- Sacramento
- View All Counties
- Judges
- Acero, George (6)
- Acquisto, Stephen (8)
- Brown, David I (1771)
- Cadei, Raymond M (199)
- Chang, Shelleyanne W.L. (17)
- Craddick, Judith (10)
- Culhane, Kevin (5)
- Damrell, Lauri (7)
- Davidian, Ben (3)
- De Alba, David (3)
- Eurie, Stacy Boulware (3)
- Gevercer, Steven M (51)
- Goode, Barry (0)
- Hayes, Jonathan R. (20)
- Krueger, Christopher E (2492)
- LaPorte, James (26)
- McFetridge, James (42)
- Mennemeier, Kenneth (13)
- Mesiwala, Shama H (632)
- Rodda, Steven H (231)
- Salter, Timothy W (62)
- Sueyoshi, Richard K (657)
- Talley, Jill H (23)
- Ueda, Kara (4)
- Zuniga, Barbara (3)
6 Results
2021.08.05 Motion to Strike 826
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.05
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.05
Excerpt: ...t Plaintiff Michael Trainor (“Plaintiff”) failed to disclose material information to a buyer of residential property in which Plaintiff not only held an ownership interest but also acted as the realtor for the sale. According to the FAC in the present action, Plaintiff had a variety of disputes with Hallmark Specialty, the insurance carrier for his real estate brokerage, but was ultimately provided a defense under a reservation of rights. Pla...
2021.08.05 Motion to Set Aside Default, Judgment 036
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.05
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.05
Excerpt: ...otion to set aside and quash service of summons on the ground that he was not personally served with summons and complaint on November 19, 2017, or at any time, as specified in the Proof of Service. Plaintiff conceded that the proof of service identified an incorrect address as the place of service for Defendant. The court granted the motion on 11/8/2019 and quashed the service of the summons. (ROA 25.) Since the court quashed service of the summ...
2021.08.05 Motion to Compel Further Responses 926
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.05
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.05
Excerpt: ...ual capacity, as well as successor‐in‐interest to decedent Louise Chappell (“Decedent”), alleges that Decedent was a resident at Gramercy Court from August 16, 2018 through September 13, 2018. Plaintiff alleges that as a result of Gramercy Court's reckless neglect, Decedent passed away. The Sacramento County Coroner's office began an investigation and later ruled her death a homicide. At issue is RFP No. 1 (set three) which requests: “E...
2021.08.04 Petition to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings 084
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.04
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.04
Excerpt: ...nsel is directed to contact opposing counsel and advise him/her of Local Rule 1.06 and the Court's tentative ruling procedure and the manner to request a hearing, along with the correct address for Dept. 53/54. If moving counsel is unable to contact opposing counsel prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the hearing by Zoom or by telephone. Both moving and opposing counsel failed to comply with CRC Rule 3.1110(b)(3)‐(4). Factu...
2021.08.03 Motion to Strike TAC 210
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.03
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.03
Excerpt: ...material to the court's ruling on this motion. Overview Plaintiffs previously represented Defendant Priscilla Hill in litigation brought by Hill in 2011 (the “Hill Action.”) In 2015, Plaintiffs were disqualified from further representing Ms. Hill in the Hill Action. On or about June 2, 2015, Hill engaged Defendant/moving party Port Parker to take over representing Hill in the Hill Action. On October 14, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a “Notice of L...
2021.08.03 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 698
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.03
Location: Sacramento
Judge: Acero, George
Hearing Date: 2021.08.03
Excerpt: ...st for Judicial Notice Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED in its entirety pursuant to Evid. Code 452(d) [records of any court of this state.]) Factual Allegations In October 16, 2016, Plaintiff entered into a contract (the “2016 PSA”) with Defendants Platinum Capital Investment Partners, LP (“PCIP”) and Sac Valley Holdings 88th, LLC (“SV88”) related to the real property located at 5852 88th Street in Sacramento, CA (th...