Search by Keyword:
Start Date:
End Date:
Tip: Wrap text in quotation marks when searching for phrases (e.g. "motion to dismiss").

252 Results

Clear Search Parameters x
Location: San Bernardino x
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17 x
2024.02.06 Motions for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 540
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.06
Excerpt: ...emoval. A certiÞed copy of the order of remand shall be mailed by the clerk to the clerk of the State court. The State court may thereupon proceed with such case. (28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) [emphasis added].) 3 add two additional representative plainti¯s2 and to allege class claims for (1) wage violations; (2) wage statement violations; (3) waiting time penalties; (4) failure to reimburse; (5) FLSA minimum wage violations; (6) unfair competition in...
2024.02.01 Motion to Compel Further Deposition Responses 978
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.01
Excerpt: ...respond to Question 5. She is also ordered to serve an objection-free response to RFP 6 within Þfteen (15) days. However, she need not respond to RFP 14. The Court would further GRANT sanctions. Plainti¯ will pay Defendant JBGC $1,500, within thirty (30) days. 3 Relevant Facts This matter is, in essence, an emotional distress claim. After Plainti¯s' minor daughter passed, they sought casket and funeral services from Defendants. They allege t...
2024.02.01 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 721
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.02.01
Excerpt: ...s; (3) meal periods; (4) rest breaks; (5) Þnal pay; 5 (6) wage statements; as well as for (7) violation of the unfair competition law. Plainti¯ also sent a letter to the LWDA in order to perfect her Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) claim, and on August 17, 2022, she Þled a First Amended Complaint (FAC) to add an additional cause for (8) civil penalties available pursuant to PAGA. On April 12, 2023, Plainti¯ Þled a Second Amended Compla...
2024.01.31 Motion for Order that No Discretionary Stay be Issued 175
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.31
Excerpt: ...ntive programs to lower their tax burdens. It asserts that it maintained trade secret, proprietary, and conÞdential systems to further its business. It further alleges that it hired Defendant Gan on April 9, 2018, via a Membership Admission Agreement and that, despite contractual obligations to maintain the conÞdentiality of those systems, Defendant Gan accessed and copied company Þles and secretly applied for employment at Specialty Tax Group...
2024.01.30 Motion to Stay Action 261
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.30
Excerpt: ... action. Plainti¯ alleges a variety of wage-and-hour violations which allegedly occurred during his employment for Defendant. On January 25, 2019, Defendant removed this matter to the federal District Court. On June 11, 2019, Plainti¯ Þled his operative First Amended Complaint (FAC), which alleges violations relating to (1) meal periods; (2) rest breaks; (3) overtime wages; (4) minimum wages; (5) Þnal pay; (6) maintenance of required record...
2024.01.30 Motion to Quash Service of Summons 175
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.30
Excerpt: ...hicle was sold to Defendant Kheterpal and that he was not paid any portion of the sales price. He alleges that he did not learn of the sale until midFebruary 2021. Despite promises to pay, he alleges the sales money was never provided. On that basis, he reported the vehicle stolen on March 1, 2021. The vehicle was thereafter retrieved at Defendant Kheterpal's residence. Plainti¯ asserts damage while in Kheterpal's possession and necessary repai...
2024.01.30 Motion to Consolidate Cases 911
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.30
Excerpt: ... actions. In the Ruiz matter, the proposed class includes all of Defendant Bright Sky's hourly, non-exempt employees for statutory period of four years prior to Þling. Ruiz Þled suit on August 15, 2022, alleging violations related to (1) minimum wages; (2) overtime; (3) meal periods; (4) rest breaks; (5) reimbursements; (6) Þnal pay; (7) wage statements; as well as claims for (8) violation of the unfair competition law, and (9) civil penalties...
2024.01.22 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 782
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.22
Excerpt: .... United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement, the e...
2024.01.22 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 313
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.22
Excerpt: ...reaks; (4) minimum wages; (5) final pay; (6) untimely pay; (7) wage statements; (8) recordkeeping; (9) reimbursements; as well as (10) violation of the unfair competition law. Later, and separately, Plaintiff Navarro filed his own wage- and-hour complaint on December 14, 2021, alleging the same causes of action. On September 28, 2022, the matters were consolidated pursuant to stipulated order. After commencing litigation, the parties informally e...
