Excerpt: ...GM was falsely advertising the transmission, knowing the material was false, and with the intent to induce reliance and knowing Martinez's vehicle was defective. Despite such knowledge, GM failed to disclose the true facts and Martinez was induced by the representations and omissions to his detriment. (Compl. at 3-4, 7, 11, 15, 23-53, 116, 121, 131, and 137.) b. Less particularity is needed in the concealment context and in cases when the facts a...

Excerpt: ...pleadings or amendments; (2) State what allegations in the previous pleading are proposed to be deleted, if any, and where, by page, paragraph, and line number, the deleted allegations are located; and (3) State what allegations are proposed to be added to the previous pleading, if any, and where, by page, paragraph, and line number, the additional allegations are located. (California Rule of Court 3.1324, subd. (a).) Additionally, a separate dec...

Excerpt: ...mary Adjudication on the Complaint: 1. First Cause of Acton for Breach of Contract: The motion is denied. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant arise from a combinations of sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Non- Disclosure Agreement (NDA). Defendant Jasmine Marie Acosta (ACOSTA) fails in her burden because even if section 2.3 of the NDA is void/unenforceable, the entre NDA is not demonstrated to be void/unenforceable, and section 2.3 of the NDA would on...

Excerpt: ... the court re-set the filing deadline for January 31, 2023. Plaintiff did not file the motion or seek relief before expiration of the deadline. Instead, on February 3, 2023, plaintiff filed an ex parte application to extend the filing date nunc pro tunc. On February 5, 2023, the court denied ex parte relief, but reserved a hearing date of April 20, 2023, for a moton. The hearing was subsequently continued to June 2, 2023. How plaintiff's counsel ...

Excerpt: ...90- 150 days is not unusual. The Court also finds that once Defendant told escrow to cancel, financing that was in progress could not be completed. As the agreement provided for the Defendant's business to be included in the transaction, there was no need for Defendant to close the business. Defendant cancelled the transaction too quickly. Plaintiffs have presented evidence demonstrating it takes several months to obtain the financing they needed...

Excerpt: ...stantially related matter whose interests are materially adverse to the former client unless written consent is provided. In actions where the potential conflict arises from successive representations of clients with potential adverse interest, the chief fiduciary value in jeopardy is the client's confidentiality. (Flatt v. Superior Court (Daniel) (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283.) Disqualifying an attorney for undertaking a representation adverse to a ...

Excerpt: ...of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (Failure or Delay in Payment), (3) Bad Faith and Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing (Failure to Properly Investigate Claim), and (4) Unfair Business Practices. According to the Complaint, between November 1, 2019 and November 1, 2020, Defendant provided insurance coverage for real property owned by Plaintiff, including ccwerage for vandalism, theft and/or fire damage. (Comp. , '1 8.) On De...

Excerpt: ...ulation Judicial correction of an award is authorized only if the alleged miscalculation or mistake is "evident"—apparent on the face of the award—and not merely suppositional. (See Lopes v. Millsap (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1679, 1587 [arbitrator's declaration admissible for limited purpose of showng evident miscalculation that could be corrected without affecting merits of controversy]; Severtson v. Williams Constr. Co. (1985) 173 Cal.App.3d 85,...

Excerpt: ...ndate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1091.4 compelling the County to remove his name. This court exercises its independent judgment in reviewing the administrative decision. (Gonzalez v. Santa Clara County Dept. of Social Services (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 72, 84; Saraswati v. County of San Diego (2011) 202 Cal.App.4th 917, 928.) In applying the "independent judgment" standard of review, the court must determine whether the weight of the evid...

Excerpt: ...es that Defendants defaulted under the terms of the contract. Thus, Plaintiff filed suit for breach on February 25, 2021, and Defendants issued a general denial on February 1, 2022. Relevant here, the contract contains provisions selecting choice of law, consent to jurisdiction, and venue in Utah. (Motion, Exh. 1 [Contract], 11932 [venue] & 40 [governing lawl.) Accordingly, Defendants bring this motion to stay or dismiss this California action so...

