Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

2440 Results

Location: San Mateo x
2023.12.28 Demurrer 409
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.12.28
Excerpt: ...ormance of the agreement, declaratory relief, or, in the alternative, for resc:ission of the agreement based on mutual mistake. Defendant 930 Linden Ave LLC ("Defendant" or "Linden") now demurs to the Complaint. A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, raising issues of law but not fact regarding the form or content of the opposing party's pleading. (Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 CA4th 968, 994.) For the purposes of de...
2023.12.28 Demurrer 801
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.12.28
Excerpt: ...t Portfolio Servicing, Inc.'s and U.S. Bank, N.A.'s Request for Judicial Notice is DENIED as irrelevant. (AL Holding Co. v. O'Brien & Hicks, Inc. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 1310, 1313 fn. 2 ["a court must decline to take judicial notice of material that is not relevant"].) Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A. (collectively, "Lenders"), the latter in its capacity as trustee for WaMu Mortgage Pass Through Certificate For WMALT...
2023.12.22 Motions for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 881
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ...chard Poletti, individually and dba Poletti Realty, and John Poletti, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as discussed herein. Issue 1: Claims by Keith Giusto against Poletti Defendants The MSA is DENIED as to Issue 1. It is undisputed that Plaintiff Keith Giusto asserts no claims against any of the Poletti Defendants. Therefore, summary adjudication cannot be granted on claims that are not alleged and there are no claims to dismiss. Issue 2: T...
2023.12.22 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 546
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ...ifications herein. Accordingly, the Court's prior tentative from December 1, 2023, is adopted and incorporated here by this reference. The parties' supplemental briefing following the hearing on December 1, 2023, has not persuaded the Court to change its prior tentative decision that relief is warranted under CCP 5473.5. Here, two years have not yet passed since the default judgment was entered. (See Mar. 30, 2023 Default Judgment.) Nor have 180 ...
2023.12.22 Motion to Seal Court Records 760
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ...fs and exhibits to the trial briefs). Any new motion must be heard in Department 611 before Judge Karnow (contact his clerk for a date and time). The moving party must: At the time of filing, lodge with Department 611, but not file, a "delta" document which is comprised of documents the subject of the sealing motion, redlined to show the specific words or portions sought to be deleted from the public file; Rely only on admissible evidence to show...
2023.12.22 Motion for Summary Judgment 873
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ...law. Brantley v. Pisaro (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 1591, 1597. Defendants, as moving parties, cannot "simply argue or allege that the opposing party has no evidence." Scheiding v. Dinwiddie Constructon Company (1999) 59 Cal.App.4th 64, 80—81. Further, Defendants evidence is to be strictly construed in determining whether they have met their initial burden with doubts or ambiguities at this stage resolved in Plaintiffs' favor. Johnson v. American Sta...
2023.12.22 Motion for Summary Adjudication 690
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ... the opposing party's evidence must be liberally construed." (Binder v. Aetna Lie Ins. Co. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 832, 838.) There are a triable issues of material fact regarding whether plaintiffs substantially performed their agreements. (Magic Carpet Ride LLC v. Rugger Investment Group, L.L.C. (2019) 41 Cal.App.5th 357, 364 ["What constitutes substantial performance is a question of fact. The evidence creating triable issues of material fact ar...
2023.12.22 Motion for Protective Order Nunc Pro Tunc 990
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ...in order to comply with this re-designaton of the case. That is a significant and unreasonable amount of clerical work that would be an undue burden on this Court's already overworked Clerk's Office. This is especially true in light of the fact that the Court is not correcting ANY clerical error, but rather a result of alleged inadequate legal advice by Defendant's former counsel. Accordingly, Defendant and/or her counsel must perform the tasks o...
2023.12.22 Motion for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation 097
