Excerpt: ...ation t hat he was retained by defendant on June 27, 2023. Defendant counsel left a message for Plaintiff and faxed a letter to Plaintiff on July 11, 2023. Defense counsel heard nothing from Plaintiff until he received a copy of the request for default in the mail around August 21, 2023. On August 22, 2023, Defendant attempted to file an answer that was rejected by the court because default had been entered. Defendant moves to set aside the defa...

Excerpt: ...for atto rney's fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5. Under section 1021.5, a court may award fees “to a successful party … in any action which has resulted in the enforcement of an important right affecting the public interest if: (a) a signifi cant benefit, whether pecuniary or nonpecuniary, has been conferred on the general public or a large class of persons; and (b) the necessity and financial burden of private enfor...

Excerpt: ...l of th e party's intention to contest, specifying the issues to be contested. As stated in last week's tentative ruling, however, even if there is no contest, counsel are to appear (Zoom okay) to discuss scheduling and the future course of this case. The Court va cated last Friday's scheduled Issue Conference/Mandatory Settlement Conference in light of its not having decided this motion yet. Moreover, the Court predicted last week that the prese...

Excerpt: ..., CON TRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ, CA DEPARTMENT 27 JUDICIAL OFFICER: TERRI MOCKLER HEARING DATE: 04/17/2024 The plaintiff filed this action for negligence on February 27, 2023, alleging injuries caused by an unleashed dog in Calistoga, California on June 2 1, 2021. The defendants propounded Form Interrogatories Set One, Special Interrogatories Set One, and Request for Production of Documents Set one on April 11, 2023, with responses due May 13, 2...

Excerpt: ... to th is evidence prior to a ruling on the motion. Plaintiff shall file and serve a response to this evidence, not exceeding five (5) double -spaced pages, by April 23, 2024. Background While walking for exercise, plaintiff Felicia Sonnier fell and sustained sev ere injuries on May 24, 2020. (Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, hereinafter “SSUMF,” Fact Nos. 1 and 3, and plaintiff's responses.) The City contends the location o...

Excerpt: ...URT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA C OSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ, CA DEPARTMENT 27 JUDICIAL OFFICER: TERRI MOCKLER HEARING DATE: 04/17/2024 liability. Only the first and fourth causes of action are alleged against Defendant City of Oakley. Defendant demurs to Plaintiff's first cause of action p ursuant to Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) § 430.10(e) on the grounds that Plaintiff's general negligence cause of action against the City is improper and the Cour...

Excerpt: ...laint Plaintiff Emeziem & Others is a law firm that represented seven individuals – Melondy Spears, Candace Spears, Kela Spears, Olajuwon Spears, Shante Ray Jackson, LaShanda Ray, and Latondiwe Hasty (collectively, the “Beneficiaries”), in a Wills and Trust case filed in Contra Costa County (Case no. P21 -00824). (¶ 10.) The matter pertained to a Trust established by the parents/grandparents of the Beneficiaries – Willie L. Spears St...

Excerpt: ...y judgment direc ted toward the first amended complaint. Procedural Background Plaintiff filed his Complaint on November 10, 2021. Defendant Oakwood Athletic Club, LLC (“Oakwood”) filed its Answer on January 26, 2022. Thereafter, Defendant filed its MSJ on May 5, 2023. T he MSJ was set for hearing on August 17, 2023. On July 17, 2023, the Court continued the hearing 24 25 until November 16, 2023. On November 9, 2023, the Court continued t...

Excerpt: ...care), and add additional allegations regarding certain loan distributions. Defendant Albert D. Seeno Jr. opposes the motion on several grounds including legal futility and inexcusable delay. For the following reasons, the motion is granted. The First Amended Complaint is deemed filed as of April 15, 2024. Plaintiff is directed to electronically file a new copy of the Second Amended Complaint by April 19, 2024. Analysis A trial court has discre...

Excerpt: .... (Second Am . Comp. (“SAC”) 1st C/A, ¶¶ 1-30.) Kilarr was previously a party to litigation with Plaintiffs the Menascos, specifically the case James Kenneth Menasco, et al. v. Jerry Kilarr, et al., Contra Costa Superior Court Case No. MSC16 -01460 (the "Prior Litigatio n"). The Prior Litigation was resolved by settlement. This lawsuit arises out of the settlement and other events related to the Prior Litigation. 21 After this acti...

Excerpt: ...ining c laims. Plaintiffs may amend their complaint to include a wrongful foreclosure cause of action at a later date should it become necessary. WFB shall answer the FAC no later than April 29, 2024. The Complaint This case arises out of the claim of plaintiffs Steven V. Schnier and Ana Maria D. Schnier that defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (WFB) moved forward with foreclosing on plaintiffs' residence despite their application for a loan modifi...

Excerpt: ...t moved to intervene in t he action as of the date of the hearing or within seven days of the date of the hearing, the Court will appoint a guardian ad litem for Plaintiff under Code of Civil Procedure sections 372 and 373(c) as set forth below. Background In the SAC, Plaintiff Chl oe Lauren Zebrach alleges a single cause of action for negligence against Monte Nido, a residential care facility. (SAC ¶ 2.) Plaintiff was diagnosed with bi -polar d...

