Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

8838 Results

Location: Riverside x
2018.3.29 Preliminary Injunction 600
Location: Riverside
Judge: Asberry, Irma
Hearing Date: 2018.3.29
Excerpt: ...forcement Officer Marcella Villanueva: Overrule Objections to Paragraphs 5, 11, 12, 13, 20, 25, 27, 30, 32 and Exhibits F and K; Sustain Objections to Paragraphs 8, 15, 18, 19, 23, 28, 29, 31 and Exhibits C, G, I, L. As to the Declaration of attorney Nazik Hasan: Overrule Objections to Paragraphs 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, and Exhibit A; Sustain Objections to Paragraph 9; and the Objection to Paragraph 17 is moot. Page 3 of 3 As to the Merits: The au...
2018.3.29 Motion to Strike 482
Location: Riverside
Judge: Riemer, Craig
Hearing Date: 2018.3.29
Excerpt: ... irrelevant to the Court's analysis. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant violated Labor Code section 2802 by failing to reimburse travel expenses incurred for “pre‐employment drug testing and physical examination . . . .” Subdivision (a) of that section requires an employer to “indemnify his or her employee for all necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties, o...
2018.3.29 Motion for Relief from Waiver of Discovery 907
Location: Riverside
Judge: Asberry, Irma
Hearing Date: 2018.3.29
Excerpt: ...(CCP. §§2030.210, 2030.220, 2030.230 and 2030.240 for interrogatories and C.C.P. §§2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230, 2031.240 and 2031.280 for request for production of documents); and (2) the party's failure to serve timely responses was due to mistake, inadvertence or excusable neglect. The discovery at issue in the motions to compel further responses contains objections, responses or a hybrid response with objection. An objection to an interro...
2018.3.29 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 482
Location: Riverside
Judge: Riemer, Craig
Hearing Date: 2018.3.29
Excerpt: ...continue the case management in this case, currently scheduled for 5‐9‐18, to 5‐10‐ 18, to coincide with the trial setting conference in the Garcia case. Any party wishing to oppose that order should appear on 3‐29‐18. Analysis: The demurrer is overruled because it does not dispose of the entire cause of action alleged. “No action shall be brought under this part for any violation of a posting, notice, agency reporting, or filing re...
2018.3.29 Demurrer 908
Location: Riverside
Judge: Latting, James
Hearing Date: 2018.3.29
Excerpt: ...nt to Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. On 10/24/17, Plaintiff James Foxx filed his complaint against Defendants Daniel Foxx, Jeff Curci, Bennion Deville Homes, Roseanne Foxx, D&R Foxx, Inc. and Sterling Ridge Lot 1, LLC alleging 15 causes of action. On 1/12/18, Plaintiff dismissed the 2nd and 9th causes of action, leaving the following 13 causes of action: 1) breach of contract, 3) declaratory relief, 4) breach of fiduciary duty...
2018.3.29 Demurrer 145
Location: Riverside
Judge: Sykes, Sunshine
Hearing Date: 2018.3.29
Excerpt: ...demarks on the part of defendant John Suhr. As to the 2nd and 3rd causes of action, the court rejects the argument that abuse of control and corporate waste cannot be asserted as separate breaches of fiduciary duty. As to the 5th cause of action, the FAC adequately states the basis for irreparable harm to support an injunction claim. Plaintiff alleges that defendant John Suhr has claimed ownership of the trademarks, has sought to license the trad...
2018.3.29 Motion for Summary Judgment 823
Location: Riverside
Judge: Chapman, David
Hearing Date: 2018.3.29
Excerpt: ...disregarded. Lifschutz cites Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(b)(3) which sets forth that opposition paper requirements. While section 437c(b)(3) does not reference other facts that the opposing party believes are undisputed and material to the court's ruling, CRC, rule 3.1350(f)(3) provides that the content of the separate statement in opposition may include additional material facts pertinent to the disposition of the motion, which Page 2 o...
2018.3.27 Motion for Attorneys' Fees 161
Location: Riverside
Judge: Bermudez, Angel
Hearing Date: 2018.3.27
Excerpt: ...pent on these particular motions and this case seems beyond reasonable when one returns to the subject matter of the litigation which, as far as the moving party, is a surrender of money with no claim. Also the number of attorneys working on the case seems high. However, to recognize the efforts of each attorney seems reasonable. Finally, the hourly rate seem reasonable. Therefore, the court reduces the fees to one‐half of the hours prayed for ...
