants demur to each cause of action in the Complaint. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”) is GRANTED pursuant to Cal. Evid. Code § 452(c), but only as to their existence and not as to the truth of the factual matters contained therein. For the r...

Excerpt: ...s Complaint asserts six causes of action against her employer, Defendant Visa Technology & Operations LLC (“Visa”), for gender, race, and national origin discrimination and retaliation in violation of California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). (Govt. Code Sect. 1 2940 et. seq.) The Complaint alleges that at all relevant times, Plaintiff resided and worked in Virginia. (Cmplt., para. 4.) It alleges that “[Visa's] office overs...

Excerpt: ...oss- Defendant”). The original Cross-Com plaint was served on Cross - Defendants on August 14, 2023. On October 12, 2023, Cross -Defendant Stiles timely filed his special motion to strike (“anti -SLAPP motion”) pursuant to CCP §425.16, directed at the tenth cause of action for abuse of process allege d against him in the original Cross -Complaint. After the Court sustained in part and overruled in part Cross -Defendants' separate demurrer...

Excerpt: ...r Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set One, is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses from Defendant Ampex Engineering and Construction, Inc. (“Defendant”) to Special Interrogatories nos. 1 through 12, contending that Defendant's supplemental responses are insufficient. Specifically, Plaintiff argues that none of Defendant's objections have merit and the substantive portion of Defendant's supplemental responses are...

Excerpt: ...tional distress (“IIED”). Vinogradova demurs here to the second cause of action for IIED on the grounds of uncertainty and a failure to state facts sufficient to state a cause of action. (CCP §430.10(e) –(f).) A. Legal Standard on Demurrer The purpose of a demurrer is to t est the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged in the operative complaint to see whether they state a cause of action under any legal theory, as a matter of law. (New Li...

Excerpt: ... 5 Palms, LLC, an d Natural Software Systems, Inc. Money Purchase Pension Plan (the “Dakota Parties”) have here moved to expunge three lis pendens recorded by Plaintiffs/CrossDefendants/Cross -Complainants Nariman Teymourian, Gail Teymourian, and 2700 Middlefield Road, LLC (the “Teymourian Parties”) against 66 Barry Lane in Atherton (the “Barry Property”). Counsel for both parties is ORDERED TO APPEAR at the hearing on this motion. A...

Excerpt: ...kins' Form I nterrogatories (Sets One and Two), Special Interrogatories (Set One), and Demand for Production (Set One). Defendant served the requests on February 14, 2023 and October 17, 2023. (Declaration of David E. Hunter III in Support of the Motion, ¶¶ 3 -5, 7.) (“Hunter Decl.”) Counsel for Defendant wrote Plaintiff's counsel repeatedly to request verified answers, but to no avail. (Id. at ¶ 6.) After Plaintiff failed to appear at th...

Excerpt: ...tiffs in settlements with other defendants. Plaintiffs are the prevailing party and on January 23, 2024, filed a memorandum of costs, seeking a total of $68,368.87. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1032.) Defendants have filed a motion to tax costs. In their opposition, plaintiffs agreed that certain of their requested costs are not supported and reduced the total requested to $53,066.35. Defendants have argued that $838.48 for “Court -ordered transcript...

Excerpt: ...alifornia Rules of C ourt, rule 2.550. Accordingly, the motion to seal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Specifically, defendant has moved to seal the following documents: • Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant Timothy Logue's Motion for Summary Judgmen t; • Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of Defendant Timothy Logue's Motion for Summary Judgment; • Declaration of Timothy Logue; • Declaration ...

Excerpt: ...rt state d that plaintiff had waived a jury trial by failing to pay the fees, but set a jury trial based on defendants' payment. (Note, however, that the parties represented at paragraph 12 in their joint case management and trial setting conference statement, fil ed on April 7, 2023, that “[a]ll parties have demanded a jury trial on all issues.”) Plaintiff's counsel admits that he did not understand that jury trial fees are due at the time ...

Excerpt: ...s a whole, wi th a view to substantial justice between the parties. (Code Civ. Proc., § 452; Saxer v. Philip Morris Inc. (1975) 54 Cal.App.3d 7, 18.) The demurrer admits the truth of all material facts properly pleaded (i.e., all ultimate facts alleged, but not conten tions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law). (Aubry v. Tri -City Hosp. Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 966- 967.) Courts have repeatedly recognized that where a plaintiff “ "...

Excerpt: ...Superior Court (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 173.) In order to obtain a writ of possession though, plaintiff must show that he has the right to immediate possession of tangible personal property, and that the property is being wrongfully detained by Defendant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 512.010, subd. (b)(1), (2).) In this case, there is conflicting evidence as to who is Figo's owner. Plaintiff claims that he is Figo's owner. (Plaintiff's Decl., and attached ...

