Excerpt: ...‐site accident involving Plaintiff, Dean Robbins ("Plaintiff” or “Mr. Robbins”). On May 8, 2017, Plaintiff was injured while working on a construction project taking place in Elk Grove, California called the Echo Water Project (the "Project"). (UMF 2.) Plaintiff was a Senior Inspector and performed tasks as a welding inspector in May of 2017. (UMF 7) On May 8, 2017, when Plaintiff was being shown the Flatiron job site, he stepped into a h...

Excerpt: ...pay Plaintiffs' reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and expenses with Plaintiffs as the designated prevailing party Civil Code § 1794(d). Under the Song‐Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, Crv. Code § 1791 et seq., the prevailing buyer is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees, based on actual time expended, and court costs and expenses. Civil Code § 1794(d). Thereafter the settlement was delayed when the vehicle was in an accident and a s...

Excerpt: ...nistrative agencies that are referenced in the plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff Patrick Notestine's ("Plaintiff or "Notestine") Complaint ("Compl.") alleges a third cause of action against Defendant Patriot Environmental Services, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Patriot") pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act, Labor Code §§ 2698, et seq. ("PAGA"). Plaintiff seeks to recover civil penalties on behalf of all "current or former employees of Defendan...

Excerpt: ...ts, LLC (“Crescent”) and 9750 Airport Management, LLC (“9750”) (collectively, “Defendants”). This is a coordinated action. On December 8, 2016, plaintiff Anatoli Romanov ("Plaintiff Romanov") filed a class action complaint entitled Anatoli Romanov v. Crescent Hotels & Resorts, LLC, et al., in the Sacramento County Superior Court, Case Number 34‐2016‐00204535 (the "Romanov Action"). The Romanov Action asserts the following causes o...

Excerpt: ...tax liability. Defendants seek a protective order pursuant to CCP § 2017.020(a) which allows a court to limit discovery if it determines that “the burden, expense, or intrusiveness of that discovery clearly outweighs the likelihood that the information sought will lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.” (CCP § 2017.020(a).) To that end, they seek a protective order stating that they do not need to respond to any further discovery unt...

Excerpt: ...motion is opposed by co‐ defendant L.A.'s Best Security, Inc., dba American Calstar Security ("LABS"). The factual allegations of Plaintiff's action, the procedural history of the action, and the terms of the conditional settlement are all well described in the moving papers and need not be recited here. The California Supreme Court's opinion in Tech‐Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward‐Clyde & Assocs. (1985) 38 Cal. 3d 488, guides the court's inquiry un...

Excerpt: ...March 23, 2015. This motion was placed on today's calendar after the Court granted Defendants' ex parte application for an order shortening time on March 24, 2021. Defendants move for a protective order pursuant to CCP § 2034.250 in connection with Plaintiffs' demand for exchange of expert witness information that was served on March 10, 2021. According to Defendants, the demand was duplicative of the previous demand served in March 2020. Defend...

Excerpt: ...assment based on disability, retaliation, failure to engage in the interactive process. She also alleges the Tenth Cause of Action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (“IIED”) which is the subject of the instant demurrer. Plaintiff began her employment with CSU in 1989 and is currently employed as an Administrative Support Coordinator I. She alleges that she suffers from numerous physical disabilities including anxiety and depres...

Excerpt: ...e building permits in violation of numerous provisions of the County Code. Plaintiff previously sought a TRO/OSC re: preliminary injunction which the Court denied on November 20, 2020. (ROA 11) The Court found that the application did not contain sufficient evidence to show irreparable harm or emergency as there was no evidence that the ADU was occupied at the time and that the argument that unpermitted construction presented a risk of public har...

Excerpt: ...er real property at 8529 Bond Road in Elk Grove. JJD's predecessor‐in‐interest Elk Grove Marketplace, LLC entered into a lease agreement with Jo‐Ann's predecessor‐in‐interest FCA of Ohio, Inc. dated June 13, 2003 (“Lease”). JJD is the landlord and Jo‐Ann is the tenant under the Lease. JJD contends that certain provisions in the Lease setting forth when Jo‐Ann would pay reduced “alternative” or “Substitute Rent” in Sectio...

Excerpt: ... Complaint asserts against defendants American Staffing Services, LLC, Galvez and others for misappropriation of trade secrets, interference with contract and prospective economic relations, breach of fiduciary duty, defamation, false advertising and unfair business practices. Defendant Galvez filed in December 2018 a cross‐complaint against SVSD, McAlpine and others for breach of contract, false promise, intentional misrepresentation, negligen...

Excerpt: ...nses to Defendant's special interrogatories nos. 4, 8, 12, 17 and 20. These interrogatories asked Plaintiff to identify documents which she relied upon to support her contentions regarding Defendant's liability. For each interrogatory Plaintiff interposed numerous boilerplate objections, including objections based on relevance, that the interrogatories were overbroad and premature, called for expert witness information and a legal conclusion. Sub...

