Excerpt: ...il action who is over 70 years of age may petition the court for a preference, which the court shall grant if the court finds both that the party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole, and that the health of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party's interest in the litigation. Section 35(a) "is mandatory and absolute in its applicaton in civil cases whenever the litigants are 70 years old." ...

Excerpt: ... defenses. A party may demur to an answer on grounds of failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a defense. (CCP S 430.20.) The determination of whether an answer states a defense is governed by the same principles which are applicable in determining if a complaint states a cause of action. (South Shore Land Co. v. Petersen (1964) 226 Cal.App.2d 725, 732.) The allegations of the pleading demurred to must be regarded as true, but a demurrer...

Excerpt: ... Deborah Q. Ruddock by Defendants and Cross-complainants Thomas J. Gearing and Daniel K. Gearing (collectively, the "Gearings") on August 31, 2023. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to quash is granted. A. Deposition Not Warranted Code of Civil Procedure section 1987.1 permits a party to move for an order quashing a subpoena and authorizes the Court to enter appropriate protective orders. (Code of Civ. Proc., S 1987.1 subds. (a)—(b).)...

Excerpt: ...On November 13, 2023, plaintiff applied ex parte for a temporary restraining order and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. This Court granted plaintiff's ex parte application, and issued a temporary restraining order enjoining the termination of PG&E services to the premises and ordering that any previously terminated PG&E services be restored. The matter is now before the Court on an order to show cause why a preli...

Excerpt: ...Summary Judgment (MS]), filed August 24, 2023, which seeks summary judgment of all claims asserted against each of them in Plaintiff Liezel De Guzman's August 31, 2022 Second Amended Complaint (SAC), is GRANTED as to each of defendants RTR, MERS, and Boedeker. (Code Civ. Proc., S 437c.) Accordingly, the moving defendants' alternative Motion for Summary Adjudication (MSA) is DENIED AS MOOT. (Code Civ. Proc., S 437c.) Defendants' request for adjudi...

Excerpt: ...ositions, and matters of which judicial notice shall or may be taken." Under Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, the party moving for summary judgment has the burden of production to make a prima facie showing that there is no triable issue of any material fact. The burden then shifts to the nonmoving party to make a prima facie showing that there is a triable issue of material fact. Here, there is no opposition; thus, the court ...

Excerpt: ...is unlawful detainer Complaint is defective. The Complaint alleges that Defendants' tenancy is exempt from the Tenant Protection Act of 2019 ("Act") based on Civil Code section 1946.2(e)(8). Defendants argue that section 1946.2(e)(8) only applies to residential real property "that is alienable separate from the title to any other dwe ling unit." Since the notice includes "Unit #1" in the property address, Defendants contend that this reference to...

Excerpt: ...PTED AT THE DECEMBER 5, 2023 HEARING. Defendant Bren Farrell's Demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") is OVERRULED as to the first through sixth causes of action. (Code Civ. Proc. S 430.10, subd. (e), (f), (g).) Defendant's request for judicial notice of the Complaint, First Amended Complaint and Second Amended complaint is GRANTED, BUT NOT FOR THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS ASSERTED THEREIN. Plaintiff's request to file a Notice of Errata to ...

Excerpt: ...RTIES BY 4:00 2M. ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2023. HOWEVER, THE HEARING ON THE MOTION IS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 5, 2023 AT 2:00 P.M. FOR ARGUMENT. IF THE TENTATIVE IS NOT CONTESTED, IT WILL BE ADOPTED AT THE DECENBER 5, 2023 AT 2:00 P.M. HEARING. THERE WILL BE NO LAW AND MOTION HEARING ON NOVEMBER 28, 2023. DEFENDANT PROVIDED NOTICE THAT SHE IS CONTESTING. For the reasons stated below, defendant Kathryn Castricone's demurrer, filed 10-13-23, which is...

Excerpt: ...intiff's motion for approval of a settlement of claims brought pursuant to the Private Attorney General's Act (PAGA). On October 24, 2023, plaintiff's counsel submitted a renewed motion for an order approving the settlement, including supplemental declaration addressing the court's concerns. In ruling on settlements involving PAGA claims, this court has a duty to independently determine whether a settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate. (Moni...

Excerpt: ...D. As a preliminary matter, the Notce of Application and Hearing incorrectly lists the address of the Court. Hearings for Department 4 are held at 800 North Humboldt Street in San Mateo, California 94401. On the merits, the unopposed application satisfies all procedural requirements, and its supporting declarations and documentary evidence are sufficient to find all the facts prerequisite to the issuance of a right to attach order and writ. First...

Excerpt: ...he court regardless of whether the arbitrator determines arbitrability. (Code of Civ-l Proc„ S 1281.2, subd. (a); Omar v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 955, 961- 964.) To prove waiver, plaintiff must show (1) knowledge of an existing right to compel arbitration; and (2) intentional acts inconsistent with that existing right. (Hill v. Xerox Business Services, LLC (9th Cir. 2023) 59 F.4th 457, 468.) In taking into account the totality...

Excerpt: ...TING PARTY MUST NOTIFY DEPARTMENT FOUR AND ALL OTHER PARTIES BY 4:00 P.M. ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2023. HOWEVER, THE HEARING ON THE MOTION IS CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 5, 2023 AT 2:00 P.M. FOR ARGUMENT. IF THE TENTATIVE IS NOT CONTESTED, IT WILL BE ADOPTED AT THE DECENBER 5, 2023 AT 2:00 P.M. HEARING. THERE WILL BE NO LAW AND MOTION HEARING ON NOVEMBER 28, 2023. PLAINTIFF PROVIDED NOTICE THAT HE IS CONTESTING. Plaintiff's Mohon to Compel Further Resp...

