Excerpt: ...date Hearing Date: January 11, 2022 Page 4 of 105 CVS26011922 I Introduction Petitioners, Save Our Forest Association, Inc., the Sierra Club, and the San Bernardino Audubon Society, seek a writ of mandate ordering Respondents, the County of San Bernardino and the County Board of Supervisors, to rescind approval for Real Party in Interest, Church of the Woods, to build a church and related facilities in the San Bernardino Mountains. Petitioners br...

Excerpt: ...covery responses, and in the exercise of the court's discretion, the Court considers the motion notwithstanding the defects. 2. The objections are all without merit. There is no evidence supporting the unduly burdensome objections and evidence is required to sustain such an objection. (W. Pico Furniture Co. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 407, 418.) The requests are also not overbroad and they seek relevant information since the requests are c...

Excerpt: ...uance of preliminary injunctions at any time before judgment upon a verified complaint or upon affidavits that show satisfactorily that sufficient ground exists. Nevertheless, a preliminary injunction is a drastic and extraordinary remedy that should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion. (Mazurek v. Armstrong (1997) 520 U.S. 968, 972.) A preliminary injunction is appropriate if irreparable harm wi...

Excerpt: ...Code as required by PAGA. A copy of the notice is attached as exhibit 1. The 19 page notice is sufficiently detailed for pleading purposes. Plaintiff has standing to pursue claims under PAGA because she was allegedly worked at Kaiser and personally suffered one or more Labor Code violations. (See FAC ¶ 8, 28, 55.) 1 Defendant's request for judicial notice is granted. It does not affect the outcome of the motion. Page 3 of 3 CVS26011822 Identifia...

Excerpt: ...: 1. First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract: The motion is denied. The allegations are sufficiently alleged. 2 2. Second and Third Causes of Action for Negligent and Intentional Misrepresentation: The motion is denied as to the Third Cause of Action but granted as to the Second Cause of Action, with thirty days leave to amend. In the Complaint, Plaintiff Connelly alleges Defendant Sherman misrepresented that she would pay for the purchased ...

Excerpt: ... intentionally caused the flooding or plumbing issues—only that Defendant failed to keep the subject property in a habitable condition, and Defendant acted unreasonably in delaying the repairs with the recognition that Plaintiffs would likely suffer annoyance or discomfort while being unhoused for an extended period of time with their young children. (See, e.g., Stoiber v. Honeychuck, supra, 101 Cal.App.3d at p. 921; Erlach v. Sierra Asset Serv...

Excerpt: ... of Court, rule 2.550(a)(3) [stating sealed record rules do not apply to discovery motions].) Here, given what is at issue in the special interrogatory motion, the specific names are not necessary for consideration of the motion and the names should have been redacted. Plaintiff could have just provided a description of the exhibits as providing lists of names and the number of names. The Court orders Exhibits 1 and 2 attached to Eric J. Goodman'...

Excerpt: ... The demurrer is overruled. The allegations that Plaintiff refused to discriminate when he was told that he was hiring too many black employees coupled with the removal of job duties is sufficient to allege Plaintiff Martinez engaged in a protected 2 activity and as a result, suffered from an adverse employment action– i.e. complaining to supervisors regarding instructions to engage in discriminatory hiring practices – and that as a result of...

Excerpt: ...e claim fails because Cohen did not take or retain Braswell's property for a wrongful use, with intent to defraud, or by undue influence. Issue No. 3: Braswell has not presented evidence to support a finding of punitive damages. Fourth Cause of Action – Promissory Fraud The Complaint alleges Sullivan and Cohen falsely promised Braswell that they would rebate 50% of their earned commissions over the lifetime of the policy to Braswell. But they n...

Excerpt: ...There is a split of authority regarding whether a demurrer may be properly sustained on the ground that a cause of action is duplicative. (Compare Palm Springs Villas II Homeowners Assn., Inc. v. Parth 2 (2016) 248 Cal.App.4th 268, 290 [demurrer properly sustained to cause of action for “breach of governing documents” on ground that cause of action was duplicative of cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty], with Blickman Turkus, LP v. M...

Excerpt: ...f he thinks it is not in the best interest of the class. These principles have not changed since the last hearing when the court denied intervention, and the court will not revisit the same points it made previously. Razo, however, does not rely exclusively on his previous grounds for intervention. He now argues that the proposed settlement is improper, based on Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC (2021) 11 Cal.5th 858. 1 Ferra held that the term...

Excerpt: ...yment terminated before commencement of the PAGA period do not participate in the PAGA portion of a settlement. Class members who opt out of the class settlement still participate in a PAGA settlement if they worked during the PAGA period. The settlement agreement improperly identifies the PAGA aggrieved employees as the participating class members. (¶ 50.) Counsel should therefore provide estimates of the number of aggrieved employees and the t...

Excerpt: ...ues possession is not an issue, as Defendant has agreed to vacate the premises Page | 2 as expeditiously as controlling law and regulations permit. Defendant argues the issue of past rent due will be addressed on the Federal Action, requiring abatement of this action. A brief description of the inadmissible extrinsic evidence is necessary to understand Defendant's arguments. Defendant asserts its own former CEO, Bruce Hebets, entered into the lea...

