Array
(
)
Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

116 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: Orange County x
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre x 
Array
(
)
SELECT * FROM wp_posts WHERE (post_type = 'attachment') AND ID IN (SELECT object_id FROM wp_term_relationships WHERE term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND parent IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_terms WHERE term_id = 236)) AND term_taxonomy_id IN (SELECT term_id FROM wp_term_taxonomy WHERE taxonomy = 'wpmf-category' AND term_taxonomy_id = 830)) AND (true) AND (true) ORDER BY post_title DESC LIMIT 25
Array
(
)
2024.04.29 Motion to Set Aside, Vacate Default 367
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.04.29
Excerpt: ...�), JOSHUA SCHUETTE (“Schu ette”), and KARA GRANT LAW (“KGL”), move the Court for an order pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 473, et seq., to set aside and vacate the October 26, 2023 Defaults taken against Defendants Grant, Schuette, and KATHLEEN GERMANE (“Germane”) and the September 19, 2023 Default taken against KGL. Motions are GRANTED. Sanctions against Attorney Jacobson in the amount of $500 to be paid within t...
2024.04.29 Motion to Quash 107
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.04.29
Excerpt: ...ts. A court ac quires personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant through either general or specific jurisdiction. The “defendant may be subject to the general jurisdiction of the forum if his or her contacts in the forum state are ‘substantial . . . continuous an d systematic.'” Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc., 14 Cal. 4th 434, 445 (1996). To determine whether specific jurisdiction exists, courts consider the relations...
2024.04.22 Motion to Strike 799
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.04.22
Excerpt: ... be true. Blakemore v. Superior Court, 129 Cal. App. 4th 36, 53 (2005). “If facts appearing in the exhibits contradict those alleged, the facts in the exhibits take precedence.” Holland v. Morse Diesel Intern., Inc., 86 Cal. App. 4th 1443, 1447 (2001). Defendant argues that the challenged allegations must be stricken because they are inconsistent and/or contradictory to the terms of the Agreement attached to the Complaint, which do not eviden...
2024.04.22 Motion to Stay Action 054
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.04.22
Excerpt: ... Code of Civil Procedure § 410.30. Said section states: (a) When a court upon motion of a party or its own motion finds that in the interest of substantial justice an action should be heard in a forum outside this state, the court shall stay or dismiss the action in who le or in part on any conditions that may be just. (b) The provisions of Section 418.10 do not apply to a motion to stay or dismiss the action by a defendant who has made a gener...
2024.04.22 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 474
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.04.22
Excerpt: ...es to strike Plaintiff 's prayer for punitive damages. Defendant first argues that the fourth cause of action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations and Plaintiff is not entitled to the delayed discovery rule. Code of Civil Procedure section 338(d) provides that an action for fraud must be brought within three years. “A plaintiff must bring a claim within the limitations period after accrual of the cause of action.” Fox v. Ethico...
2024.04.22 Demurrer to FAC, Motion to Strike 944
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.04.22
Excerpt: ...rer is OVERRU LED as to the first and second causes of action and SUSTAINED with 15 days leave to amend as to the third through fifth causes of action. The Regents demur to all five causes of action alleged in Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). I. First Cau se of Action for Violation of California Whistleblower Protection Act (Govt. Code §§ 8547, et seq.) As described in Levi v. Regents of University of California: The [Califor...
2024.04.15 Motion for Terminating Sanctions 984
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.04.15
Excerpt: ... a termi nating sanction against anyone engaging in conduct that is a misuse of the discovery process by an order striking out the pleadings or parts of the pleadings of any party engaging in the misuse of the discovery process, an order staying further proceedings by that party until an order for discovery is obeyed, an order dismissing the action, or any part of that action, of that party, or an order rendering a judgment by default against tha...
2024.04.15 Demurrer to Amended Complaint 680
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.04.15
Excerpt: ... to amend. “To establish a prima facie case of harassment, [Plaintiff] must show that: (1) she is a member of a protected class; (2) she was subjected to unwelcome harassment; (3) the harassment was based on her protected status; (4) the harassment unreasonably interfered with her w ork performance by creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment; and (5) defendants are liable for the harassment.” Galvan v. Dameron Hospital...