2018.3.27 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 917
Location: Riverside
Judge: Chapman, David
Hearing Date: 2018.3.27
Excerpt: ...al argument, this court granted moving party leave to respond to Robledo's late filed declaration. In addition, the court allowed leave to file supplemental briefing on whether or not the contents of the declaration raised a triable issue of fact as to any of the causes of action. In addition, the court was going to further consider arguments of counsel concerning the Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (“IIED”) claim. In response, D...
2018.3.27 Motion to Tax Costs 550
Location: Riverside
Judge: Chapman, David
Hearing Date: 2018.3.27
Excerpt: ...his court granted UPS summary judgment as to the Cross‐Complaints filed by Mission Linen, Adam Hudson and JFK Memorial as those cross complaint only sought indemnity, apportionment, contribution and declaratory Page 2 of 11 relief, none of which had merit in light of the court's ruling that UPS was entitled to summary judgment as to all causes of action in Navarro's Complaint. UPS filed identical memorandum of costs for $13,724.87 against Plain...
2018.3.27 Motion to Strike 020
Location: Riverside
Judge: Latting, James
Hearing Date: 2018.3.27
Excerpt: ... re: Alter ego, Indemnification, Emotional distress, Attorneys' Fees, Punitive Damages, UCL damages, Injunctive relief. For the following reasons, the motion is denied as to Alter ego, Indemnification, Emotional distress, Punitive Damages, Injunctive relief and granted without leave to amend as to Attorneys' fees and UCL damages. Alter ego‐As discussed in reference to the demurrer, Plaintiffs have alleged alter ego. Indemnification‐The Settle...
2018.3.27 Motion to Compel Production 556
Location: Riverside
Judge: Bermudez, Angel
Hearing Date: 2018.3.27
Excerpt: ...equest to only claimants in California and that are within the Defendant's database is most reasonable. Sanctions are not awarded because the initial RFP was not so narrowly tailored as that which resulted from the meet and confer process. ...
2018.3.27 Motion to Compel Further Responses 398
Location: Riverside
Judge: Asberry, Irma
Hearing Date: 2018.3.27
Excerpt: ... distributed by [Defendant].” The issue is “evidence, describe, refer, or relate” which is broad to encompass virtually any document—which Plaintiff never addressed in her separate statement or meet and confer In opposition, Defendant appears to have no issue with producing its Lemon Law policies, and Plaintiff failed to address why that is not sufficient. Nos. 23 (technical service bulletins) and 24 (recalls) for the type of car at issue...
2018.3.27 Motion for Summary Judgment 923
Location: Riverside
Judge: Asberry, Irma
Hearing Date: 2018.3.27
Excerpt: ...is pervasive and seventh cause of action – whether there is extreme and outrageous conduct); denied as to the second, eighth and ninth causes of action on the grounds that Defendant has failed to meet its initial burden. First Cause of Action for Sexual Harassment: Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence to establish a triable issue of material fact regarding this cause of action. She has provided evidence that over a two‐month period of t...
2018.3.27 Demurrer 486
Location: Riverside
Judge: Riemer, Craig
Hearing Date: 2018.3.27
Excerpt: ...r. Thereafter, the demurring party must file a declaration demonstrating compliance with those provisions by describing “the means by which” the parties met and conferred. (§ 430.41, subd. (a)(3)(A).) The declaration of Wasser – which is identical for all three demurrers – does not describe the means by which she met and conferred with opposing counsel, or otherwise demonstrate compliance with the “in person or by telephone” requirem...
2018.3.27 Demurrer 201
Location: Riverside
Judge: Chapman, David
Hearing Date: 2018.3.27
Excerpt: ... section 2966, 4) negligence, 5) accounting, and 6) unfair business practices. Thereafter, on 1/9/18 Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) alleging 8 causes of action, including the original 6 causes of action plus 7) intentional representation, and 8) negligent misrepresentation. Page 8 of 11 Defendant demurs asserting that the facts set forth in the original verified Complaint are distinctly different than those in the FAC and ...
