Excerpt: ...erlying labor arbitration and contain exclusively confidential, sensitive, and private information not disseminated to the public. (Notice of Motion at 2:11‐16.) “The court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it expressly finds facts that establish: (1) There exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the record; (2) The overriding interest supports sealing the record; (3) A substantial probabil...

Excerpt: ...the Fifth Cause of Action for Reformation asserted in Plaintiff's FAC. The ground for the demurrer is that the FAC fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies for...

Excerpt: ...der Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of 3 hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing. Plaintiff and Judgment Creditor Don Weil moves for an order to show cause re: contempt and for sanctions and attorneys' fees on the grounds that Defendant Matt Follner's i...

Excerpt: ...e Statement, compliant with Rules of Court, rule 3.1345, subdivision (c), no later than August 30, 2022. Defendants are granted leave to file a Responsive Separate Statement, compliant with Rules of Court, rule 3.1345, subdivision (c), no later than September 6, 2022. Plaintiff is directed to serve and file, no later than August 30, 2022, an additional declaration, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 2016.040, detailing the additional me...

Excerpt: ... judgment on Plaintiff's Complaint, or in the alternative summary adjudication of the two causes of action asserted therein on the grounds that there are no triable issues of fact relating to either. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. The moving party is therefore directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missin...

Excerpt: ...ocal Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is pres...

Excerpt: ...o compel. Plaintiffs cite Civil Code section 1717 as authority for their motion. Plaintiffs acknowledge that section 1717 provides: “In any action on contract, where the contract specifically provides that attorney's fees and costs, which are incurred to enforce that contract, shall be awarded either to one of the parties or to the prevailing party, then the party who is determined to be the party prevailing on the contract, whether he or she i...

Excerpt: ...negligence cause of action in the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”), 1 as discussed more fully below. 1 The Court refers herein to TAC to refer to Plaintiffs' operative complaint, which is the Third Amended Complaint filed on September 22, 2017, along with the First Amendment thereto filed on January 21, 2022. 4 Chase moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 438, subd. (c)(1)(B)(ii), for an order granting judgment on the pleadings in ...

Excerpt: ...tunity to conduct discovery and investigate its claims. MKB's motion is made on, essentially, the same grounds asserted in support of its motion for leave to file a cross‐complaint against Reyes, namely that, “MKB only recently learned of the Elmin's scope of work and its direct involvement...[and as a result] MKB was unaware of Elmin [sic] crucial role as potential joint tortfeasor until this late stage...[and] [n]o party will be prejudiced ...

Excerpt: ...urt, rule 3.1345, subdivision (c), no later than August 23, 2022. Defendants are granted leave to file a Responsive Separate Statement, compliant with Rules of Court, rule 3.1345, subdivision (c), no later than September 1, 2022. Plaintiff is directed to serve and file, no later than August 23, 2022, an additional declaration, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 2016.040, detailing such meet and confer efforts. Defendant is invited to fi...

Excerpt: ... Sheriff's Office and the Napa County District Attorney's Office (collectively, “Subpoenas”) by Defendants. The Motion is brought “on the basis that no ‘notice to the consumer' within the meaning of California Code of Civil Procedure section 2020.410, subdivision (d), was issued or served as to Plaintiffs as required under California Code of Civil Procedure1 sections 1985.3, subdivision (e), and 1985.4.” (Notice at 2.) A notice to consu...

Excerpt: ...CEDURAL MATTERS In an effort to avoid as much confusion as possible, the Court briefly addresses the moving papers. On June 20, 2022, Fultz filed an ex parte application to shorten time for hearing on the present motion. The application was granted on June 22, 2022. Thereafter, on June 22, 2022, Fultz filed notice of the present motion (Notice). Fultz did not, however, file any papers in support of the motion, save a declaration discussed below. ...

Excerpt: ...S PROCEDURAL OBJECTION TO DEMURRER In opposition, Plaintiff objects on the ground that Defendant's pleading fails to specify the grounds for the demurrer. “A demurrer shall distinctly specify the grounds upon which any of the objections to the complaint, cross‐complaint, or answer are taken. Unless it does so, it may be disregarded.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.60; Rules of Court, rule 3.1320, subd. (a) [“Each ground of demurrer must be in a...

