Excerpt: ...e timely service on June 2, 2023. (Code Civ. Proc., SS 1170.7; Yanez v. Vasquez (2021) 65 Cal.App.5th Supp. 1, 8 [Code Civ. Proc., S 1013 applies].) Opposition, however, may be made orally at the hearing or in writing the court day before the hearing. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1351.) l. Legal Standard Summary judgment is proper when there are no triable issues of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law....

Excerpt: ...or Production of Documents, Set One ("RFP"); Form Interrogatories, Set One ("Form Interrogatories"); and Special Interrogatories, Set One ("Special Interrogatories"). Plaintiff served objections to the RFP and Special Interrogatories and objections to many of the Form Interrogatories. 1 On November 3, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff's counsel's motion to be relieved as counsel. Cannon attempted to meet and confer with Plaintiff and her former c...

Excerpt: ...ed to pay. On October 21, 2022, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Breach of Contract, Negligence, and Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Plaintiff filed the subject motion seeking preference pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 36, subdivision (a), which provides that "[a] partyto a civil achon who is over 70 years of age may petition the court for a preference, which the court shall grant if the c...

Excerpt: ...roduce; 3. Precluding counsel for Garden Street SLO Partners, L.P. (Garden Street), Roy Ogden, from coaching Mr. Smith during his deposition; and 4. For sanctions of $2,800 against Mr. Smith, Mr. Ogden, and Garden Street.l Garden Street opposes the motion, and requests sanctions of $2,040 for its opposition. The motion is granted in part and denied in part as set forth below; and the parties' respective requests for sanctions are denied. A. Motio...

Excerpt: ...h of fiduciary duty, and removal of director. On December 8, 2022, Robert filed a second amended cross-complaint against Steve alleging both individual and derivative claims. Steve alleges Robert has stolen BBC vehicles and equipment, misrepresented the profitability of a project leading to imprudent shareholder distributions, misused BBC assets to reduce his personal liability on outstanding personal guarantees, violated his obligation to sign b...

Excerpt: ...on October 23, 2021, in Paso Robles. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to quash Defendants' subpoena for medical records or, in the alternative, for a protective order and order to modify the subpoenas issued to Sierra Vista Regional Medical Center and for sanctions in the amount of $1,130 against Defendants and their counsel of record. The Court is not in receipt of an opposition; a proof of service is on file. On October 18, 2022, Plai...

Excerpt: ...rust. The Handleysl , Destino Investments LLC, and The Development Trust filed a cross- action Stier and John Handley. The operative cross-complaint is the fifth amended cross- complaint (5ACC), filed April 6, 2023, after this Court (Hon. Donald G. Umhofer, presiding) granted Cross-complainants' moton for leave to file an amended pleading. The 5ACC includes causes of action for (1) breach of partnership agreement; (2) intentional interference in ...

Excerpt: ...otion for summary judgment. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $41,015.00. The Court is not in receipt of an opposition; a proof of service is on file. Plaintiff seeks attorney's fees under Civil Code section 5975(c), which mandates an award of attorney's fees to the prevailing party in an action to enforce a homeowners association's governing documents as a matter of right. Plaintiff broug...

Excerpt: ...r 7, 2018, Plaintiffs' son, Jordon Grant (Jordan), was riding his motorcycle southbound on Highway 101, when Richard Giuli, who was driving eastbound on El Campo Road, made a left turn onto the highway. Mr. Giuli passed directly in front of Jordan resulting in a collision that killed Jordan. In the first amended complaint, Plaintiffs assert a single cause of action against the County for Dangerous Condition of Public Property under Government Cod...

Excerpt: ...eys, several individuals, and a Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge ("the Complaint"). Four demurrers filed by the following defendants are at issue: 1. City of Santa Barbara and its employees sued in this case (collectively referred to as "City Defendants"); 2. Attorney Gabriela Ferreira ("Ferreira"); 3. Lisa Ann O'Niahll ("O'Niahll"); 4. Attorney Christopher E. Haskell ("Haskell") All the demurrers are brought on the grounds that the Comp...

Excerpt: ... demurrer, which the Court sustained with leave to amend. On October 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint (SAC). On May 16, 2022, the Court sustained Knudson's demurrer to the SAC without leave to amend. 1 Knudson now seeks attorney's fees in the amount of $58,772, pursuant to section 6.8 of the parties' Stock Purchase Agreement (SPA), which provides in relevant part: Attorney's Fees. If any legal action or proceeding arising out o...

Excerpt: ... supervisor, Flores, while employed with CMD at the Grizzly Youth Academy (GYA) in San Luis Obispo. Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel the production of records from the California Highway Patrol (CHP) pursuant to Evidence Codel section 1043, known as a Pitchess2 motion. Legal Authority. Personnel records of peace officers as well as records of citizens' complaints against personnel maintained under Penal Code section 832.5 are ...

Excerpt: ...ued the following day.l On August 22, 2022, Brian Harms (Harms), identified as the representative of the Estates of David Harms and Jolene Harms, filed a creditor's claim in the amount of $300,000. The Public Administrator rejected the claim in September 2022. In the interim, the Public Administrator had filed Notices of Proposed Action proposing to sell Decedent's real property. Harms then recorded a Notice of Pending Action (Lis Pendens) on Sep...

