Excerpt: ...t Defendant's Motion to Quash Plaintiff's Subpoena for Business Records filed by Defendant Foster Poultry Farms. The stay appears to apply only to this court's June 29, 2020 order and not to other matters pending in this case. In this motion for sanctions by Defendant Foster Poultry Farms, to which Defendant Dan Huber joins, Defendants seek an order, pursuant to CCP § 2023.010(g) either (a) an order dismissing Plaintiff Curtis LaClaire's Second ...

Excerpt: ...closes the expert who prepared the existing Defense Cost of Repair Allocation, all reports by that expert, including the subject Defense Cost of Repair Allocations must be produced. If Bernard Bros., Inc. discloses a different expert for Cost of Repair Allocations, then the subject report will remain privileged, and the new report of the designated expert will be produced in accordance with normal expert discovery rules. If Bernard Bros., Inc. do...

Excerpt: ...uses of action arising out of the refusal of Merced Irrigation District to sell water to Cross‐Complainants between two lawsuits, Case 19CV‐02453 in which CrossComplainants brought a Verified Petition for Peremptory Writ of Mandate to compel the sale of water that had been allegedly denied for not being in the best interest of Merced Irrigation District, and this action, Case 19CV‐03470, in which they seek damages for the both the original ...

Excerpt: ...yment contract with Apple to maintain an office in their home that meets specified requirements, but who are not reimbursed for the expense of such home office. The complaint seeks damages and reimbursement for the expenses incurred by members of the class in maintaining the home office. Thus, inspection of Plaintiff's home, and the home office within it, is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence as to the appropria...

Excerpt: ...xist. Accordingly, there are triable issues of material fact with regard to Facts 3, 4, 5, 6 and Additional Disputed Fact F. Plaintiff's lay opinion that the floor was excessive slippery, an issue within the scope of her day to day experience, is based on her percipient observation of the floor and is admissible evidence that the floor was excessively slippery. ...

Excerpt: ...unts terminated on the basis of their occupation without evidence that they engaged in a transaction prohibited by the terms of service. An intentional discrimination claim cannot be based on an arbitrary termination of services based on an algorithm absent allegations that such algorithm uses a protected classification as a criteria for the termination of services. Absent the allegation that a protected class criteria is applied, an algorithmic ...

Excerpt: ...ompensation is claimed as part of an alleged continuing claim. Note that if there are claims involving multiple properties, separate facts establishing a continuing claim must be alleged for each property. The motion to strike the injunctive relief claim for failure to comply with the Government Claims Act is DENIED. The motion to strike the drainage injunctive relief claim is GRANTED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND to separately allege specific facts establ...

Excerpt: ... strike is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. This will become the order of the court unless a party notifies the court that it objects to the tentative, in which case, the order of the court will be that the matter is CONTINUED TO TUESDAY MAY 26, 2020 at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8. ...

Excerpt: ...el further response to Requests 12‐14, 19, 28, and 32 is granted with respect to document involving driver Jeffrey Cone and otherwise denied. The motion to compel further response to Requests 48‐51 are granted with regards to documents in Responding Party's possession and control and otherwise denied. The motion to compel further response to Requests 58‐59 is denied. The motion to compel further response to Requests 60‐64, 71, 73, 79‐80...

Excerpt: ... discovery, but not to extrinsic evidence of facts in declarations filed by adverse parties contradicting the pleading. (See Del e. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604‐605.) Since the allegations of the First Amended complaint's ¶ 24 are not contradicted by matters of which this court takes judicial notice, and since the allegations on their face state facts sufficient to establish a cause of action and are no...

Excerpt: ...essed to and received by crossdefendant) referenced in the cross‐complaint are not attached as exhibits to the pleading. Demurrers for uncertainty under Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10, subdivision (e) are disfavored. (Chen v. Berenjian (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 811, 822.) “A demurrer for uncertainty is strictly construed, even where a complaint is in some respects uncertain, because ambiguities can be clarified under modern discovery proc...

Excerpt: ...oper remuneration. In addition to provisional relief, MID seeks damages for conversion and trespass. Before the Court this day is a defense motion to remove and transfer the action to a “neutral” county. Pursuant to CCP §394(a), any action brought by a government agency in its own locality against an entity doing business in a different county shall be removed and transferred to a neutral county – that is, a county where neither the plaint...