Excerpt: ...at date, the Court continued the matter and directed Defendant to provide sufficient notice to Plaintiff by serving the moving papers, as revised to reflect the continued hearing date, on Plaintiff's counsel. 12 The matter came on for a continued hearing on June 24, 2022. The Tentative Ruling advised Defendant that the Court was unable to determine whether Defendant served on Plaintiff the moving papers with the revised hearing date. The Tentativ...

Excerpt: ...unds for the motion are that Plaintiff cannot establish the necessary elements of dangerous condition or causation under Government Code section 835. II. LEGAL STANDARDS A. Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication “A party may move for summary judgment in an action or proceeding if it is contended that the action has no merit or that there is no defense to the action or proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, s...

Excerpt: ...te Order of that date, the Court continued the matter and invited Plaintiff to file an additional brief providing the Court with authority by which the Court could grant the motion, and further urged Defendant to file “at any time prior to the hearing, any materials that might inform the Court of his desires regarding the subject matter.” No party has filed any papers from or after June 27, 2022. 23 Defendant has not made an appearance in the...

Excerpt: ...include the notice of that system explicitly required by Local Rule 2.9. The moving party is therefore directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receiv...

Excerpt: ...e to amend. (Rules of Court, rule 3.1320, subd. (g).) I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Defendants Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (“AJG”) and Dina Smith (“Smith”) (collectively, the “Broker Defendants”) demurrer, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subd. (e), to the eighth and ninth causes of action asserted against them in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Spring Mountain Vineyards, Inc. (“SMV”) on March 11, 2022 (“Complaint”)....

Excerpt: .... A. Procedural Matters The Court did not rely on paragraph 3 of the Declaration of John Michael Galloway in its analysis of the issues presented. As a result, Plaintiff's evidentiary objection is MOOT. B. Legal Analysis “At any time after notice of pendency of action has been recorded, any party...may apply to the court in which the action is pending to expunge the notice.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 405.30.1 ) Such motion may be made on one or mo...

Excerpt: ...subject questions is not properly before the Court, as there is no failure to answer specific follow‐up questions at this juncture. On that ground, Plaintiff's request is DENIED. Finally, Plaintiff's alternative request that the Court deny Defendant's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subd. (h), is premature, as Defendant's motion is not presently before the Court. On that ground, this requested relie...

Excerpt: ... further responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Demands for Document Production on three grounds: (1) Defendant failed to identify the specific requests which correspond to the documents produced, in violation of Code of Civil Procedure, section 2031.280, subdivision (a); (2) Defendant's representation of inability to comply is inadequate, incomplete and/or evasive and Defendant's other objections are without merit or too general; and (3) Defendan...

Excerpt: ...tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. MKB is therefore directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardle...

Excerpt: ...d, and Plaintiffs on the other – is in good faith. “[T]he intent and policies underlying section 877.6 require that a number of factors be taken into account including a rough approximation of plaintiffs' total recovery and the settlor's proportionate liability, the amount paid in settlement, the allocation of settlement proceeds among plaintiffs, and a recognition that a settlor should pay less in settlement than he would if he were found li...

Excerpt: ...orneys' fees incurred in bringing the motion. This is substantially the same motion brought by Plaintiff on April 19, 2022. The Court denied the April 19, 2022 motion, without prejudice, because Plaintiff had failed to served Defendant's counsel of record, Buchalter. Despite the Court's ruling on the April 19, 2022, the proof of service of Plaintiff's instant motion indicates that Plaintiff provided notice only to Defendant and not Defendant's at...

Excerpt: ...to the settlement over which SLF seeks a determination. The notice of motion indicates the settlement is with Plaintiffs. (See Notice of Motion at 1:27‐2:2.) SLF even suggests that no other party to the litigation is a party to the subject settlement agreement. (See id. at 2:16‐19.) However, and of apparent importance to SLF, it further appears that Plaintiffs assert no claim in this action against SLF. (See First Amended Complaint.) Rather, ...