Excerpt: ...ltima, VIN 1N4AL3AP3JC248855 (“Vehicle”). The court has read and considered the moving papers (no opposition was filed) and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Complaint Plaintiff Santander commenced this proceeding on October 19, 2022, alleging causes of action for (1) claim and delivery; (2) conversion; (3) quiet title; and (4) declaratory relief. The Complaint alleges in pertinent part as follows. Prior to...

Excerpt: ...[2] and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Luo filed this lawsuit on June 24, 2022, alleging mandamus and declaratory relief claims against the County for violation of (1) the CPRA and (2) Cal. Const. Art. 1 section 3(b). The verified Petition alleges in pertinent part as follows. On November 20, 2021, Luo submitted a CPRA request for Chain of Custody Reports from the Los Angeles Sheriff's De...

Excerpt: ...ative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Complaint Petitioner People of the State of California (“People”) commenced this proceeding against Defendant AERO Institute (“AERO”) on June 17, 2021 alleging a cause of action for involuntary dissolution. The Complaint alleges in pertinent part as follows. AERO is a non-profit public benefit corporation with the charitable mission of educating the public regarding science, technology, and aero...

Excerpt: ...pers (no opposition was filed) and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Complaint Plaintiff filed this Complaint against Defendants Company and Munoz on October 21, 2022, for (1) breach of written agreement; (2) breach of guaranty; (3) open book account; (4) reasonable value; (5) account stated; (6) indebtedness; (7) unjust enrichment; (8) claim and delivery; and (9) conversion. The Complaint alleges in pertinent ...

Excerpt: ... of the Case 1. Complaint The City filed the Complaint against Defendant Carlos Galvan, Jr. (“Galvan”) on June 2, 2021, alleging (1) public nuisance and injunctive relief; (2) violations of the Commerce Municipal Code (“CMC”); and (3) declaratory relief. The Complaint alleges in pertinent part as follows. Galvan has at all relevant times been the owner of the Property. Galvan illegally constructed the Structure, which is a two-story struc...

Excerpt: ...ick as a Battalion Chief of the Los Angeles Fire Department (“LAFD”). The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition On May 25, 2022, Kilpatrick filed the Petition against Respondents, alleging causes of action for traditional mandamus and administrative mandamus. The verified Petition alleges in pertinent part as follows. On Novemb...

Excerpt: ...20, with back salary and interest at the legal rate. The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Quesada filed the Petition for writ of mandate against Respondents County and LASD on March 19, 2021, alleging in pertinent part as follows. Quesada has been an LASD deputy sheriff since April 1995. In June 2015, LASD initiated...

Excerpt: ... (“RFPs”). The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Mengistu filed the Petition for writ of mandate on August 9, 2021, against Respondents HA and Douglas Guthrie (“Guthrie”) in his capacity as President and CEO of the HA. The Petition alleges claims for traditional and administrative mandamus. The pertinent alle...

Excerpt: ...��“HA”) (1) to terminate Deborah's Section 8 voucher) and (2) collect the overpayment HA has assessed against her. The court has read and considered the moving papers and opposition [1] (no reply was filed) and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Deborah filed the Petition for writ of administrative mandamus on November 28, 2022. The Petition alleges in pertinent part as follows. Deborah i...

Excerpt: ...t Amended Petition (“FAP”) and opposition (no reply was filed), and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Simon commenced this proceeding on June 5, 2022, via Petition against Respondent DMV. The operative pleading is the First Amended Petition (“FAP”) filed September 10, 2022, alleging a cause of action for administrative mandamus. The FAP alleges in pertinent part as follows. Simon had...

Excerpt: ...ourt has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, [1] and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Complaint Plaintiff Landlord filed the Complaint on June 27, 2022 alleging (1) breach of lease and (2) breach of guaranty. The Complaint alleges in pertinent part as follows. On March 27, 2018, Tenant entered into a lease for seven years and four months (“Lease”). Terms of the Lease included paym...

Excerpt: ...roperty”). The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, [1] and reply, and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Complaint Plaintiff Shipflex filed its Complaint on December 17, 2022, alleging (1) breach of lease, (2) breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, (3) intentional interference with prospective economic enjoyment, and (4) violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200 (“...

Excerpt: ...pposition, and reply and amended reply, [1] and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. First Amended Petition Petitioner Garber filed this proceeding in pro per on December 12, 2019 against Respondents County and Department of Social Services (“DSS”). The operative pleading is the First Amended Petition (“FAP”), filed on November 3, 2022 and alleging claims for (1) fraud and (2) reinstatement of CalFresh ben...

