Excerpt: ...f California, Inc. (1993) 14 Cal. App. 4th 612, 616.) Here, the causes of action pled against Cross- Defendant are not so unclear as to render them indecipherable. Accordingly, the demurrer based on uncertainty is OVERRRULED. First Cause of Action - Negligence Cross-Defendant again contends the negligence cause of action is barred by the Economic Loss Rule, as this action is purely a contractual dispute. The economic loss rule ordinarily prevents...

Excerpt: ...raw v. Cal. Physicians' Service (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 39, 42.) Plaintiffs' well-pleaded facts are assumed to be true by the Court, but the Court does not assume the truth of contentions, deductions, or conclusions of fact or law. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) “Generally, it is an abuse of discretion to sustain a demurrer without leave to amend if there is any reasonable possibility that the defect can be cured by amendment.” (G...

Excerpt: .... U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 182, 199.) The court's sole function on a motion for summary judgment is issue-finding, not issue- determination. The judge must simply determine from the evidence submitted whether there is a “triable issue as to any material fact.” (C.C.P. § 437c(c) (emphasis added); see Zavala v. Arce (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 915, 926 (citing text); Binder v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 832, 839 (c...

Excerpt: ...es agreeing to produce (“Motion 2” below); (3) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Admission (“RFAs”) Set One, for RFA 14 and to deem the RFAs admitted (“Motion 3” below); (4) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories (“SROGs”) Set One, for SROG Nos. 1-6, 21-24, 30-31, 33, 36, and 37-41 (“Motion 4” below); and (5) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form ...

Excerpt: ...Thus, no matter how unlikely or improbable, the allegations made must be accepted as true for the purpose of ruling on the demurrer. (Del E. Webb Corporation v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) Absent court orders or other items subject to judicial notice, or items attached as exhibits to the complaint, the court may not consider the contents of pleadings or other exhibits when ruling on a demurrer. (Day v. Sharp (1975) 5...

Excerpt: ... of the claim by establishing a probability of success.”  (Baral v. Schnitt (2016) 1 Cal.5th 376, 384.)  If the defendant meets his burden, then the plaintiff must show the “challenged claim based on protected activity is legally sufficient and factually substantiated. The court, without resolving evidentiary conflicts, must determine whether the plaintiff's showing, if accepted by the trier of fact, would be sufficient to sustain a fav...

Excerpt: ...a probability of success.”  (Baral v. Schnitt (2016) 1 Cal.5th 376, 384.)  If the defendant meets his burden, then the plaintiff must show the “challenged claim based on protected activity is legally sufficient and factually substantiated. The court, without resolving evidentiary conflicts, must determine whether the plaintiff's showing, if accepted by the trier of fact, would be sufficient to sustain a favorable judgment.”  (Bara...

Excerpt: ... Elder Abuse. (Opp at 1:12-13) Plaintiffs also concede the propriety of Carol Wilson's demurrer to the SAC. Accordingly, the demurrer is SUSTAINED as to the 2nd and 4th causes of action and as to the claims made against Carol Wilson. The remaining issue in the demurrer is the Negligence cause of action asserted by Thomas and Jailyn Kramer (“Plaintiffs”) against the HOA. The issue is whether the Plaintiffs as tenants have standing to assert th...

Excerpt: ...e, the allegations made must be accepted as true for the purpose of ruling on the demurrer. (Del E. Webb Corporation v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) Absent court orders or other items subject to judicial notice, or items attached as exhibits to the complaint, the court may not consider the contents of pleadings or other exhibits when ruling on a demurrer. (Day v. Sharp (1975) 50 Cal.3d 904, 914; Sosinsky v. Grant (199...

Excerpt: ... ambiguities can be clarified in discovery. (Khoury v. Maly's of Calif., Inc. (1993) 14 CA4th 612, 616.) Here, the Complaint adequately apprises the Defendant of the nature of and basis for the claim, for pleading purposes. The Demurrer, based on the statute of limitations and C.C.P. § 430.10(e), is OVERRULED. A demurrer based on a statute of limitations will not lie where the action may be, but is not necessarily, barred. (Lee v. Hanley (2015) ...

Excerpt: ...loyment Arbitration Rules effective January 1, 2023. ROA 20 and 39. Both parties' requests are GRANTED. There is a Valid Arbitration Agreement Between the Parties. Defendant has met its initial burden of demonstrating the existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties. (Rosenthal v. Great Wester Fin. Securities Corp. (1996) 14 Cal. 394, 413; Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (1997) 15 Cal.4 th 951, 972.) Defendant presents evid...

Excerpt: ... (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) The issue is the sufficiency of the pleading, not the truth of the facts alleged. Thus, no matter how unlikely or improbable, the allegations made must be accepted as true for the purpose of ruling on the demurrer. (Del E. Webb Corporation v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604.) Absent court orders or other items subject to judicial notice, or items attached as exhibits to the complaint, the court...