2024.01.18 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 171
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.18
Excerpt: ...ve wage- and-hour class and PAGA representative achon on November 7, 2019. The allegations at issue include violations relating to (1) meal periods; (2) rest breaks; (3) minimum and overtime wages; (4) accurate wage statements; (5) waiting time penalties; as well as (6) violations of the unfair competition law and (7) civil penalties pursuant to PAGA. The Gutierrez matter additionally sought declaratory relief. After commencing litigation, the pa...
2024.01.17 Motion to Compel Production of Docs 181
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.17
Excerpt: ...er 2, 2019. He alleges the subject vehicle had a defective transmission, and the defects manifested after the purchase. Despite taking it in for repairs, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant could not repair or remedy. On that basis, Plaintiff filed his initial complaint on August 26, 2023. The current operative Second Amended Complaint (SAC) was filed on May 31, 2023, following a demurrer, and alleges (1) breach of express warranty under the Song-Be...
2024.01.16 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 152
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.16
Excerpt: ...air, adequate and reasonable." (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further liti...
2024.01.16 Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena 278
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.16
Excerpt: ...storage unit door at Defendant's storage facility on December 22, 2021. As such, on May 18, 2022, he filed suit against Defendants for (1) negligence; (2) premise liability; and (3) product liability. Relevant here, on September 26, 2023, Defendants StoreAmerica and Guardian issued a deposition subpoena to Dr. Fardad Mobin, seeking to depose the doctor on October 25, 2023 on the following areas of inquiry: (1) custom and practice for medical lien...
2024.01.16 Motion to Quash Subpoena 478
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.16
Excerpt: ... Case Summary This is a post-judgment collection effort. On February 28, 2022, Judgment Creditor file a renewal of judgment against Defendants. There are currently two hearings set for the examination of Defendants as judgment debtors. Relevant here, on November 7, 2023, Judgment Creditor issued numerous subpoenas for production of business records, mostly to financial institutions. (Walker Decl., 94.) On November 21, 2023, Defendants' counsel se...
2024.01.11 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 620
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.11
Excerpt: ...t breaks; (5) final pay; as well as (6) violation of the unfair competition law. The FAC adds causes of action for (7) failure to provide accurate, itemized wage statements; as well as (8) civil penalties pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). The Court deemed that FAC as filed on September 6, 2023. The proposed settlement would have Plaintiff represent all current and former non-exempt employees working for Defendant in...
2024.01.10 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 952
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.10
Excerpt: ...2/31/20); (3) Flowers v. unica' Aviation, Inc. (CIVSB2108699, filed 3/30/21); and, the Flowers companionate claim to recover attorneys' fees for an abandoned arbitration, (4) Flowers v. Unical Aviation, Inc. (CIVSB2106366, filed 5/27/21). In essence, these cases allege: (1) Unpaid overtime; (2) meal period violations; (3) rest period violations; (4) unpaid minimum wages; (5) final pay violations; (6) untimely pay; (7) inaccurate payroll records; ...
2024.01.08 Motion for Summary Judgment 676
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.08
Excerpt: ...ok and account stated. Defendant filed an answer with a general denial on June 22, 2023. This motion followed on September 14, 2023. No opposition has been filed. Summary of the Law Summary judgment is proper where there is no triable issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Code Civ. Proc., S 437c(c).) The analysis requires three steps: First, the court must identify of the issues framed wit...
2024.01.05 Motion to Compel Arbitration 276
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.05
Excerpt: ...jections are OVERRULED. As to the Motion for Joinder: The Court would GRANT ABP's motion for joinder. As to the Motion to Compel Arbitration: The Court would GRANT the motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiff's Eighth through Thirteenth Causes. The Court would STAY the remainder of the action (First through Seventh Causes) pending completion of arbitration. Case Summary This is largely a disability discrimination and wrongful termination case. I...
2024.01.05 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 332
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.05
Excerpt: ...trate that "the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable." (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and ...