Excerpt: ...”) to reverse its decision denying Cali Proposition M (“Prop M”) Priority Processing. The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, [1] and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioners filed the Petition on November 2, 2021, alleging a cause of action for administrative mandamus. The Petition alleges in pertinent part as follows. On December 16, 2005, Larry Kent (�...

Excerpt: ... decision concerning his staff privileges. The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, [1] and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Aleman commenced this proceeding on March 11, 2022 alleging a cause of action for administrative mandamus. The Petition alleges in pertinent part as follows. Aleman has been licensed as a physician in California since 1984 and has pr...

Excerpt: ... court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, [1] and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Mengistu filed this petition for writ of mandate on August 9, 2021 against Respondents HA and Douglas Guthrie (“Guthrie”) in his capacity as President and CEO of the HA. The Petition alleges claims for traditional and administrative mandamus. The pertinent allegations are fo...

Excerpt: ...against the Medical Board on September 26, 2022 alleging a single cause of action for traditional mandamus under CCP section 1085. The Petition alleges in pertinent part as follows. In 1997, the Legislature enacted Business and Professions Code [2] section 2027. Pet., ¶5. Section 2027 required the Medical Board to post to its website any information concerning arbitration awards reported to the Medical Board after January 1, 1993. Pet., ¶5. In ...

Excerpt: ..."RR SLPR Tractor 6x4 (“2015 Tractors”); and (2) one 2018 International LT Series: LT625 6x4 (“2018 Vehicle”). BMO also seeks a writ of possession against Defendant Andrea Spencer (“Spencer”) for the 2015 Tractors. It also seeks a writ of possession against Defendant Roy Beasley (“Beasley”) for the 2018 Vehicle. The court has read and considered the moving papers (no opposition was filed) and renders the following tentative decisio...

Excerpt: ...Complaint Plaintiff Coronado commenced this action against Defendants Yireh and Marvin Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) on October 10, 2023, alleging (1) breach of note, (2) money lent, (3) two counts of account stated, (4) two counts of open book account, (5) two counts of unjust enrichment, (6) fraud, (7) breach of oral agreement, (8) money had and received, (9) conversion, and (10) violations of Business and Professions Code section 17200. The unve...

Excerpt: ...��). The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Perrys commenced this action on July 12, 2022, alleging causes of action for (1) traditional or administrative mandamus, and (2) declaratory and injunctive relief. The verified Petition alleges in pertinent part as follows. The Perrys are a married couple who own the Propert...

Excerpt: ...vely, “Department” or “LASD”) to suspend Maas for 15 days. The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, [1] and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Maas commenced this proceeding on October 7, 2021, alleging a single cause of action for administrative mandamus. The Petition alleges in pertinent part as follows. Maas has been a deputy sheriff with LASD sin...

Excerpt: ...�DSS”), and a reply declaration, [1] and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. First Amended Petition Petitioner Garber filed this proceeding in pro per on December 12, 2019. The operative pleading is the First Amended Petition (“FAP”), filed on November 3, 2022 and alleging (1) fraud and (2) petition for reinstatement of CalFresh benefits. Because FAP appears to be only the amended pages, the Petition remain...

Excerpt: ...ctively, “Compton Respondents”), and Olson Urban Housing, LLC, (“Olson”) demur to the First Amended Petition (“FAP”) filed by Petitioner Malloy Family Partners, LP (“Malloy”). The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Malloy filed the Petition against Respondents on July 15, 2022. The operative pleading i...

Excerpt: ...e 1. Complaint DKP filed the Complaint on September 6, 2022, alleging breach of contract. The Complaint alleges in pertinent part as follows. On March 31 and July 19, 2021, DKP received from Follow Beauty purchase orders for $39,500, $16,200, and $50,750 (“Purchase Orders”). Follow Beauty failed to pay the invoices issued by DKP pursuant to the Purchase Orders, sent on (1) November 23 and December 8, 2021; (2) March 5 and 18, 2022; and (3) Ap...

Excerpt: ...ecision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Petition Petitioner Herskowitz commenced this proceeding on December 22, 2021, alleging a cause of action for administrative mandamus. The verified Petition alleges in pertinent part as follows. On January 14, 2020, the Board filed an Accusation against Herskowitz. The Board amended the Accusation on May 20, 2020, and a second time at the administrative hearing in September 2021. Herskowitz was accused of comm...