Excerpt: ...e same thing. (Choi Declaration ¶ 5.) The Parks Declaration states later on, however, that actual costs incurred are $2,936.43. The declaration references Exhibit 3, but that seems to indicate $10,435.43 in costs. Counsel needs to clarify the amount of costs sought in the motion. If counsel seeks $3,500 in costs, the net settlement, after all deductions, is $8,166.67, not $9,166.67 as stated in the motion. The court assumes this difference is th...

Excerpt: ...ia law to reimburse its current and former employees for their work‐related business cell phone expenses; failed to provide compliant rest periods; Page 3 of 4 CVS26122221 failed to provide compliant meal periods and/or pay missed rest and meal period premiums; failed to issue accurate/complete wage statements; failure to pay all wages due upon termination to . . . the aggrieved employees.” After the 65 day period required to exhaust administ...

Excerpt: ...il October 15, 2019, when her employment was terminated based on allegations she shoplifted a $2.99 protein bar from an ARCO AM/PM convenience store. (Pet. 1, 7.) Page 5 of 13 CVS26122021 After a three‐day administrative hearing, the hearing officer issued a written, advisory report stating the City failed to carry its burden of demonstrating good cause for Petitioner's termination and further stating Petitioner should be reinstated and made wh...

Excerpt: ...rden of proof in showing that Plaintiff's Motion for Relief for Mistake of Law or Fact was frivolous, without factual or legal merit, and was filed primarily for improper purposes to delay this action and harass Defendant in violation of Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7. Initially, Plaintiff filed an Ex Parte Application to Vacate Judgment which was denied, without prejudice, on March 23, 2021 as there was no judgment on file with the Court....

Excerpt: ...0 a.m. in Department S29. The trial attorneys shall personally appear at the TRC – no court call. The trial document exchange is on or before March 31, 2021 (which is a non‐appearance date) and the trial documents filing date is April 11, 2022, except that motions in limine shall be filed and served in accordance with the local rules. The parties are ordered to comply with the Court's Trial Setting Order which is attached to this Order and wi...

Excerpt: ...ium. Given the nature of the work in the hospital caring for patients, defendant had no means to know that a meal or rest break was missed or interrupted unless a premium was requested. Plaintiffs acknowledged that requesting a premium was the only way defendant would know that a premium was due. Plaintiffs made requests for premiums, and uncontradicted evidence showed that every time they requested payment of a premium, defendant paid them. Ther...

Excerpt: ...ccurred while Jermane was crossing Coalinga Rd from North to South on the east side of the intersection with Cahuenga. UF #2 (undisputed). 1 Defendant repeats some of the facts with a different fact number. The first fact number used is referenced herein. In 2018, the school had two pick‐up/drop‐ off sites on the campus. The third site was for bus use only. The school does not have any designated drop‐off sites off‐campus. The first dismi...

Excerpt: ...reduction is approximately $130. Counsel has not addressed why the class size estimate was so far off or how the reduction still results in a fair settlement. 2. The request for a 35% fee award is not supported, especially in light of the substantially smaller per class member share due to the unanticipated increase in the class size. If the court approves the settlement, the court will award a fee of one‐third of the gross, or $75,000.00. 3. T...

Excerpt: ...ng parties are the prevailing parties entitled to an award of fees. Absent such a contract, fees can only be awarded in connection with the defense of the claim for misappropriation of trade secrets. Trade Secrets: Under Civil Code section 3426.4, an award is available to a prevailing defendant if the claim was made in bad‐ faith. A lack of evidence to support the claim can satisfy the standard. The court granted the moving parties' motion for ...

Excerpt: ...ated evidentiary objections. (Hartwell Corp. v. Superior Court (2002) 27 Cal. 4th 256, 279 fn.12; Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLC (2013) 213 Cal. App. 4th 872, 889 [“no ‘official web site' provision for judicial notice in California”].) 2 Defendants' Evidentiary Objections: 1‐14. “Facts” ‐ Overruled. Separate statements are not evidence. (Jackson v. County of Los Angeles (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 171, 178, fn. 4.) Because undisputed f...

Excerpt: ...chez”) operated a Mexican Restaurant in one of the restaurant spaces at the Subject Property. (UMF, #9.) On November 4, 2020, MG Petroleum caused a 30‐day notice to quit (“30 Day Notice”) to be served on Sanchez based on its understanding that the fixed term lease expired on October 31, 2019 and the parties entered into a month‐to‐month tenancy. (UMF, #14.) On or around January 14, 2021, Sanchez filed a verified answer to the Unlawful...

Excerpt: ...action are based upon allegations that Explorer breached its duty to provide the Hendersons a defense in the underlying lawsuit brought against them by Blackburn. The causes of action are also based upon Explorer's failure to settle the underlying case within the policy limits. Both causes of action are governed by the four‐year‐statute of limitations under Code of Civil Procedure section 337, subdivision (a). As argued by Plaintiffs, an acti...