2024.01.03 Motion to Seal Confidential Docs
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.03
Excerpt: ...filed a complaint, alleging a single cause of action for medical malpractice. Statement of the Law California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551, discuss sealing court records. A court order is required to seal a record. (Rules of Court, rule 2.551(a).) Code of Civil Procedure, secton 124, and Rules of Court, rule 2.550(c), set the basic policy presumption that "the sittings in every court shall be public" and court records are "presumed to be...
2024.01.03 Motion for Relief from Stay 301
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.03
Excerpt: ...as well as (9) violation of the unfair competition law. The complaint alleged a class of hourly, non-exempt employees working as service representatives, tellers, and related positions. On April 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC) to add a cause of action for civil penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Relevant here, on September 13, 2022, Defendant moved to compel arbitration as to the individual a...
2024.01.02 Motion to Strike 233
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.02
Excerpt: ...se for Invasion of Privacy, against the District. The Court would OVERRULE as to the First Cause for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED). As to the Motion to Strike: As a result of the preceding ruling on demurrer, the District's motion to strike is rendered MOOT. Defendant District will file its Answer within thirty (30) days and provide notice of the final ruling in this matter. Case Summary At essence, this is a putative class ...
2024.01.02 Demurrer to FAC 731
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2024.01.02
Excerpt: ...cted categories. Plaintiff Vasek further contends he was denied protected leave. Plaintiff Pellis alleges he was subjected to comments about his sexual orientation, race, and national origin. Plaintiffs further allege that they were retaliated against for their complaints. As a result, they filed suit against Defendant City on December 1, 2022. The operative first amended complaint (FAC) was filed as a matter of right on May 17, 2023. The FAC con...
2023.12.29 Motion to Compel Arbitration 276
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.29
Excerpt: ...s employer's representatives subjected him to racial slurs and comments and that he was denied raises and promotions. He further alleges that his employer failed to accommodate his disability. Finally, he alleges that he was subjected to a number of wage-and-hour violations, including but not limited to denial of meal and rest periods. On May 27, 2021, he filed a complaint alleging (1) disparate treatment; (2) racial discrimination; (3) disabilit...
2023.12.28 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 131
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.28
Excerpt: ...Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount ...
2023.12.20 Motions to Compel Responses 476
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.20
Excerpt: ...tiff in the amount of $2,000 ($1,000 per unopposed motion). Sanctions are payable within thirty (30) days. Case Summary This is a medical malpractice case. Plaintiff alleges that on November 18, 2018, she was a patient at Defendant Hospital. She alleges that Defendant was negligent in her care and that, as a result, she suffered severe and permanent injuries, as well as mental anguish. As a result, on or about August 16, 2019, Plaintiff filed a c...
2023.12.14 Motion to Compel Further Responses 731
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.14
Excerpt: ...ent. If necessary, a privilege log must be provided to document documents withheld due to asserted privilege and confidential third-party information would be redacted. Further, the City will provide documents responsive to No. 65, limited to council minutes involving Green, Affrunb, Goodman and Elliot that relate to discrimination, harassment, and retaliation since 2013 to present. Finally, the City will respond to No. 68, limited to documents t...
2023.12.12 Motion to Compel Deposition of PMQ 775
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.12
Excerpt: ...t demands, as no separate statement was timely filed. Finally, the Court would GRANT sanctions in the amount of $2,328.20, payable within thirty (30) days. Relevant Facts This is a lemon law case. Plaintiff alleges she purchased the subject vehicle in April of 2021. The vehicle purportedly had various defects including but not limited to stalling, not starting, engine knocking, and issues with the check-engine light. Despite being covered by expr...
2023.12.12 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement 551
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.12
Excerpt: ...p.4th 116, 126; Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offere...
2023.12.11 Motion to Enforce Automatic Stay 609
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.11
Excerpt: ..., who were fourteen or older, were not disclosed on the initial insurance application. The rescission took place despite the fact that the undisclosed household member was not the driver at the tme of the relevant accident. Plaintiffs allege that the application system forced applicants to represent that all disclosures of household members had been made, despite preventing that very disclosure. On December 15, 2022, Plaintiffs, including Plainti...
2023.12.11 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 160
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.11
Excerpt: ...ourt, rule 3.769.) The moving party must demonstrate that "the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable." (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. united Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 705, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of the plaintiff...