Excerpt: ...e court DENIE S the motion for summary judgment. In order to prevail on a motion for summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that “there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (C ode Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (c).) In this motion, plaintiff has failed to provide any argument concerning the second cause of action for account stated or third cause of acti...

Excerpt: ...hearing. Depa rtment 4 is not located in Redwood City as the notice states, but instead at the Central Courthouse, Courtroom G, 800 North Humboldt St., San Mateo, CA 94401. (See Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1110 [the notice “must specify” the location of the hearing].) A. Legal Standard on Motion to Determine Good Faith Settlement Any party to an action in which it is alleged that two or more parties are joint tortfeasors or co -obligors on a ...

Excerpt: ...��led, defe ndant had not yet made an appearance; thus the motion did not need to be served on defendant. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1014.) Defendant filed an answer on March 1, 2024. Therefore, Liberty shall by 4:00 p.m. on March 18, 2024 provide notice to defendant of this motion and provide the tentative ruling. If defendant wishes to oppose the motion, she has until 10:00 a.m. on March 19, 2024 to notify the court and all parties of her intent to ...

Excerpt: ...as it relates to a motorhome vehicle plaintiffs purchased from defendant. As part of the purchase process, the parties agree there is contained in the agreement of purchase a forum selection and choice -of -law clause providing that exclusive jurisdiction for deciding le gal disputes relating to the warranty shall be within the state or federal courts of Ohio, and that Ohio law will apply. (Declaration of Rick March, Ex. B at page 2.) Defendant n...

Excerpt: ... Maduros' (collectively, “Respondents”) “Motion to Transfer Venue,” filed 12 -2223, is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 392 et. seq.) Background. Petitioners/Plaintiffs the City of San Bruno and Walmart.com USA, LLC (“Petitioners”) filed this Petition/Complaint against Respondents, seeking to set aside/invalidate certain decisions (“Reallocation Notices”) made by the CDTFA on April 17, 2023. Petitioners contend that the April 17, ...

Excerpt: ...plaint is DEN IED. Plaintiff and Cross -defendant Montgomery Sansome, L.P.'s Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED as to all items, but only for the existence of these documents as court records and not for the truth of any fact therein. (See Lockley v. Law Office of Cantrell, Green, Pekich, Cruz & McCort (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 875, 883– 884.) Defendant and Cross-complainant Nathalie Anne Gachot's papers reference a request for judicial notice ...

Excerpt: ...aranty Agreement to guarantee the lease entered into by Plaintiff and its tenant, Green Haven LLC (“Tenant”). The Guaranty Agreement calls for joint and several liability among the Guarantors, of whom Defendant Hester is one. (Defendant's SSUMF ¶ 9.) The Tenant defaulted on its re nt obligations in January 2023. (Defendant's SSUMF ¶ 5; Kronenberg Decl. ¶ 3.) Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment against Defendant for breach of guaranty....

Excerpt: ... and to set aside the default and default judgment, if applicable, under CCP §473. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED. Where a motion for relief is not accompanied by an attorney affidavit of fault but is timely made, the court may grant discretionary relief from default taken against a party due to that party's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. (CCP §473(b).) The law favors judgment based on the merits, not based on procedural ...

Excerpt: ...- defendants Nite sh Hissaria and Digitize Solutions Private Limited (DSPL) is DENIED. Cross - complainants move here to enter the defaults of Cross -defendants Hissaria and DSPL on the Amended Cross -Complaint. Hissaria and DSPL are purportedly located in the Republic of India . Service of process on a person outside the United States may be made (1) as provided in part 2, title 5, chapter 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or (2) “if the court...

Excerpt: ...) The Court continued this Demur rer for Defendants to establish compliance with the meet and confer requirement under Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41, and to file a supplemental declaration establishing compliance with this requirement. Defendants' counsel previously filed a decla ration stating that the parties met and conferred by telephone on September 8, 2023, and also attached a meet and confer email to Plaintiff to confirm the co...

Excerpt: ...n. 24, 2024, is DEN IED. (Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 2025.420(h).) Courthouse/hearing location. The Court notes that CLT's 1 -24- 24 Notice of Motion incorrectly states that the March 14 hearing will take place in the San Mateo courthouse. Department 3 (Judge Greenberg) is located o n the Second Floor of the Redwood City courthouse, located at 400 County Center in Redwood City. The Gearings' 3 -1 -24 Request for Judicial Notice, which requests that th...

Excerpt: ...e of Civ. Pro c., § 473, subd. (a)(1).) The proposed amendment would simply delete the first two affirmative defenses from the Answer. Plaintiff Alfredo Ortiz refused to stipulate to obtaining an advantage for himself and opposes this motion on the basis of delay and pr ejudice. However, both principles are founded upon a consideration of fairness. Ortiz presents no coherent argument as to why the elimination of his adversary's defenses works a...