Excerpt: ...courier service, that is fine. Absent such a stipulation or court order, however, e‐mail is not a proper means of service. The Court is not aware of any such stipulation or court order. (Defendant has filed no response to the motion.) The motion rests on the assertion that in her vexatious‐litigant motion (Line 20), defendant has violated HIPAA and various other privacy laws by disclosing a confidential custody evaluation conducted in the Mar...

Excerpt: ...t‐title action on December 23, 2014, seeking to void the deed of trust then held by Countrywide. The lead named defendant was America's Wholesale Lender (hereinafter AWL), which she believed to be the corporate lender and deed‐of‐trust holder in the underlying transaction. Also named as defendants were National City Bank (not otherwise involved in this motion), and unidentified “all persons known or unknown”, etc., as is standard practi...

Excerpt: ... motion for summary adjudication of the claim for attorney's fees under Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 is granted. Because summary adjudication is being denied as to one cause of action, necessarily the motion for summary judgment is denied. I. Procedural Issues Counsel are reminded to comply with the Rules of Court as to motion papers generally and summary judgment motions specifically. The Church's exhibits are unwieldy as a result of this f...

Excerpt: ... Friedman's misdiagnosis to conform to an onerous gluten‐free diet. She asserts damages in the form of unnecessary expense (in obtaining food) and inconvenience and emotional distress (in avoiding restaurants, social situations, and the like). She alleges no physical harm from the misdiagnosis. Friedman moves on the basis that Manning's action is barred by the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations for malpractice claims against a h...

Excerpt: ... successive theory is shot down by clear proof or by defendants' own admissions in discovery. Defendants' brief spends several pages recounting an anecdote about Dennis Rodman, the relevance of which eludes the Court. A more appropriate pop‐culture reference might be Maxwell Smart: “Would you believe….?” Defendants argue that they should not be stuck with what they characterize as a sloppy and inadequate answer filed by their former attor...

Excerpt: ...d by ISI. Plaintiff alleges that the device caught fire, causing him personal injury in a variety of ways. His complaint did not name ISI as a defendant, He instead incorrectly sued Greg Otto, an executive of ISI, alleging that ISI was a dba of Mr. Otto. The Court previously granted Mr. Otto's motion to quash service for lack of personal jurisdiction, noting that plaintiff had not sued the correct entity. Although plaintiff did not take the hint ...

Excerpt: ...uest for continuance of the demurrer hearing. He was properly and timely served with the demurrer, however, nearly a month before his opposition was due. He states no grounds why he was unable to respond timely, or why he needs more time, beyond an unexplained reference to the holidays and the Butte County fire – but with no suggestion how, if at all, the fire could have affected plaintiff's ability to prepare an opposition. (Plaintiff lives in...

Excerpt: ...l is not a California resident, and therefore is not protected by the statute. As to Union Oil, plaintiffs argue that defendants have failed to separate costs involving Ashland from those involving Union Oil. In addition, plaintiffs argue that the specific costs requested are not shown to be reasonable and recoverable. Finally, they argue that defendants have not shown a reasonable possibility that they will prevail. They do not argue that they a...

Excerpt: ..., the summons and complaint were not served within 3 years from the filing of this case. Plaintiff had ample opportunity to properly obtain an order for publication but failed to timely do so. Case is dismissed pursuant to CCP §583.210 et seq.” After plaintiff orally argued the matter on August 9, 2018, the court adopted the tentative ruling as its order and ordered the case dismissed. The formal order granting defendants' motion was signed on...

Excerpt: ... Goel (2005) 35 Cal. 4th 1094, 1105, n. 4.) In this instance, Jarboe points out that the Court's prior decision contains an erroneous statement of fact, i.e., that Parr had not given a PAGA notice to the LWDA at an important time in the process. Indeed, Parr had given such a notice on September 21, 2017, a fact not contested by the opposing parties. This affected the Court's reasoning, because, as the order stated, “with proper notice to all co...

Excerpt: ...opposition, which the Court has reviewed. Plaintiff is entitled to reply at the hearing. Accordingly, the Court sets forth tentative views based on the papers filed to date, and the parties must appear. Plaintiff moves for summary judgment, asserting that this is a straight‐forward postforeclosure unlawful detainer, i.e., that the plaintiff foreclosed on the property in a non‐judicial foreclosure complying with all statutory notice requiremen...

Excerpt: ...event sexual harassment. Plaintiff Tonya Guice was hired as a full‐time security guard in February 2017. When Plaintiff was hired, she was provided a copy of Defendant's Arbitration Policy and Agreement as a mandatory condition of her hiring. The Agreement contained the following language, “By accepting and/or continuing employment with the Company, you agree to the terms of this Policy and Agreement.” Plaintiff has refused to submit to arb...