Excerpt: ...nd notice of the entry of the default judgment was served by mail on the moving defendant on December 14, 2018. To challenge the entry of default, the motion must be filed and served within a reasonable time, but no later than six months after the entry of default. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (b); Bae v. T.D. Serv. (2016) 245 Cal.App.4th 89, 97.) Here, defendant's motion challenging the default entered on March 16, 2018 and default judgment e...

Excerpt: ...ndment permitting Sergio Garcia Sanchez to be a new class representative and include a Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”) claim, is (a) time‐barred from pursuing a PAGA action, (b) an attempt to add a new claim, and (c) untimely. First, the relation‐back doctrine is applicable to this representation action as the cases cited by defendant (Bartalo v. Super Ct. (1975) 51 Cal.App.3d 526 and San Diego Gas & Elec. Co. v. Super Ct. ...

Excerpt: ... § 657).) Plaintiff's arguments do not support claims of error based on the explicit grounds contained in Code of Civil Procedure section 657. Plaintiff's seventeen (17) purported “grounds” are actually arguments that Plaintiff has already made in support of its objections to the Court's Statement of Decision. Thus, Plaintiff has failed to raise any new issue of fact or law not already fully considered by the Court because each issue raised ...

Excerpt: ...less the parties agree to a later date. Counsel shall meet and confer regarding available dates for the depositions. If counsel cannot resolve deposition scheduling issues after a good faith attempt to resolve informally without court intervention, the Court will entertain a motion on shortened time for a protective order regarding scheduling as well as for monetary sanctions. It is further noted that Plaintiff's counsel is currently not in conta...

Excerpt: ...d finalization of representation; fees and costs as indicated on the Memorandum of Costs; and the amount of the appraisal and the appraiser to appear for the trial. The prevailing party is directed to prepare a written order consistent with the Court's ruling for the Court's signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312, and to provide notice thereof to the opposing party/counsel as required by law and the California Rules of Cour...

Excerpt: ...surprise because Mr. Wright was in discussions to purchase the property with a third party that is not a party to the action. The court finds the assertion that Plaintiffs participated in fraudulent negotiations to lack sufficient basis to grant the motion. The prevailing party is directed to prepare a written order consistent with the Court's ruling for the Court's signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312, and to provide not...

Excerpt: ...xamination of a party to the action where the physical or mental condition of that party is at issue. Various subdivisions describe the terms on which ‘a' physical or mental examination ‘conducted under this section' is to be carried out, but no language specifically limits the number of examinations to only one. Such a limit cannot be implied from the use of the nonrestrictive singular article ‘a.' In fact, the statutory language clearly c...

Excerpt: ... adequately addressed the “opposition” in their reply, so the Court will consider the Plaintiff's late “opposition”. The Court notes that even where a demurrer is sustained for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, leave to amend the complaint is routinely granted. Courts are very liberal in permitting amendments, not only where a complaint is defective in form, but also where substantive defects are apparent:...

Excerpt: ...and special interrogatories served on February 22, 2019, is GRANTED. The Court notes that while plaintiffs' counsel has inexplicably filed some responses to the discovery with the court in lieu of opposition (see Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.280(a) and 2031.290(a)), in reply defendant's counsel has declared under penalty of perjury that plaintiffs' discovery responses have not been provided to her. Additionally, the one set of discovery responses d...

Excerpt: ...The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725‐4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear. 2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall of your ...

Excerpt: ...tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725‐4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear. 2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying Court Call of your intent to app...

Excerpt: ...stantively deficient. Service of both motions was made via electronic means on May 24, 2019, and June 6, 2019, respectively. In order for service by electronic means to be proper, the parties must expressly consent to accept service of process in that fashion. See California Rules of Court, rule 2.251. The motions are also procedurally deficient in that they appear to be made on behalf of a corporation – Defendant Coast Xpress, Inc. – by a pe...

Excerpt: ...egligent infliction of emotional distress under either the “bystander” or “direct” theory set forth in legal precedent. (See Dillon v. Legg (1968) 68 Cal.2d 728 and Thing v. La Chusa (1989) 48 Cal.3d 644 with regard to the “bystander” theory and Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1980) 27 Cal.3d 916 with regard to the “direct” theory.) In opposition, Plaintiffs have failed to provide any additional facts they might allege whic...