2018.3.27 Demurrer 020
Location: Riverside
Judge: Latting, James
Hearing Date: 2018.3.27
Excerpt: ...of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. The First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for: (1) fraud, (2) negligent misrepresentation, (3) breach of contract, (4) slander of title, (5) quiet title, (6) tortious interference with prospective business advantage, (7) unfair competition, (8) declaratory relief, (9) injunctive relief, (10) financial elder abuse, (11) tortious breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and (12) contr...
2018.3.26 Motion to Compel Arbitration 198
Location: Riverside
Judge: Riemer, Craig
Hearing Date: 2018.3.26
Excerpt: ...nc., dba Paragon Schmid Building Products. Analysis: The arbitration provision in the contract between K. Hovnanian and BSG provides that the only disputes that must be arbitrated are disputes that arise “out of this Master Subcontract . . . , including disputes involving claims made by homebuyers, . . . which involve[] a matter with economic value in excess of the jurisdictional limit of a small claims court….” (See Exh. S to decl. of Josh...
2018.3.26 Petition for Ordering Reduced Voting Percentage 816
Location: Riverside
Judge: Chapman, David
Hearing Date: 2018.3.26
Excerpt: ...aring for 3/26/18. Opposition was to be filed on or before 3/13/18, and reply Page 2 of 3 on or before 3/19/18). The court's order also provided that all members were to be provided notice at least 20 days before the hearing either via e‐mail or first‐class mail, pursuant to Civil Code section 4040, based on each member's preferred method of communication. Although the court order provide 20 days' notice the code provides 15 days' notice whic...
2018.3.26 Motion for Summary Judgment 547
Location: Riverside
Judge: Stamen, Randall
Hearing Date: 2018.3.26
Excerpt: ...sagree with one another. Their opinions are supported by Plaintiff's medical records. Hence, there are disputed material facts as to whether defendant Dr. Ha's actions fell below the applicable standard of care and whether that alleged failure to meet the applicable standard of care caused or contributed to Plaintiff's injuries. Plaintiff presented evidence (response to Form Interrogatory 2.6) that defendant Dr. Ha was an employee of defendant Ri...
2018.3.26 Motion for Leave to Intervene 503
Location: Riverside
Judge: Riemer, Craig
Hearing Date: 2018.3.26
Excerpt: ... declaration was actually filed with the motion. The only evidence in support of the motion is the declaration of Field filed with the reply. The Court will not consider that evidence, because the opposing parties have not had a chance to respond to or rebut it. Because this denial is not on the merits of the motion, it is without prejudice to the filing of a second motion that is supported by evidence. Alternatively, if the Field declaration was...
2018.3.26 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 373
Location: Riverside
Judge: Sykes, Sunshine
Hearing Date: 2018.3.26
Excerpt: ... through illusory modification proposals in order to charge exorbitant processing and late fees. (FAC, ¶73.) This allegation arguably constitutes an unfair business practice. Although many of the other allegations are unclear or improper, Plaintiff has stated a cause of action based on this allegation. Although, Nationstar argues that Plaintiff does not have standing to bring a UCL cause of action because he was granted a loan modification and n...
2018.3.26 Motion for Equitable Accounting 053
Location: Riverside
Judge: Riemer, Craig
Hearing Date: 2018.3.26
Excerpt: ..., memorandum of points and authorities, and exhibits filed on 1‐5‐18;  The defendant's opposition to the motion, and attached exhibits and transcripts, filed 1‐29‐18;  The declaration on behalf of defendant regarding the timeliness of that opposition, filed 1‐30‐18;  The plaintiff's reply, filed 2‐5‐18;  The declaration on behalf of plaintiff, filed 2‐9‐18;  The declaration of Sherise Histen filed 3‐12‐18. �...
2018.3.26 Peremptory Writ of Mandate 090
Location: Riverside
Judge: Asberry, Irma
Hearing Date: 2018.3.26
Excerpt: ...tired faculty member. There are no material facts are in dispute and the parties agree the petition raises a question of law. There is no administrative record. Request for Judicial Notice: The Request for Judicial Notice is granted pursuant to Evidence Code 452(b) and (c). “It is settled principle that administrative agencies have only such powers as have been conferred upon them, expressly or by implication, by constitution or statute.” (Fe...