2023.12.08 Motion to Vacate Judgment 061
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.08
Excerpt: ...laims for violations relating to wages, meal-and-rest periods, wage timeliness, and inaccurate wage statements. Shortly thereafter, Plaintiff Waltz filed a wage-and-hour class action on June 11, 2021, and PAGA representative acton on August 5, 2021 (CIVSB2117018 & CIVS82133560, respectively). While both the Flores and Waltz wage-and-hour matters were removed to federal court, they both were ultimately brought back to this Court. On July 7, 2022, ...
2023.12.05 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 001
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.05
Excerpt: ...ating to (1) meal periods; (2) rest breaks; (3) overtime wages; (4) wage timeliness; (5) final pay; (6) maintenance of required records; (7) accurate wage statements; (8) unfair competition; as well as (9) civil penalties pursuant to PAGA. Per the terms of the currently proposed settlement, Plaintiff would represent a class of non-exempt workers in Defendant's California operations from August 27, 2026, to July 25, 2023. (Settlement, 992 ["Class"...
2023.12.04 Motion for Leave to File FAC 451
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.12.04
Excerpt: ...time wages; (2) minimum wages; (3) meal periods; (4) rest breaks; (5) waiting time; (6) wage statements; (7) wage timeliness; (8) reimbursements; as well as (9) violation of the unfair competition law. In essence, Plaintiff alleges that he was employed by Defendants from October of 2013 through approximately December 2020. He seeks to represent all current and former non-exempt California employees who worked for Defendants during the statutory p...
2023.11.28 Motion to Compel Arbitration 247
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...e with Defendant BMW. Plaintiff alleges that defects and nonconformities manifested within the warranty period, including those relating to the vehicle's electrical, transmission, and breaks. She further alleges that, despite a reasonable number of attempts, the Defendant was unable to fix the vehicle. Further that the manufacturer failed to replace or make restitution, as required by the Song-Beverly Act (Act). On August 26, 2022, Plaintiff file...
2023.11.28 Motion for Summary Judgment, Adjudication 975
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...ainer complaint against Defendants Grabowski, Crawford, and Graboswki Brothers Racing (G8R). Defendants CITV and DGM appeared by filing prejudgment claims of right of possession. Generally, Plaintiff alleges that the subject property is a commercial warehouse with two suites. Plaintiff has owned the subject property since Defendant Grabowski occupied shortly thereafter and Page 7 was allowed to occupy until March 2021, when he, along with Defenda...
2023.11.28 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 211
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...he moving party must demonstrate that "the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable." (Kullar v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. united Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2W5) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, th...
2023.11.28 Application for Writ of Attachment 978
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.28
Excerpt: ...amended order. Case Summary This is an action relating to the breach of construction contracts. Plaintiff alleges that it entered into a Master Contractor Agreement (MCA) with Defendant, in which it would provide construction materials at various construction sites. Individual Defendant Theisen allegedly executed a personal guaranty, both individually and as trustee of a related trust. Plaintiff alleges it also executed a Master Pay App Agreement...
2023.11.27 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 820
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.27
Excerpt: ...final pay; (7) required maintaining of records; (8) accurate statements; (9) unfair competition law; as well as a claim for civil penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). On March 30, 2023, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC) to add a cause of action for violations relating to indemnification of necessary employee expenses. After commencing litigation, the parties informally exchanged policy and payroll document...
2023.11.22 Motion to Compel Further Responses 731
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.22
Excerpt: ...GRANT sanctions against Defendant in the amount of $2,5æ', payable within 30 days. Case Summary This is, in essence, a discrimination and harassment case. Plaintiffs contend that they were harassed and discriminated against during their employment as police officers at Defendant City. They allege discrimination and harassment on the basis of disability and age, as well as other protected categories. Plaintiff Vasek further contends he was denied...
2023.11.22 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement 751
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.22
Excerpt: ...Y, without prejudice. Alternatively, the Court would consider a CONTINUANCE for the purpose of submission of a revised class notice. Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements in General Settlement of a class action requires court approva . (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.759.) The moving party must demonstrate that "the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable." (Kullar v. Fcm Locker Retail, Inc. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 116, 126; Reed v. un...