2024.04.10 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 341
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...resulting from the breach, and damage to plaintiff. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping Center, 6 Cal. 4th 666, 673 (1993) (disapproved on another ground in Reid v. Google, Inc., 50 Cal. 4th 512, 527 (2010), fn. 5). Pursuant to the Complaint, Plaintiffs own property in a c ommon interest development which is managed by the Northwood Villa Homeowners Association (the “HOA”). Compl. ¶¶ 1,4. The HOA contracted with Defendant to provide property ...
2024.04.10 Demurrer 339
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.04.10
Excerpt: ...n for tortious interference with contractual and business relations against Defendants Ralph Lauren and Swim USA, and sixth cause of action for conspiracy against Defendants Ralph Lauren and Swim USA. The Court rules as follows: The Demurrer is SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND as to the fourth cause of action for fraudulent concealment. Pursuant to Civil Code section 1710(3) fraud by concealment is the “suppression of a fact, by one who is bound t...
2024.03.25 Application for Right to Attach Order, Writ of Attachment 255
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.25
Excerpt: ... amount of $120,832.44 against Defendant, OTA Franchise Corporation (“OTAF”), as follows. Upon filing of the Complaint, or at any time thereafter, the plaintiff may apply for a Right to Attach Order (“RTAO”) and writ of attachment by filing an application for the order & writ with the court in which the action is brought. Code Civ. Proc. § 484.010. If a debtor is a corporation, all of its assets are subject to attach ment. Code Civ. Pr...
2024.03.25 Application for Right to Attach Order, Writ of Attachment 759
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.25
Excerpt: ... all of the following: 1. The claim upon which the attachment is based is one upon which an attachment may be issued; 2. The plaintiff has established the probable validity of the claim upon which the attachment is based; 3. The attachment is not sought for a purpose other than the recovery on the claim u pon which the attachment is based; and 4. The amount to be secured by the attachment is greater than zero. Code Civ. Proc., § 484.090(a). A cl...
2024.03.25 Motion to Compel Answers 685
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.25
Excerpt: ...e sections 2030.290, a party who fails to serve t imely responses to interrogatories waives any objection to the requested discovery. Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290(a). The party propounding the interrogatories or requests for production may move for an order compelling responses to the discovery. Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290(b). “Unlike a motion to compel further responses, a motion to compel responses is not subject to a 45 – day time limit, ...
2024.03.25 Demurrer 132
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.25
Excerpt: ...ately met and conferred before the filing of this Demurrer. Defendant argues that Pl aintiff's newly added basis for liability against it, Code of Regulations Title 5 § 5551, fails. Defendant cites to C.A. v. Williams S. Hart Union High School Dist., 53 Cal. 4th 861 (2012), wherein the California Supreme Court held that school principals a nd other supervisory employees “have the responsibility of taking reasonable measures to guard pupils ag...
2024.03.25 Motion to Compel Physical, Mental Exam 939
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.25
Excerpt: ...District met and conferred and timely filed a Jo int Statement pursuant to the Court's February 26, 2024 Minute Order. Per the Joint Statement, the parties agree to a mental examination of Plaintiff, and have resolved one issue, agreeing that Plaintiff may be asked questions about past mental history pe rtaining to issues she claims resulted from or were exacerbated by the subject incident. According to the Joint Statement, three conditions that...
2024.03.25 Motion to Enforce Settlement 396
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.25
Excerpt: ...of $86,469.53 within 15 days, as well as an order that D efendant pay Plaintiff for reasonably incurred attorneys' fees in the total amount of $7,164 relating to collecting the payment of attorney's fees, costs, and expenses. No opposition has been filed. Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 provides, in pert inent part: If parties to pending litigation stipulate, in a writing signed by the parties outside of the presence of the court or orally...