Excerpt: ...te concerns alleged construction defects. Specifically, "major foundation settlement [issues] that will require stabilization and related repairs to the damaged structure," i.e., Plaintiffs' residence. (FAC, 10, 11.) l. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are the owners of real property located at 5255 Cascabel Road in Atascadero (the Property). Priorto Plaintiffs' ownership, the Property was owned by Darren Thomas (Thomas). In September 2007, Thomas a...

Excerpt: ...irst Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed on March 7, 2023. Colorado Structures now moves pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 435, subd. (b) and 436, to strike the alter ego allegation in paragraph 10 of the FACI , on the grounds that it lacks the specific particularity required for pleading.2 Plaintiffs oppose the motion and contend that the allegations are sufficient to put the defendants on notice of the claim. Code of Civil Procedure se...

Excerpt: ...between Plaintiff and ABC. A default against Szulborski was entered on January 25, 2021, and a default judgment was entered against him for the full amount allegedly owed on the contract, plus interest and attorney fees, on April 29, 2021. Szulborski filed the subject motion to set aside default on the grounds that he was never served with a summons, and the judgment was obtained by fraud in that Plaintiff failed to advise the Court that Van De S...

Excerpt: ...had been entered earlier that morning. The deadline for Sharianne to file a responsive pleading was Thursday, September 8, 2022. (Code Civ. Proc., SS 412.20(a)(3), 415.10.) The request for entry of default against Michael was denied because his answer was timely filed. (Code Civ. Proc„ S 415.20(a).) Sharianne seeks to set aside her default under Code of Civil Procedure section 473. Under subsection (b) of section 473, the court may relieve a pa...

Excerpt: ...d Parker were served on October 31, 2022, and Weinberg was served on November 3, 2022. (Pl. Decl., 7, 15, 23.)1 The date for production on all three subpoenas was November 18, 2022. (Pl. On November 1, 2022, Jed Hazeltine (Hazeltine), the successor trustee of Trusts B and C informed Sander via email that he was asserting the attorney-client privilege in the documents.2 On November 9, 2022, Weinberg objected to the subpoena served on him. (Pl. Dec...

Excerpt: ...irst Amended Petition alleging wrongdoing by the trustee, Deborah Foster-Swenson (Swenson) .2 Bruce has since settled and dismissed his claims, leaving Sarah Foster as the sole remaining petitioner. On April 25, 2022, Sarah Foster (Petitioner) filed a Second Amended Petiton (the SAP). The 1994 Trust directed that the residual trust estate be divided 50% to Swenson (outright); 25% to Bruce (in a trust with the balance to his children upon his deat...

Excerpt: ...Robert Leslie, at the deposition of Jeff Martin. Mr. Leslie represents Specialty Construction, Inc. (Specialty), and Mr. Martin is Specialty's senior vice president. Specifically, Moving Parties seek an order: 1. Precluding Specialtvs counsel from making speaking objections or coaching witnesses on the record; 2. Precluding Specialty's counsel from making personal attacks against opposing counsel during depositions; 3. Requiring the parties to me...

Excerpt: ... large tree branch fell on him while he was working on a property located at or near 650 Tank Farm Road in San Luis Obispo on October 6, 2021. Multiple cross-complaints are on file, including a cross-complaint filed by Bunpn on July 12, 2022. Now before the Court is Covelop's motion for good faith settlement. Also on calendar is cross- defendant Box Kite Barnyard, Inc. (Doe 2)'s (BKB) motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Bunyon's cross-comp...

Excerpt: ...n San Luis Obispo on October 6, 2021, when a large tree branch fell on him. Multiple cross-complaints are on file, including a cross-complaint filed by Bunpn on July 12, 2022. Now before the Court is cross-defendant RRM Design Group (Doe 3)'s (RRM) demurrer to Bunyon's cross-complaint. l. RRM's Demurrer RRM demurs to Bunyon's cross-complaint as follows: 1) The cross-complaint and each cause of achon therein as to RRM pursuant to Code of Civil Pro...

Excerpt: ...f refused Defendant's requestfor an extension of time within which to serve responses, and Defendant served an objection only response. Plaintiff's counsel engaged in an effort to meet and confer, which Defendant argues was not in good faith. While Plaintiff gave Defendant a very short deadline (about 12 hours) to agree to a discovery conference or the subject moton would be filed, Plaintiff's counsel had already provided a detailed explanation c...

Excerpt: ... of Civil Procedure section 2023.040. Defendants contend that Plaintiffs served a non-complaint Supplemental Designation of Experts that included admissions that it was intended as a placeholder. Defendants seek an order striking the supplemental designation, a sanction order prohibiting introduction of expert testimony by Plaintiffs at trial (aside from rebuttal testimony) and monetary sanctions against counsel for Plaintiffs payable to Defendan...

Excerpt: ...l Defendant to prov-de further discovery responses and to have requests for admissions deemed admitted. No opposition has been filed. The specific discovery at issues is as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Form Interrogatories, Set One, ("Form Interrogatories") interrogatory numbers 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 2.5, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, 17.1, 50.1, and 50.6; 2. Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories, Set One, ("Special Interrogatories") interrogatory numbers 5 and 6;...