Excerpt: ...nated; and that We Is Fargo failed to provide Plaintiff with a reasonable accommodation and failed to engage in the interactive process. Now before the Court is Defendants' motion for a protective order and request for sanctions in the amount of This motion relates to Plaintiff's attempt to take the deposition of non party Christopher Smith. In general, depositions of any person may be taken without leave of court at any time during the pendency ...

Excerpt: ... to ASH personnel for a "preference diet." Currently on calendar is Plaintiff's request that the Court provide a court reporter to serve as a deposition officer for written depositions via video conferencing, or in the alternative, that the Court appoint a deposition offcer to conduct the written depositions, and have the defendants bear the cost. ASH opposes the request that it pay for the deposition officer.l Wr-tten depositions are authorized ...

Excerpt: .... Now before the Court are Plaintiff's four unopposed motions to compel and request for sanctions. On May 26, 2022, Plaintiff propounded Supplemental Interrogatories and Supplemental Requests for Production Set Two. (Declaration of Tonya Ortega ("Ortega Decl.") 93, Ex A.) The parties mutually agreed to extend the response date to July 6, 2022. As of the filing of the motion, Defendant has not served outstanding responses. (ld. at '14.) On June 16...

Excerpt: ... incarcerated as a result of Defendants' negligence. (Gov. Code, S 815.6.) Now before the Court is Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court grants Defendants' request judicial notice of Governor Newsom's proclamation of the state emergency dated March 4, 2020. l. Background Plaintiff is an inmate at CMC, and at all times relevant to this cause of action was housed in Dorm 12 and had a COVID-19 risk score of 3. (Complaint Cause ...

Excerpt: ...vehicle left to avoid hitting Defendant on his driver's side. Plaintiff alleges his vehicle then veered off the road and he hit a tree head-on. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to deem facts admitted or in the alternative to compel further responses to requests for admission nos. 1, 6, 7, 8, and 13, and for monetary sanctions in the amount of $1,810. Plaintiff's first request, which is to deem the facts in the requests for admission (RF...

Excerpt: ... Now before the Court is Defendants' motion to compel Plaintiff to appear for her deposition. The Court will not delve into the meet-and-confer communications between counsel. Suffice to say, Plaintiffs' counsel (located in Los Angeles) and defense counsel (located in Novato) cannot agree on the date, location, and manner of Plaintiff's deposition. The gist of the parties' dispute is whether Plaintiff will appear for her deposition in person, or ...

Excerpt: ...to the Handleys into equity in the development of the Resort Project at issue in this matter; • Declaratory relief ordering that the Handleys are not in breach of the loan agreements that were the subject of the Settlement Agreement; • Injunctive relief asking for an order prohibiting Stier from taking any action to enforce said loan agreements either through foreclosure or a money judgment; • Include in the prayer for relief a request for ...

Excerpt: ...) Plaintiff opposes the demurrer.1 Demurrers can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack; or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 C3d 311, 318.) The court must draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiffs, not the defendant. (Perez v. Golden Empire Transit Dist. (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 1228, 1239.) I. Background2 Crosbie's allegation...

Excerpt: ...ya Ortega (“Ortega Decl.”) ¶ 4, Ex. A.) Each deposition subpoena also requested extensive document production related primarily to Plaintiff's workers compensation claims and benefits. Plaintiff now moves to quash the subpoenas and for a protective order. Plaintiff also seeks sanctions against defense counsel. Plaintiff argues that the depositions were set unilaterally on a date upon which Plaintiff's counsel, Ms. Ortega, was not available a...

Excerpt: ... located at 802 Park Way, in Arroyo Grande (the Property). Plaintiffs allege that Mary Kim and her husband Kenny Kim, through the Trust, purchased the Property in 2018 for Plaintiffs. Mary and Kenny made a private loan to Plaintiffs, memorialized by a promissory note, requiring Plaintiffs to make monthly payments on the $485,000 note. Plaintiffs allege they paid at least $500 per month in cash per the note's terms, from October 2018 to November 2...

Excerpt: ...nts kept by Plaintiff, that constituted the principal record of transactions between Plaintiff and Defendant relative to Defendant's credit card account, and none of the statements were disputed by Defendant. Defendant opposes the motion. The Court grants Plaintiff's request that the Court take judicial notice of 15 U.S.C. section 1666, and 12 C.F.R. section 202.12. Plaintiff's motion is supported by its separate statement of undisputed material ...

Excerpt: ...lopment Permit Project No. P20-000076 (the Permit). The Amended Petition requests a writ directing the City to approve the Permit “without any unlawful conditions attached.” (Amd. Pet., p. 14, ll. 1- 4.) Currently before the Court is the City's demurrer to the Amended Petition on the ground it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e).) Specifically, the City argues that Petitioner...

Excerpt: ... the FAC alleges that Plaintiffs were forced to do work for Defendant as mechanics and personal attendants and as such, are entitled to compensation as employees. Defendant now demurs to the entire FAC pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 430.10, subds. (e) and (f) on the grounds that it fails to state a cause of action and is uncertain.1 Plaintiff opposes the demurrer. No reply is on file. Defendant's counsel submitted a declaration chec...