2024.03.18 Motion to Compel Production 893
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...mjula”) and non -party Tulsan Partners LLC (“Tulsan”), and compelling third- party witness, Ump qua Bank to comply with Strategic's deposition subpoena for production of business records, issued November 3, 2023. The Motion to Compel is DENIED except as to Request Nos. 9 and 13. Plaintiff Strategic and Cross -Defendants, Farshad Hashemi aka Sean Hashemi and Jeanette Hashemi (collectively, the “Sellers”) were the sellers of the assets an...
2024.03.18 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 772
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.18
Excerpt: ...y Patrol. 181 Cal. App. 4th 856, 868 (2010) (c itation omitted). Defendant Kenneally contends that the Complaint does not allege that he disclosed facts to the public, but rather that he only disclosed them to Defendant Ladd. Kenneally also contends that the facts disclosed were not private facts since the information was found in records that can be obtained by members of the public pursuant to Govt. Code § 6254. In opposition, Plaintiff conten...
2024.03.11 Motion to Strike 023
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...marily to chill the defendant's exercise of First Am endment rights.” Finton Construction, Inc. v. Bidna & Keys, APLC, 238 Cal. App. 4th 200, 208 (2015). The trial court engages in a two -step process to determine whether a special motion to strike should be granted. Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16(b)(1). First, the court decides whether the defendant has met its initial burden of establishing a prima facie showing that defendant's acts, of whic...
2024.03.11 Motion to Compel Deposition 804
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...n the deposition notice if, after service of a deposition notic e and without having served a valid objection, the party fails to appear for examination. A motion under Code of Civil Procedure § 2025.450(a) must be accompanied by a declaration under Code of Civil Procedure § 2016.040 or, when the deponent fails to att end the deposition and produce documents, by a declaration stating that the moving party contacted the deponent to inquire about...
2024.03.11 Motion to Compel Arbitration 499
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...te covered by the agreement. Code Civ. Proc. § 1281.2. “The trial court m ay resolve motions to compel arbitration in summary proceedings, in which ‘[t]he petitioner bears the burden of proving the existence of a valid arbitration agreement by the preponderance of the evidence, and a party opposing the petition bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence any fact necessary to its defense. In these summary proceedings, the ...
2024.03.11 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 780
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ..., 49 (2018). “It then falls to plaintiff to counter with evidence creati ng a dispute about a fact relevant to that defense.” Id. “That is, the plaintiff must submit evidence that would allow a ‘reasonable trier of fact [to] find in plaintiff[‘s] favor on the statute of limitations issue.” Id. This is a wrongful death and surv ival action. Plaintiffs allege that the Decedent died from injuries sustained in an electrical fire that oc...
2024.03.11 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 037
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...f the causes of action for breach of contract. The breach of contract claims involve an Equipment Finance Agreement (“EFA”) entered into by ST and Partners Capital Group (“PCG”). The original term was for 60 months with 60 payments of $4,990.46. The EFA notes that an advance payment of $4,990.46 was received and applied to the first monthly payment due with an y remainder to be applied to the last payment(s) due. The “Commencement Date...
2024.03.11 Motion for Preference 478
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.03.11
Excerpt: ...ecessary to prevent prejudicing the party's int erest in the litigation.” Code Civ. Proc., § 36(a) (emphasis added); Weil & Brown, Cal. Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2023) ¶ 12:246:1 (“Trial priority is not mandatory and absolute merely because one of the parties is age 70. The court has discretion to determine the extent of that party's interest and find as a matter of fact the risk posed of that party...
2024.02.05 Motion to Transfer and Coordinate Actions 839
Location: Orange County
Judge: De La Cruz, Andre
Hearing Date: 2024.02.05
Excerpt: ...rth below, the Court Þnds that the transfer and coordination will promote the ends of justice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 404.1. The Court understands that counsel for Ganahl Lumber Company (“Ganahl”) expressed concern that the Merced Action cannot be transferred to this Court because it includes a cause of action for foreclosure of mechanics lien, and the property that is the subject of that claim is located in Merced County. Thi...

116 Results

Per page

Pages