2018.3.26 Motion for Approval of Class Action Settlement 927
Location: Riverside
Judge: Riemer, Craig
Hearing Date: 2018.3.26
Excerpt: ...ary approval on May 21, 2018, at 8:30 A.M. in this department. If a second motion is filed at least three court days before that date, the Court is likely to vacate that status conference. Page 3 of 7 Analysis: New Evidence With Reply New evidence is generally not permitted with reply papers. (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537‐1538.) Plaintiff submits his declaration and deposition transcripts, as well as the supplemental declar...
2018.3.7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction 498
Location: Riverside
Judge: Sykes, Sunshine
Hearing Date: 2018.3.7
Excerpt: ......
2018.3.7 Demurrer 116
Location: Riverside
Judge: Bermudez, Angel
Hearing Date: 2018.3.7
Excerpt: ....” (Vournas v. Fidelity National Title Insurance (1999) 73 Cal. App. 4th 668, 677.) “The scope and nature of the trustee's duties are exclusively defined by the deed of trust and the governing statutes. No other common law duties exist.” (Kachlon v. Markowitz (2008) 168 Cal. App. 4th 316, 335.) The trustee acts at the direction of the original beneficiary or its assignee or that entity's agent. (Yvanova v. New Century Mortgage Corp....
2018.3.7 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action 095
Location: Riverside
Judge: Waters, Sharon
Hearing Date: 2018.3.7
Excerpt: ... of the “recovery by the average class member” if the settlement is approved, as required by Section E.1.c, or the estimated high and low range, in the event that recovery varies, which it does. Similarly, the notice to class members provides no such information. (E.19) There is no statement from plaintiffs' attorney in compliance with section E.1.d. There is a declaration from defense counsel but it fails to state that counsel made a “reas...
2018.3.7 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 827
Location: Riverside
Judge: Marquez, Raquel
Hearing Date: 2018.3.7
Excerpt: ... 26, 2018. Defendants are ordered to meet and confer with Plaintiffs for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections raised in the motion. As part of the meet and confer process, Defendants shall identify the specific cause of action that they believe is subject to the motion and identify with legal support the basis of the deficiencies. Plaintiffs shall provide legal support for their position...
2018.3.7 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 171
Location: Riverside
Judge: Asberry, Irma
Hearing Date: 2018.3.7
Excerpt: .... The motion appears to be plaintiff's opposition to the motion for judgment on the pleadings. Even if consideration could be made of the motion, it does not contain a request for reconsideration of the ruling of December 8, 2017 under CCP 1008 nor does it seek a set a set aside of the ruling under CCP 473. ...
2018.3.7 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 873
Location: Riverside
Judge: Waters, Sharon
Hearing Date: 2018.3.7
Excerpt: ...pts to obtain preliminary approval. It appears the time spent preparing client for deposition may be excessive. The Court cannot determine how much time was spent for that activity because it is lumped in with time in connection with the mediation process. The Court requires further information on this activity. Additionally, counsel has not adequately explained why a 1.9 multiplier is reasonable. The Court needs further, more detailed informatio...
2018.3.7 Demurrer 779
Location: Riverside
Judge: Stamen, Randall
Hearing Date: 2018.3.7
Excerpt: ....) Fourth Cause of Action (Declaratory Relief): A claim for declaratory relief requires a present controversy between the parties. None of the allegations in the First Amended Complaint challenge the validity of the Deed of Trust in favor of CommerceWest or state a basis for avoiding the Deed of Trust. Additionally, plaintiff Janaco cites no agreement or basis for the Court to substitute Janaco in place of defendant ZXCR as the obligor on the loa...
2018.3.7 Demurrer 618
Location: Riverside
Judge: Asberry, Irma
Hearing Date: 2018.3.7
Excerpt: ...s to orders, findings of action and judgments. (Ramsden v. Western Union (1977) 71 CA3d 873, 879. 2 nd Cause of Action for Breach of Lease: To state a cause of action for breach of contract, a party must establish: (1) the existence of a contract; (2) the party's performance or excuse of nonperformance; (3) the opposing party's breach; and (4) resulting damages. (Oasis West Realty v. Goldman (2011) 51 Cal. 4th 811, 822.) A contract will be enforc...