2023.11.20 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlements in General 742
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.20
Excerpt: ...Reed v. United Teachers Los Angeles (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 322, 337.) The court has "broad discretion in making this determination." (In re Microsoft I-V Cases (2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 706, 723.) Relevant factors the court may consider include "the strength of the plaintiffs' case, the risk, the expense, complexity and likely duration of further litigation, the risk of maintaining class action status through trial, the amount offered in settlement,...
2023.11.16 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement 570
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.16
Excerpt: ...ments; (5) waiting time; and (5) unfair competition law. As part of and in furtherance of settlement, Plaintiff— along with the prior motion for preliminary approval— submitted a proposed First Amended Complaint (FAC), adding a cause of action for civil penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). The Court approved and filed the proposed FAC at that time. After commencing litigation, the parties informally exchanged policy...
2023.11.15 Motions to Quash Summons 076
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.15
Excerpt: ...ional distress; (2) promissory fraud; (3) negligent misrepresentation; and (4) negligence. After a demurrer and motion to strike heard on 29, 2021, Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC), asserting the same causes. As background, Plaintiff suffered physical and emotional injuries when he intervened to protect a women from being attacked in October of 2018. He alleges that his treating doctor at Defendant Hospital made written...
2023.11.13 Special Motion to Strike 475
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.13
Excerpt: ...o the Ethereum was held on a USB device called a "ledger." The ledger stores private keys for each cryptocurrency. Plaintiffs allege that, in November of 2021, they wanted to sell 110 of their Ethereum. Since these are sensitive transactions, they reached out to Defendants, who were friends that could help them. On November 17, 2021, Plaintiffs went to Defendants' home to conduct the transaction. Plaintiffs allege that one Defendant noted the lar...
2023.11.13 Motion for Final Approval of Class and PAGA Action Settlement 322
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.13
Excerpt: ... (6) timeliness of pay; (7) accurate wage statements; and (8) unfair competition law. On April 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (FAC) to add a cause of action for civil #nalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). After commencing litigation, the parties informally exchanged policy and payroll documents and other information sufficient to allow early mediation. Thereafter, on February 28, 2023, the parties eng...
2023.11.13 Demurrer, Motion to Strike 278
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.13
Excerpt: ...he child abuse and neglect reporting act; (2) negligence; (3) breach of duties arising under a special relationship; (4) professional negligence; and (5) medical malpractice. The causes are alleged to arise out of events subsequent to Plaintiff's presentation as a patent to Defendant Hospital on or about October 2, 2020, relating to a religion-based declining of certain treatment protocol and an alleged failure on the part of Defendants to follow...
2023.11.09 Motion for Leave to File FAC 912
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.09
Excerpt: ... minimum wages: (3) meal periods; (4) rest breaks; (5) waiting tme penalties; (6) accurate wage statements; as well as (7) violation of the unfair competition law; (8) penalties pursuant to Section 210; (9) penalties pursuant to Section 226.3; (10) penalties pursuant to Secton 558; (11) penalties pursuant to Section 1197.1; and (12) civil penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Relevant here, in Riverside County, plaintiff...
2023.11.09 Demurrer 918
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.09
Excerpt: ...rd was in the file. Its contents were a concealed book insofar as the consideration of the demurrer was concerned."].) As to the Demurrer: The Court would SUSTAIN. However, the Court would grant 30 days' leave to amend to allow Plaintiff an attempt to address the statute of limitations issues noted infra. Case Summary This is essentially an action for retroactive enrollment in CalPERS medical plan. Plaintiff retired per disability from her state-...
2023.11.08 Demurrer 775
Location: San Bernardino
Judge: Ortiz, Joseph T S17
Hearing Date: 2023.11.08
Excerpt: ...ewage backup -nto the insured's home. On April 25, 2023, the Plaintiff filed this instant suit against Defendants City, NPL and Federal Insurance Company. Defendant City filed the instant demurrer in response on July 28, 2023. Statement of Law A demurrer challenges defects that appear on the face of the pleading, which includes incorporated exhibits, or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 c...

252 Results

Per page

Pages