Excerpt: ... ADOPTED AT THE DECEMBER 5, 2023 HEARING. Defendant uber Technologies, Inc.'s ("Uber") Motion to Seal, filed 10-20-23, is GRANTED. (Cal. Rules of Court ["CRC"], Rules 2.550(d); 2.551). Uber's Motion seeks to seal the following two documents: • Unredacted Declaration of Matthew J. Michelsen in support of Motion to Enforce Settlement (lodged on 10-25-23); unredacted Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Motion to Enforce Settlement (...

Excerpt: ... served form interrogatories, a first set of special interrogatories, and a first set of document requests on Plaintiff. (Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice ("RJN") Ex. C-1.) After some back and forth with Plaintiff's counsel, Defendant requested an Informal Discovery Conference ("IDC") before Commissioner Mau, which was held on June 5, 2023. (ld.) Plaintiff agreed to serve substantive supplemental discovery responses by June 13, 2023. (ld.)...

Excerpt: ... Reply Request for Judicial Notice is DENIED because none of the requested matter is material to the Court's evaluation of Defendants' motion. l. ABO COMIX STANDING The motion is DENIED as to A. 8.0. for lack of standing. The cases cited by County do not support this motion. In the case of Creed-21 v. City of Wildomar (2017) 18 Cal.App.5th 690, the complaint alleged that the plaintiff organization was "formed and operating under the laws of Calif...

Excerpt: ...ice of Appeal "fails to state a cause of action" against the Fields, and/or improperly names them as parties (real parties in interest) in this appeal. (Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 430.10(d), (e).) The function of a demurrer is to test whether, as a matter of law, the facts alleged in the complaint state a cause of achon under any legal theory. Intengan v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1047, 1052. Code Civ. Proc. Sect. 389(a) stat...

Excerpt: ...to amend, as to the Special Demurrer to the First Cause of Acton ("COA") for Civil Rights Violations pursuant to Cal. Code of Civil Procedure Section 430.10(e). OVERRULED with respect to the general Demurrer to the Complaint and the remaining special demurrers. General Demurrer OVERRULED. Defendants argue that each cause of action in the Complaint must be dismissed pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, (1994) 512 U.S. 477 ("Heck") because the claims impl...

Excerpt: ...ed on October 16, 2020, after failing to heed the summons purportedly served on him. (Oct. 16, 2020 Request for Entry of Default; see Sep. 21, 2020 Proof of Service of Summons by Substituted Service.) More than two years later, Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Co. ("Scottsdale") requested a default judgment, and judgment was entered against McNulty in the amount of $433,448.73 on March 30, 2023. (Mar. 22, 2023 Request for court Judgment; Mar. 30, 2...

Excerpt: ...whether the proposed settlement satisfies CCP 5877.6. See Tech-Bilt v. Clyde & Associates, 38 Cal.3d 488 (1985) and Regan Roofing Co. v. Superior Court, 21 Cal.App.4th 1685 (1994). However, the Oppositions contain evidence indicating that the proposed settlement between the Plaintiffs and Sung defendants may qualify as a faith settlement if the record is further developed. Accordingly, the Motion is DENIED without prejudice to re-file in accordan...

Excerpt: ... 20, 2023, is ruled upon as set forth below. Chugh refers in its briefing to the Amended Cross-complaint as the "Second Amended Crosscomplaint, or "SAXC." This Order refers to it as the AXC. The AXC asserts seventeen (17) total causes of action, eight (8) of which are asserted against the Chugh Cross-Defendants. Chugh has demurred to all eight of these claims. The AXC identifies three Cross-complainants: (1) CPQ Solutions, LLC ("CPQ") (2) Christo...

Excerpt: ...ely "Plaintiffs") is ruled on as follows: Procedurally, Defendant has not established compliance with the meet and confer requirement under Code of Civil Procedure secton 430.41 regarding the Second Cause of Action. Defendant only shows that he met and conferred regarding the Third, Sixth and Seventh Causes of Acton. Nevertheless, since the Second and Third Causes of Action are both fraud claims, the Court proceeds to address the merits of the De...

Excerpt: ...ement of Non-oppositon as to the requested production, confirming that the parties have agreed to such production through participation in the Informal Discovery Conference process and subsequent meet and confers. Accordingly, the Court shall GRANT this Motion, subject to the conditions outlined below. Pupil and education records are protected from disclosure under federal and state law. Federal educational funds are withheld from any school dist...

Excerpt: ... (the "Settling Parties") have agreed upon material terms, as summarized: Rodda will pay Plaintiff a $250,000.00 settlement payment. In exchange, Plaintiff has agreed to provide Defendant/cross-complainant SC Builders with an issue release discharging all claims in connection with Rodda's work on the renovation project which is the subject of this litigation. Plaintiff and Rodda have agreed to fully discharge, waive, and release each other from a...

Excerpt: ...has indicated actual notice of the Opposition, it has been considered. The only argument it raises is that the Motion is untimely pursuant to Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1702. Timeliness of Mohon A motion for attorney's fees up to and including the rendition of judgment must be served and filed within the time for filing a notice of appeal. Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1702. In this case, that time is 60 days pursuant to Cal. Rules of Court, Rule ...