Excerpt: ...e specifically described notice conditions. (Kwok v. Bergren (1982) 130 Cal.App.3d 596, 600.) Title 24 Code of Federal Regulations part 5.2005 requires a covered housing provider to provide to each of its tenants the notice of occupancy rights under the Violence Against Women Act (“VAWA”) and certification form with any notification of eviction. (24 C.F.R. § 5.2005(a)(2)(iii).) A notice to pay rent or quit served by a covered housing provide...

Excerpt: ...ribed notice conditions. (Kwok v. Bergren (1982) 130 Cal.App.3d 596, 600.) Where forfeiture of the tenant's lease for non‐ payment of rent is one of the objectives of the action, the exact amount of rent claimed to be due must be stated in the notice to pay rent or quit. (Baugh v. Consumers Associates, Limited (1966) 241 Cal.App.2d 672, 674.) Where notice is insufficient, a complaint fails to state a cause of action. (See Baugh v. Consumers Ass...

Excerpt: ...interrogatories].) The Court finds that defendant has established a reasonable, good faith attempt to resolve informally this discovery dispute. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2031.310, subd. (b)(2); 2016.040; Ichinaga decl., ¶¶ 18‐20. Exs. 5, 6, 8, 9.) The Court finds defendant's motion to compel further responses is timely. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2031.310, subd. (c); Ichinaga decl., ¶18.) 2 of 3 Defendant's motion to compel further response to reque...

Excerpt: ...as these documents are irrelevant to the Court's determination of the instant motion. (People v. Rowland (1992) 4 Cal.4th 238, 268, fn. 6.) The Court construes Bridge Partners' motion to sever complaint‐in‐intervention as a motion to bifurcate and GRANTS said motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1048, subd. (b); see Morehart v. County of Santa Barbara (1994) 7 Cal.4th 725, 738, fn. 3 [“Code of Civil Procedure section 1048 no longer authorizes sever...

Excerpt: ... include: filing, motion and jury fees (§ 1033.5, subd. (a)(1)) and service of process by a public officer, registered process server, or other means (§ 1033.5, subd. (a)(4)). If service is by a registered process server, the recoverable cost is the amount actually incurred in effecting service…unless those charges are successfully challenged by a party to the action. (§ 1033.5, subd. (a)(4)(B).) An award of costs shall be subject to the fol...

Excerpt: ...isclosure of information which is not relevant to the subject matter of the action and will not lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (Coy v. Superior Court (1962) 58 Cal.2d 210, 220; Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Superior Court for Los Angles Co. (1968) 263 Cal.App.2d 12, 19 [if interrogatories are so framed as to require the disclosure of relevant as well as irrelevant matter, the trial court in the exercise of its discretion ma...

Excerpt: ...il Procedure section 1008 is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1008, subd. (a).) The Court finds that plaintiff has failed to provide any “new or different facts, circumstances, or law” upon which relief can be granted. (Ibid.; See In re Marriage of Herr (2009) 174 Cal.App.4th 1463, 1468 [facts of which a party seeking reconsideration was aware of at the time of the original ruling are 2 of 2 not “new or different facts,” as would support a tr...

Excerpt: ...to the hearing, with an additional 2 court days required for electronic service].) The Court also finds that plaintiff has failed to show “a reasonable and good faith attempt at an informal resolution” of the discovery dispute prior to filing the instant motion. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2016.040, 2030.300, subd. (b)(1); Townsend v. Superior Court (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1431, 1438; Clement v. Allegre (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 1277, 1294; Obregon v. ...

Excerpt: ...pp.3d 596, 600.) Courts have held that because of insufficient notice served upon a tenant, an unlawful detainer complaint failed to state a cause of action. (Baugh v. Consumers Associates, Limited (1966) 241 Cal.App.2d 672, 675 [the defect was failure to state amount of rent owed].) Plaintiff sets forth that defendant Mohammad Iqbal filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy on April 8, 2021, effectuating an automatic stay against existing creditors. (Plain...

Excerpt: ...tained within the City's response to plaintiff's separate statement of undisputed material facts in opposition to the motion for summary judgment because “[a]ll written objections to evidence must be served and filed separately from the other papers…in opposition to the motion.” (California Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(b); Hodjat v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1, 7 – 8.) The Court declines to rule on the Ci...

