Excerpt: ...chool (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 726, 733.) All properly pleaded facts are assumed to be true as well as those that are judicially noticeable. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318; Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 1149, 1153.) Plaintiff's complaint alleges six separate causes of action. The allegations within each claim are disjointed, partially illegible, and conclusory in nature, failing to sufficiently allege facts...

Excerpt: ...m. (In re Emery's Estate (1962) 199 Cal.App.2d 22.) The current guardian ad litem cannot simply withdraw from the action. He must bring a noticed motion and request a hearing seeking to withdraw along with discussing why a new guardian ad litem should not be appointed. (Ibid.) The court declines to consider any filings by plaintiff until such time as the issues surrounding the appointed guardian ad litem have been properly addressed. PLACER COUNT...

Excerpt: ...zes the recovery of attorneys' fees to a buyer who prevails in an action under that section, “determined by the court to have been reasonably incurred by the buyer in connection with the commencement and prosecution of such action.” Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this action, and entitled to attorneys' fees pursuant to this statute. Plaintiff asserts that the attorneys' fees billed by his counsel in this action total $24,000. Plaintiff ...

Excerpt: ...legal sufficiency of the pleadings, not the truth of the plaintiff's allegations or the accuracy of the described conduct. Bader v. Anderson (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 775, 787. The allegations in the pleadings are deemed to be true no matter how improbable the allegations may seem. Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604. The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts tha...

Excerpt: .... The court assumes the truth of all facts properly pleaded, and accepts as true all facts that may be implied or reasonably inferred from facts expressly alleged, unless they are contradicted by judicially noticed facts. Evans v. City of Berkeley (2006) 38 Cal.4th 1, 6. However, the court does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of facts or law. Id. The City's demurrer is sustained as to the first cause of action for ...

Excerpt: ...d the opposition papers plaintiff filed to the ex parte application on March 22, 2019. Ruling on Defendant's Request to Present Oral Testimony On April 5, 2019, defendant filed a “Notice of Intention to Introduce Oral Testimony at hearing to Disqualify Counsel”. Defendant failed to submit an application seeking the introduction of oral testimony as required under California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1306. Further, the notice fails to sufficientl...

Excerpt: ...uests on the grounds that the responses do not comply with Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.230. With respect to the production of documents, the motion is denied as moot. In opposition to the motion, the City represents that the subject documents were produced on January 17, 2019, the same date this motion was filed. Plaintiffs concede that the documents have now been produced. With respect to the wording of the City's responses, the motion ...

Excerpt: ...irectly by plaintiff in a case where the court has appointed a guardian ad litem for him. Plaintiff cannot file motions on his own behalf until such time as the court approves the withdrawal of the guardian ad litem. (In re Emery's Estate (1962) 199 Cal.App.2d 22.) The current guardian ad litem cannot simply withdraw from the action. He must bring a noticed motion and request a hearing seeking to withdraw along with discussing why a new guardian ...

Excerpt: ...on. Second, there is no proof of service in the file demonstrating defendant has been properly served. It is noted service under Code of Civil Procedure section 415.10 et seq. is required since the court file does not reflect defendant has been served with the summons and complaint. Third, it is unclear whether plaintiff has the capacity to bring the current motion. According to the allegations in the complaint, the plaintiff in this action is Li...

Excerpt: ...der Section 437c(b)(1). Ruling on Request for Judicial Notice Defendant's initial request for judicial notice and supplemental request for judicial notice are both granted under Evidence Code section 452. Indeed, judicial notice of such court records is mandatory under Evidence Code section 453 where the party makes a timely request, giving all adverse parties and the court sufficient notice to permit a response to it. (See 2 Jefferson's Californ...

Excerpt: ...o not impose such a sanction lightly. Upon careful review of the moving papers and the court file, the court determines that terminating sanctions are appropriate in this instance. Defendant served plaintiff with discovery requests on 2 February 16, 2018, including interrogatories and requests for production. Plaintiff failed to serve any responses. Defendant moved to compel responses which motion was unopposed and granted January 8, 2019. Defend...

Excerpt: ...fact. Walker v. Walker (1960) 177 Cal.App.2d 89, 91‐92. The purpose of consolidation is to promote trial convenience and economy by avoiding duplication of procedure, especially with respect to the proof of issues common to both actions. See McClure, on Behalf of Caruthers v. Donovan (1949) 33 Cal.2d 717, 722‐ 723. Consolidation rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Plaintiff seeks to consolidate an unlimited civil action in w...

