Excerpt: ... novel allegations of the Proposed SAC, with cut‐off dates calculated pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure based on the new trial date. Plaintiffs Frank Wang and Laura Young (collectively Wangs) move, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, sections 473, subdivision (a)(1), for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint in the form attached as Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Anna St. John (Proposed SAC) for the purpose of “add[ing] or adjust[in...

Excerpt: ... 2:3‐6.) Through the Petition, Petitioner contends that “DMV abused its discretion and illegally withdrew Petitioner's driving privilege after her administrative interview appointment when Petitioner demonstrated, through her testimony, that she was not a negligent operator of her vehicle and has no physical or mental conditions which affect her ability to safely drive. The withdrawal of Petitioner's driving privilege is not supported by the ...

Excerpt: ...rcises its discretion to consider Defendant's late‐filed Opposition, which, to the Court's best understanding, requests an evidentiary hearing on the motion and another continuance to allow time to prepare for an evidentiary hearing and to retain counsel. Defendant provides no authority, or showing of good cause, for either request. “Evidence received at a law and motion hearing must be by declaration or request for judicial notice without te...

Excerpt: ... negligence asserted in the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”),4 on the ground that, under Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (2022) 12 Cal.5th 905, 915 reh'g denied 2022 Cal. LEXIS 2930 (Cal. June 1, 2022) (“Sheen”), Chase owes no duty of care to Plaintiffs as a matter of law and cannot be held liable for negligence. 4 The Court refers herein to TAC to refer to Plaintiffs' operative complaint, which is the Third Amended Complaint filed on Sep...

Excerpt: ...rsuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subd. (e) and, with respect to the fifth cause of action, section 430.10, subd. (f) on the ground that Defendant is a religious nonprofit corporation exempt from the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) pursuant to Government Code section 12926, subd. (d) and, as to the fifth cause of action, the complaint is uncertain as to an applicable policy basis. A complaint must co...

Excerpt: ...CEDURAL MATTERS 1. Initial Moving Papers In an effort to avoid as much confusion as possible, the Court briefly addresses the moving papers. On June 20, 2022, Fultz filed an ex parte application to shorten time for hearing on the present motion. The application was granted on June 22, 2022. Thereafter, on June 22, 2022, Fultz filed notice of the present motion (Notice). Fultz did not, however, file any papers in support of the motion, save a decl...

Excerpt: ...iant verification as to all of its Special Interrogatory Responses no later than 15 calendar days after notice of entry of the present order. Plaintiff moves, pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure, sections 2030.300, subdivision (a), for an order compelling Defendant EVIG, LLC to produce further responses to Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories, Set One (Subject Discovery) on grounds that Defendant's objections are without merit or too general, ...

Excerpt: ...plaint. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance ...

Excerpt: ...rtgage Pass‐Through Trust 2005‐9, Mortgage Pass Through Certificate series 2005‐9 (“BNY Mellon”) (collectively, “Movants”) demur, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (e), to all three causes of action asserted in Plaintiff Christopher Bearman's (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed on June 13, 2022 against Movants and Law Office of Les Zieve (collectively, “Defendants”). The demu...

Excerpt: ...n 15 calendar days after notice of entry of the present ruling, sanctions in the amount of $772.50 to Defendant, care of his attorney of record. Defendant Marco Hernandez Peralta moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 2030.290, for an order compelling Plaintiff Elijahnick Brown to provide full and complete verified responses, without objections, to form interrogatories, special interrogatories and requests for production of documents...

Excerpt: ...�� is in good faith.2 The motion is opposed by Defendant Michael Buchanan (Buchanan). “Any party to an action in which it is alleged that two or more parties are joint tortfeasors or co‐obligors on a contract debt shall be entitled to a hearing on the issue of the good faith of a settlement entered into by the plaintiff or other claimant and one or more alleged tortfeasors or co‐obligors....” (§ 877.6, subd. (a)(1).) Importantly, the par...

Excerpt: ...rsuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subd. (e) and, with respect to the fifth cause of action, section 430.10, subd. (f) on the ground that Defendant is a religious nonprofit corporation exempt from the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) pursuant to Government Code section 12926, subd. (d) and, as to the fifth cause of action, the complaint is uncertain as to an applicable policy basis. A complaint must co...

Excerpt: ...a monetary sanction to Plaintiff in the sum of $1,060. The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant bel...

Excerpt: ...est oral argument on the below tentative ruling, a copy of which was emailed to the parties on August 25, 2022. Defendant City of Napa requested oral argument. As such, the parties shall appear for oral argument. TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion is DENIED. I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Defendant City of Napa (“City”) moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, for summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication of the single ca...