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ... at least $281.18 commencing on April 30, 2021, until the "compromise sum" of $10,122.50 was paid off in full. (Declaration of Gloria Zarco ("Zarco Decl."), Ex. 1 ("Stipulation") '13).) Plaintiff asserts that Defendant has failed to make payments on the compromise sum since March 30, 2023, and has not paid the compromise sum in full. Plaintiff now moves the Court to enter judgment pursuant to the terms of the settlement under CCP S 654.6. CCP S 5...
2023.12.22 Demurrer to TAC 784
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ...ourtroom 2F. Defendants' counsel's declaration fails to establish compliance with the meet and confer requirement under CCP 5430.41, which states in relevant part: (a) Before filing a demurrer pursuant to this chapter, the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objecti...
2023.12.22 Demurrer 979
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ...ed in the complaint. To be sure, the Reply make a new argument that the trade secret allegations are insufficient, but that's a new argument not properly before the court. Cf., High Sierra Rural Alliance v. County of Plumas (2018) 29 Cal.App.5th 102, 112 n.2. (2) An intentional interference with contract is a wrong in and of ftself, and the complaint states that cause of action. Ixchel Pharma, LLC v. Biogen, Inc. (2020) 9 Cal.5th 1130, 1142. The ...
2023.12.22 Application for Writ of Possession 320
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.22
Excerpt: ...ssion regarding a 2020 Kia that plaintiff allegedly wrongfully possesses. The court denied Budget's writ application on September 5, 2023. Budget now seeks another writ of possession over the same car in a nearly identical writ application filed October 10, 2023. This is a renewed motion under CCP 1008(b). Section 1008(b) requires a party bringing a renewed motion to submit an affidavit [or declaration] identifying new or different facts, circums...
2023.12.21 Demurrer 274
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.12.21
Excerpt: ...tiffs Third Amended Complaint is: (1) being presented primarily for an improper purpose to harass Defendant, (2) the fraud claim is not warranted by existing law, and/or (3) is devoid of evidentiary support. (See Code of Civ. Proc. S In order to obtain sanctions under section 128.7, the moving party must show that other party's conduct in asserting the claim was objectively unreasonable. (Kumar v. Ramsey (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 1110, 1120.) A claim...
2023.12.21 Motion to Compel Further Responses 450
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.12.21
Excerpt: ...part, as follows: Timeliness of Motion Unless notice of a motion to compel further responses to interrogatories is given within 45 days of the service of the verified response, or any supplemental verified response, or on or before any specific later date to which the propounding party and the responding party have agreed in writing, the propounding party waives any right to compel a further response to the interrogatories. Cal. Code of Civil Pro...
2023.12.21 Demurrer, Special Motion to Strike 109
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.12.21
Excerpt: ... for Judicial Notice (RJN) is GRANTED in its entirety. (Evid. Code Sect. 452(d).) The Court hereby incorporates its Order denying Defendant Evernote's Special Motion to Strike the FAC'S asserted claims. Although a SLAPP motion, unlike a demurrer, permits the Court to consider evidence external to the pleading, here, Evernote's ant-SLAPP motion and this demurrer involve overlapping issues and analyses. Thus, the Court incorporates, herein, its Ord...
2023.12.21 Motion for Sanctions 937
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Greenberg, Susan
Hearing Date: 2023.12.21
Excerpt: ... improper purpose to harass Defendant, (2) the fraud claim is not warranted by existing law, and/or (3) is devoid of evidentiary support. (See Code of Civ. Proc. S In order to obtain sanctions under section 128.7, the moving party must show that other party's conduct in asserting the claim was objectively unreasonable. (Kumar v. Ramsey (2021) 71 Cal.App.5th 1110, 1120.) A claim is objectively unreasonable if " 'any reasonable attorney would agree...
2023.12.20 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 289
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Healy, Nicole S
Hearing Date: 2023.12.20
Excerpt: ...n on Plaintiff Lorie Jones' Complaint. For the reasons below, summary judgment is warranted. A. Legal Standard on Summary Judgment "A party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding." (Code Civ. Proc., S 437c, subd. (a)(l).) A cause of action has no merit if one or more of its elements cannot be separately established or an affir...