2018.3.7 Demurrer 551
Location: Riverside
Judge: Latting, James
Hearing Date: 2018.3.7
Excerpt: ...ivil Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. Defendant Duke Partners, LLC filed an Answer to the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) setting forth 12 affirmative defenses (“a/ds”). The demurrer is based upon the grounds each a/d fails to state a defense and is uncertain. For the following reasons, the demurrer is overruled as to the 1 st and 5th affirmative defenses; sustained with leave thirty (30) days to amend as to the 2nd through 4th affir...
2018.3.7 Motion to Compel 106
Location: Riverside
Judge: Stamen, Randall
Hearing Date: 2018.3.7
Excerpt: ...er Responses are GRANTED. Defendant Alfa Business filed timely Motions to Compel Further Responses. Hence, the burden was on Plaintiffs to justify the objections they asserted to the subject Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Admission, and Requests for Production and/or to justify their failure fully to respond to the discovery. (Coy v. Sup.Ct. (Wolcher) (1962) 58 Cal.2d 210, 220 ‐ 221.) Plaintiffs did not satisfy that...
2018.3.6 Demurrer 695
Location: Riverside
Judge: Latting, James
Hearing Date: 2018.3.6
Excerpt: ...fendants are named on each cause of action. Each cause of action (or affirmative defense) should be separately stated, must be separately numbered, and must identify the parties asserting the claim and against whom it is asserted. CRC, rule 2.112. Thus, each separately stated cause of action should state: — its number (e.g., “FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION”); — the party asserting it if the complaint is filed on behalf of more than one plaintiff (...
2018.3.6 Motion to be Relieved as Counsel 168
Location: Riverside
Judge: Riemer, Craig
Hearing Date: 2018.3.6
Excerpt: ...oration. If true, how can that entity have a current address, as represented in the motion? And why should the Court believe that a dissolved corporation has an account manager, as claimed in the proof of service? The declaration and the proposed order both state that the case is stayed. That is true as to the prosecution of the case against Skypatrol, LLC, in light of the bankruptcy petition filed by Skypatrol in December of 2017. What is the ba...
2018.3.6 Motion to Quash Subpoena 828
Location: Riverside
Judge: Stamen, Randall
Hearing Date: 2018.3.6
Excerpt: ... Declaration. There is no indication that District Attorney Hestrin possesses personal knowledge related to any events or issues raised in the Complaint. Any information regarding the criminal investigation which is the subject of the Motion to Quash, including the interview by Detective David Smith of Defendant Rosie Quintana on or about December 11, 2016, is protected and beyond the scope of discovery. (Cal. Code Civ. Pro. § 1987.1(a); 2017.01...
2018.3.6 Motion to Strike 414
Location: Riverside
Judge: Stamen, Randall
Hearing Date: 2018.3.6
Excerpt: ...tion 425.16(e)(1)(2)(4) because the Complaint concerns an underlying action between the parties, Hudack v. Siggard, et al., Riverside Superior Court Case No. RIC 450529. Plaintiff fails to meet his burden on the second prong of the analysis. Plaintiff presents no admissible evidence or argument that he has a reasonable probability of prevailing on his contention that the Judgment in Hudack v. Siggard, et al., is void despite the finality of the j...
2018.3.6 Motion to Vacate Judgment 376
Location: Riverside
Judge: Riemer, Craig
Hearing Date: 2018.3.6
Excerpt: ...473, subdivision (b) [6 months], subdivision (d) (2 years), or section 473.5 [2 years]. ...
2018.3.6 Demurrer 077
Location: Riverside
Judge: Bermudez, Angel
Hearing Date: 2018.3.6
Excerpt: ...nd in Flatley v. Mauro (2006) 39 Cal.4th 299 and its progeny. These cases have not required the exchange of money for the COA of Extortion. IIED: The extortion facts presented are sufficient to support this cause of action as well. Litigation Privilege: This is not applicable when the communication is not made in good faith. Here, Defendants threatened to report Plaintiff to the IRS and seek administrative and/or criminal penalties unless he succ...
2018.3.6 Motion to Dismiss 892
Location: Riverside
Judge: Latting, James
Hearing Date: 2018.3.6
Excerpt: ...guments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced.” ([CRC 3.1113(b); see Quantum Cooking Concepts, Inc. v. LV Assocs., Inc. (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 927, 934—trial court not required to “comb the record and the law for factual and legal support that a party has failed to identify or provide”) ...