Excerpt: ... reopen discovery. This is Plaintiff's fourth attempt to try to reopen discovery. Plaintiff calls her motion an “objection to sanctions,” and she objects to the $852.50 in monetary sanctions that were awarded to Defendants pursuant to CCP § 128.5 on January 26, 2021. Plaintiff asks this Court to vacate the sanctions order, but she also asks the Court to vacate “all the orders.” A full reading of her moving brief reveals that Plaintiff, f...

Excerpt: ...California. The Complaint contains causes of action for the following alleged violations: (1) Labor Code §§510 and 1198 (Unpaid Overtime); (2) Labor Code §§ 226.7 and 512(a) (Unpaid Meal Period Premiums); (3) Labor Code § 226.7 (Unpaid Rest Period Premiums); (4) Labor Code §§ 1194, 1197, and 1197.1 (Unpaid Minimum Wages); (5) Labor Code §§ 201 and 202 (Final Wages Not Timely Paid); (6) Labor Code § 204 (Wages Not Timely Paid During Empl...

Excerpt: ...oom audio, if available (see bolded language above), to participate in oral argument on the continuance date. Defendants V. Penmetcha, M.D., A. Johnson, M.D., and S. Hill (collectively, “Defendants”) demurrer to Plaintiff Mervin LeRoy's (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Civil Complaint (“FACC”) is sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiff's currently‐operative “First Amendment Civil Complaint” (“FACC”) is actually the Second Amende...

Excerpt: ...leging causes of action for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, “deceit,” “concealment,” based on allegations that Plaintiff charges credit card interest in excess of allowable rates. Nowhere in the cross‐complaint does Defendant indicate that he seeks to represent a class. Nevertheless, he now brings the instant motion seeking to certify his crosscomplaint as a class action. He indicates that the ...

Excerpt: ...amin James White initially failed to answer the Complaint and Plaintiff requested and obtained an entry of default and a default judgment on June 8, 2017. Plaintiff served the Notice of Entry of Judgment on July 28, 2017. On September 18, 2019, Defendant moved to set aside the entry of default and the judgment on the grounds that he had not been properly served with the Complaint, which was served by substitute service. On November 21, 2019, the ...

Excerpt: ...stence or non‐existence of a triable issue of material fact. *** Defendant the State of California by and through the 36th District Agricultural Association aka Dixon May Fair's ("Defendant" or "District” or the "36th District") Motion for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication is DENIED. This case arises out of a collision between a golf cart and a two‐year‐old boy at the 2018 Dixon May Fair. The District is a stat...

Excerpt: ...n this action, Plaintiff Pamela Palmieri (“Plaintiff Palmieri”) alleges that she represented Plaintiff Kayrinkia Gilliland (“Plaintiff Gilliland") in a foreclosure‐related matter. She alleges that she had a contingency fee agreement allowing for a percentage of the gross recovery and also provided her a charging lien for any sums owing for unpaid fees and costs. Plaintiff Palmieri alleges that she associated with Defendants in June 2016 a...

Excerpt: ...tice of findings of fact does not mean that those findings of fact are true];Steed v. th Department of Consumer Affairs(2012) 204 Cal.App.4th112, 120‐121 ["[W]hile the existence of any document in a court file may be judicially noticed, the truth of the matters asserted in those documents, including the factual findings of the judge who was sitting as the trier of fact, is not entitled to notice."];Sosinsky v. Grant(1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1548, 15...

Excerpt: ...ry 2019 and the pleading purports to assert causes of action for retaliation and disability discrimination under the FEHA, retaliation in violation of the Labor Code, and retaliation in violation of the Health & Safety Code. Defendant denies liability, insisting that Plaintiff's employment was terminated was a legitimate non‐ discriminatory and non‐retaliatory reason: Plaintiff's failure to perform her managerial duties and specifically, her ...

Excerpt: ... Plaintiffs allege that on September 16, 2016, the Decedent was working in the course and scope of his employment with Goodwill Industries as a "Loader and Unloader." Plaintiffs allege that the Decedent was checking the alignment of a container being unloaded from a "roll‐off‐hoist‐truck" when he was fatally injured. Plaintiffs allege causes of action for strict products liability, negligence (products), negligence, and a "survivor's action...

Excerpt: ... cause of action for fraud (negligent misrepresentation), third cause of action for fraudulent concealment, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Defendant's issues for summary adjudication are: (1) Plaintiff's claims for fraud ‐ intentional misrepresentation, fraud ‐ negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent concealment, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of covenant of good faith and fair deali...

Excerpt: ...olve whether the Demurrer disposes of the causes of action asserted by Plaintiff in his complaint in their entirety.” The continuance provided that the reply briefing would be due according to the new hearing date. No reply brief was filed. Defendant demurs to the first cause of action for common counts for unjust enrichment, second cause of action for constructive trust, and third cause of action for account on the grounds that each cause of a...

Excerpt: ...s‐Defendant First Franklin Financial Corporation's (“FFF”) demurrer to Defendants/Cross‐Complainants Christine and Richard Evans' (the “Evans”) first amended cross‐complaint (“FAXC”) is ruled upon as follows. Overview Plaintiff/Cross‐Defendant Aspen G LLC's (“Aspen”) complaint asserts causes of action for breach of contract and common counts ‐ money owed. Aspen alleges that on 8/31/2005, the Evans obtained a loan for $12...