2023.12.19 Motion to Strike Supplemental Expert Designation, for Monetary Sanctions 534
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2023.12.19
Excerpt: ...y sanctions against plaintiff Daniel Jay Fried's counsel and the court GRANTS plaintiff Daniel Jay Fried's motion for leave to augment his expert designation on the following conditions: (1) Joseph R. Pohlot be made available no later than January 3, 2024 and plaintiff pay the cost for an expediated deposition transcript (responsible only for the cost associated with the expediated amount); (2) defendant may designate its own expert economist no ...
2023.12.19 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint 212
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2023.12.19
Excerpt: ...ourt repeats the tentatve issued on December 11, 2023: The court rules on plaintiff Delma Jefferson's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Plaintiff moves to file a "Second" Amended Complaint, but the record shows that no First Amended Complaint is on file) as follows: Defendant Brayan Perez properly objects that plaintiff failed to provide proper notice yet also responded substantively on the merits. A defendant who does not receive pr...
2023.12.19 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 536
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2023.12.19
Excerpt: ...location of the hearing].) The parties should be aware that the Hon. Nancy L. Fineman, Department 4 is located at the Central Courthouse, Department G, 800 North Humboldt St., San Mateo, CA 94401. The court provided this information to the parties through the tentative ruling for the April 4, 2023 hearing and the hearing's minutes. Defense counsel is ordered to contact plaintiff by 4:00 p.m. on Monday, December 18, 2023 to provide the proper loca...
2023.12.19 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 303
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2023.12.19
Excerpt: ...e regular law and motion calendar, if the court determines that the parties need more time for argument, the court will set another hearing for further briefing. One party has called Department 4 about a power point presentation and, if time allows, the court has no objection to such a presentation. Defendants seek judgment on the pleadings. By stipulation, the parties agreed that this motion is the "proper procedural vehicle to resolve the issue...
2023.12.19 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 479
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2023.12.19
Excerpt: ... many of its vehicles, including a vehicle sold to Plaintiff, thereby fraudulent concealing a material defect in the vehicles and putting Plaintiff and other consumers at increased risk. AHM demurs to the second cause of action in the Complaint, fraudulent concealment, on the following grounds: (1) failure to state a cause of action because Plaintiff has not adequately alleged that AHM owed Plaintiff a duty of disclosure; (2) uncertainty, unintel...
2023.12.19 Demurrer 128
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Fineman, Nancy L
Hearing Date: 2023.12.19
Excerpt: ...cause of action and are uncertain. (Notice at p. 2 citing Code Civ. Proc., S 430.10, subd. (e),(f).) The court agrees. The court first notes that the proofs of service ("POS") of defendant's demurrer, supporting documents and reply do not include plaintiff's zip code although plaintiff includes it in the complaint and the zip code is in the court file. The United States Post Office explains that zip code delays delivery. (https://faq.usps.com/s/a...
2023.12.15 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 881
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.15
Excerpt: ...issues to be adjudicated and is supported by an 18-page Separate Statement of undisputed Material Facts. Plaintiffs' Opposing Separate Statement is more than three times as long and supported by 60 exhibits consuming more than 1,300 pages. Plaintiffs' Opposing Separate Statement does not further the purpose of the Separate Statement requirement, but rather hinders it. Plaintiffs' Opposing Separate Statement does not allow the Court to easily iden...
2023.12.15 Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement 304
Location: San Mateo
Judge: Finigan, Jeffrey R
Hearing Date: 2023.12.15
Excerpt: ... Cory L Cooper ("Cooper"), a real estate agent who was associated with Defendant Dwell Realtors ("Dwell") at the time of the transaction, failed to properly obtain Mr. Driker's signature on the cancellation addendum. Plaintiff then decided again to sell the property in 2021 and hired Cooper, who was by then associated with Defendant Compass California II, Inc. ("Compass"), to facilitate the sale, again to Mr. Driker. Shortly after Plaintiff hired...

2440 Results

Per page

Pages