Excerpt: ...e motion is GRANTE D as to the request to vacate the current preliminary injunction. The motion is DENIED as to the request for a new preliminary injunction. As discussed below, this matter involves members of the Rhee family: decedent Henry Rhee, his wife Grace Rhee, their sons Thomas and Brian Rhee, and Thomas's wife Judy Ren. The Court refers to these persons by their first names for clarity. No disrespect is intended. EVIDENTIARY MATTERS I. ...

Excerpt: ...imite d insurance coverage to protect against uninsured drivers or driver's whose insurance is insufficient to pay for the injuries or damage caused. Ins. Code, § 11580.2 Insurance protecting against a vehicle with no liability insurance is called “uninsured mot orist” (UM) coverage, and insurance protecting against a vehicle with limited liability insurance coverage is called “underinsured motorist” (UIM) coverage. Recovery under UM...

Excerpt: ...er v. AT&T Mobilit y, LLC (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1545, 1556 [elements] The FAC states facts sufficient to state a cause of action for Negligent Repair See Berkley v. Dowds (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 518, 527 [Negligence may be alleged in general terms].) The FAC states facts sufficient to state a cause of action for Violation of the UCC (Defendants failed to identify any defects with the pleading of this cause of action). The omission of the allegati...

Excerpt: ...ffs filed an opposition to Defendants' Request to take Judicial Notice of documents apparently related to the prelitigation complaints made by plaintiffs to defendants. (See ROAs 76, 95.) At the same time, Plaintiffs state that “judicial notice is unnecessary if the se are the documents attached to Plaintiff's SAC already filed with the court.” Copies of the same documents are in fact attached to the SAC and were previously judicially notic...

Excerpt: ...“Hirson” an d crossdefendants as “Korpivaara.” Defect/misjoinder of parties. Korpivaara has not shown Niral Patel is an indispensable party. “An agent is not an indispensable party in litigation between his principal and a third party over the subject matter of the a g e n c y .” (Writers Guild of America, West, Inc. v. Screen Gems, Inc. (1969) 274 Cal.App.2d 367, 374.) 1st cause of action, declaratory judgment -partner disassociation...

Excerpt: ...gent m isrepresentation. The FAC fails to state facts sufficient to constitute these causes of action. (See Lazar v. Superior Court (1996) 12 Cal.4th 631, 638, 645 [fraud elements]; Nissan Motor Acceptance Cases (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 793, 823 [negligent misrepre sentation elements].) The residential purchased agreement (RPA) attached as exhibit A to the FAC shows that at the time defendants made the subject “misrepresentations” on 6/1/22 (FAC...

Excerpt: ...oving party in fact served the instant motion and supporting papers more than 21 days prior to filing them. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 128.5, subd. (f)(1)(B), 128.7, subd. (c)(1); Smith, Smith & Kring v. Superior Court (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 573, 577 -578 [statements in brie fs are argument, not evidence]; Hart v. Avetoom (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 410, 413 -415 [motion initially served must be the same as the one eventually filed]; Galleria Plus, Inc. v...

Excerpt: ...REQUEST: Caltrans and OCTA mov e for an order permitting Reply briefs to support its Motion in Limine Nos. 1 -3. ROA 431 -433. FACTS / OVERVIEW: These consolidated actions involve inverse condemnation claims and cross -complaints for indemnification. The action was initiated by JL Kids, wh ich seeks recovery for damages caused by a landslide onto its property in San Clemente. St. Andrews cross -complained against OCTA and Caltrans for indemnifi...

Excerpt: ...oposed cla ss action and PAGA settlement. UPCOMING EVENTS: None FACTS/OVERVIEW: This is a putative wage -and -hour class action and PAGA matter. On March 3, 2023, Plaintiff Ene C. Hernandez, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated (“Plaintiff”), filed a Complaint against Defendant Northwest Hotel Corporation (“Defendant”). (ROA 2.) The Complaint alleged the following eight causes of action: 1. Failure to Provide Me...

Excerpt: ... Responding Party: Plaintiffs M. Westland, LLC; Dorothy Sublett -Miller and Walter J. Miller, as Successor Trustees of The Miller Family Trust, originally dated October 12, 1979, amended and restated February 05, 2004, for the Estate of Willis L. Miller, deceased, as to an u ndivided ½ interest; Dorothy Sublett -Miller and Walter J. Miller, Successor Trustees of The Miller Family Trust, originally dated October 12, 1979, amended and restated Feb...

Excerpt: ...s no defense to a ca use of action if that party has proved each element of the cause of action entitling the party to judgment on the cause of action. Once the plaintiff . . . has met that burden, the burden shifts to the defendant . . . to show that a triable issue of one or more material facts exists as to the cause of action or a defense thereto. The defendant . . . shall not rely upon the allegations or denials of its pleadings to show that ...

Excerpt: ...t all times men tioned, each of DEFENDANTS, except as otherwise alleged or contended, are and have been the partners, joint venturers, alter egos, and/or co -conspirators of each other.” (Compl. ¶ 12.) Further, Plaintiff alleged that “DEFENDANTS were “employers” within the meaning of Government Code section 12926(d) . . . .” (Compl. ¶ 8.) Although not initially raised in the MSA, Defendants now claim that Cedar Mountain and not Madiso...