Excerpt: ...rank J. Ballentine Irrevocable 2012 Trust dated May 11, 2012 (“Respondent”) moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure2 sections 2023.010 et seq., 2030.290, 2031.310, 2031.320 and 2033.290, for an order compelling Petitioner William V. Ballentine Jr. (“Petitioner”) to further respond, under oath, and produce all responsive documents and a privilege log, to the Respondent's Form Interrogatories – General, Set One, Nos. 8.1, 8.8, 9.1, 9.2...

Excerpt: ...hellpoint”) and the Bank of New York Mellon FKA the Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWMBS Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass‐Through Trust 2005‐9, Mortgage Pass Through Certificate series 2005‐9 (“BNY Mellon”) (collectively, “Movants”) demur, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (e), to all three causes of action asserted in Plaintiff Christopher Bearman's (“Plaintiff”) First Amen...

Excerpt: ...es for an order awarding attorney fees in the amount of $4,800.00 incurred in bringing this Demurrer, plus additional fees to be added upon the filing of a Reply, plus filing fees.” (Notice of Hearing at 2:7‐9.) A complaint must contain “facts constituting the cause of action.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.10, subd. (a)(1)1 .) “The party against whom a complaint or cross‐complaint has been filed may object, by demurrer or answer as provid...

Excerpt: ...ocal Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing. By Order dated August 6, 2021, the Court suspended the execution of the sentence for Defendant Cliff Reno's previous violations of the October 16, 2018 judgment (“Judgment”) ...

Excerpt: ...Hogins, together, “Cross‐Defendants”) move, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure1 section 425.16, subdivision (a), 474, and 576, for an order striking “the allegations in Paragraph 13 of the First Amended Cross‐Complaint (“FACC”), the Fifth and Sixth Causes of Action for Defamation and Intentional Interference with Economic Relations, respectively, and Paragraph 62 in the Eighth Cause of Action referring to ‘defamatory, misleading,...

Excerpt: ...uly 21, 2022, Mr. Le declared that he “lives in southern California and reserved an Airbnb for three weeks starting July 27 in anticipation of the trial. Because of the trial continuance and unknown trial date, the Airbnb reservation was cancelled last minute, and Defendant's counsel received partial refund; still having to pay the remaining balance in the amount of $1,892.” (Declaration of Cang N. Le (“Le Decl.”) ¶ 4.) Mr. Le provided a...

Excerpt: ... of action and as a result the present action violates the prohibition on splitting a cause of action among multiple suits. Lawson's request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Court takes judicial notice of the February 16, 2022 order in the matter of Miller v. GVM Law LLP, et al., case number 17 20CV000283, and takes judicial notice of Plaintiff's Third Verified Complaint in the same action, but, as to the latter, not for the truth of the matte...

Excerpt: .... As such, the parties shall appear for oral argument. TENTATIVE RULING: In the First Supplemental Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed by Plaintiffs John P. and Wanda E. McGill, individually and as trustees for the McGill Family Trust 2018 (“Plaintiffs”), the fifth cause of action asserts a claim for declaratory relief regarding maintenance of an easement. (Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”), Exh A; Declaration of James Patrick (“Patri...

Excerpt: ...Civil Procedure sections 2025.480, 2031.310, 2031.310(h) and Evidence Code sections 911, 1060, 1016, and Civil Code section 3426.1, for an order enforcing the subpoena duces tecum (“Subpoena”) served on Key Health. Defendant further moves for monetary sanctions against Key Health pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 2025.480(j), 2023.010, and 2031.310(h). The Court notes Defendant's counsel's supplemental declaration indicating that t...

Excerpt: ...hird Amended Complaint (“TAC”). Rice's ground for summary adjudication of the Sixth Cause of Action is that “the undisputed material facts establish, as a matter of law, that, contrary to defendants' contention, plaintiffs' right to take water from defendants' property pursuant to the parties' 2005 water sharing agreement and water easement was not terminated by reason of plaintiffs' reconstruction of the house and renovation of the barn on...

Excerpt: ..., from notice of entry of the present order, to file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC). (Rules of Court, rule 3.1320, subd. (g).) The Clerk is directed to send notice unless waived at a hearing properly requested pursuant to Local Rule 2.9. 2 A. PROCEDURAL MATTERS The Notice of Motion indicates that Defendants Jannette Hall and Norcal Gold, Inc. demur to the SAC on the grounds that Plaintiff fails to allege facts therein sufficient ...