Excerpt: ...ot Liable for Water Related Damages. Tentative Ruling: Motion in Limine #1 is GRANTED. Defendants Ramson Piro Construction & Development, Inc. and Piro Enterprises, Inc. Are being sued in two capacities: (1) As the Developer that designed and built the Plaintiffs' Homes; and (2) As the Developer that Sold the Subject Homes to the Plaintiffs. The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intent...

Excerpt: ...ses to Form Interrogatories is GRANTED and the objections to such Form Interrogatories, brought by Plaintiff Parkash Pabla, are OVERRULED. To the extent that a Form Interrogatory requests information concerning a classification of damages that Plaintiff is not seeking, Plaintiff may provide a full and complete response by unambiguously waiving any right to that category of damages as a complete response. Plaintiff Parkash Pabla is ordered to prov...

Excerpt: ...ontent of each such statement, and the manner in which each such statement was conveyed. (See e.g. Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp. (2004) 34 Cal.App.4th 979, 993. Furthermore, allegations of fraud against a corporate entity must state the name of each person who made each alleged statement, that person's authority to speak for the corporation, to whom that person spoke, what they said or wrote, and when each such statement was oral or...

Excerpt: ...ensed healthcare provider and that the claims brought against such Defendant are claims based on the healthcare provider's alleged failure to provide appropriate medical care. Accordingly, Defendant Anberry Transitional Care LLC is entitled to the benefits of MICRA. (See Ruiz v. Podolsky (2010) 50 Cal.4th 838, 849 [“we are persuaded that [CCP] section 1295, construed in light of its purpose, is designed to permit patients to bind their heirs in...

Excerpt: ...fore the Contractors State License Board. Defendant asserts that since the contractor's license bond is a statutory bond, not a contract bond or common law bond where a balance of equities may be considered by the court, the fact that the statutory scheme does not require exhaustion of administrative remedies via the filing of a CSLB administrative complaint, the Legislature is deemed to have chosen not to make exhaustion a requirement and theref...

Excerpt: ... § 1793.2, are without merit because Defendant Ford Motor Company promptly offered to repurchase or replace Plaintiff's truck prior to the filing of Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is Supported Facts 1‐30 which appear to be supported by admissible evidence, and those same facts are incorporated by reference into three additional issues seeking Summary Adjudication of the First, Second, and Third Causes of Action ...

Excerpt: ...dently caused, and (2) Defendant First National Insurance Company of America owes a duty to defend Erick Baumbach‐Madriz (aka Erick Baumbach) in the litigation of property damage claims arising out of a fire that he accidently caused. Plaintiff California Mutual Insurance Company brought a subrogation action and obtained a default judgment on September 22, 2020, against Erick Baumbach‐Madriz (aka Erick Baumbach) in the amount of $327,171.32 i...

Excerpt: ...tion for Summary Judgment on the grounds that any duty that Ransom Piro Construction & Development, Inc. and Piro Enterprises, Inc might have had to limit or mitigate water intrusion from the Merced Irriagation District Canal was a duty owed to the Plaintiff homeowners in this action, not to Merced Irrigation District, the entity ulimtimately responsible for water intrusion and the public entity whose failure to contain waters under its control m...

Excerpt: ...n (k) is dependent on a claim of actual discrimination: Employers should not be held liable to employees for failure to take necessary steps to prevent such conduct, except where the actions took place and were not prevented. (Id., quoting Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 280, 289].) This court held above that Discrimination did not occur because there was no material adverse employment action, but that a triable issue...

Excerpt: ...amed as Defendant in the First and Second Cause of Action only, brings the instant motion for Summary Judgement on the Grounds that (1) there is no triable issue of material fact with regard to the First Cause of Action for Negligence because Defendant did not owe a Duty to Plaintiff nor did Defendant Cause Plaintiff's injuries; and (2) there is no triable issue of material fact with regard to the Second Cause of Action for Strict Liability as De...

Excerpt: ...t‐cause requirements of The Tenant Protection Act of 2019, Civil Code § 1947.2(a). A Demurrer to the complaint was overruled on 3‐29‐21, and a motion to compel discovery was withdrawn on 4‐26‐21 because the Defendant was no longer in possession of the property and the case would proceed as a normal civil unlimited. The clerk of the Court does not appear to have reclassified this matter as a general civil unlimited case. Counsel for Pla...

Excerpt: ...s: 1. You must call (209) 725‐4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear. 2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. To limit the spread of the COVID‐19 virus, the court will only conduct remote hearings. Parties who contest the tentative ruling or wish to appear remotely at a ...

Excerpt: ...s Manual published by YOU and provided to YOUR authorized repair facility(s) within the State of California, from 2017 to present. [This request will be understood to include production of any and all versions of such manual as distributed to YOUR dealerships during the relevant time frame.]” Defendant objected to the request on the grounds that it was overbroad and seeks documents that are not relevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to ...