Excerpt: ...production has met his burden of showing good cause simply by a fact‐specific showing of relevance. (Kirkland v. Superior Court (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 92, 98.) Once good cause is shown, the burden shifts to the responding party to justify his objection. (Ibid.) Defendant in this case seeks three months of communications directly relevant to plaintiff's attempts to seek and obtain employment before his suspension, plaintiff's intent to resign his...

Excerpt: ...transactions or occurrences as the cause[s] of action which the plaintiff alleges in his complaint.” (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 426.10, subd. (c), 428.10, subd. (b); Heshejin v. Rostami (2020) 54 Cal.App.5th 984, 993‐994; Young decl., ¶ 1, Exhibit A.) However, El Macero has not shown that its causes of action against plaintiff were “in existence at the time of service of the answer.” (Heshejin, supra, 54 Cal.App.5th at p. 993; see also Crock...

Excerpt: ...gency as such is a statement of ultimate fact.” (Skopp v. Weaver (1976) 16 Cal.3d 432, 439.) Consequently further allegations explaining how this fact of agency originated become unnecessary. (Id.) Plaintiffs have set forth allegations of agency that are sufficient to withstand demurrer. (See complaint, ¶¶ 14, 17, 21, 22.) However, respondeat superior is a theory of vicarious liability, not an independent cause of action. (See Hilts v. Solano...

Excerpt: ...ce's continued and renewed motion for attorney's fees. (Save Open Spaces Santa Monica Mountains v. Superior Court (2000) 84 Cal.App.4th 235, 250 – 256 [Save Open Spaces]; Barth Decl., ¶¶ 6 – 9, Exhibits 6 – 10.) However, the Court also finds a compelling interest in petitioner's right of associational privacy, and protection of the attorney‐client and work‐product privileges. (Cal. Const., art. I, §§1 – 3; Save Open Spaces, supra,...

Excerpt: ...d. (c)(1)(A).) Plaintiff's complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and defendant Christopher A. Hubert's answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint. (Ibid.; H. Russell Taylor's Fire Prevention Service, Inc. v. Coca Cola Bottling Corp. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 711, 726‐727; CACI No. 372; Higgins v. Wortell (1861) 18 Cal. 330, 333; Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Most (1940) 39 Cal.App...

Excerpt: ...thin their separate statement of disputed material facts in opposition to Shopcore's motion for summary judgment; or, (2) defendant Jason Marsh's (“Marsh”) evidentiary objections made within his response to Shopcore's separate statement of undisputed material facts in support of motion for summary judgment because “[a]ll written objections to evidence must be served and filed separately from the other papers…in opposition to the motion.�...

Excerpt: ...rby as the evidence objected to is not germane to the disposition of the instant motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (q).) Pruco's objections to the declarations of Dr. Timothy J. Wiegand and Dr. Mario San Bartolome are OVERRULED. Pruco's motion for summary adjudication as to issues nos. 1 and 2 is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(2).) “The rule in insurance cases is that a material misrepresentation or concealment in an insura...

Excerpt: ...idge Partners”) request for judicial notice is DENIED. (Evid. Code, §§ 452, 453.) The proffered documents are irrelevant to the Court's determination of the instant motion. (People v. Rowland (1992) 4 Cal.4th 238, 268, fn. 6.) Proposed intervenors' motion for leave to intervene is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387.) For both mandatory and permissive intervention, the party seeking to intervene must make a timely application to the court. (Code...

Excerpt: ...before this Court. (See Decision After Hearing on Appeal, issued March 8, 2022.) Respondent's motion to strike appellant's memorandum of costs in its entirety is denied. Appellant concedes a clerical error in the tabulation of costs and stipulates that the correct tabulation is that service of process costs were $455.56 and the total costs claimed are thus $590.56. Thus, the Court grants respondent's request to tax the amount claimed in error: $5...

Excerpt: ...rate treatment. (Gov. Code, § 12940, subd. (a); Guz v. Bechtel Nat., Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 317, 354; Del E. Webb Corp. v. Structural Materials Co. (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 593, 604 [the sole issue raised by a general demurrer is whether the facts pleaded state a valid cause of action – not whether they are true; thus, no matter how unlikely or improbable, plaintiff's allegations must be accepted as true for the purpose of ruling on the demurrer]...