Excerpt: ...dicial notice is otherwise granted. Plaintiff's request for judicial notice is granted. On December 7, 2018, plaintiff applied ex parte for a temporary restraining order prohibiting defendants from performing the following acts: Selling, attempting to sell, listing for sale or private auction, recording a trustee's deed, or otherwise completing a non‐judicial trustee sale pertaining to the residential real estate with a physical address of 6021...

Excerpt: ...rguments or explained how co‐defendant's arguments relate to the allegations against moving defendants. As to the second cause of action, defendants rely on extrinsic evidence which may not be considered in ruling on a 3 motion for judgment on the pleadings. Based on all of the foregoing reasons, the motion must be denied. ...

Excerpt: ...pplemental declaration of Jolita Mikuleniene is not properly executed under Code of Civil Procedure section 2015.5 as the declaration is not executed under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California. Defendant's motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, summary adjudication is continued to March 28, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42. Defendant may submit an amended declaration, properly executed under Code of Civi...

Excerpt: ...the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (Code of Civil Procedure §437c(c).) The trial court engages in a specific analysis when reviewing a motion for summary judgment. First, it must define the scope of the motion by looking to the operative pleading. The pleadings serve as the “outer measure of materiality” for a motion for summar...

Excerpt: ...ition is wrong or to arrive at a solution without involving the court. Defendant's motion seeks to compel further responses to a single RPD, RPD no. 27. The RPD requests the following: All DOCUMENTS, including, medical and psychological reports and records, prepared by House Psychiatric Clinic, Inc., which reflect, memorialize, refer to, or otherwise RELATE TO any treatment, opinion, or diagnosis of YOUR purported injuries alleged in the COMPLAIN...

Excerpt: ...l interrogatories, set one; and (3) request for production of documents, set one, by March 29, 2019. The request is denied as to the request for admissions. Defendant has made a sufficient showing that responses have been provided to plaintiff. PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT THURSDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 42 THE HONORABLE CHARLES D. WACHOB TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR MARCH 7, 2019 AT 8:30 A.M. PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 42 Thursday C...

Excerpt: ...ent with or supported by the facts in the case. (Code of Civil Procedure section 663(1); see Glen Hill Farm, LLC v. California Horse Racing Bd. (2010) 189 Cal.App.4th 1296, 1302.) A motion to vacate does not allow for a reweighing of the facts. (Simac Design, Inc. v. Alciati (1979) 92 Cal.App.3d 146, 153.) Defendant has failed to make a sufficient showing the judgment is based upon an incorrect or erroneous legal basis. Plaintiff's sister state j...

Excerpt: ...nstitute a cause of action against the defendant. Code Civ. Proc. § 438(c). The grounds for the motion must appear on the face of the challenged pleading, or be based on facts which may be judicially noticed. Code Civ. Proc. § 438(d). Nationstar's motion is granted without leave to amend as to plaintiffs' first cause of action for violation of Civil Code section 2923.5. The sole remedy for noncompliance with this statute is postponement of a fo...

Excerpt: ..., failure to provide meal and rest breaks, failure to provide accurate wage statements, and violations under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). PAGA “authorizes an employee to bring an action for civil penalties on behalf of the state against his or her employer for Labor Code violations committed against the employee and fellow employees, with most of the proceeds of that litigation going to the state. Iskanian v. CLS Trans. L.A.,...

Excerpt: ...ded complaint as Exhibit A. Exhibit A is a document titled “verified complaint” (not first amended complaint). It appears that plaintiffs then attempted to file another version of the complaint, this one titled “verified first amended complaint”, which was rejected for filing. The court presumes that defendants' demurrer relates to the “verified complaint” attached as Exhibit A to the notice of errata, which though not labeled as such...

Excerpt: ...s' (“SCP's”) responses to the requests at issue do not comply with the Code of Civil Procedure, as SCP does not clearly state whether it is complying with the request, or whether it is unable to comply. For example, in response to Request No. 1, SCP sets forth several objections, then states that “to the extent that relevant non‐privileged documents otherwise subject to production and responsive to this request actually exist within the R...

Excerpt: ...alleges that James Allen, on behalf of himself and as agent for Marie Allen, executed the operative contract which was subsequently breached by the defendants. Plaintiff alleges damages of $14,908. James Allen was subsequently dismissed from the lawsuit. A proof of service of summons filed December 8, 2014, states that Marie Allen was personally served with the first amended complaint and summons on November 25, 2014, at 3:25 p.m. Allen denies th...

Excerpt: ...ices, Inc. and Dennis F. Graham are hereby enjoined from directly or indirectly (1) competing with plaintiff in the business of providing heating, ventilation and air conditioning services to national retail commercial customers; (2) soliciting plaintiff's national retail commercial heating, ventilation and air conditioning service customers whose business and contracts were transferred to plaintiff pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement; and (...