Excerpt: ...ons, Inc. (“Lucky”), an Idaho corporation (collectively, “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs filed a request to file an extended page length in their opposition. That request is granted. No reply was filed. By way of the Motion, Defendants seek to strike the entirety of Plaintiffs' verified complaint (the “VC”) containing four causes of action for: 1) Libel Per Se; 2) Slander Per Se; 3) Intentional CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR COURT MARTINEZ, CALIFORN...

Excerpt: ...5.16 provides that “any cause of action against a person arising from any act. . . in furtherance of the person's right to petition or free speech . . . in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR COURT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT: 33 HEARING DATE...

Excerpt: ...ourth causes of action for negligence and violation of Business & Professions Code section 17200 are overruled. The unopposed requests for judicial notice are granted. (Evid. Code § 452.) I. Background In 2005, Plaintiffs Amir Shenas and Azadeh Vaezizadeh refinanced a property located at 4071 Lilac Ridge Rd. in San Ramon. Defendant Bank of New York is the current beneficiary of the loan. Defendant Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC services the loan. D...

Excerpt: ...d by Defendant DeVries. Plaintiffs is suing the State of California, Department of Transportation (“Caltrans”) for (1) premises liability ‐ dangerous condition of public property per Government Code section 835 and (2) general negligence. Caltrans has demurred to the CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR COURT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT: 33 HEARING DATE: 11/29/18 ‐ 14 ‐ second cause of action. In that cause of action, Plaintiff alleges that Caltra...

Excerpt: ...rces, Inc. (“Cross‐Defendant or “IR”) demurs to the all causes of action alleged against it on the ground Cross‐Complainant failed to file a certificate of merit, pursuant to CCP § 411.35. The certificate must be filed before or concurrently with the complaint or cross‐ complaint. Failure to file a certificate is a ground for demurrer or motion to strike. (Price v. Dames & Moore (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 355, 359‐360; CCP § 411.35(g)....

Excerpt: ...ond Amended Complaint (“ASAC”) filed on October 19, 2018. Defendants shall prepare a proposed judgment of dismissal, separate from any formal order on the demurrer, and shall submit that proposed judgment to plaintiff's counsel for approval as to form. Despite the serious concerns expressed in the Court's interim ruling of October 25, 2018, and in Part A‐3 of this ruling below, the Court exercises its discretion not to award monetary sancti...

Excerpt: ...urt. The parties should be prepared to address whether that is proper. Until that issue is resolved, the Court is not inclined to proceed with the motion. If that issue can be resolved, the Court offers the following observations. Legal Standards: The Legislature's express command that PAGA settlements be approved by the court necessarily implies that there is some substantive dimension to the review. See Labor Code Section 2699(l). The Court's r...

Excerpt: ... that the property Alamo leased from Diablo did not conform to the promised specifications. Emo‐Gizella Hites and George Hites (“the Hites”) originally leased the property to Alamo, and Diablo is the successor in interest to the Hites. The demurrer is overruled. Diablo asserts that each of Alamo's causes of action fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action because the lease agreement stated that the property would be lea...

Excerpt: ...ion of the trial court.” (Thomson v. Continental Ins. Co. (1967) 66 Cal.2d 738, 746‐ 747.) The California court has discretion to stay the state proceedings in favor of the federal action. (Caiafa Prof. Law Corp. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. (1993) 15 Cal.App.4th 800, 804.) According to Caiafa, the court should “consider the importance of discouraging multiple litigation designed solely to harass an adverse party, and of avoiding unseemly ...

Excerpt: ... Affinito's evidentiary objections, filed on October 15, 2018. Nos. 1, 2, 7, 19, 47, 50, 51: sustained in part. Unverified pleadings are not evidence. However, the filing date of the original Complaint is relevant to the statute of limitations analysis, and the allegations of the Third Amended Complaint define the scope of the issues that can be decided by the pending motions. Also, the Court can take judicial notice of the probate petition and t...

Excerpt: ...n October 22, 2018, is also granted. Neither side has filed evidentiary objections. Plaintiffs' objection to defendant's reply memorandum is overruled. Defendant's counsel is directed to properly serve opposition and reply papers in the future. The Court notes that it has received only a reply memorandum; the Court has not received a reply separate statement, or any reply evidence. CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR COURT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT: 15 H...

Excerpt: ...w no later than June 26, 2018. However, Huang canceled the contract on June 29, 2018. Crowd Fund therefore filed this action for specific CONTRA COSTA SUPERIOR COURT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT: 15 HEARING DATE: 11/05/18 ‐ 7 ‐ performance and recorded a lis pendens against the Property. Huang now moves to expunge the lis pendens. Defendant Zeng, who offered to purchase the Property on June 30, 2018 for a predominantly seller‐financed am...

Excerpt: ... relief available for certain causes of action; they are not a cause of action in themselves. E.g., Hiliard v. A.H. Robins Co. (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 374, 391. Accordingly, defendants properly proceed by a motion to strike rather than a demurrer. This motion raises questions as to both the level of alleged conduct that is substantively required to support recovery of punitive damages, and what level of specificity is required in a pleading seeking...