Excerpt: ... Proc., § 2025.410, subd. (c); Underwood decl., ¶¶ 21‐22, Exhibits 15‐16.) Bridge Partners' motion for protective order is GRANTED IN PART. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.420, subd. (b).) The Court finds that Bridge Partners has established good cause for a protective order, which allows parties and their counsel to appear via Zoom (or similar method). (Ibid.) However, the Court limits to the sought protective order to only non‐deponent indiv...

Excerpt: ...writing, of the intent to take defendants' defaults, including failing to provide a date by which a responsive pleading needed to be filed. (See Lasalle v. Vogel (2019) 36 Cal.App.5th 127, 135, 141 [all parties shall cooperate in bringing the action to trial or other disposition, quiet speed and unreasonable deadlines do not qualify as “cooperation” and cannot be accepted by the courts]; Barreno Decl., ¶¶ 3 – 4.) The notice of motion does...

Excerpt: ...., LLC v. Monroy (2013) 215 Cal.App 4th 972, 1004 [Heritage].) The Court may rely on its own knowledge and familiarity with the legal market in setting a reasonable hourly rate. (Id., at p. 1009; Serrano v. Priest (1977) 20 Cal.3d 25, 49.) In the Court's experience, the local rates for this type of work ranges from $350.00 to $450.00 per hour. In making its calculation, a court should also consider the experience, skill, and reputation of the att...

Excerpt: ... Code, §§ 452, 453.) The proffered documents are irrelevant to the Court's determination of the instant motion. (Rowland, supra, 4 Cal.4th at p. 268, fn. 6.) Plaintiffs' motion for summary adjudication as to the first cause of action (elder abuse) is DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (p)(1).) Plaintiffs have failed to establish that defendants took Kaneezan Iqbal's property for wrongful use, with the intent to defraud, or by undue influe...

Excerpt: ...laintiff The People of the State of California has provided competent evidence that defendant, Flowmaster, and Driven have all shared a corporate officer – Thomas W. Tomlinson. (In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I and II (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 100, 110–111 [citations omitted]; Centerpoint E. v. Superior Court (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 1101, 1120 [citations omitted]; Ray v. Alad Corp. (1977) 19 Cal.3d 22, 28 – 29 [a 2 of 3 corporation acquiring ...

Excerpt: ...may move for an order compelling production and notice of that motion to compel shall be given to all parties and the deponent. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.480, subds. (a), (c), emphasis added.) A written notice and all moving papers supporting a motion to compel an answer to a deposition question or to compel production of a document or tangible thing from a 2 of 5 nonparty deponent must be personally served on the nonparty deponent unless the non...

Excerpt: ...tion to defendant's MJOP, (6) defendant's reply (in support of its MJOP), (7) this Court's ruling granting defendant's MJOP with leave to amend, (8) plaintiff's third amended complaint, (9) plaintiff's notice of motion and motion for sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.7, (10) declaration of attorney Adam Ambrozy in support of defendant's motion for sanctions pursuant to section 128.7, (11) defendant's request for judicial n...

Excerpt: ...via P. Boehme should not be held in contempt, filed May 26, 2022. (Evid. Code, §§ 452, subd. (d), 455, subd. (a).) The Court shall afford each party reasonable opportunity before the cause is submitted for decision by the Court to present to the Court information relevant to (1) the propriety of taking judicial notice of the matter and (2) the tenor of the matter to be noticed. (Evid. Code, § 455, subd. (a).) Defendant Doris Wacker's request f...

Excerpt: ... (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 154, 157 – 158 [a second offer to compromise extinguishes the first offer for purposes of Code of Civil Procedure section 998]; March 17, 2022, Judgment; Houvener Decl., Exhibit C.] The Court thus awards defendant post‐offer expert costs in the amount of $39,027.00. (Houvener Decl., Exhibit D.) The notice of motion does not provide notice of this Court's tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counse...

Excerpt: ...ere reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5. subds. (c)(2) – (4).) 2. The motion to strike/tax costs as to court reporter fees ($15,051.59) is GRANTED IN PART. The Court finds that while the court reporter's appearance fee at court proceedings is a recoverable cost, the transcripts from those proceedings were not “ordered by the court.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1033.5, subds. (a)(9), (11); Gov. Code, �...

