Excerpt: ...arly has Plaintiff and other non‐ exempt employees at its fulfillment centers work over 10 hours, without providing or compensating for a second meal break or third rest break, as required by California law. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendant failed to pay all wages owed in each pay period, and that in violation of Labor Code § 226(a), Defendant issued false and inaccurate wage statements which fail to account for all Plaintiff and other...

Excerpt: ...or in interest to Evelyn Gurion (Decedent) (together, “Plaintiffs”) filed this action on September 9, 2015. Moving Defendants assert that they have been properly served with the Summons and Complaint since the case's inception. However, they state that Plaintiffs have never properly served the Individual Defendants and there is no stipulation to extend time for service. (Patterson Decl. ¶¶3‐4.) As it has now been three years since the cas...

Excerpt: ...overt Gurion, as individual and successors in interest to Decedent's (together, “Plaintiffs”) request for judicial notice of Exhibits A, B, and C is granted. (See, Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc. (2005) 133 Cal. App. 4th 26, 32.) Plaintiffs' request for judicial notice of Exhibit D, the California State Auditor's report on Skilled Nursing Facilities, is denied. This is an elder abuse action arising from the c...

Excerpt: ...m Saleem (together, “Plaintiffs”) filed their Complaint on April 27, 2018, alleging that the four‐vehicle collision and their resulting injuries were caused by Mr. McKinley's unsafe lane change. They further named Mr. McKinley's employer, AT&T Corp., as a defendant. On June 18, 2018, Defendants answered the Complaint. On August 9, 2018, Defendants filed a Notice of Change in Handling Attorney, notifying the Court and parties that a differen...

Excerpt: ...lings. This is a construction defect case. The plaintiffs are multiple homeowners (Plaintiffs). Plaintiffs filed this action in May 2017. A special master was appointed, and considerable discovery has been completed. On 7/11/18, Plaintiffs filed Doe Amendment No. 1, thereby naming eight subcontractors as defendants. No trial date has been set. In addition, the special master has stepped down and a motion to appoint a substitute is pending. Morris...

Excerpt: ... follows the Labor Commissioner's Order, Decision and Award in favor of employee Cheryl Harrington (Harrington). On 4/11/16, the Commissioner awarded Harrington approximately $50,000 from her former employer, Defendant and CoJudgment Debtor 2600 Bravado Dr. LLC, (“the LLC”) in unpaid minimum wages, penalties and other amounts. (The LLC had employed Harrington as a property manager.) Pursuant to Labor Code § 98.2(e), this administrative award...

Excerpt: ...ientation and national origin. Echevarria is the former employee, and RCRC is the former employer. RCRC is defending in part on the theory that it terminated Echevarria for legitimate, non‐discriminatory reasons related to Echevarria's job performance. To obtain emails and other documents relevant to this theory of defense, Echevarria propounded his second set of document requests. RCRC did not timely respond, and on 6/26/18, this court granted...

Excerpt: ... alleges that Macy's placed two clothing racks next to one another and displayed a "40% off" sign on one of the racks such that a reasonable consumer would have believed the merchandise on both racks was on sale. Instead, when he purchased shorts on the rack furthest from the on‐sale sign, he learned that he would have to pay the full price, which he paid. He alleges that other shoppers were similarly misled. With respect to his resulti...

Excerpt: ...d motion matters. *** Defendants Samuel Merritt University (“SMU”), Sutter Bay Hospital (“SBH”), Sutter Health (“Sutter”) and Isaac Bristow's (“Bristow”) (collectively “Defendants”) demurrer to the Second Amended Complaint (“2AC”) is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART, with leave to amend except as to the 14th cause of action against Bristow. The notice of demurrer does not provide notice of the court's tentative ruli...

Excerpt: ...sed at the hearing. The parties should be prepared to point to specific admissible evidence which is claimed to show the existence or non‐existence of a triable issue of material fact. *** Defendants State Farm General Insurance Company (“SF General”), State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“SF Mutual Auto”), State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“SF Fire”), Teresa L. Moon (“Moon”), Estate of Paula Foster (“Foster Est...

Excerpt: ...ocedural Background Plaintiffs filed this breach‐of‐guaranty case in 2010. Defendants are the guarantors. The parties entered into a written settlement agreement (Settlement) in March 2012. Under the Settlement, each Defendant is required to pay a maximum of $1,000,000 over a period not to exceed 10 years from the time his first payment is made (subject to an exception not relevant here). (See Derickson Decl., Exh. A, ¶ 4(f).) Each Defendant...

Excerpt: ...he manner to request a hearing. If moving counsel is unable to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing in person or by telephone. Moving counsel failed to comply with CRC Rule 3.1110(b)(3)‐(4) Factual Background This is a legal malpractice action. Plaintiff alleges she retained defendant attorneys to file and prosecute an action against her employer but despite filing the action in 2015, it ...

Excerpt: ...rm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm Mutual), State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm Fire), Teresa L. Moon (Moon), Estate of Paula Foster (Estate), and Teresa L. Moon as Executor of the Paula C. Foster Revocable Trust (Moon as Executor) (collectively “Defendants”) to dismiss the action for failure to prosecute is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The parties' requests for judicial notice of court documents are GRANTE...

Excerpt: ...ively sometimes “the Individual Defendants”) to serve further responses to the first sets of requests for admissions and form interrogatories is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Individual Defendants' request for judicial notice of court documents is GRANTED. Procedural Background In the complaint, Dinelli alleges that he, Timms and Baccala each own shares in CoDefendant California Academy of Baseball, Inc. (CAB). Dinelli further alleg...

Excerpt: ...em (collectively “Plaintiffs”). APM was the landlord's property manager. CoDefendant Ding Zhang (Zhang) was the landlord. In the operative fourth amended complaint (4AC), Plaintiffs allege that they occupied the premises with a Section 8 HUD voucher. They allege a toxic mold infestation as well as other violations of housing laws, and they further allege that there were no timely attempts to repair despite their initial complaints. When repai...

Excerpt: ... physical and psychological injuries. On August 7, 2018, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Compel a psychiatric examination of Plaintiff. Defendant's Notice of Motion stated that Defendant was moving under section 2032.010(a) “to have the Plaintiff evaluated by psychiatrist Dr. John Greene.” (Kilduff Decl. Ex. 4) Citing to CCP § 2032.310(b), the Notice further identified the following specific conditions for the examination: • Date/T...

Excerpt: ...Owen, Special Administrator of the Estate of Mark Whisler, is OVERRULED. The court refers to Robert Winger, now deceased, as well as the personal representative of his estate, as “Robert.” Likewise, the court refers to deceased Plaintiff and Cross‐Defendant Mark Whisler dba Whisler Land Company, as well as the Special Administrator of Mr. Whisler's Estate, as “Whisler.” The parties' requests for judicial notice of court documents an...