Excerpt: ...ction and response to the Petition. On August 9, 2022, Petitioner dismissed the action. On August 18, 2022, Respondent filed a motion to vacate the dismissal. Petitioner opposes the motion. No reply is on file. Respondent filed her motion pursuant to Probate Code section 17202, which provides that the court may dismiss a petition if it appears that the proceeding is not reasonably necessary to protect the interests of the trustee or beneficiary, ...

Excerpt: ...l wages due, including minimum, regular, and overtime wages as a result of Defendant's policy of improperly paying its non-exempt hourly employees; (2) failure to provide meal periods; (3) failure to provide rest periods; (4) failure to provide accurate wage statements; and (5) failure to pay wages upon ending employment of terminated or resigned employees. (Compl., ¶ 2.) Plaintiff alleges that she was employed by the Defendant from on or about ...

Excerpt: ... judgment on those causes of action. No opposition has been filed. Wells Fargo, as the moving party, bears the burden to produce admissible evidence on each element of each cause of action entitling it to judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(1); see also Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) If Wells Fargo makes a prima facie showing, then the burden shifts to Taber to show the existence of a triable issue of ma...

Excerpt: ...al and emotional injuries. The complaint sets forth the following causes of action: (1) Battery; (2) Negligence; (3) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (4) Fraudulent Concealment; and (5) Public Nuisance. The Hotel, Weyrich, and Guerrero (Defendants) now move for summary judgment on the ground Plaintiff cannot prove causation, an essential element of each cause of action. (See CACI Nos. 400, 1300, 1600, 1901, 2021.) To satisfy their in...

Excerpt: ...ed. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel the County's further responses to requests for production of documents, set one (the RFPs), and request for sanctions in the amount of $1,560.00. As of the date of this ruling, the County has provided supplemental responses to the subject RFPs, Nos. 1 through 11 and 15. The supplemental responses do not comply with the Code of Civil Procedure. A party has three options in responding to requ...

Excerpt: ...) III. Although Lowry served as the interim Harbor Chief from September 2011 to October 2015, he voluntarily returned to the HPO III position. On March 11, 2016, when descending the rungs of an open ladder mounted to a pile of the pier, Lowry's legs became entangled with the ladder leaving him stuck and suspended upside down with his head and upper body submerged in the water. As a result of the accident, Lowry sustained physical injuries and was...

Excerpt: ... Court's probate department and assigned case number PR120281. Plaintiff filed an amended petition in December 2018.1 On September 9, 2019, Plaintiff filed a separate Petition for Instructions re Corrections, which he amended on August 24, 2020. In the interim, Plaintiff filed this civil complaint against Hazeltine, Glenn, Marianne Davis (Davis), Gail Edwards (Edwards), and Martin Harris (Harris), on April 30, 2018.2 According to the complaint, D...

Excerpt: ...ted at 6955 Estrella Road in San Miguel for $7,000/month. Plaintiff alleges the tenancy was a fixed-term lease from June 1, 2018 to June 30, 2021. Plaintiff alleges that beginning June 1, 2019, the rent was modified to $4,800 per month until June 1, 2022. In the second lawsuit, Plaintiff alleges that on June 1, 2018, Defendants agreed to rent premises located at 6953 and 6957 Estrella Road in San Miguel for $3,200/month. Plaintiff alleges the ten...

Excerpt: ...timely motion for summary judgment.2 Opposition to the motion may be made orally at the hearing or in writing. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1351(b).) No opposition has been filed. However, even when unopposed, the trial court is required to determine that no dispute of material fact exists, and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Code of Civ. Proc. § 437c(c).) Plaintiff, as the moving party, bears the burden to pro...

Excerpt: ...ed at 6955 Estrella Road in San Miguel for $7,000/month. Plaintiff alleges the tenancy was a fixed- term lease from June 1, 2018 to June 30, 2021. Plaintiff alleges that beginning June 1, 2019, the rent was modified to $4,800 per month until June 1, 2022. In the second lawsuit, Plaintiff alleges that on June 1, 2018, Defendants agreed to rent premises located at 6953 and 6957 Estrella Road in San Miguel for $3,200/month. Plaintiff alleges the ten...

Excerpt: ...andling of body and remains, (5) negligence and negligence per se, (6) intentional infliction of emotional distress for mishandling of body and remains, and (7) negligent handling of a corpse and infliction of emotional distress. In the complaint, Plaintiff alleges she is a Trustee of the Ruth Madocks Trust (the Trust) and was specifically authorized by the Trust to carry out Ruth Madocks' wishes regarding her remains and memorial service. (Compl...

Excerpt: ...hysical Education issued by the Commission. (Respondents' Request for Judicial Notice [RFJN], Ex. A, p. A-10, ¶ 1.) On December 17, 2021, following a four-day hearing, the Commission issued a decision revoking Petitioner's credential. (Id. at p. A-4; Pet., ¶ 48.) The decision became effective on January 16, 2022. (Id. at p. A-4; Pet., ¶ 46.) With his petition, Petitioner requests that the Court issue a writ of mandate commanding Respondents to...