2018.3.5 Demurrer 551
Location: Riverside
Judge: Latting, James
Hearing Date: 2018.3.5
Excerpt: ...ee's deed upon sale, (3) wrongful foreclosure, (4) quiet title, (5) slander of title, and (6) unfair competition is that Defendants' (“Ds' ”) foreclosure was based upon the alleged breach of a loan agreement that Plaintiff did not enter into. The demurrer is based upon the grounds that each cause of action (“c/a”) fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. For the following reasons, the demurrer is sustained with lea...
2018.3.5 Motion to Strike, Request for Attorney's Fees 925
Location: Riverside
Judge: Chapman, David
Hearing Date: 2018.3.5
Excerpt: ..., Salima Nurani, Kalab Honey and the Law Offices of Kalab Honey, PC. The complaint is for malicious prosecution arising out a lawsuit filed against Plaintiff in the case of Sun Salt Sand Inc. v. Tony Cueves, PSC1503692. The prior lawsuit was terminated in Plaintiff's favor on the granting of his motion for summary judgment as to all six causes of action brought by Defendant Sun Salt Sand, Inc. against him. The owners of Sun Salt Sand, Inc. are De...
2018.3.5 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena, for Sanctions 958
Location: Riverside
Judge: Chapman, David
Hearing Date: 2018.3.5
Excerpt: ...Cross‐Defendant Stanton Place 2014, LLC is to prepare a proposed order and give notice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, forthwith. Plaintiffs Goodell and Self Reliance, Inc. dismissed all causes of action. The CrossComplaint of Frederick Brillman against Goodell and Self Reliance, Inc. was also dismissed. Remaining are the Cross‐Complaint of Stanton Place 2014, LLC, First Amended Cross‐ Complaint of Luis Martin, Jr. and t...
2018.3.5 Motion to Discharge Peremptory Writ 572
Location: Riverside
Judge: Waters, Sharon
Hearing Date: 2018.3.5
Excerpt: ...the potential environmental impacts. In light of the new petitions that have been filed challenging the new FEIR, there is no reason for this Court is continue to retain jurisdiction. To the extent respondent and real party wish to assert that certain challenges made in the new petitions are barred by res judicata, they will have the right to make those claims in those cases. ...
2018.3.5 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award, Enter Final Judgment 559
Location: Riverside
Judge: Chapman, David
Hearing Date: 2018.3.5
Excerpt: ...d be awarded anything on their claims. Defendants now move to have the Award confirmed and for the entry of final judgment in this matter. Page 2 of 9 Plaintiff asserts that the award should not be confirmed as it relates to one of the four findings made by the Arbitrator for the following reasons:  Arbitrator failed to fully review Plaintiff's brief and failed to understand some of the relevant issues, and that he failed to address any of the...
2018.3.5 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 106
Location: Riverside
Judge: Latting, James
Hearing Date: 2018.3.5
Excerpt: ...l facilitate the presentation of all claims and defenses in the present action between the parties and will re‐open discovery in the event it is appropriate to do so. ...
2018.3.5 Motion for Final Approval of Settlement 460
Location: Riverside
Judge: Riemer, Craig
Hearing Date: 2018.3.5
Excerpt: ...e entered shortly. Analysis: On 1‐4‐18, the Court continued the hearing on the motion to allow the parties the opportunity to address a variety of questions and concerns posed by the Court in its tentative ruling. The supplemental documents submitted address some but not all of those concerns. To pick just some of the examples of concerns that are not resolved by the supplemental documents: 1. The Court informed the parties that it would not ...
2018.3.5 Demurrer 933
Location: Riverside
Judge: Latting, James
Hearing Date: 2018.3.5
Excerpt: ...g his death in April 2017, his daughter, Patricia Yvonne Playan Leonel de Cervantes, filed a declaration stating that she was the proper person to maintain this action and substituted in as plaintiff because she was both the successor trustee to Marion's trust and the executor of his will. The Court sustained with leave to amend a demurrer to the Third Amended Complaint because there were no facts alleged that showed that Cervantes, who was named...

8838 Results

Per page

Pages