Excerpt: ...) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class achon status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and the stage o...

Excerpt: ...pp.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class achon status through trial, the amount offered in set...

Excerpt: ... has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and the stage of the proceedings, the experience and...

Excerpt: .... (2008) 168 cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. united Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial...

Excerpt: ...l, Inc. (2008) 168 cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2W5) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, t...

Excerpt: ...o Request for Production number 24. A verified supplemental response with be produced within ten (10) days of this ruling. The Court would DENY the remainder. Case Summary This is a lemon law case. The Complaint alleges that on May 3, 2022, Plaintiff purchased the subject vehicle with a warranty from the Defendant Auto Manufacturer. The vehicle developed defects in its suspension, electrical, and structural systems. Although it was taken for repa...

Excerpt: ... they were not authorized for sale or use anywhere in the United States. (Compl„ "6-9.) On September 15, 2022, Plaintiff filed suit for (1) breach of contract; (2) breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (3) promissory estoppel; (4) intentional misrepresentation; (5) negligent misrepresentation; (6) declaratory relief; and (7) unfair competition. Under its fraud cause, Plaintiff also alleges that Defendant knew its representations we...

Excerpt: ...e court exercise its discretion. "The level of effort at informal resolution which satisfies the 'reasonable and good faith attempt' standard depends upon the circumstances." (Obregon v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 424, 431.) A reasonable and good faith attempt at informal resolution entails something more than bickering with opposing counsel. (Clement v. Alegre (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1294 [noting argument is not the same as inform...

Excerpt: ... Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the riskof maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the ext...

Excerpt: ... of fees and costs, as the plaintiff must post an appropriate appeal bond or undertaking or petition for writ of supersedeas to stay enforcement. (Dowling v. Zimmerman 85 Cal.App.4th 14CL) Thus this case is not different from any other case where a party obtains a judgment, the losing party files and appeal, and the judgment is stayed pending the appeal only if a bond is posted. Out of State Lawyer The ability to recover fees incurred by an out-o...

Excerpt: ...e court exercise its discretion. "The level of effort at informal resolution which satisfies the 'reasonable and good faith attempt' standard depends upon the circumstances." (Obregon v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 424, 431.) A reasonable and good faith attempt at informal resolution entails something more than bickering with opposing counsel. (Clement v. Alegre (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1294 [noting argument is not the same as inform...

Excerpt: ...he ceiling. The incident caused damage to the residence, personal property, and also exposed Carmona's relatives to injury. Semper Solaris then breached the contract by failing to pay for the cleanup and repair costs. Based on these allegations, Carmona commenced suit against Semper Solaris in October 2022 for (1) negligence, (2) breach of contract, (3) products liability, and (4) strict liability. Now, through the pending motion, Semper Solaris ...

Excerpt: ...h 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2W5) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of plaintiffs' case, the risk, expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the extent of discovery completed and the stage of the proceeding...

Excerpt: ...142 S.Ct. 1905. Before Viking River, PAGA claims were not subject to arbitration under any circumstances. (See e.g. Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348.) In Viking River, however, the Court held, contrary to Iskanian, that under the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C., section 1 et seq. (FAA), a PAGA action is divisible into "individual" and "non-individual" components. In the Viking River lexicon, an "individual" PAGA cla...

Excerpt: ...e to act on the part of their attorneys. There is no evidence the amendment was intended to be a catch-all remedy for every case of poor judgment on the part of counsel which results in dismissal.' ( Huens v. Tatum, supra, 52 Cal. App. 4th at p. 264, quoting, in part, Peltier v. McCloud River R.R. Co., supra, 34 Cal. App. 4th at p. 1824, italics in original.)" English v. IKON Business Solutions, Inc. 94 Cal.App.4th 130, 146-147[114 Cal.Rptr.2d 93...