Excerpt: ...nd filed separately from the other papers…in opposition to the motion.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1354(b); See Reid v. Google, Inc. (2010) 50 Cal.4th 512, 531–532.) The Court notes that it can only grant summary adjudication “if it completely disposes of a cause of action, an affirmative defense, a claim for damages, or an issue of duty.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (f)(1); see Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001) 25 Cal.4th...

Excerpt: ...enforceable only if the lessor strictly complies with the specifically described notice conditions. (Kwok v. Bergren (1982) 130 Cal.App.3d 596, 600.) Courts have held that because of insufficient notice served upon a tenant, an unlawful detainer complaint failed to state a cause of action. (Baugh v. Consumers Associates, Limited (1966) 241 Cal.App.2d 672, 675.) Plaintiff's unlawful detainer complaint relies upon a 3‐day notice to pay rent or qu...

Excerpt: ...ion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of standing by plaintiff as follows: The Court construes the issue of the name of/who is the proper plaintiff [standing], including Jack Duran's representation thereof, as a motion for reconsideration of plaintiff D‐Q University Board of Trustees' motion for preliminary injunction, which the Court DENIES. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1008, subd. (a); Sole Energy Co. v. Petrominerals Corp. (20...

Excerpt: ...rmane to the disposition of the instant motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (q).) Defendant's objections to evidence contained within plaintiff's opposition no. 5 is OVERRULED. The Court declines to rule on all other evidentiary objections as the evidence 3 of 4 objected to is not germane to the disposition of the instant motion. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (q).) Defendant's motion for summary adjudication as to issue no. 1 (general neg...

Excerpt: ...e of action alleges that, notwithstanding the express warranties provided to him, defendant violated this provision. (Complaint, ¶¶ 7, 14, 19‐20.) However, defendant asserts that plaintiff's claim for breach of express warranty fails because the subject vehicle was not a “new motor vehicle” as required. (See Civ. Code, §§ 1793.2, subd. (d)(2), 17.22, subd. (e)(2); Complaint, ¶ 7 [“On May 30, 2013, Plaintiff purchased a used 2011 Hyun...

Excerpt: ...ermination of the instant motion. (People v. Rowland (1992) 4 Cal.4th 238, 268, fn. 6 [“Rowland”].) Defendants' request for judicial notice in support of reply is DENIED because this document is irrelevant to the Court's determination of the instant motion. (Rowland, supra, 4 Cal.4th at p. 268, fn. 6.) Defendants' motion to expunge lis pendens is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 405.31.) Expungement of the lis pendens is mandated “if the plead...

Excerpt: ...), 2016.040; Townsend v. Superior Court (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1431, 1435; Obregon v. Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 424, 431–433; Underwood decl., ¶¶ 5‐14, Exhibits 6‐ 8; Cohen decl., ¶¶ 4‐8.) Denial is without prejudice, however, to permit further informal meet and confer efforts aimed at resolving the matter. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2016.040; Obregon, supra, 67 Cal.App.4th at pp. 433–436.) Plaintiff's requests for sanctions are...

Excerpt: ...les of Court, rule 3.1354(b); See Reid v. Google, Inc. (2010) 50 Cal.4th 512, 531–532.) The Court declines to rule on defendant's evidentiary objections to the Declaration of Aish Khalil, objections 1 and 2, as the evidence objected to is not germane to the disposition of defendant's motion for summary judgment. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (q).) The Court OVERRULES defendant's objections to the Declaration and Second Declaration of Purnima...

Excerpt: ...r the fourth cause of action for negligence, are measured exclusively under Civil Code section 3343. (See Civ. Code, § 3333; Santa Barbara Pistachio Ranch v. Chowchilla Water Dist. (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 439, 446–447; cf. Fragale v. Faulkner (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 229, 236‐237 [finding the application of Civil Code section 3343 to limit the plaintiffs' damages, when the plaintiffs brought an action based on a broker's misrepresentation]; SAC,...

Excerpt: ...s DENIED. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 685.010, 685.020, subd. (a).) “Only final judgments bear postjudgment interest.” (Hyundai Motor America v. Superior Court (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 418, 424.) “A judgment is the final determination of the rights of the parties in an action or proceeding.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 577; see also Doudell v. Shoo (1911) 159 Cal. 448, 453 [“A judgment is final when it terminates the litigation between the parties on...