Excerpt: ...evidence, which is used in California for disparate-treatment cases under FEHA, the employee must first present a prima facie case of discrimination. The burden then shifts to the employer to produce evidence of a nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse action. At that point, the burden shifts back to the employee to show that the employer's stated reason was in fact a pretext for a discriminatory act. The employer (moving party) must carry the ...

Excerpt: ...r the age of 40 were hired into the same position at a lower salary. These are similar to the allegation in the complaint that Plaintiff was terminated and a younger person was hired into Plaintiff's position at a lower salary. Defendant's response to RFA Nos. 1 – 12 where identical: “RESPONDING PARTY incorporates by reference herein its preliminary statement and general objections and conditions. [RESPONDING PARTY objects to this request on ...

Excerpt: ...ll future motions and oppositions. Here, Henkel seeks a protective order and enforcement under the parties' stipulated protective order (“SPO”). The designating party shall have the burden on any designation motion of establishing the applicability of any confidential designation. (SPO ¶ 6.) The court, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party or other person from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment...

Excerpt: ...erican Honda Motor Co. (2002) 100 Cal.App.4th 1111, 1119; C.C.P. § 437c(c).) To satisfy this burden, a defendant must establish that one or more of the elements of a cause of action (a “COA”) cannot be established or that a complete defense exists to the cause of action. (Id.; C.C.P. § 437c(o).) If the defendant meets this burden, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show a triable issue of material fact exists as to either the particular ...

Excerpt: ...ion to the motion;" Schoendorf v. U.D. Registry, Inc. (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 227, 240, fn. 2 (citing text).) Generally, the moving party bears the burden of proving the existence of an agreement to arbitrate by a preponderance of the evidence. (Villacreses v. Molinari (2004) 132 Cal.App.4th 1223, 1230.) If met, the burden then shifts to the resisting party “to demonstrate that an arbitration clause cannot be interpreted to require arbitration of...

Excerpt: ...rovides for arbitration must either be stated verbatim in the petition or attached thereto. (C.R.C. 3.1330.) FCA and Dealer move to compel arbitration based on the arbitration agreement contained in the Retail Installment Sale Contract – Simple Finance Charge (with Arbitration Provision) (“RISC”) attached as Exhibit A to ROAs 33 and 38, respectively. As FCA and Dealer both acknowledge, neither is a signatory thereto. A nonsignatory seeking ...

Excerpt: ...ction for Declaratory Relief. The plaintiff alleges that the employee sustained specific injury in 1996 and another specific injury in 2002. At the time of the 1996 Injury, the JPA was insured under a standard employers' workers compensation primary insurance policy issued to it by TAIC. (Complaint, ¶5.) At the time of the 2002 Injury, JPA was permissibly self-insured with an excess workers compensation insurance policy from American Manufacture...

Excerpt: ...nd the paragraph that provides for arbitration must either be stated verbatim in the petition or attached thereto. (C.R.C. 3.1330.) Defendants move to compel arbitration based on the arbitration agreement contained in the Retail Installment Sale Contract (“RISC”) attached as Exhibit 1 to the Polyakov Declaration. As a preliminary matter, Plaintiffs' object to Exhibit 1 and ¶ 2 of the Polyakov Declaration, based in part on authentication and ...

Excerpt: ...4th 308, 316.) Yamaha's requests for judicial notice are GRANTED. (Evidence Code §§ 452(a) and (d).) Yamaha argues that Cal. Code Civ. Proc. section 361 mandates application of Tennessee's one-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims to Plaintiff's action. The underlying facts are undisputed. Plaintiff, a Tennessee resident at the time of the accident and when this lawsuit was filed, was injured in a single-vehicle golf cart accid...

Excerpt: ...intiff to be filed no later than 05/25/23, a supplemental opposition to be filed no later than 06/01/23, and a supplemental reply brief to be filed no later than 06/08/23. The court specifically noted, “[t]he Court will not consider any additional pleadings not filed by the deadlines listed above.” Instead, Defendants filed their supplemental opposition on 06/09/23, and only state the delay was, “the result of inadvertent mis-calendaring by...

Excerpt: ...party, or its own motion, correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed, and may, on motion of either party after notice to the other party, set aside any void judgment or order.” “Where a party moves under section 473, subdivision (d) to set aside “a judgment that, though valid on its face, is void for lack of proper service, the courts have adopted by analogy the statuto...

Excerpt: ...firmative defense as to any cause of action, that there is no merit to a claim for damages, as specified in Section 3294 of the Civil Code, or that one or more defendants either owed or did not owe a duty to the plaintiff or plaintiffs. A motion for summary adjudication shall be granted only if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty. (2) A motion for summary adjudication may b...

Excerpt: ...r in evidence at trial; or (2) a statement that the parties does not presently intend to offer the testimony of an expert witness. Under subdivision (c) of section 2034.260, if a party designates an expert witness, the exchange must also include a declaration by the attorney for the party (or by a self- represented litigant) setting forth the qualifications of each expert, the general substance of the expert's anticipated testimony, a representat...