Excerpt: ...ENT 18 JUDICI AL OFFICER: DANIELLE K DOUGLAS HEARING DATE: 04/12/2024 their first amended complaint is granted but the Court does not "deem" the first amended complaint filed. Rather, Plaintiffs shall file their First Amended Complaint with the Court and serve the amended pleading on Defendant's counsel by April 22, 2024 Background This case involves a dispute between parents and their daughter/step - daughter over the parties'...

Excerpt: ...does, review document s in its own file without the need for taking judicial notice thereof. Factual Allegations This matter generally relates to issues arising from the construction and sale of real property located at 2030 Hoover Avenue in Pleasant Hill (the “Property”). The Sellers of the Property purchased the Property and performed improvements thereon, which were completed by March 2018. (¶ 16.) On or about March 7, 2018, Plaintiffs p...

Excerpt: ... 2023 she, as tenant, entered into a written agreement with defendant Starwood Enterprises, LLC (Starwood), as landlord, to rent the premises located at 1907 Hoffman Boulevard in Richmond. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ, CA DEPARTMEN T 18 JUDICIAL OFFICER: DANIELLE K DOUGLAS HEARING DATE: 04/12/2024 (Complaint, ¶ 9.) Plaintiff alleges the premises suffers from substantial habitability defects, including “rodents/ins...

Excerpt: ...injur ed while skating at a skatepark owned by the City on February 5, 2021. Plaintiff was born in 1987 and thus, was over 12 years old when the accident occurred. (Roark depo. 6:17 -18.) The City is a public entity and owns and maintains the skatepark. (Helfenbe rger ¶2.) The skatepark has a bowl structure for people to skate. (Helfenberger ¶3.) In the center of the lowest part of the bowl is a drain. (Helfenberger ¶3.) According to the City'...

Excerpt: ...e agreed u pon SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ, CA DEPARTMENT 18 JUDICIAL OFFICER: DANIELLE K DOUGLAS HEARING DATE: 04/12/2024 forum. For the reasons set forth, the motion is granted as to Plaintiff's second, third, fourth, and sevent h cause of actions asserted against Defendant Garda, and the sixth cause of action against Defendants Garda and Poppy Bank in the FAC; further, this action shall be stayed pending the outc...

Excerpt: ...ment a nd settlement agreement on the grounds that “the judgment was entered into in the absence of a trial on the merits and as the result of fraud in the inducement, surprise, mistake, inadvertence and excusable neglect and as to the fraudulent acts of Defendan t, including tax evasion, serving to void the transaction based upon the extrinsic fraud of the Defendants.” The Court has carefully reviewed the papers submitted by Plaintiff in sup...

Excerpt: ...parties have made , given that there have been both multiple “settlement agreements” entered into since the original one, and multiple recitations to the Court of unresolved issues requiring further negotiation and agreement. The motion before the Court purports to say that the settlement to be enforced is the one that was “agreed to at the Mediation conducted in this matter on October 15, 1998 in front of Mediator Hon. Mark Eaton”. That ...

Excerpt: ...ote") secured by a deed of trust on Plaintiffs' single - family residence located at 1452 Club View Drive in El Cerrito. (First Amended Complaint (with errata) ("FAC") ¶¶ 1, 4, 12 -15; P. Pan Decl. Exh. C [deed of trust].) Defendants Peter Pan and Jenny Pan (the "Pans" fo r convenience) are the lenders under the Note. On March 22, 2022, the Pans issued a Notice Pursuant to California Civil Code § 2966 ("Section 2966...

Excerpt: ...or concer ts and similar events. Plaintiffs state that they were employed in non -exempt positions, though their job descriptions and employment dates are not provided. Plaintiff King filed her original complaint as a PAGA case on March 7,2023. She filed a parallel c lass action on May 15, 2023. The class action was amended in December to combine the two cases and to add plaintiff Hill. The settlement would create a gross settlement fund of $80...

Excerpt: ...E: 04/11/ 2024 23 A. Background and Settlement Terms Defendant is in the business of providing extended vehicle service programs and ancillary finance and insurance products. This class -action case arises from its alleged former practice of recording consumer pho ne calls, made on cellular or wireless phones, without proper consent or notification. Plaintiff made two such calls in October and November 2022. The original complaint was filed on...

Excerpt: ..., administr ation costs, and representative payment. The motion is granted. A. Background of the Case and Terms of Settlement The total settlement payment is $275,000. Out of this is to come attorney's fees of $91,667 (one -third of the recovery); $22,305 in litigation costs, and $3,950 in costs to the settlement Administrator. The This a PAGA case (not a class action), alleging a variety of violations of the Labor Code concerning failure to prov...

Excerpt: ...May 10 in which to file and serve a second amended complaint, if they choose to. In the event that they elect not to amend, defendants Puri and Compass are given to June 7 in which to answer the surviving contract count of the complaint. (If there is no amendment there will remain no claim pending against defendant Mehringer. There will also remain no live claim being asserted by plaintiff Kandola.) The Court further observes that although it is...

Excerpt: ...e defenses. For the following reasons, Plaintiff's Demurrer to Defendants First, Second, Ninth, Tenth, Twelfth, Thirteenth, and Fourteenth Affirmative Defense is overruled, and Plaintiff's Demurrer to Defendant's Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Eleventh and Fifteenth Affirmative Defense is sustained, with leave to amend as to all but the fifteenth affirmative defense. Legal Standard Code of Civil Procedure § 430.20(a) provides for...