Excerpt: ...ion: 1) Failure to Pay Minimum Wage; 2) Failure to Pay Overtime Compensation; 3) Failure to Provide Lawful Meal Periods; 4) Failure to Provide Lawful Rest Periods; 8) Failure to Pay All Wages Upon Separation; 6) Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage Statements; 7) Fai lure to Indemnify Employees for Expenditures; and 8) Unfair Business Practices. ANALYSIS: The parties' sole dispute is whether or not Plaintiff qualifies for an exemption under...

Excerpt: ... the subject incident g iving rise to this complaint.” (FAC, EX-2 of Exemplary Damages Attachment.) Defendant was so impaired that he had “red/watery eyes, dilated pupils, slow lethargic speech, and difficulty concentrating” when being interviewed by the investigating Officer and failed the sobriety test. (Id.) “Defendant Topps knew from the onset that he must and would subsequently operate or control his vehicle on the public roads and t...

Excerpt: ... an orde r compelling Plaintiff to submit his individual claims to arbitration, striking or dismissing Plaintiff's class allegations, dismissing any non- individual PAGA claims, and staying further proceedings pending completion of the arbitration. UPCOMING EVENTS: None FACTS/OVERVIEW: This is a putative wage -and -hour class action. On July 6, 2022, Plaintiff Pablo Calvillo, an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“Plaint...

Excerpt: ...2024 at 9:0 0 a.m. The parties must file a Joint Status Report at least a week before the hearing, and may request a continuance if arbitration is not yet complete. The court concludes that there exists a valid agreement to arbitrate the individual claims asserted b y plaintiff in his Tenth Cause of Action for Violation of California Business & Professions Code §§17200, et seq. and that no grounds exist to bar enforcement of the agreement. CCP...

Excerpt: ...d system” conducted by local bar associations (as opposed to private alternative dispute resolution providers) and has its own rules and limitations. (See Aguilar v. Lerner (2004) 32 Cal.4th 974, 984; Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP v. Rosenson (2012) 203 Cal.App.4th 688, 693 [Legislature created MFAA as “separate and distinct arbitration scheme applicable to disputes between clients and attorneys over legal fees, costs, or b...

Excerpt: ...tober 24 , 2024 at 9:00 a.m. The parties must file a Joint Status Report at least a week before the hearing, and may request a continuance if arbitration is not yet complete. The court concludes that there exists a valid agreement to arbitrate the individual clai ms asserted by plaintiff and that no grounds exist to bar enforcement of the agreement. CCP §1281.2. Defendant has shown the existence of a signed arbitration agreement dated November ...

Excerpt: ...nterroga tories 42-45, 58 -61, 74 -77, and 89, which generally seek (1) the contact information of three students who allegedly assaulted Plaintiff and (2) the names and contact information of “Students E -M,” who were thirdparty witnesses to the alleged incident(s). The Court grants the motion as to the first category of information but denies the motion without prejudice as to the second category. Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010 s...

Excerpt: ... sustained. Evidentiary object ions nos. 4 through 6 are overruled. Evidence Submitted With Reply The court exercises its discretion to consider the evidence submitted with Plaintiffs' reply. Andry may address the evidence during the hearing. (Jay v. Mahaffey (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1522, 1537 -1538.) Merits Plaintiffs served Andry with a notice of taking a remote deposition and requests for production of documents at deposition. The notice li...

Excerpt: ...arty may move for an order compelling responses to interrogatories at any time “[i]f a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).) By failing to serve timely responses, Plaintiffs waived “any r ight to exercise the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230, as well as any objection to the interrogatories, including one based on privilege or on the protectio...

Excerpt: ...3310(E)) pro vides in relevant part, (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person* in the same or a substantially related matter in which that person's* interests are materially adverse to the interests o f the former client unless the former client gives informed written consent. (b) A lawyer shall not knowingly represent a person in the same or a substantially related matter in whi...

Excerpt: ...oanCare's Evidence should be OVERRULED. DMI moves on the grounds that during the Phase 1 of trial “LoanCare testified that it has no accounting records and for that reason, Judge Schwarm did not order LoanCare to account.” (Notice, 2:5 -7.) Specifically, during the Phase 1 of trial, DMI sought to compel an accounting against LoanCare based on its second cause of action for Accounting alleged in it Cross -Complaint filed on 2 -25 -21. (Penn...

Excerpt: ...nspection of the judgment -roll, i.e., the face of the record as opposed to extrinsic evidence. (Trackman v. Kenney (2010) 187 Cal. App. 4th 175, 181.) This distinction may impact the procedural mechanism available to attack the judgment or order, when the judgment or order may be attacked, and how the party challenging the judgment or order proves that the judgment is void. (Pittman v. Beck Park Apartments Ltd. (2018) 20 Cal. App. 5th 1009, 1020...

Excerpt: ...rder and orde r for issuance of a Writ of Attachment (“Application”) against defendant Arunpal Sehgal, M.D. (“Defendant”) are GRANTED in the following amounts: Reliant Management Group, LLC's Application is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $100,000; and Riverside Postac ute Care, LLC's Application is GRANTED in the reduced amount of $103,132.88. Plaintiff is ordered to post an undertaking of $10,000. “Under Code of Civil Procedure secti...