Excerpt: ...s Manual published by YOU and provided to YOUR authorized repair facility(s) within the State of California, from 2017 to present. [This request will be understood to include production of any and all versions of such manual as distributed to YOUR dealerships during the relevant time frame.]” Defendant objected to the request on the grounds that it was overbroad and seeks documents that are not relevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to ...

Excerpt: ...LLC owns all crops produced by such almond farm, that non‐party Dilbag Khera, a member of Plaintiff DS Orchards LLC who resigned in January and March of 2021 and Defendant Cardella Merced LLC, an entity that is alleged to be controlled by Dilbag Khera, who controls Defendant Cardella Merced LLC, were ordered to vacate the almond farm, that non‐party Dilbag Khera refused to vacate and continues to operate the almond orchard, and that non‐par...

Excerpt: ...aint's First Cause of Action for Violation of Statutory Standards pursuant to CCP § 430.10(f) on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, unintelligible, and uncertain; (3) to the Complaint's Third Cause of Action for Breach of Implied Warranty pursuant to CCP § 430.10(e) on the grounds that it fails to state facts sufficient to establish a cause of action and pursuant to CCP § 430.10(f) on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous, unintelligib...

Excerpt: ...of Action for Retaliation against Defendant N & S Tractor Company; and a Third Cause of Action for Race/Ethnicity Language Discrimination against Defendant N & S Tractor Company. Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses to the following Form Interrogatories propounded on Defendant N & S Tractor Co.: 207.1 [Written Policies or Regulations by Employer; and (a) title; (b) manner communicated; (c) manner receipt acknowledged; (d) contentions regar...

Excerpt: ...ubstantive responses. In the current motion Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses to Special Interrogatories 2, 8, 10, 17, 18, 19, 24, 27, 36, 47, 50, and 53. Since Defendant Viking Ventures LLC and Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. are represented by the same counsel, they filed a joint opposition to this motion and the separate motion brought against Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. below. This court finds that the supplemental respons...

Excerpt: ...gs ended on May 2, 2022, and the public has been granted ongoing access to the courthouse, without masks, though individuals preferring to wear masks are permitted to do so. The fact that Plaintiff resides with elders who are especially susceptible to potential COVID19 variations, does not preclude an in‐person deposition providing that reasonable protocols are observed. Plaintiff David Chavez has agreed to serve as a Representative Plaintiff a...

Excerpt: ...speak on behalf of each corporation, (3) the person or persons to whom each misrepresentations was made, (4) what the individuals who made the misrepresentations said or wrote, and (5) when each misrepresentation was said or written. (Lazar v. Superior Court (1996) 12 Cal.4th 631, 645; Tarmann v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. (1991) 2 Cal.4th 153, 157; Perlas v. GMAC Mortg. LLC (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 429, 434.); and (B) leave to amend to plead th...

Excerpt: ... on the real property located at 2521 Burgundy Drive, Livingston. (See Cross‐Complaint ¶ 8, ¶ 11.) On April 8, 2022, Plaintiffs and Cross‐Defendants Parkash Pabla and Jaswinder Kaur filed the instant Special Motion to Strike Cross‐ Complaint of ECP LP Pursuant to CCP § 425.16 (Anti‐Slapp). Courts employ a two‐prong inquiry to determine if a Cross‐Complaint is subject to a Cross‐Defendant's special motion to strike: In the First P...

Excerpt: ...hich are defined to include Defendant Stonefield Homes, Inc. Plaintiffs Demurrer attacks fifteen of the affirmative defenses contained in the Answer filed by Defendant Stonefield Home, Inc. in its Answer to Complaint filed March 23, 2022, specifically, Plaintiffs demur to (1) the Third Affirmative Defense [Assumption of Risk], (2) the Fourth Affirmative Defense [Non‐economic Damages],(3) the First Sixth Affirmative Defense [Failure to State a C...

Excerpt: ...21, Plaintiffs Yogesh Chander Gandotra and Kusman Gandotra, individually and as Trustees of the Gandortra Trust, dated August 7, 2017, Shaan Shannon Stores, Inc, DBA Shannon's Mini Mart and Shaan Gandotra (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a new case, 21CV‐01491, containing Points and Authorities in Support of Order to Show Cause re Contempt and Declarations by Bruce J. Henricks and Shaan Gandotra in support of Contempt. Accordingly, on May ...

Excerpt: ...l Interrogatories and Request for Monetary Sanctions of $1,680 against Plaintiff and her counsel pursuant to CCP § 2030.290 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. While the Special Interrogatories at issue were titled “Requests for Admission” on Page 3 of the Special Interrogatories attached as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Adam F. Summerfield filed March 22, 2022, the discovery propounded unmistakably constitute special interrogatories to...

Excerpt: ...t prevails in this Arbitration, it should be accorded attorney's fees and costs as a prevailing party and /or pursuant to Section 1780(6) of the CLRA. Western Motors also appealed to the Arbitrator's discretion under the Rules to award fees in circumstances like these where a Claimant may have failed diligently to investigate claims before pursuing them. [¶] In this matter, the Arbitrator does not consider Respondent's entitlement to fees or cos...