Excerpt: ...ng party]; see Friends of Spring Street v. Nevada City (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 1092, 1104 [in determining whether a party is a prevailing party the trial court determines whether the party succeeded at a practical level by realizing its litigation objectives and whether the action yielded the primary relief sought in the case]; DeSaulles v. Community Hospital of Monterey Peninsula (2016) 62 Cal.4th 1140, 1157 [the rule is that a partial recovery, a...

Excerpt: ...ages and (2nd) that prejudice to either party is speculative. Thus, bifurcation would not serve judicial economy and efficiency or the interests of justice. SDH's unopposed request to bifurcate the issue of punitive damages, precluding presentation of evidence on SDH's profits or financial condition until after plaintiff has obtained a finding of malice, oppression, or fraud on the part of SDH, is GRANTED. (Civ. Code, § 3295, subd. (d).) If no h...

Excerpt: ...de verifications to support his substantive responses to the subject discovery by no later than May 13, 2022. As defendant Hernandez provided timely, hybrid responses (containing objections and substantive responses) to the subject discovery, defendant has not waived his objections. (Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657‐ 658 [“Food 4 Less”].) Regarding plaintiff's request for further responses, pla...

Excerpt: ...Civ. Proc., § 430.10; See Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) The Court finds that plaintiff has failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against BNT. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10, subd. (e).) The Court finds that there are no allegations in the FAC that BNT has any adverse claim against the title of the subject property, and no amendment can cure this deficiency. (See Orcilla v. Big Sur, Inc. (2016) 244 Cal.App.4t...

Excerpt: ...f any party desires to obtain discovery by a mental examination, the party shall obtain leave of court. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2032.310, subd. (a), emphasis added.) The Court shall grant a motion for a physical or mental examination under Section 2032.310 only for good cause shown. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2032.320, subd. (a).) SDH has shown good cause for the proposed mental examination. Plaintiff has placed his mental state in controversy by the alle...

Excerpt: ... permitted number of pages. 4 of 4 Defendants Zero Net Energy Alliance, Inc. (“ZNEA”), Richard Schorske, and Sharon Tobar's request for judicial notice is DENIED. (Evid. Code, §§ 452, 453.) Defendants failed to make their request for judicial notice in a separate document as required. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1113(l).) Defendants' demurrer to plaintiff's second amended complaint (“SAC”) as to the third cause of action (alter ego lia...

Excerpt: ... 453.) Plaintiff's application for right to attach order as to Flower of Life is GRANTED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 484.010 et seq.) Plaintiff has satisfied the applicable requirements. (See Code Civ. Proc., §§ 483.010, 484.020, 484.090.) First, the claim upon which the attachment is based is one upon which an attachment may be issued. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 483.010, 484.090, subd. (a)(1).) Plaintiff's conversion cause of action against Flower of Li...

Excerpt: ...ornia (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108, 1119.) SDH's objection to the declaration of plaintiff, at 8:1‐3 (Din decl., ¶ 30), is OVERRULED. (Evid. Code, § 803.) SHD's objections to the declaration of attorney M. Bradley Wishek, at 5:23‐27 (Wishek decl., ¶ 8), are SUSTAINED. (Evid. Code, §§ 403, 702, 803.) SHD's objections to the declaration of attorney M. Bradley Wishek, at 5:27‐29 (Wishek decl., ¶ 8), are SUSTAINED. (Evid. Code, §§ 403, 70...

Excerpt: ...ed time entries attached as Exhibit A to the declaration of Tessa McGuire. (Evid. Code, §§ 402, 403; McGuire Decl., Exhibit A; see declarations of Boutin, McNairy, McGlone, Miller, Cowan and Jackson.) However, the Court finds that only those time entries that identify fees “incurred in the request for” the Stipulated Judgment (“Judgment”) are relevant. (Evid. Code, §§ 210, 350; Judgment, ¶ 4.) Regarding those time entries that do not...

Excerpt: ...c., § 128, subd. (a)(5); People ex rel. Dept. of Corporations v. SpeeDee Oil Change Systems, Inc. (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1135, 1145–1146.) Defendant does not have standing to bring the present motion to disqualify. (Great Lakes Construction, Inc. v. Burman (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 1347, 1356– 1357; cf. Blue Water Sunset, LLC v. Markowitz (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 477, 485‐486 & 481.) While a non‐client party may bring a motion to disqualify “whe...