Excerpt: ...of the judgment from Plaintiff to SFI was mailed to the court on January 20, 2015 for filing. (Motion, Scalia Decl., ¶ 3 and Exh. B.) Thereafter, on July 15, 2015, SFI states that it mailed an application for renewal of judgment to the court. (Id. at ¶ 4 and Exh. C.) The application was received by the court on July 17, 2015. On September 10, 2015, the application was rejected as being untimely because the ten-year limitation on judgments expir...

Excerpt: ...o serve verified responses to Plaintiff's interrogatories and request for production of documents within 20 days and to pay $620 in monetary sanctions within 30 days. On March 14, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Terminating Sanctions (the “Motion”). As of April 17, 2018, no opposition or reply hasbeen filed. Legal Standards The court may impose a terminating sanction by one of the following orders: 1. An order striking out the pleadings or...

Excerpt: ...December 28, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Moreno's Responses to Its Form Interrogatories and ordered Moreno to serve verified responses within thirty (30) days. On March 12, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Terminating Sanctions (the “Motion”). As of April 17, 2018, no opposition or reply has been filed. Legal Standards The court may impose a terminating sanction by one of the following orders: 1. An order striking o...

Excerpt: ...position and replies and to prepare for the hearing." (Lackner v. North<005500570003004b004400 560003005100520003[ discretion to shorten the notice period because it relates to due process for the non-moving party. (McMahon v. Superior Court<0055000f00030051005200 57004c004600480003[ must begin anew and must be for the full 75 days. (Robinson v. Woods (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 1258, 1267-1268.) The Court notes that the Proof of Service of the Mo...

Excerpt: ...sponses to Form Interrogatories and to Request for Monetary Sanctions (the “Motion”). In April 11, 2018, Saldana filed an opposition. On April 16, 2018, Defendant filed a reply. Legal Standard “On receipt of a response to [interrogatories], the [propounding party] may move for an order compelling a further response if that party deems that: ¶ An answer to a particular [request or interrogatory] is evasive or incomplete.” (CCP § 2030.300...

Excerpt: ...y telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer.” (Italic added.) CCP § 435.5(a)(3) requires the moving party on a motion to strike to file and serve a meet-and- confer declaration. The Court is satisfied with Defendant's counsel's meet-and-confer declaration. (See Demurrer, Nicolaisen ...