Excerpt: ...harges, the burden is on the party seeking to tax costs to show that they were not reasonable or necessary.” Ladas v. Cal. State Auto. Ass'n (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 761, 774. When the reasonableness of particular items is challenged, conclusory allegations do not satisfy the objecting party's burden. Id.; Jones v. Dumrichob (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1258, 1266. Alternatively, where items are properly put in issue by objection, the burden of proof is ...

Excerpt: ...s the recovery of attorneys' fees to a buyer who prevails in an action under that section, “determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the buyer in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action.” Plaintiffs request attorneys' fees in the amount of $38,468, which includes estimated fees relating to the current motion of $6,975. Plaintiff also requests a .3 multiplier resulting in additional attorneys' fees of...

Excerpt: ...otion – Tentative Rulings Page 17 of 23 PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 42 THE HONORABLE CHARLES D. WACHOB TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR NOVEMBER 21, 2019 AT 8:30 A.M. Ruling on Motion The motion is denied without prejudice. A party may be declared a vexatious litigant under the following circumstances: (1) the person, acting in pro per, has filed five or more actions within the last seven years that were either a...

Excerpt: ...al fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(c).) A party to the action may also move for summary adjudication if that party contends there is no merit to one or more of the causes of action. (Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(f)(1).) The moving party bears the initial burden of establishing that one or elements of a cause of action cannot be established or there is a compl...

Excerpt: ...med at these defendants. The trial court engages in a specific analysis when reviewing a motion for summary judgment. First, it must define the scope of the motion by looking to the operative pleading. The pleadings serve as the “outer measure of materiality” for a motion for summary judgment in addition to determining the scope of the motion. (Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Superior Court PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 42 Thursday Ci...

Excerpt: ...stitute a cause of action. (Code of Civil Procedure section 438(c)(1)(B).) “[J]udgment on the pleadings must be denied where there are material factual issues that require evidentiary resolution. (Schabarum v. California Legislature (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1205, 1216.) The court reviews the motion keeping these principles in mind. Defendant challenges all four causes of action asserting, among other things, each claim is deficiently pleaded. A re...

Excerpt: ...n 438(c)(1)(B).) “[J]udgment on the pleadings must be denied where there are material factual issues that require evidentiary resolution. (Schabarum v. California Legislature (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1205, 1216.) The court reviews the motion keeping these principles in mind. Defendants challenge all six causes of action asserting, among other things, that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations along with lacking the level of specifici...

Excerpt: ...d under well established principles. The challenge tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) Furthermore, the failure to ple...

Excerpt: ...cedure section 1033(a) is denied. The court notes that plaintiff sought damages for actual medical expenses resulting from the incident, future medical expenses and general damages that far exceeded the jurisdictional maximum of a limited civil action. There is no showing that plaintiff acted unreasonably or in bad faith in asserting her claims. Defendant alternatively moves to tax discrete items of costs claimed by plaintiff. “If the items app...

Excerpt: ...jections to evidence are ruled on as follows: Objection Nos. 3, 5, 8, 9 and 10 to the declaration of Michelle Gallagher are sustained. Objection Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6 and 8 to the declaration of Anna Murphy are sustained. The remaining objections are overruled. Ruling on Motion Defendant and cross‐complainant Charley Smith, individually and as trustee of the Charley D. Smith Family Trust (“Smith”) moves for summary judgment of plaintiff and cross...

Excerpt: ...stitute a cause of action. Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e). A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judi...

Excerpt: ...nstitute a cause of action. Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e). A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described 9 conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by j...

Excerpt: ...award of sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure §§ 128.5 and 128.7, contending Judgment Debtor Gilman's motion for fees on appeal, filed on July 24, 2019, was filed in bad faith and was frivolous and devoid of any merit. Regarding Judgment Debtors' request for sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 128.5, the Court is not persuaded that the conduct at issue warrants sanctions under this provision. In ruling on the motion, the C...

Excerpt: ... overruled. Defendants' objections to evidence are ruled on as follows: Objection No. 4 is sustained. The remaining objections are overruled. 3 Ruling on Motion Defendants Madeline Yang (“Madeline”), Richard Yang (“Richard”) and Frieda Yang (“Frieda”) move for summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs' second amended complaint. The party seeking summary judgment bears the burden of showing there is no triable issue of material fact ...

Excerpt: ...evidence a strong public policy in favor of arbitration that is frequently approved and enforced by the courts. Madden v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1976) 17 Cal.3d 699, 706; Laswell v. AG Seal Beach, LLC, et al (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1399, 1405. Under both federal and state law, a threshold question for any petition to compel arbitration is whether there exists an agreement to arbitrate. Cruise v. Kroger Co. (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 390, 396. In...

Excerpt: ...f filed a partial satisfaction of judgment on February 8, 2016, after defendant was purportedly deceased. The proof of service for the current motion then shows plaintiff served defendant, who plaintiff claims is deceased, by mail at an address in Granite Bay, California. Further, plaintiff provides little legal authority to support the motion or the ability to vacate a judgment where a partial satisfaction has been filed. Finally, the declaratio...

Excerpt: ...ies to informally meet and confer in good faith prior to setting matters for hearing. Ruling on Request for Judicial Notice Defendant's request for judicial notice is granted under Evidence Code section 452. Ruling on Motion The motion is granted with leave to amend. A motion to strike may be granted to strike irrelevant, false, or improper matters in a pleading; or to strike a pleading not drawn in conformity with the laws of the state or an ord...

Excerpt: ...k National Association is granted. This subpoena seeks “all documents and transaction history related to accounts owned by Shawn Whitney from 01/01/2017 to 01/01/2019”. Plaintiff's personal financial information is protected by the constitutional right to privacy. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 656. Where discovery seeks to invade the constitutional right to privacy, the party seeking the discovery must show tha...

Excerpt: ... is overruled. Defendants' objection to plaintiffs' request for judicial notice is overruled. Ruling on Motion Plaintiffs W1 Holdings, G4 Capital Partners, LLC and Sheena George move for summary judgment of this consolidated action, or alternatively summary adjudication of issues. With respect to plaintiffs' request for summary adjudication, plaintiffs' notice of motion states that plaintiffs seek “summary adjudication of issues” but does not...

Excerpt: ...dure section 128.5. Pursuant to this statute, the court may order a party or counsel, or both “to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, incurred by another party as a result of actions or tactics, made in bad faith, that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay.” Code Civ. Proc. § 128.5(a). Defendants contend that plaintiff and his counsel should be ordered to pay their attorneys' fees because they filed ...

Excerpt: ...f action. Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e). A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed fa...

Excerpt: .... Code Civ. Proc. § 430.10(e). A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed facts. Eva...

Excerpt: ...e issue of material fact and that the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 826, 850.) The moving party has the burden of showing, by affidavit, facts establishing every element necessary to sustain a judgment in favor of the party. (Consumer Cause, Inc. v. Smilecare (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 454, 468.) Once a plaintiff proves its prima facie case, the burden of proof shifts to the defe...

Excerpt: ...ffirmative defense to the cause of action, that there is no merit to an affirmative defense to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damages, as specified in Section 3294 of the Civil Code, or that one or more defendants either owed or did not owe a duty to the plaintiff or plaintiffs.” (Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(f)(1).) The trial court engages in a specific analysis when reviewing a motion for summary adjudicati...

Excerpt: ...om matters of which the court may or must take judicial notice.” (Aaronoff v. Martinez‐Seftner (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 910, 918.) A demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or accuracy of the described conduct. (Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787.) The allegations in the pleadings are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. (Del E. Webb Corp....